It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The IDEA mandates transition planning in Individualized Education Programs (IEP) for disabled students, who are now enrolling in postsecondary education programs at higher rates than ever before. Despite this, disabled students experience significantly worse post-school outcomes than their non-disabled peers.
The purpose of this mixed-methods correlational study was to assess secondary special educators’ knowledge of postsecondary education disability laws as they relate to transition planning for disabled students who are college bound. The theoretical foundations for the study were Systems Theory and Transition Theory.
The results of the study support the relevance and accuracy of the Sejdic Disabled Student Transition Framework that was developed from the review of available literature. The quantitative data indicates that coursework, years of experience, and professional development do not have a statistically significant effect on secondary educators' knowledge of postsecondary education disability laws. A negative, statistically significant result for professional development was found when all variables were not held constant. Qualitative data results demonstrate that educators believe their transition knowledge and competencies are impacted by years of experience, professional development, and coursework.
This study confirms what other researchers have already determined: educators are underprepared with little or no relevant pre-service coursework and in-service professional development to support them in meeting their professional responsibilities of planning and implementing transition services for disabled students who are college bound. To complicate the situation, educators experiencing the Dunning-Kruger effect don’t know what they don’t know, which limits their ability to self-assess their competency and advocate for what they need to prepare disabled students to transition to higher education successfully.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer






