It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The objective of the study is to conduct a comprehensive examination of how different neighbourhood types, namely spherical, cylindrical, and k-nearest neighbour (kNN), influence the feature extraction capabilities of the PointNet++ architecture in the semantic segmentation of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) point clouds. Two datasets are utilized for semantic segmentation analysis: the Dayton Annotated LiDAR Earth Scan (DALES) and the ISPRS 3D Semantic Labelling Benchmark datasets. In the experiments, the kNN method exhibited approximately 1% higher accuracy in weighted mean F1 and intersection over union (IoU) metrics compared to the spherical and cylindrical neighbourhood types on the DALES dataset. However, in the generalization experiment conducted on the ISPRS dataset, the spherical neighbourhood achieved the best results in these metrics, outperforming the cylindrical neighbourhood by a small margin. Notably, the kNN method was the least accurate, with a decrease in accuracy of approximately 1% in both weighted mean IoU and F1 scores. These findings suggest that the features extracted from spherical and cylindrical neighbourhood types are more generalizable compared to those from the kNN method.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Gumushane, Türkiye; Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Gumushane, Türkiye
2 Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Türkiye; Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Türkiye