It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Flood is a common global natural hazard, and detailed flood susceptibility maps for specific watersheds are important for flood management measures. We compute the flood susceptibility map for the Kaiser watershed in Iran using machine learning models such as support vector machine (SVM), Particle swarm optimization (PSO), and genetic algorithm (GA) along with ensembles (PSO-GA and SVM-GA). The application of such machine learning models in flood susceptibility assessment and mapping is analyzed, and future research suggestions are presented. The model of flood susceptibility model was constructed based on fifteen causatives: slope, slope aspect, elevation, plan curvature, land use, and land cover, normalize differences vegetation index (NDVI), convergence index (CI), topographical wetness index (TWI), topographic positioning Index (TPI), drainage density (DD), distance to stream, terrain ruggedness index (TRI), terrain surface texture (TST), geology and stream power index (SPI) and flood inventory data which later is divided by 70% for training the model and 30% for validated the model. The model output was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, Cohen Kappa, F-score, and receiver operating curve (ROC). The evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping through the receiver operating curve method along with flood density shows robust results from support vector machine (0.839), particle swarm optimization (0.851), genetic algorithm (0.874), SVM-GA (0.886), and PSO-GA (0.902). Compared have done with some methods commonly used in this susceptibility assessment. A high-quality, informative database is essential for the classification of flood types in flood susceptibility mapping that is very important and helpful to improve the model performances. The performance of the ensemble PSO-GA is better than that of the machine learning model, yielding a high degree of accuracy (AUC-0.902%). Our approach, therefore, provides a novel method for flood susceptibility studies in other watersheds.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Pal, Subodh Chandra 5
; Ghorbanzadeh, Omid 6 ; Roy, Paramita 5 ; Chowdhuri, Indrajit 5 1 Department of Geomorthology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of Technology and Engineering, East of Guilan, University of Guilan, Rudsar-Vajargah, Iran
3 School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, China; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
4 Soil Erosion and Degradation Research Group, Departament de Geografia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
5 Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Bardhaman, West Bengal, India
6 Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria





