Abstract
The extent to which adolescents are influenced by their peers has been the focus of developmental psychological research for over 50 years. That research has yielded contradicting evidence and much debate. This study consists of a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the main aim of quantifying the effect of peer influence on adolescent substance use, as well as investigation into the factors that moderate this effect. Included studies needed to employ longitudinal designs, provide the necessary statistics to calculate cross-lagged regression coefficients controlling for target adolescent’s initial substance use, and comprise participants aged 10–19 years. A search of academic databases and reference lists generated 508 unique reports, which were screened using Covidence. The final inclusion criteria yielded a total of 99 effect sizes from 27 independent studies. A four-level meta-analytic approach with correction to allow the inclusion of multiple effect sizes from a given study was used to estimate an average effect size. Results revealed a significant effect of peer influence (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Bond University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1033.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 3820)
2 Tanta University, Faculty of Education, Tanta, Egypt (GRID:grid.412258.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9477 7793); Al Ain University, College of Education, Humanities & Social Sciences, Al Ain, UAE (GRID:grid.444473.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 9411)
3 Ajman University, Department of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman, UAE (GRID:grid.444470.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8672 9927); Tanta University, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Tanta, Egypt (GRID:grid.412258.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9477 7793); Ajman University, Humanities and Social Sciences Research Center (HSSRC), Ajman, UAE (GRID:grid.444470.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8672 9927)
4 Bond University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1033.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 3820); University of Johannesburg, Department of Human Anatomy and Physiology, the Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa (GRID:grid.412988.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0109 131X); Bond University, Centre for Data Analytics, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1033.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 3820)





