It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Patching whole slide images (WSIs) is an important task in computational pathology. While most of them are designed to classify or detect the presence of pathological lesions in a WSI, the confounding role and redundant nature of normal histology are generally overlooked. In this paper, we propose and validate the concept of an “atlas of normal tissue” solely using samples of WSIs obtained from normal biopsies. Such atlases can be employed to eliminate normal fragments of tissue samples and hence increase the representativeness of the remaining patches. We tested our proposed method by establishing a normal atlas using 107 normal skin WSIs and demonstrated how established search engines like Yottixel can be improved. We used 553 WSIs of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to demonstrate the advantage. We also validated our method applied to an external dataset of 451 breast WSIs. The number of selected WSI patches was reduced by 30% to 50% after utilizing the proposed normal atlas while maintaining the same indexing and search performance in leave-one-patient-out validation for both datasets. We show that the proposed concept of establishing and using a normal atlas shows promise for unsupervised selection of the most representative patches of the abnormal WSI patches.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Mayo Clinic, KIMIA Lab, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
2 Mayo Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
3 Mayo Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Scottsdale, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
4 Mayo Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X); Mayo Clinic, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
5 Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)