1. Introduction
Globally, alcohol is the main cause of liver cirrhosis (in Europe, North America, and Latin America), accounting for 60% of the total number of cirrhosis cases [1]. Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), which is considered to be the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT), leads to liver cirrhosis [2]. The ALD spectrum consists of alcohol-related steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, acute liver failure, chronic liver failure, and hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in cirrhosis [2]. The risk of HCC among patients with alcohol-related liver cirrhosis (ALC) is about 1% per year [3]. The current state of knowledge regarding the molecular pathomechanism of ALC remains unclear and requires the investigation of the most innovative therapeutic options [2]. Nowadays, the only effective treatment option for ALC is liver transplantation. Current evidence suggests that neutrophils play a crucial role in the development of ALC. Moreover, NETosis, which is a form of programmed cell death, is a consequence of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and, subsequently, NET activation. Next, NETosis as one of the forms of programmed death in inflammatory diseases is the main subject related to identifying treatments for ALC. According to many studies, NETs may contribute to the inflammatory response of the host [4]. NETs are extracellular web-like structures of DNA-histone complexes with neutrophil granule proteins such as defensins [5]. In 1985, human neutrophil defensins (human neutrophil peptides 1-3, HNP1-3) were discovered by Lehrer [6]. They are mainly synthesized by neutrophils, epithelial cells, and Paneth cells [6]. To date, six human defensins have been detected [7]. For more than two last decades, they have been investigated in viral, bacterial, and fungal infections [7,8]. Mammalian defensins are classified as alpha- and beta-defensins [9]. Human alpha-defensins are located on chromosome 8 [6]. Structurally, they are a family of small peptides (less than 10 kDa) [10]. Alpha-defensins are first-line defense peptides of the innate immunity [8,11]. They are a part of the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) family and display antimicrobial activity [12]. A two-step cell injury process has been suggested by researchers [9]. It begins with permeabilization of the cell membrane, then DNA damage occurs [9]. Overall, recent findings have detected defensins’ inflammatory response in many diseases such as HBV and HCV infections, tumorigenesis, diabetes mellitus, SARS-CoV-2 infections, atopic dermatitis, etc. [9,12,13,14,15,16]. However, there are no data regarding the role of defensins in alcohol-related liver cirrhosis. Our objective was to examine the alpha-defensin serum concentrations in patients with alcohol-related liver cirrhosis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients
Our study assessed 86 consecutive patients, namely, 62 patients with confirmed ALC and 24 matched healthy controls, who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology with Endoscopy Unit in Lublin. The patients were prospectively recruited to the study over 2 years. In total, 51 males and 11 females with an average age of 49 (59) years served as the study group. The control group consisted of 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, namely, 15 males and 9 males. According to the WHO, the healthy volunteers without alcohol abuse who served as controls consumed no more than 10 g of ethanol daily [17]. In the current study, the same patient recruitment protocol presented in our previous studies was used [18,19,20]. The inclusion criteria were as follows: written, informed consent of the patient to participate in the study; age >18 years; positive screening results according to the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire; and an interview confirming alcohol abuse. We excluded patients with celiac disease, Wilson’s disease, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, viral hepatitis, and autoimmune liver disease; those with any severe comorbidities (malignancy, respiratory failure, or cardiovascular disease); and those with blood transfusion, immunotherapy, or steroid treatment in the last 6 months. The studied patients were grouped based on the following:
(1). sex;
(2). the severity of liver failure classified by the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score, and modified Maddrey Discriminant Function (mDF) score;
(3). ALC decompensation symptoms, such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and esophageal varices.
The severity of liver failure was established using the above mentioned scores (the CTP, MELD-Na, and mDF scores) using internet available calculators. The diagnosis of ALC was based on the guidelines upon documentation of regular alcohol consumption confirmed by the patients or their family members [21]. According to the Helsinki Declaration guidelines, all patients provided informed written consent.
Special tools were used to identify alcohol use disorder (AUD) among ALC patients. In our study, scores for the AUDIT-C, which is a shorter form of the commonly used Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), were obtained for each patient to quantify lifetime drinking history. According to the AUDIT-C, 100% of patients in the study group received at least 3 points, which was a positive test result [22,23,24]. The AUDIT-C results were negative for all of the controls. The diagnosis of alcohol-related liver disease was based on symptoms, physical examination, laboratory abnormalities, and imaging tests in accordance with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Practice Guidelines [1]. Imaging techniques showing liver cirrhosis included abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) scans.
Subsequently, ALC patients included in the study underwent upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. In the study group, 45% of patients were confirmed to have esophageal varices. The presence of portal hypertension was detected in Doppler mode abdominal ultrasonography. It was observed in 58% of the ALC patients. According to the guidelines, performing liver biopsy was not necessary to establish the diagnosis [21]. Eighteen patients from the study group who presented symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) were evaluated according to the Clinical Hepatic Encephalopathy Staging Scale (CHESS) [25,26,27]. The patients with ascites underwent diagnostic paracentesis to exclude spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Next, four patients were diagnosed with SBP and received antibiotic treatment. Large-volume paracentesis was necessary in 87% of ALC patients. According to the guidelines, patients after 5-L paracentesis were administered albumin infusion [21].
The individuals were followed for 90 days. All studied patients were discharged from hospital when liver function began to improve. Subsequent follow-up visits were planned for every 2 weeks of the 90-day observation period in the outpatient clinic or in the hospital department if necessary. Three patients died during the 90-day observation period.
This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin (No. KE-0254/94/2019).
2.2. Procedures
Venous blood samples were obtained from the studied and control patients after an overnight fast. All the tests were performed in the laboratory of the Department of Clinical Immunology at the Medical University of Lublin. The study was performed as recommended by the producer. In total, 15 milliliters of peripheral blood was obtained from ALC patients and control group subjects with a sterile S-Monovette (SAR-STEDT AG & Co., D-51588 Numbrecht, Germany). Next, the samples were incubated for 20 min in a dark dry room at room temperature. Plasma concentrations of HNP1-3 were quantified with an HNP1-3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Hycult Biotech, Uden, The Netherlands) kit.
2.3. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses of the results were conducted with the use of the Statistica 10 software package (StatSoft, Cracow, Poland). Deviation from normality was evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for between-group comparisons, while Spearman’s correlation test was used to verify the correlations between the parameters of liver function and HNP1-3 concentrations. The categorical variables were described using either Fisher’s exact test or the χ2 test. Next, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to check the differences in HNP1-3 levels in the patients with different severity of liver dysfunction according to the CTP score. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) were checked in order to assess the sensitivity and specificity of measured variables for predicting the degree of liver failure. The method of DeLong was used for the calculation of the standard error of the AUC. The Youden index was estimated for marking optimal points. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of Females and Males with Alcohol-Related Liver Cirrhosis
Routine laboratory tests were performed among the group of ALC patients. These tests assessed liver function parameters; levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), total bilirubin, and albumin; prothrombin time (PT) with the international normalized ratio (INR); kidney function on the basis of the creatinine level; and markers of inflammation, namely, the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil (NEU) count, lymphocyte (LYM) count, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Based on these parameters, the CTP, MELD-Na, and mDF scores were evaluated. Online available calculators were used. The results are presented in the next chapters. The patients with ALC were examined in order to detect the decompensation of chronic liver disease symptoms such as encephalopathy, esophageal varices, and ascites, and the mortality rate was calculated. The evaluation of the demographic and laboratory data in the ALC patients was performed as seen in Table 1.
A comparison of the levels of the laboratory data, the CTP, MELD-Na, and mDF scores, and the presence of symptoms of liver decompensation showed no differences between females and males with ALC.
3.2. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in the ALC Patients and Individuals in the Control Group
Subsequently, serum HNP1-3 concentrations between females and males with ALC and between ALC patients and controls were evaluated. The results are presented in Table 2.
Our analysis did not reveal significant differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC subgroups according to sex (p < 0.25). However, it showed statistically significant higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations (p < 0.0009) in the ALC group compared to the controls.
Next, serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC males and females were compared to males and females from the control group (Table 3).
The results showed no significant differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC males and in healthy males (p < 0.044). However, the results showed significantly higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations (p < 0.003) in ALC females compared to control females.
3.3. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in Patients with ALC Based on Age
Serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients were measured based on age > 40 years vs. <40 years (Table 4).
The results showed no differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations (p < 0.66) in patients with ALC based on age.
3.4. Analysis of Correlations of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations with Child-Turcotte-Pugh, MELD-Na, and mDF Scores
3.4.1. Analysis of Correlations of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations with Child-Turcotte-Pugh Scores
Differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC were evaluated based on the degree of liver dysfunction classified according to the CTP score (class A—17 patients, class B—25 patients, and class C—20 patients). The results are shown in Table 5.
There were no statistically significant differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC and different CTP scale scores (p < 0.30).
3.4.2. Analysis of Correlations of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations with MELD-Na Scores
Differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC were evaluated based on the degree of liver dysfunction classified according to the MELD-Na score (>20 points or ≤20 points). The results are presented in Table 6.
The concentrations of HNP1-3 were statistically significantly increased in patients with ALC who had a MELD-Na score of more than 20 points (p < 0.02) compared to patients with a MELD-Na score of ≤20 points. Figure 1 and Figure 2 present the results of comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients based on MELD-Na scores (Mann–Whitney test).
3.4.3. Analysis of Correlations of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations with mDF Scores
Moreover, patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis with an mDF score of >32 points also had significantly higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations compared to patients with an mDF score of ≤32 (Table 7, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
3.5. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in Patients with ALC Based on End-Stage Liver Disease Complications
Among different features of chronic liver disease decompensation, the highest predictive value AUCs for serum HNP1-3 concentrations were detected for the development of hepatic encephalopathy (0.81), ascites (0.74), and mortality at >40 years (0.87) in ALC patients. The highest sensitivity and specificity were found in the analysis of predictive value for serum HNP1-3 for death in ALC patients above 40 years of age.
3.5.1. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in Patients with ALC Based on the Development of Hepatic Encephalopathy
Figure 5 shows the predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for the development of hepatic encephalopathy.
Figure 5 shows that there is a correlation between the development of hepatic encephalopathy and higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients with a sensitivity of 100% (p < 0.001).
3.5.2. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in Patients with ALC Based on the Development of Ascites and Esophageal Varices
Figure 6 shows the predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for the development of ascites in ALC patients.
Figure 6 shows that there is a correlation between the development of ascites and higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients (p < 0.001). Next, in our study, serum HNP1-3 concentrations were compared according to subgroups based on the presence of esophageal varices. We concluded that there is no correlation between the presence of esophageal varices and serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients (p < 0.58).
3.5.3. Comparison of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations in Patients with ALC Based on Non-Survival
Patients with ALC were evaluated for 90 days. During this time, three ALC patients died, while 59 individuals survived. We compared serum HNP1-3 concentrations among these two subgroups of patients as shown in Table 8.
There were no significant differences in serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC who died and in those who survived (p < 0.54) during a 90-day observation period.
We also measured if age could be an important factor for survival in ALC patients. We divided ALC patients into two subgroups: older than 40 years of age, and no more than 40 years of age. Figure 7 shows the predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for non-survival in ALC patients > 40 years.
Figure 7 shows that there is a correlation between non-survival and higher serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients (p < 0.001).
3.6. Analysis of Correlation of Serum HNP1-3 Concentrations and Markers of Inflammation in Patients with ALC
We checked whether there was any relationship between serum HNP1-3 concentrations and markers of inflammation (CRP, WBC, neutrophils, and NLR) in ALC patients. The results are presented in Table 9.
No positive correlations were found between HNP1-3 and CRP, WBC, NEU, and NLR levels.
4. Discussion
Alcohol-related liver disease has been reported as a very common disease worldwide with the highest rates confirmed in western Europe [28]. According to previous studies, a 1-year mortality rate is estimated as 25–30% among ALD patients [29]. Furthermore, alcohol-related liver disease is responsible for almost 60% of cirrhosis cases in the USA [30]. According to a British study, the number of patient admissions to UK hospitals with the primary diagnosis of liver disease rose by 22% in 2022 and almost doubled in the past ten years [31].
In patients with alcohol-related liver cirrhosis, neutrophils are activated. However, their ability to respond to pathogens is impaired. Neutrophils’ antimicrobial activity is possible due to neutrophil extracellular traps, phagocytosis, or production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [32]. NET formation is activated through cytokines and chemokines [33]. Significantly higher expression of AMPs such as HNP1-3, LL-37, HBD-1, and HBD-2 is observed in many inflammatory processes [34]. Antimicrobial peptides can be distinguished into cathelicidins and defensins.
Among defensins, HNP1-3 belong to the alpha-defensin peptide family, while HBD-1 and HBD-2 belong to the beta-defensin peptide family [34]. Some mechanisms have been described to be involved in the expression of alpha-defensins, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) or nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) [35]. MAPKs play a crucial role in the production of cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-2 [36]. NF-κB signaling is triggered by the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) [37]. The inactivation of NF-κB signaling is possible through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family [38]. Alpha-defensins induce the production of IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, and IL-6 and enhance TLR9 activation through the NF-κB pathway [39].
Several studies have revealed that PPARα ligands may exhibit anti-steatotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic effects [40]. The deregulation of PPAR pathways leads to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), ALD, hepatitis virus-injury, and HCC [41,42]. The chronic expression of alpha-defensins induces increased systemic lipolysis and decreased hepatic fat accumulation [43]. In particular, the defensins neutralize bacterial toxins, disrupt the membrane of the bacterial cell wall, and inhibit the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall leading to killing bacteria or preventing their growth [7]. Their role is crucial in tumorigenesis as well. While beta-defensins play a suppressive or a proliferative role in tumor development, alpha-defensins are suggested to be produced by tumors themselves. Furthermore, HNP1-3 lead to tumor progression and invasiveness [7].
Our study investigated whether alpha-defensin concentrations are associated with sex, age, CTP, MELD-Na, and mDF scores, ALC decompensation, and inflammatory markers. As a result, a significant correlation between HNP1-3 serum concentrations and ALC was found. The concentrations of HNP1-3 were evaluated in patients with ALC compared to healthy patients. Interestingly, females with ALC had elevated levels of HNP1-3 compared to healthy females. The concentrations of HNP1-3 were statistically significantly increased in patients with ALC with a MELD-Na score of >20 points (p < 0.02) compared to patients with a MELD-Na score of ≤20 points. Moreover, our findings are in line with previous human data, suggesting increased expression of defensins in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, bronchiolitis, and psoriasis [34].
Similarly, a significant correlation between HNP1-3 serum concentrations and alcoholic hepatitis was found, which is a very promising discovery because of the lack of possible therapeutic options in the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis. Several clinical trials are under investigation at present. Nonetheless, liver transplantation and alcohol abstinence are the keys to quick recovery [44]. In our study, the highest predictive AUC values for HNP1-3 concentrations were detected for the development of hepatic encephalopathy (0.81), ascites (0.74), and mortality >40 years (0.87) in ALC patients. The presence of hepatic encephalopathy leads to acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) leading to a high rate of short-term mortality [45]. Another study, in which the participants were patients with decompensation of liver cirrhosis plasma HNP1-3, showed better predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.885)46 [46]. In the study by Abu Fanne et al., high HNP1-3 levels in patients with coronary artery disease negatively affected mortality (19.54%) and recurrent revascularization (8.05%), while high HNP1-3 levels were positively associated with myonecrosis and the severity of the disease [47]. The study by Abu Fanne et al. shows the elevation of alpha-defensin concentrations in fibrotic liver areas [11]. In another study, mice after sepsis onset given a high dose of HNP-1 showed more severe liver injury and increased mortality but no lung injury, which shows the liver predisposition of HNP1 [48]. More recent work, however, has shed light on the antimicrobial activity of defensins. AMPs induced by nutrients could be eligible alternatives to antibiotic therapy [35]. In our study, systemic concentrations of HNP1, HNP2, and HNP3, were significantly increased in patients with ALC in comparison with healthy individuals.
5. Conclusions
HNP1-3 levels correlated with MELD-Na scores and mDF scores. ALC subgroups with MELD > 20 and mDF > 32 presented with significantly higher HNP1-3 concentrations. Furthermore, HNP1-3 levels revealed a good predictive AUC for hepatic encephalopathy and ascites development (0.81 and 0.74, respectively) and for the survival (0.87) of patients over 40 years of age. Overall, the results reveal that the systemic blood levels of NET components—HNP1-3—are elevated in ALC patients and support the value of alpha-defensins as biomarkers in cirrhosis assessment. Therefore, HNP1-3 may be potentially applied as predictors of survival in patients with ALC.
Our study has some limitations. Firstly, this was an observational study. Therefore, we are currently unable to generate causal conclusions. Secondly, 77% of the study population were males, which limited the study generalizability to both sexes. However, our study included all patients admitted to the hospital with ALC—most patients with ALC are statistically males compared to females.
Conceptualization, A.R.-B., B.K.-S. and H.C.-L.; methodology, A.S.; software, A.S. and J.R.; validation, A.S. and H.C.-L.; formal analysis, J.R.; investigation, J.R.; resources, A.S.; data curation, J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-B.; writing—review and editing, B.K.-S.; visualization, A.R.-B.; supervision, B.K.-S. and H.C.-L.; project administration, B.K.-S. and H.C.-L.; funding acquisition, A.R.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical University of Lublin on 28 March 2019, No. KE-0254/94/2019.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data supporting reported results can be found by contacting the correspondence author.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC with different MELD-Na scores. Legend: MELD-Na—Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Correlation between serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC with different MELD-Na scores. Legend: MELD-Na—Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC with severe alcohol hepatitis based on mDF scores (p < 0.01). Legend: mDF—modified Maddrey Discriminant Function score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Correlation between serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC with different mDF scores (p < 0.01, rho 0.40). Legend: mDF—modified Maddrey Discriminant Function score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for the development of hepatic encephalopathy in ALC patients.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for the development of ascites in ALC patients.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. The predictive power of serum HNP1-3 concentrations for non-survival in ALC patients > 40 years.
Demographic and laboratory data in the ALC patients assigned by sex.
| Variable | Males ALC | Females ALC | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | ||
| Age, years a | 47.00 | 33.00–64.00 | 56.00 | 26.00–61.00 | 0.28 |
| ALT, U/L a | 42.00 | 17.50–228.25 | 38.00 | 22.00–480.00 | 0.93 |
| AST, U/L a | 101.00 | 34.40–360.40 | 112.00 | 43.00–550.00 | 0.74 |
| ALP, U/L a | 153.00 | 56.50–405.15 | 121.00 | 73.00–411.00 | 0.76 |
| GGT, U/L a | 378.00 | 43.20–2558.20 | 444.00 | 155.00–2193.00 | 0.16 |
| Bilirubin, mg/dL a | 2.90 | 0.60–16.57 | 1.70 | 0.60–34.10 | 0.82 |
| Albumin, g/dL a | 3.08 | 2.00–4.13 | 2.94 | 2.43–4.62 | 0.73 |
| INR a | 1.29 | 0.93–2.23 | 1.33 | 0.60–2.54 | 0.87 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL a | 0.80 | 0.42–1.57 | 0.60 | 0.40–2.90 | 0.14 |
| CRP, mg/L a | 20.23 | 1.69–144.82 | 23.90 | 0.53–109.70 | 0.74 |
| WBC, ×109/L a | 7.00 | 3.24–15.94 | 5.79 | 4.07–13.55 | 0.94 |
| NEU, ×109/L a | 4.52 | 1.51–13.85 | 3.57 | 2.74–12.52 | 0.86 |
| LYM, ×109/L a | 1.06 | 0.44–2.37 | 0.92 | 0.46–1.55 | 0.39 |
| NLR a | 3.98 | 1.47–14.81 | 4.03 | 2.06–27.22 | 0.68 |
| CTP, points a | 8.00 | 5.00–13.00 | 8.00 | 5.00–13.00 | 0.78 |
| MELD-Na, points a | 15.00 | 6.25–25.00 | 11.00 | 7.00–39.00 | 0.89 |
| mDF, points a | 24.40 | 2.21–75.39 | 15.40 | 1.06–102.44 | 0.88 |
| Ascites, | 26 (50.98) | 5 (45.45) | 0.65 | ||
| Encephalopathy, | 16 (31.37) | 2 (18.18) | 0.67 | ||
| Esophageal varices, | 24 (47.05) | 4 (36.36) | 1.00 | ||
| Non-survival, | 2 (3.92) | 1 (9.09) | 0.33 | ||
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; CRP—C-reactive protein; CTP—Child-Turcotte-Pugh score; GGT—ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase; INR—international normalized ratio; LYM—lymphocytes; mDF—modified Maddrey Discriminant Function; MELD-Na—Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score; NEU—neutrophils; NLR—NEU/LYM ratio; WBC—white blood cell count; a Mann–Whitney test; b Fisher test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations in patients with ALC assigned by sex and between ALC patients and controls.
| Variable, ng/mL | ALC Men | ALC Women | p a | ALC Patients | Controls | p a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 | Median | 5–95 | Median | 5–95 | Median | 5–95 | |||
| HNP1-3 | 3.55 | 1.63–12.80 | 3.65 | 2.35–14.58 | 0.25 | 3.57 | 1.76–12.86 | 2.07 | 1.20–7.30 | 0.0009 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between female and male ALC patients and between female and male controls.
| Variable, ng/mL | ALC Males | Controls Males | p a | ALC Females | Controls Females | p a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | |||
| HNP1-3 | 3.55 | 1.63–12.80. | 2.16 | 1.12–8.89 | 0.044 | 3.65 | 2.35–14.58 | 2.02 | 1.18–4.25 | 0.003 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between patients with ALC based on age.
| Variable, ng/mL | Age > 40 Years | Age < 40 Years | p a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | ||
| HNP1-3 | 3.56 | 1.67–13.23 | 3.63 | 1.94–11.50 | 0.66 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between ALC patients based on Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores.
| Variable (ng/mL) | ALC | p a | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTP Class A | CTP Class B | CTP Class C | |||||||||||
| Median | Minimum | 25–75 Percentile | Maximum | Median | Minimum | 25–75 Percentile | Maximum | Median | Minimum | 25–75 Percentile | Maximum | ||
| HNP1-3 | 3.09 | 1.48 | 1.91–5.44 | 11.96 | 3.52 | 1.50 | 2.32–6.46 | 15.94 | 4.49 | 1.60 | 3.03–6.99 | 13.35 | 0.30 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; CTP—Child-Turcotte-Pugh score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Kruskal–Wallis test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between ALC patients based on MELD-Na scores.
| Variable (ng/mL) | MELD-Na > 20 (Points) | MELD-Na ≤ 20 (Points) | p a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | ||
| HNP1-3 | 5.90 | 3.64–7.65 | 3.23 | 2.54–3.92 | 0.02 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; MELD-Na—Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between ALC patients based on mDF scores.
| Variable (ng/mL) | mDF > 32 (Points) | mDF ≤ 32 (Points) | p a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | ||
| HNP1-3 | 4.49 | 3.65–6.60 | 2.94 | 2.23–3.59 | 0.01 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; mDF—modified Maddrey Discriminant Function score; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Comparison of serum HNP1-3 concentrations between ALC patients based on survival.
| Variable (ng/mL) | Non-Survival | Survival | p a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5–95 Percentile | Median | 5–95 Percentile | ||
| HNP1-3 | 8.21 | 2.41–9.71 | 3.55 | 1.76–13.08 | 0.54 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; a—Mann–Whitney test.
Analysis of correlations of serum HNP1-3 concentrations in ALC patients and markers of inflammation.
| Markers of Inflammation | HNP1-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rho | p a | |
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.14 | 0.41 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| NEU (×109/L) | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| NLR | 0.26 | 0.11 |
ALC—alcohol-related liver cirrhosis; CRP—C-reactive protein; HNP1-3—human neutrophil peptides 1-3; NEU—neutrophils; NLR—neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; rho—Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; WBC—white blood cell count; a—Spearman test.
References
1. Devarbhavi, H.; Asrani, S.K.; Arab, J.P.; Nartey, Y.A.; Pose, E.; Kamath, P.S. Global Burden of Liver Disease: 2023 Update. J. Hepatol.; 2023; 79, pp. 516-537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.017]
2. Niu, L.; Thiele, M.; Geyer, P.E.; Rasmussen, D.N.; Webel, H.E.; Santos, A.; Gupta, R.; Meier, F.; Strauss, M.; Kjaergaard, M. et al. Noninvasive Proteomic Biomarkers for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease. Nat. Med.; 2022; 28, pp. 1277-1287. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01850-y]
3. Simonetto, D.A.; Shah, V.H.; Kamath, P.S. Outpatient Management of Alcohol-Related Liver Disease. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2020; 5, pp. 485-493. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30415-7]
4. Ahn, M.-H.; Han, J.H.; Chwae, Y.-J.; Jung, J.-Y.; Suh, C.-H.; Kwon, J.E.; Kim, H.-A. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps May Contribute to the Pathogenesis in Adult-Onset Still Disease. J. Rheumatol.; 2019; 46, pp. 1560-1569. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181058]
5. Chen, T.; Li, Y.; Sun, R.; Hu, H.; Liu, Y.; Herrmann, M.; Zhao, Y.; Muñoz, L.E. Receptor-Mediated NETosis on Neutrophils. Front. Immunol.; 2021; 12, 775267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.775267] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804066]
6. Fu, J.; Zong, X.; Jin, M.; Min, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y. Mechanisms and Regulation of Defensins in Host Defense. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.; 2023; 8, 300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01553-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37574471]
7. Xu, D.; Lu, W. Defensins: A Double-Edged Sword in Host Immunity. Front. Immunol.; 2020; 11, 764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00764] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457744]
8. Gao, X.; Ding, J.; Liao, C.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Lu, W. Defensins: The Natural Peptide Antibiotic. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.; 2021; 179, 114008. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.114008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673132]
9. Adyns, L.; Proost, P.; Struyf, S. Role of Defensins in Tumor Biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2023; 24, 5268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065268] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982340]
10. Wu, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G.; Dai, J.; Feng, T. Defensins as a Promising Class of Tick Antimicrobial Peptides: A Scoping Review. Infect. Dis. Poverty; 2022; 11, 71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-00996-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725522]
11. Abu Fanne, R.; Maraga, E.; Kassem, E.; Groisman, G.; Amsalem, N.; Zeina, A.-R.; Abu Mouch, M.; Taher, R.; Abu-Mouch, S. Human Neutrophil α-Defensins 1–3 Are Upregulated in the Microenvironment of Fibrotic Liver. Medicina; 2023; 59, 496. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030496]
12. Hrynkiewicz, R.; Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, P. Etiology of Viral Induced Acute Liver Failure and Defensins as Potential Therapeutic Agents in ALF Treatment. Front. Immunol.; 2023; 14, 1153528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1153528] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153560]
13. Li, G.; Wang, Q.; Feng, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Shao, T.; Deng, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, M. et al. Recent Insights into the Role of Defensins in Diabetic Wound Healing. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2022; 155, 113694. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113694] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36099789]
14. Xu, C.; Wang, A.; Marin, M.; Honnen, W.; Ramasamy, S.; Porter, E.; Subbian, S.; Pinter, A.; Melikyan, G.B.; Lu, W. et al. Human Defensins Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Blocking Viral Entry. Viruses; 2021; 13, 1246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13071246] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206990]
15. Banu, S.; Nagaraj, R.; Idris, M.M. Defensins: Therapeutic Molecules with Potential to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Indian J. Med. Res.; 2022; 155, pp. 83-85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2798_21] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859434]
16. Nguyen, H.L.T.; Trujillo-Paez, J.V.; Umehara, Y.; Yue, H.; Peng, G.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Chieosilapatham, P.; Song, P.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H. et al. Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 7607. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066696]
17. The WHO Regional Office for Europe. Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in the WHO European Region. 2020; Available online: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/health-promotion-knowledge-gateway/food-based-dietary-guidelines-europe-table-17_en (accessed on 19 February 2024).
18. Kasztelan-Szczerbinska, B.; Adamczyk, K.; Surdacka, A.; Rolinski, J.; Michalak, A.; Bojarska-Junak, A.; Szczerbinski, M.; Cichoz-Lach, H. Gender-Related Disparities in the Frequencies of PD-1 and PD-L1 Positive Peripheral Blood T and B Lymphocytes in Patients with Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: A Single Center Pilot Study. PeerJ; 2021; 9, e10518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10518] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552711]
19. Kasztelan-Szczerbinska, B.; Surdacka, A.; Slomka, M.; Rolinski, J.; Celinski, K.; Cichoz-Lach, H.; Madro, A.; Szczerbinski, M. Angiogenesis-Related Biomarkers in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease: Their Association with Liver Disease Complications and Outcome. Mediat. Inflamm.; 2014; 2014, 673032. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/673032] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959006]
20. Kasztelan-Szczerbińska, B.; Surdacka, A.; Celiński, K.; Roliński, J.; Zwolak, A.; Miącz, S.; Szczerbiński, M. Prognostic Significance of the Systemic Inflammatory and Immune Balance in Alcoholic Liver Disease with a Focus on Gender-Related Differences. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0128347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128347]
21. Thursz, M.; Gual, A.; Lackner, C.; Mathurin, P.; Moreno, C.; Spahr, L.; Sterneck, M.; Cortez-Pinto, H. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Alcohol-Related Liver Disease. J. Hepatol.; 2018; 69, pp. 154-181. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.018]
22. Bush, K.; Kivlahan, D.R.; McDonell, M.B.; Fihn, S.D.; Bradley, K.A. The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch. Intern. Med.; 1998; 158, pp. 1789-1795. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789]
23. Källmén, H.; Elgán, T.H.; Wennberg, P.; Berman, A.H. Concurrent Validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Relation to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) Severity Levels According to the Brief DSM-5 AUD Diagnostic Assessment Screener. Nord. J. Psychiatry; 2019; 73, pp. 397-400. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2019.1642382] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31347426]
24. Khadjesari, Z.; White, I.R.; McCambridge, J.; Marston, L.; Wallace, P.; Godfrey, C.; Murray, E. Validation of the AUDIT-C in Adults Seeking Help with Their Drinking Online. Addict. Sci. Clin. Pract.; 2017; 12, 2. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-016-0066-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049515]
25. Ortiz, M.; Córdoba, J.; Doval, E.; Jacas, C.; Pujadas, F.; Esteban, R.; Guardia, J. Development of a Clinical Hepatic Encephalopathy Staging Scale. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.; 2007; 26, pp. 859-867. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03394.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17767470]
26. Stickel, F.; Datz, C.; Hampe, J.; Bataller, R. Pathophysiology and Management of Alcoholic Liver Disease: Update 2016. Gut Liver; 2017; 11, pp. 173-188. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl16477]
27. Córdoba, J. New Assessment of Hepatic Encephalopathy. J. Hepatol.; 2011; 54, pp. 1030-1040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.015]
28. Mellinger, J.L. High 10-Year Mortality in Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Where Do We Go from Here?. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2023; 8, pp. 961-962. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00282-0]
29. Kraglund, F.; Deleuran, T.; Askgaard, G.; Fleming, K.M.; Jepsen, P. Decreasing Incidence of Alcohol-Related Liver Disease in Denmark: A 25-Year Nationwide Study. Clin. Epidemiol.; 2021; 13, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S287870] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442297]
30. Bhala, N.; Mellinger, J.; Asrani, S.K.; Shah, V.H. Tackling the Burden of Preventable Liver Disease in the USA. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2024; 9, pp. 9-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00361-8]
31. Bhala, N.; Subhani, M.; Aithal, G.P. Liver Disease Admissions in the UK Are Increasing, Urgently Needing Local and National Solutions. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2023; 8, 1071. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00334-5]
32. Irvine, K.M.; Ratnasekera, I.; Powell, E.E.; Hume, D.A. Causes and Consequences of Innate Immune Dysfunction in Cirrhosis. Front. Immunol.; 2019; 10, 293. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00293]
33. Elieh Ali Komi, D.; Kuebler, W.M. Significance of Mast Cell Formed Extracellular Traps in Microbial Defense. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.; 2022; 62, pp. 160-179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08861-6]
34. Srivastava, M.; Chandra, A.; R, R.; Nigam, J.; Rajan, P.; Parmar, D.; Srivastava, R.N.; Gupta, V. Expression of Antimicrobial Peptides and Cytokines in Human Omentum Following Abdominal Surgery. Cureus; 2021; 13, e17477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17477] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589365]
35. Chen, J.; Zhai, Z.; Long, H.; Yang, G.; Deng, B.; Deng, J. Inducible Expression of Defensins and Cathelicidins by Nutrients and Associated Regulatory Mechanisms. Peptides; 2020; 123, 170177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170177] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31704211]
36. Park, C.-H.; Min, S.-Y.; Yu, H.-W.; Kim, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, Y.-J. Effects of Apigenin on RBL-2H3, RAW264.7, and HaCaT Cells: Anti-Allergic, Anti-Inflammatory, and Skin-Protective Activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 4620. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134620] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610574]
37. Zhang, L.; Wei, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, P.; Hou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Su, H.; Koci, M.D.; Yin, H.; Zhang, C. NF-κB Activation Enhances STING Signaling by Altering Microtubule-Mediated STING Trafficking. Cell Rep.; 2023; 42, 112185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112185] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857187]
38. Korbecki, J.; Bobiński, R.; Dutka, M. Self-Regulation of the Inflammatory Response by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors. Inflamm. Res.; 2019; 68, pp. 443-458. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-019-01231-1]
39. Fruitwala, S.; El-Naccache, D.W.; Chang, T.L. Multifaceted Immune Functions of Human Defensins and Underlying Mechanisms. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2019; 88, pp. 163-172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.023]
40. Wang, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Tanaka, N. PPARs as Metabolic Regulators in the Liver: Lessons from Liver-Specific PPAR-Null Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 2061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062061]
41. Wagner, N.; Wagner, K.-D. The Role of PPARs in Disease. Cells; 2020; 9, 2367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9112367]
42. Zhang, C.-Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, M. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Chronic Liver Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapy. World J. Hepatol.; 2023; 15, pp. 180-200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v15.i2.180] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36926234]
43. Maraga, E.; Safadi, R.; Amer, J.; Higazi, A.A.; Fanne, R.A. Alleviation of Hepatic Steatosis by Alpha-Defensin Is Associated with Enhanced Lipolysis. Medicina; 2023; 59, 983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050983] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241215]
44. German, M.N.; Musto, J.; Lucey, M.R. Novel Treatments for Alcoholic Hepatitis. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.; 2021; 37, 179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000725] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33769374]
45. Badal, B.D.; Bajaj, J.S. Hepatic Encephalopathy in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. Clin. Liver Dis.; 2023; 27, pp. 691-702. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2023.03.012]
46. Huang, C.; Lou, C.; Zheng, X.; Pang, L.; Wang, G.; Zhu, M.; Dai, X.; Wang, J.; Tu, M.; Xu, W. et al. Plasma Human Neutrophil Peptides as Biomarkers of Disease Severity and Mortality in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis. Liver Int.; 2023; 43, pp. 1096-1106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.15520]
47. Abu Fanne, R.; Arbel, Y.; Chorin, E.; Maraga, E.; Groisman, G.M.; Higazi, A.A.; Banai, S. Association between Tissue Human Neutrophil Peptide 1-3 Levels and Cardiovascular Phenotype: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study. J. Int. Med. Res.; 2022; 50, 3000605221127099. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221127099]
48. Chen, Q.; Yang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, F.; Shu, Q.; Fang, X. Human Neutrophil Defensins Disrupt Liver Interendothelial Junctions and Aggravate Sepsis. Mediat. Inflamm.; 2022; 2022, 7659282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7659282]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Kasztelan-Szczerbińska, Beata 1
; Cichoż-Lach, Halina 1 ; Surdacka, Agata 2 ; Roliński, Jacek 2 1 Department of Gastroenterology with Endoscopy Unit, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;
2 Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;