It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Computer vision technology for detecting objects in a complex environment often includes other key technologies, including pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, and digital image processing. It has been shown that Fast Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with You Only Look Once (YOLO) is optimal for differentiating similar objects, constant motion, and low image quality. The proposed study aims to resolve these issues by implementing three different object detection algorithms—You Only Look Once (YOLO), Single Stage Detector (SSD), and Faster Region-Based Convolutional Neural Networks (R-CNN). This paper compares three different deep-learning object detection methods to find the best possible combination of feature and accuracy. The R-CNN object detection techniques are performed better than single-stage detectors like Yolo (You Only Look Once) and Single Shot Detector (SSD) in term of accuracy, recall, precision and loss.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 G.L. Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management (GLBITM), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Greater Noida, India (GRID:grid.418403.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0733 9339); Graduate Program in Telecommunications Engineering. (PPGET), Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Fortaleza, Brazil (GRID:grid.418403.a)
2 Amity University, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Noida, India (GRID:grid.444644.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1805 0217)
3 SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, India (GRID:grid.412742.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0635 5080)
4 Federal University of Ceará, Department of Teleinformatics Engineering, Fortaleza, Brazil (GRID:grid.8395.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 0329)
5 University of Wollongong in Dubai, School of Computer Sceince, FEIS, Dubai, UAE (GRID:grid.444532.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 6152); Middle East University, MEU Research Unit, Amman, Jordan (GRID:grid.449114.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0457 5303)