Abstract
Background
Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to its initial state before exposure to a disturbance. Resilient livestock are desired because of their improved health and increased economic profit. Genetic improvement of resilience may also lead to trade-offs with production traits. Recently, resilience indicators based on longitudinal data have been suggested, but they need further evaluation to determine whether they are indeed predictive of improved resilience, such as disease resilience. This study investigated different resilience indicators based on deviations between expected and observed egg production (EP) by exploring their genetic parameters, their possible trade-offs with production traits, and their relationships with antibody traits in chickens.
Methods
Egg production in a nucleus breeding herd environment based on 1-week-, 2-week-, or 3-week-intervals of two purebred chicken lines, a white egg-laying (33,825 chickens) and a brown egg-laying line (34,397 chickens), were used to determine deviations between observed EP and expected average batch EP, and between observed EP and expected individual EP. These deviations were used to calculate three types of resilience indicators for two life periods of each individual: natural logarithm-transformed variance (ln(variance)), skewness, and lag-one autocorrelation (autocorrelation) of deviations from 25 to 83 weeks of age and from 83 weeks of age to end of life. Then, we estimated their genetic correlations with EP traits and with two antibody traits.
Results
The most promising resilience indicators were those based on 1-week-intervals, as they had the highest heritability estimates (0.02–0.12) and high genetic correlations (above 0.60) with the same resilience indicators based on longer intervals. The three types of resilience indicators differed genetically from each other, which indicates that they possibly capture different aspects of resilience. Genetic correlations of the resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals with EP traits were favorable or zero, which means that trade-off effects were marginal. The resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals also showed no genetic correlations with the antibody traits, which suggests that they are not informative for improved immunity or vice versa in the nucleus environment.
Conclusions
This paper gives direction towards the evaluation and implementation of resilience indicators, i.e. to further investigate resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals, in breeding programs for selecting genetically more resilient layer chickens.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Bedere, Nicolas 2 ; Peeters, Katrijn 3 ; Poppe, Marieke 4 ; Visscher, Jeroen 3 ; Mulder, Han A. 5 1 Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666); TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Reproductive Biotechnology, Freising, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 2966)
2 Institut Agro, PEGASE, INRAE, Saint Gilles, France (GRID:grid.463756.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0497 3491)
3 Hendrix Genetics B.V., Boxmeer, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.482400.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0624 5121)
4 Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666); CRV B.V., Arnhem, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.511144.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 6052 5255)
5 Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)





