It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Resistance to punishment is commonly used to measure the difficulty in refraining from rewarding activities when negative consequences ensue, which is a hallmark of addictive behavior. We recently developed a progressive shock strength (PSS) procedure in which individual rats can titrate the amount of punishment that they are willing to tolerate to obtain food rewards. Here, we investigated the effects of a range of delays (0–12 s) on resistance to punishment measured by PSS break points. As expected from delay discounting principles, we found that delayed shock was less effective as a punisher, as revealed by higher PSS breakpoints. However, this discounting effect was not equally distributed in the population of rats, and the introduction of a delay highlighted the existence of two populations: rats that were sensitive to immediate punishment were also sensitive to delayed shock, whereas rats that were resistant to immediate punishment showed strong temporal discounting of delayed punishment. Importantly, shock-sensitive rats suppressed responding even in subsequent non-punishment sessions, and they differed from shock-resistant rats in anxiety-like behavior, but not in sensitivity to pain. These results show that manipulation of temporal contingencies of punishment in the PSS procedure provides a valuable tool to identify individuals with a double vulnerability to addiction: low sensitivity to aversion and excessive discounting of negative future consequences. Conversely, the shock-sensitive population may provide a model of humans who are vulnerable to opportunity loss due to excessive anxiety.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Expérimentales et Cliniques, Université de Poitiers, INSERM, U1084, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.11166.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 6368); Centre Hospitalier Henri-Laborit, Unité de Recherche Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.477078.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 083X)
2 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Expérimentales et Cliniques, Université de Poitiers, INSERM, U1084, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.11166.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 6368)
3 Centre Hospitalier Henri-Laborit, Unité de Recherche Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.477078.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 083X)
4 National Institute on Drug Abuse, Real-world Assessment, Prediction, and Treatment Unit, Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.420090.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 7147)
5 Centre Hospitalier Henri-Laborit, Unité de Recherche Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.477078.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 083X); Centre de Recherche sur la Cognition et l’apprentissage, Université de Poitiers, CNRS, UMR 7295, Poitiers, France (GRID:grid.503078.9) (ISNI:0000 0000 9627 3775)