It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Classical swine fever has been spreading across the country since its re-emergence in Japan in 2018. Gifu Prefecture has been working diligently to control the disease through the oral vaccine dissemination targeting wild boars. Although vaccines were sprayed at 14,000 locations between 2019 and 2020, vaccine ingestion by wild boars was only confirmed at 30% of the locations. Here, we predicted the vaccine ingestion rate at each point by Random Forest modeling based on vaccine dissemination data and created prediction surfaces for the probability of vaccine ingestion by wild boar using spatial interpolation techniques. Consequently, the distance from the vaccination point to the water source was the most important variable, followed by elevation, season, road density, and slope. The area under the curve, model accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for model evaluation were 0.760, 0.678, 0.661, and 0.685, respectively. Areas with high probability of wild boar vaccination were predicted in northern, eastern, and western part of Gifu. Leave-One-Out Cross Validation results showed that Kriging approach was more accurate than the Inverse distance weighting method. We emphasize that effective vaccination strategies based on epidemiological data are essential for disease control and that our proposed tool is also applicable for other wildlife diseases.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Complutense University of Madrid, VISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667); Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667); Kagoshima University, South Kyushu Livestock Veterinary Center, Soo, Japan (GRID:grid.258333.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1167 1801)
2 Complutense University of Madrid, VISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667); Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)
3 Hokkaido University, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sapporo, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691); Hokkaido University, Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institute for Collaborative Research and Education, Sapporo, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691)