It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of exercise on pain intensity, function, and quality of life in individuals with gluteal tendinopathy. Searches were carried out in PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were included. Five studies met the eligibility criteria, comparing exercise-based interventions with minimal interventions and/or corticosteroid injections. Three studies, involving 383 participants, were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analyses showed that exercise is superior to minimal intervention for function in short-term [mean difference (MD) = 10.24; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 5.98, 14.50) and long-term (MD = 6.54; 95%CI = 1.88, 11.21]). However, no difference was observed for quality of life in the short [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.33; 95%CI = −0.29, 0.94] and long-term (SMD = 0.11; 95%CI = −0.16, 0.37). The effect of exercise was no different from that of corticosteroid injections for pain intensity in the short (MD = 1.25; 95%CI = −3.56, 6.05) and long-term (MD = −1.37; 95%CI = −3.72, 0.98]). In conclusion, exercise is superior to minimal interventions for function in the short- and long-term in individuals with gluteal tendinopathy. Exercise and corticosteroid injections had similar effects on pain intensity, however, exercise showed a higher treatment success rate when compared to corticosteroid injections in this population. The GRADE analysis revealed that the certainty of the evidence ranges from low to very low, therefore, large high-quality randomized controlled trials are recommended.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021242853.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN/FACISA), Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences (PPGCREAB), Health Sciences College of Trairi, Santa Cruz, Brazil (GRID:grid.411233.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9687 399X); Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazilian Tendinopathy and Sports Injuries Research Group (BRATSI), Santa Cruz, Brazil (GRID:grid.411233.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9687 399X); Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Postgraduate Program in Physical Therapy (PPGFIS), Natal, Brazil (GRID:grid.411233.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9687 399X)
2 Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN/FACISA), Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences (PPGCREAB), Health Sciences College of Trairi, Santa Cruz, Brazil (GRID:grid.411233.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9687 399X); Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazilian Tendinopathy and Sports Injuries Research Group (BRATSI), Santa Cruz, Brazil (GRID:grid.411233.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9687 399X)