Content area

Abstract

Aim

We aimed to compare the debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and simulation satisfaction of using oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session in an interdisciplinary cohort of health sciences students.

Background

Debriefing is a reflective process that takes place after a clinical simulation and that can be performed either in a traditional way (oral) or using video-assisted debriefing.

Design

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 143 health sciences students (35.7% male, 61.5% female).

Methods

The simulation scenario was designed to evaluate the procedure for donning and doffing personal protective equipment. Differences in debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and satisfaction were assessed.

Results

Regarding debriefing experience, significant differences were observed for the category “learning” (34.9 (6.13) vs. 36.7 (3.89); p = 0.039). For simulation assessment, significantly higher scores for all categories were identified in video-assisted debriefing compared with oral debriefing (p<0.001). There were also significant differences between the oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing for the overall score of reflection ability (86.97 (10.55) vs. 90.74 (9.67); p=0.028) as well as for the category “reflective communication” (24.72 (3.77) vs 26.04 (4.07); p=0.047). Perceived satisfaction was significantly higher in the video-assisted debriefing group compared with oral debriefing group (p <0.001). For anxiety, no significant differences were observed between debriefing groups.

Conclusion

Video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session improves debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection and simulation satisfaction, but does not increase anxiety compared with oral debriefing among health sciences students.

Details

Title
Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing versus oral debriefing in simulation-based interdisciplinary health professions education: A randomized trial
Author
Rueda-Medina, Blanca 1 ; Reina-Cabello, José Carlos 2 ; Buendía-Castro, Miriam 3 ; Aguilar-Ferrándiz, María Encarnación 4 ; Gil-Gutiérrez, Rocío 5 ; Tapia-Haro, Rosa María 4 ; Casas-Barragán, Antonio 4 ; Correa-Rodríguez, María 1 

 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, Spain 
 Functional Area of Health and Social Policy, Subdelegation of the Government of Almería, Almería, Spain 
 Department of Translation and Interpreting, Faculty of Translation and Interpreting, University of Granada, Granada 18003, Spain 
 Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain 
 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain 
Pages
103901
Publication year
2024
Publication date
Feb 2024
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
ISSN
14715953
e-ISSN
18735223
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2927844658
Copyright
©2024. The Authors