1. Introduction
Alveolar macrophages are immensely important innate immune cells residing in the air–blood barriers of lungs [1]. They exhibit a strong phagocytic activity against invading pathogens. Similar to other macrophages, alveolar macrophages are non-immune, display a strong tissue specificity, maintain homeostasis and eliminate excess surfactants [2]. Thus, these are closely associated with the onset, progression and healing of many lung diseases, such as pulmonary fibrosis [3], lung cancer [4], asthma [5], tuberculosis [6] and so on. Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) [7]. Mtb commonly enters into the lungs during respiration, and eventually it is taken up by alveolar macrophages, yielding phagosomes [8]. These phagosomes can then fuse with lysosomes to form phagolysosomes and kill the Mtb [9]. When Mtb cannot be effectively eliminated, it might interfere with the maturation of phagosomes, block the fusion of phagosomes and lysosomes by regulating the host signal transduction pathway and survive in the lungs for a long time [8,10,11].
Over several years, oral anti-tubercular drugs have been commonly used as a routine treatment strategy for tuberculosis [12]. Following oral administration, these drugs are widely distributed throughout the body, resulting in a very low drug concentration in the lungs, especially in the alveolar macrophages [13]. In order to achieve an effective inhibitory concentration, patients need a long-term oral administration of larger doses of anti-tubercular drugs, causing severe side effects such as liver toxicity, hypersensitivity and peripheral neurotoxicity [14]. A lower drug concentration in the alveolar macrophages could lead to the emergence of drug-resistant strains [15]. Serious side effects of anti-tubercular drugs and the existence of multidrug-resistant Mtb are the biggest challenges in the treatment of tuberculosis [12,13]. Nowadays, the targeted delivery of anti-tubercular drugs to the alveolar macrophages through pulmonary inhalation is considered an effective strategy for tuberculosis [16]. For instance, Shrivastava and co-workers formulated liposomes for macrophage targeted delivery dual anti-tubercular drugs [17]. Moreover, Pawde et al. developed chitosan-based scaffolds encapsulating clofazimine, which exhibited superior anti-mycobacterial activity compared to the pristine drug [18]. These could increase the local drug concentration in alveolar macrophages and effectively kill the pathogens retained there [13].
Recently, nanotechnology has been widely exploited as a promising strategy for alveolar macrophage targeted drug delivery [16]. Among various nano-size drug delivery systems, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) have received overwhelming attention due to their distinct benefits like safety, biodegradability, affordable cost, etc. It is noteworthy that the mean particle size, charge, surface morphology, hardness, etc., might influence the cellular internalization of these particles [2]. In general, particles with suitable particle size range (100–200 nm), high positive or negative surface charges and suitable shape (such as spherical) with adequate hardness or stiffness would increase their uptake by the alveolar macrophages [1]. All these physiochemical properties of the SLNs are associated with their inherent compositions. Beside these factors, the cellular uptake of these nanosystems by alveolar macrophages could efficiently be improved by their surface modification with different ligands, leading to the enhancement of drug accumulation in the lung tissues [19]. Mannose is the most common alveolar macrophage-targeting ligand used to functionalize the surfaces of various nanosystems [20]. In our current work, glyceryl monostearate (GMS), a biocompatible and pharmaceutically acceptable emulsifier, would be utilized for the production of SLNs [21]. Stearyl amine (SA) could further be introduced to provide free amino groups onto the surfaces of SLNs [22]. The aldehyde groups of the ring-opened mannose could react with the amino groups of SA, creating mannosylated SLNs [23]. To our best knowledge, mannosylated SLNs composed of GMS and SA have not been formulated, nor even have their drug delivery properties been explored yet. The objective of our present study was to formulate rifampicin (Rif), a model anti-tubercular drug, loaded with GMS-based SLNs (Rif-SLNs) by the solvent diffusion method and investigate the impact of their surface modification with mannose on the alveolar macrophage targeting abilities through various in vitro investigations.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Glyceryl monostearate (GMS, Tianjin Bodi Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), stearyl amine (SA, Shanghai Yien Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), rifampicin (Rif, Guangzhou Aichun Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) D-(+)-mannose (Beijing SolarbioTechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and coumarin 6 (Beijing SolarbioTechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Dalian Meilun Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, high glucose, Dalian Meilun Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) were utilized. Various other reagents and solvents used in this study were of analytical grade.
2.2. Formulation of Rif-Loaded SLNs (Rif-SLNs)
GMS-based SLNs were prepared by the solvent diffusion method according to previously reported protocol [24]. Briefly, GMS (15 mg) and Rif (4.5 mg) were dissolved in absolute ethanol (3 mL) and the mixture was heated at 75 °C. Subsequently, it was rapidly dispersed in Milli-Q® water (30 mL) at 75 °C under stirring (600 rpm) for five min. The newly prepared dispersion was then cooled down to 25 °C to solidify the melted lipid droplets. Thereafter, the formulations were dialyzed (MWCO 12,000–14,000 Da, Shanghai Yuanye Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) against Milli-Q® water for 3 h to remove the free Rif and lyophilized.
2.3. Mannose Functionalization
SA (5 mg) was initially incorporated in the Rif-SLNs by adding SA with GMS, and similar steps were followed as described in Section 2.2. After the solidification of the SLNs, mannose functionalization was performed based on the previous report [20]. Precisely, mannose (50 mM) was dissolved in acetate buffer solution (pH 4.0) and heated in a water bath at 60 °C for 0.5 h. The resulting mannose solution (molar ratio of SA to mannose, 1:15) was added dropwise into the aqueous dispersion of SLNs. The mixture was magnetically stirred at 600 rpm for 72 h at 25 °C and subsequently dialyzed (MWCO 12,000–14,000 Da) for 0.5 h to obtain purified mannose modified Rif-SLNs (Rif-Man-SLNs).
2.4. Particle Size, PDI and Zeta Potential
All the samples were appropriately diluted with Milli-Q® water for the determination of their particle size, PDI and zeta potential utilizing a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).
2.5. Drug Loading
An accurately weighted quantity of freeze-dried SLNs (5 mg) was dispersed in methanol (1.2 mL) and the mixture was vortexed and heated at 60 °C for 2 min to completely dissolve the nanoparticles. It was then cooled at −20 °C for 10 min to precipitate the lipid. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation and assayed for Rif contents using a HPLC analysis method [25]. The drug loading (DL, %) and drug encapsulation efficiency (DEE, %) of the preparations were calculated according to the following formula [26].
2.6. Appearance and Morphology
The freshly prepared SLNs were mounted onto the carbon films (Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology, Beijing, China) at room temperature and allowed to stand for 15 min to adsorb onto the films. The rest of the liquid was removed and dried overnight at room temperature. These specimens were then viewed under a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Hitachi, HT7700, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
2.7. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
Various samples were scanned using IFS 55 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany) within a wide wave number range (4000–400 cm−1).
2.8. Powder X-ray Diffractometer (P-XRD)
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of different samples were recorded on a P-XRD (Haoyuan Instrument Co., Ltd., Dandong, China) at room temperature. It was operated within scanning angles of 3° to 40° (2θ) at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA.
2.9. In Vitro Drug Release
Different formulations containing an equivalent amount of Rif (120 μg), which were calculated based on their drug loading, were introduced inside a membrane dialysis bag (MWCO 12,000–14,000 Da), which was placed into 20 mL of pre-warmed PBS (pH 7.4) containing vitamin C (VC, 200 μg/mL) and agitated in a water bath shaker (100 rpm, Suzhou Peiying Experimental Equipment, Suzhou, China) at 37 °C [27]. Samples (1 mL) were withdrawn at predefined time points and the cumulative drug release (%) was calculated based on the data obtained after HPLC analyses [25].
2.10. Cellular Uptake
2.10.1. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)
Macrophage cells (RAW264.7) and lung cancer cells (A549) were suspended in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells/mL and incubated in 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 12 h. The cells were then treated with coumarin 6 (C-6)-loaded SLNs and incubated for 1 h and 4 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, the media were removed and the cells were washed three times with PBS. Thereafter, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (1 mL), stained with DAPI solution (10 μg/mL) for 5 min at room temperature and washed three times with PBS. The prepared samples were observed under CLSM (CLSM, Nikon C2 Plus, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) [28].
2.10.2. Flow Cytometer
The cellular uptake of SLNs was quantified by flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) [29]. The competitive effect of cellular uptake of mannose-modified SLNs was also assessed by pre-incubating the cells with free mannose (50 mM) for 1 h before treating them with the corresponding C-6-loaded SLNs. The treated cells were then examined by flow cytometer [20].
2.11. Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic potential of the Rif-loaded SLNs against RAW264.7 and A549 cells was assessed by employing the MTT assay protocol [26]. Precisely, the cells (2000 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated in a 5% CO2 chamber (HERAcell 150i, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China) at 37 °C for 24 h. The cells were then treated with different concentrations of pure Rif, mannose-free and mannose-decorated SLNs and incubated for another 24 h. Subsequently, the MTT reagent was added to the wells. Following 4 h of incubation, the formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the absorbance of the plates was recorded on a multimode microplate reader (FLUOstar, BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) at 570 nm.
2.12. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0) and differences were compared using an independent sample t test. Differences were considered as significant at a level of p < 0.05, highly significant at level of p < 0.01 and extremely significant at a level of p < 0.001.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Preparation and Physico-Chemical Characterization of SLNs
Tuberculosis is an extremely prevalent respiratory disease and the causative agents of tuberculosis often reside in the alveolar macrophages of lungs for a long period of time [7]. Recently, various carbohydrate-functionalized nanotherapeutics were exploited for macrophage targeted anti-tubercular drug delivery [30]. These could internalize the macrophages via overexpressed carbohydrate binding receptors and effectively suppress the invading microorganisms. The present study discussed the fabrication of mannose appended SLNs containing Rif and evaluated their effectiveness to accumulate the drug molecules inside the alveolar macrophages following endocytic uptake via the mannose receptor, a carbohydrate-binding receptor of the macrophage, for effective management of tuberculosis (Figure 1A) [22]. In other words, this could be accomplished through an active targeting process. On the contrary, passive targeting utilizes no homing device and uses only the natural distribution phenomenon of a carrier for drug targeting. In this context, Rif-loaded SLNs (Rif-SLNs) as control scaffolds were prepared using a solvent diffusion protocol, which involved the intense diffusion of solvent from the solvent–lipid phase into the surrounding aqueous phase followed by the evaporation of the organic solvent and solidification of lipid particles (Figure 1B) [26]. To afford Rif-Man-SLNs, SA was initially incorporated to provide amine terminated functionalities on Rif-SLNs. The coupling of mannose with these SLNs was then performed via Schiff bases chemistry, in which the aldehyde moieties of the ring-opened mannose could conjugate with the amino groups of SA present on the surfaces of drug-loaded SLNs (Figure 1C) [23].
The physical appearances of the drug-loaded SLNs were examined as compared to the corresponding blank templates (Figure 2A,B). Blank SLNs exhibited a light bluish opalescence due to the typical Tyndall effect [31], conferring the presence of abundant nanoparticles in the dispersions. On the other hand, drug-loaded SLNs appeared in different colors because of the presence of red-colored Rif molecules in the nanoparticles. Mannose-anchored and unmodified SLNs were further characterized in terms of their size, uniformity, zeta potential and morphology. The average hydrodynamic diameter of mannose-free SLNs was 167.7 ± 12.2 nm with a unimodal size distribution (PDI values, 0.19) (Table 1), while the mannose-modified SLNs exhibited a bigger particle size of 196.5 ± 15.5 nm [22]. Mannose conjugation could also enhance the PDI values (~0.320), indicating a higher heterogeneous characteristic of Rif-Man-SLNs compared to parent SLNs (Table 1) [32]. The zeta potential value of unmodified SLNs was about −24 mV. This was accredited to the existence of anionic charges on the outer layers of the SLNs owing to the presence of terminal carboxylic groups of the lipids [33]. The high zeta potential value of Rif-SLNs ensured the stability of the colloidal dispersions because of the electrostatic repulsions [34]. The functionalization of Rif-SLNs with mannose caused a highly positive zeta potential value (+42 mV) due to the existence of SA, a strong positively charged substance, in their nanoarchitectures [35]. This was consistent with the earlier reports [36]. Rif-SLNs exhibited an extremely high drug loading of 20.4 ± 0.7% with a DEE of 88.3 ± 3.2%, which was ascribed to the speedy configuration of rigid lipid nanoparticles, eventually restricting Rif leakage from the matrices [37]. The inclusion of SA into Rif-Man-SLNs conferred significantly reduced drug entrapment than the corresponding control matrices (Rif-SLNs) (p< 0.05). This was credited to the formation of leaky matrices (Rif-Man-SLNs) due to the presence of SA, causing extravasation of Rif molecules in the aqueous medium during their preparation. This was well collaborated with the previous report [20]. The TEM images of Rif-loaded SLNs showed spherical particles (Figure 2C,D). Their average size in TEM was slightly smaller compared to the DLS results, which could be due to their dehydrated state in the TEM grid.
3.2. FT-IR and XRD Analyses
FT-IR spectra of mannose, SA, GMS, their physical mixture, mannose-free and mannose-modified SLNs are compared in Figure 3A. In the spectrum of D-mannose, the broad signal at 3348.4 cm−1 and intense peak at 2916.6 cm−1 were attributed to its –OH stretching and –CH2 stretching vibrations, respectively. Moreover, the bands around 1630.5 and 1068.3 cm−1 were designated to the C=O stretching vibration of either alcohol or aldehyde groups in mannose [38]. On the other hand, the SA exhibited a lower intensity peak at 3361.9 cm−1, conferring an –NH2 stretching vibration. The signals at 2917.6 and 2849.4 cm−1 indicated –CH2 stretching of the long alkyl chains of SA molecules [39]. The GMS demonstrated various peaks at 3316.0 cm−1 (–OH stretching), 2915.7 cm−1 (–CH stretching), 1732.2 cm−1 (C=O stretching), 1470.7 cm−1 (–CH3 bending) and 1470.7 cm−1 (–CO bending) [40]. The FTIR spectrum of physical mixtures displayed simple superimposition of the typical bands of mannose, SA and GMS. Compared to mannose-free SLNs, the mannose-modified SLNs evidenced the existence of a –C=N stretching vibration peak at 1572.9 cm−1 and a bending vibration signal of –NH at 1413.1 cm−1, indicating mannose functionalization on the surfaces of Man-SLNs [20,22]. This was accomplished by the ring-opening reaction of the mannose and then the conjugation of its –CHO groups with the free –NH2 groups of SA situated on the surfaces of SLNs, resulting in the formation of Schiff’s bases (Figure 1C) [36].
The diffraction patterns of pristine components (Rif, GMS, SA and mannose), their physical mixtures and SLNs are portrayed in Figure 3B,C. The XRD curve of pure Rif revealed highly intense signals at 2θ of 9.9°, 11.9°, 13.8°, 14.5°, 16.4°, 18.6°, 19.5°, 21.4° and 26.1°, indicating its crystalline character [41]. The XRD patterns of GMS, SA and mannose also evidenced several intense and sharp diffraction peaks, which were indicative of their crystalline nature. The diffraction patterns of the physical mixtures were simply summations of the Rif and other components with identical sharp peaks and similar d (interplanar distance) values. The observed well-defined and sharp XRD peaks of pure Rif became less intense or disappeared in the case of Rif-SLNs and Rif-Man-SLNs. It confirmed a remarkable transformation of the pristine drug from its crystalline state to an amorphous form in the SLNs. In addition, Rif might strongly interact with component materials at the molecular level, affording a solid solution in the SLNs [42].
3.3. Drug Release
Rif could be hydrolyzed to its less soluble form, like 1-amino-4-methyl piperazine, under acidic conditions [43]. At pH values between 7.4 and 8.2, the drug molecule could be oxidized to an insoluble quinone derivative or a deacetylated form. VC, a small molecular weight antioxidant, plays a vital role in protecting against the oxidative damage of Rif by a variety of mechanisms [27]. Thus, VC was used as a stabilizer during the drug release study [44,45]. We initially investigated the stability of Rif in the release media (PBS, pH 7.4) containing variable amounts of VC. The stability of Rif in the PBS medium containing 200 μg/mL of VC was found to be better than that of the other two groups (Figure 4A). Based on this observation, PBS containing 200 μg/mL of VC was selected as the drug release medium in the subsequent experiments.
The drug release profiles of Rif-SLNs and Rif-Man-SLNs, as depicted in Figure 4B, indicate that the mannose modification had no significant impact on the drug release behavior. In both types of SLNs, the drug was rapidly released within the initial 6–8 h (~80%), and then slowly eluted until 48 h.
3.4. Cellular Uptake
The cellular uptake efficiencies of C6-loaded SLNs and Man-SLNs on Raw 264.7 and A549 cells at variable time points were investigated using CLSM and compared. The C6 was selected as a fluorescent tracker based on its structural resemblance with Rif. DAPI, a blue fluorescence dye, was employed to localize the cell nucleus [29]. Following treatment with these SLNs, the green fluorescence signals of C6 were located in the cytoplasm of the Raw 264.7 cells (Figure 5A), suggesting internalization of SLNs by the cells [28]. When the positively charged substance, SA, was introduced during the modification process, the zeta potential of the SLNs was drastically changed. However, the cellular uptake efficiency of C6-SA-SLNs remained closer to that of C6-SLNs, conferring insignificant effects of surface charges of SLNs on their cellular uptake behavior. On the contrary, the C6 labeled Man-SLNs portrayed an obviously stronger intracellular fluorescence signal on Raw264.7 cells than that of SLNs at either 1 or 4 h. The greater extent of uptake of the Man-SLNs by the Raw264.7 cells could be attributed to their mannose-mediated active targeting effects. The fluorescence intensity was augmented with increasing incubation time from 1 to 4 h, signifying that their cellular uptake was time-dependent [46]. The uptake studies of unmodified SLNs, SA-SLNs and Man-SLNs on mannose receptor overexpressing A549 cells [47] exhibited similar behavior to that of Raw264.7 cells (Figure 5B). The flow cytometry was also utilized to quantify the differences of the cellular uptake efficiencies of SLNs, SA-SLNs and Man-SLNs on Raw 264.7 and A549 cells, and the outcomes were consistent with the results of CLSM (Figure 5C–H).
We further attempted to examine the cellular uptake abilities of Man-SLNs on Raw 264.7 cells preincubated with or without free mannose by flow cytometry analyses (Figure 6). When the cells were preincubated with free mannose, the cellular uptake of Man-SLNs was remarkably reduced (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A,B). Free mannose could competitively inhibit the mannose receptors present on the cell surfaces and block the uptake of Man-SLNs by reducing receptor availability [20]. This implied that the cellular internalization of Man-SLNs could take place via mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis as well as non-specific adsorption-mediated trafficking [23].
3.5. Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic potentials of pure Rif, Rif-SLNs and Rif-Man-SLNs were evaluated on two different cells (Raw264.7 and A549) by MTT assay protocol after 24 h of incubation (Figure 7) [26]. Pristine Rif and Rif-SLNs did not show cytotoxicity against Raw264.7 and A549 cells, with average cell viability around 100%. In contrast, Rif-Man-SLNs containing similar drug concentration ranges displayed varying degrees of cytotoxicity on both the cell lines. The cytotoxicity of Rif-Man-SLNs was increased with raising the loaded drug concentrations. Possibly, the presence of the positively charged substance SA in Rif-Man-SLNs could enhance their cytotoxicity [48]. In addition, the mannose-modified SLNs showed a greater cellular uptake efficiency, causing a higher cytotoxicity on Raw264.7 and A549 cells [49].
4. Conclusions
In this study, lipid GMS was successfully exploited to produce SLNs (~170 nm), which were further surface-modified with mannose. The particle size of the mannose-modified SLNs was increased slightly, their zeta potential became higher and the drug loading capacity was decreased relative to their native SLNs. The cellular uptake of Man-SLNs on Raw264.7 and A549 cells was significantly enhanced compared to unmodified scaffolds. The uptake of Man-SLNs was drastically inhibited when the cells were preincubated with mannose, indicating that their uptake was mediated through the mannose receptors. The mannose-modified SLNs showed a higher cytotoxicity at the effective antibacterial concentration of Rif due to their greater cellular uptake. Overall, the preliminarily experimental data evidenced the efficacy of mannose-modified SLNs to achieve greater alveolar macrophage targeting effects to combat tuberculosis.
Conceptualization, H.B., C.Z., X.T., D.C. and M.Y.; methodology, C.Z. and X.T.; validation, H.B., C.Z., X.T., D.C. and M.Y.; formal analysis, H.B., C.Z., X.T., D.C. and M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.B., D.C. and M.Y.; supervision, H.B., D.C. and M.Y.; funding acquisition, D.C. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Data are contained within the article.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Schematic illustration of passive and active targeting of SLNs to macrophages (A). Preparation schemes of the Rif-SLNs (B) and Rif-Man-SLNs (C).
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Physical appearances of blank SLNs (left) and Rif-SLNs (right) (A) and blank Man-SLNs (left) and Rif-Man-SLNs (right) (B). TEM images of Rif-SLNs (C) and Rif-Man-SLNs (D).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. FT-IR overlay spectra of mannose, SA, GMS, physical mixture, SLNs, Man–SLNs (A). XRD patterns of Rif, GMS, physical mixture, Rif–SLNs (B) and XRD patterns of Rif, GMS, SA, mannose, physical mixture, Rif–Man–SLNs (C).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. The stability of pure Rif in PBS media containing different amounts of VC (A). The in vitro release profiles of Rif from Rif-SLNs and Rif-Man-SLNs in PBS containing 200 μg/mL of VC (B) (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Cellular internalization of C6-SLNs, C6-SA-SLNs and C6-Man-SLNs on Raw 264.7 cells (A) and A549 cells (B) analyzed using CLSM. Cellular uptake efficiency of SLNs recorded by flow cytometry (C,D,F,G) and quantitative evaluation of their signals (E,H). Statistical significance levels are indicated as: * (p < 0.05); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001).
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Flow cytometry studies of cellular uptake behavior of C6-Man-SLNs on Raw 264.7 cells with or without mannose preincubation (A) and their quantitative analyses (B). Statistical significance levels are indicated as: * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01).
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Cytotoxic potentials of Rif solution and different formulations on Raw 264.7 cells (A) and A549 cells (B) after 24 h of incubation (n = 5, Mean ± SD).
Mean hydrodynamic particle size, PDI, zeta potential, DL and DEE of Rif-SLNs and Rif-Man-SLNs (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
| Scaffolds | Particle Size | PDI | Zeta Potential | DL (%) | DEE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rif-SLNs | 167.7 ± 12.2 | 0.191 ± 0.048 | −24.4 ± 0.8 | 20.4 ± 0.7 | 88.3 ± 3.2 |
| Rif-Man-SLNs | 196.5 ± 15.5 | 0.320 ± 0.075 | 42.3 ± 1.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.4 |
References
1. Patel, B.; Gupta, N.; Ahsan, F. Particle engineering to enhance or lessen particle uptake by alveolar macrophages and to influence the therapeutic outcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.; 2015; 89, pp. 163-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25497488]
2. Joshi, N.; Walter, J.M.; Misharin, A.V. Alveolar Macrophages. Cell. Immunol.; 2018; 330, pp. 86-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.01.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370889]
3. Shi, T.; Denney, L.; An, H.; Ho, L.P.; Zheng, Y. Alveolar and lung interstitial macrophages: Definitions, functions, and roles in lung fibrosis. J. Leukoc. Biol.; 2021; 110, pp. 107-114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.3RU0720-418R] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33155728]
4. Nielsen, S.R.; Schmid, M.C. Macrophages as Key Drivers of Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Mediat. Inflamm.; 2017; 2017, 9624760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9624760] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210073]
5. Saradna, A.; Do, D.C.; Kumar, S.; Fu, Q.L.; Gao, P. Macrophage polarization and allergic asthma. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med.; 2018; 191, pp. 1-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2017.09.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066321]
6. Guirado, E.; Schlesinger, L.S.; Kaplan, G. Macrophages in tuberculosis: Friend or foe. Semin. Immunopathol.; 2013; 35, pp. 563-583. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-013-0388-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23864058]
7. Ankrah, A.O.; Glaudemans, A.; Maes, A.; Van de Wiele, C.; Dierckx, R.; Vorster, M.; Sathekge, M.M. Tuberculosis. Semin. Nucl. Med.; 2018; 48, pp. 108-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.10.005]
8. Ufimtseva, E.; Eremeeva, N.; Bayborodin, S.; Umpeleva, T.; Vakhrusheva, D.; Skornyakov, S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis with different virulence reside within intact phagosomes and inhibit phagolysosomal biogenesis in alveolar macrophages of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis; 2019; 114, pp. 77-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2018.12.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30711161]
9. Maphasa, R.E.; Meyer, M.; Dube, A. The Macrophage Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Opportunities for Autophagy Inducing Nanomedicines for Tuberculosis Therapy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 618414. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.618414]
10. Trousil, J.; Syrova, Z.; Dal, N.K.; Rak, D.; Konefal, R.; Pavlova, E.; Matejkova, J.; Cmarko, D.; Kubickova, P.; Pavlis, O. et al. Rifampicin Nanoformulation Enhances Treatment of Tuberculosis in Zebrafish. Biomacromolecules; 2019; 20, pp. 1798-1815. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00214]
11. Queval, C.J.; Brosch, R.; Simeone, R. The Macrophage: A Disputed Fortress in the Battle against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Microbiol.; 2017; 8, 2284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02284] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218036]
12. Horsburgh, C.R., Jr.; Barry, C.E., III; Lange, C. Treatment of tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2015; 373, pp. 2149-2160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1413919] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605929]
13. Pham, D.D.; Fattal, E.; Tsapis, N. Pulmonary drug delivery systems for tuberculosis treatment. Int. J. Pharm.; 2015; 478, pp. 517-529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25499020]
14. Tornheim, J.A.; Dooley, K.E. The Global Landscape of Tuberculosis Therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Med.; 2019; 70, pp. 105-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-040717-051150] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403551]
15. Khadka, P.; Dummer, J.; Hill, P.C.; Das, S.C. Considerations in preparing for clinical studies of inhaled rifampicin to enhance tuberculosis treatment. Int. J. Pharm.; 2018; 548, pp. 244-254. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983396]
16. Lee, W.H.; Loo, C.Y.; Traini, D.; Young, P.M. Nano- and micro-based inhaled drug delivery systems for targeting alveolar macrophages. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.; 2015; 12, pp. 1009-1026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.1039509] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25912721]
17. Shrivastava, P.; Gautam, L.; Sharma, R.; Dube, D.; Vyas, S.; Vyas, S.P. Dual antitubercular drug loaded liposomes for macrophage targeting: Development, characterisation, ex vivo and in vivo assessment. J. Microencapsul.; 2021; 38, pp. 108-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652048.2020.1857861] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267623]
18. Pawde, D.M.; Viswanadh, M.K.; Mehata, A.K.; Sonkar, R.; Narendra,; Poddar, S.; Burande, A.S.; Jha, A.; Vajanthri, K.Y.; Mahto, S.K. et al. Mannose receptor targeted bioadhesive chitosan nanoparticles of clofazimine for effective therapy of tuberculosis. Saudi Pharm. J.; 2020; 28, pp. 1616-1625. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.10.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424254]
19. Chae, J.; Choi, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Choi, J. Inhalable nanoparticles delivery targeting alveolar macrophages for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Biosci. Bioeng.; 2021; 132, pp. 543-551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2021.08.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538591]
20. Costa, A.; Sarmento, B.; Seabra, V. Mannose-functionalized solid lipid nanoparticles are effective in targeting alveolar macrophages. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2018; 114, pp. 103-113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2017.12.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29229273]
21. Mukherjee, S.; Maity, S.; Ghosh, B.; Chakraborty, T.; Mondal, A.; Bishayee, A. Assessment of the antidiabetic potentiality of glyburide loaded glyceryl monostearate solid lipid nanoparticles. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 55, 101451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101451]
22. Nimje, N.; Agarwal, A.; Saraogi, G.K.; Lariya, N.; Rai, G.; Agrawal, H.; Agrawal, G.P. Mannosylated nanoparticulate carriers of rifabutin for alveolar targeting. J. Drug Target.; 2009; 17, pp. 777-787. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10611860903115308] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19938949]
23. Jain, A.; Agarwal, A.; Majumder, S.; Lariya, N.; Khaya, A.; Agrawal, H.; Majumdar, S.; Agrawal, G.P. Mannosylated solid lipid nanoparticles as vectors for site-specific delivery of an anti-cancer drug. J. Control. Release; 2010; 148, pp. 359-367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.09.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20854859]
24. Chai, G.H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, S.Q.; Cheng, B.; Hu, F.Q.; You, J.; Du, Y.Z.; Yuan, H. Transport Mechanisms of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles across Caco-2 Cell Monolayers and their Related Cytotoxicology. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2016; 8, pp. 5929-5940. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b00821] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26860241]
25. Banerjee, S.; Roy, S.; Bhaumik, K.N.; Kshetrapal, P.; Pillai, J. Comparative study of oral lipid nanoparticle formulations (LNFs) for chemical stabilization of antitubercular drugs: Physicochemical and cellular evaluation. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol.; 2018; 46, (Suppl. 1), pp. 540-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1431648] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373927]
26. Gaspar, D.P.; Faria, V.; Goncalves, L.M.; Taboada, P.; Remunan-Lopez, C.; Almeida, A.J. Rifabutin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for inhaled antitubercular therapy: Physicochemical and in vitro studies. Int. J. Pharm.; 2016; 497, pp. 199-209. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.11.050] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656946]
27. Diab, R.; Brillault, J.; Bardy, A.; Gontijo, A.V.; Olivier, J.C. Formulation and in vitro characterization of inhalable polyvinyl alcohol-free rifampicin-loaded PLGA microspheres prepared with sucrose palmitate as stabilizer: Efficiency for ex vivo alveolar macrophage targeting. Int. J. Pharm.; 2012; 436, pp. 833-839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.07.036] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846409]
28. He, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; Xu, F.; Zou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; He, H.; Yang, H.; Liu, J. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive size-reducible nanoassemblies for deeper atherosclerotic plaque penetration and enhanced macrophage-targeted drug delivery. Bioact. Mater.; 2023; 19, pp. 115-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.041] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475030]
29. Vieira, A.C.; Magalhaes, J.; Rocha, S.; Cardoso, M.S.; Santos, S.G.; Borges, M.; Pinheiro, M.; Reis, S. Targeted macrophages delivery of rifampicin-loaded lipid nanoparticles to improve tuberculosis treatment. Nanomededicine; 2017; 12, pp. 2721-2736. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-0248]
30. Pei, Y.; Yeo, Y. Drug delivery to macrophages: Challenges and opportunities. J. Control. Release; 2016; 240, pp. 202-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686082]
31. Pei, Q.; Hu, X.; Zhou, J.; Liu, S.; Xie, Z. Glutathione-responsive paclitaxel dimer nanovesicles with high drug content. Biomater. Sci.; 2017; 5, pp. 1517-1521. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00052A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191576]
32. Pardeshi, C.V.; Agnihotri, V.V.; Patil, K.Y.; Pardeshi, S.R.; Surana, S.J. Mannose-anchored N,N,N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles for pulmonary administration of etofylline. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.; 2020; 165, Pt A, pp. 445-459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.163]
33. Kraisit, P.; Hirun, N.; Mahadlek, J.; Limmatvapirat, S. Fluconazole-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) as a potential carrier for buccal drug delivery of oral candidiasis treatment using the Box-Behnken design. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.; 2021; 63, 102437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102437]
34. Sawant, K.K.; Dodiya, S.S. Recent advances and patents on solid lipid nanoparticles. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul.; 2008; 2, pp. 120-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/187221108784534081]
35. Venkateswarlu, V.; Manjunath, K. Preparation, characterization and in vitro release kinetics of clozapine solid lipid nanoparticles. J. Control. Release; 2004; 95, pp. 627-638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.005]
36. Pinheiro, M.; Ribeiro, R.; Vieira, A.; Andrade, F.; Reis, S. Design of a nanostructured lipid carrier intended to improve the treatment of tuberculosis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther.; 2016; 10, pp. 2467-2475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S104395] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536067]
37. Hu, F.Q.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, H.H.; Fang, M. Preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles with clobetasol propionate by a novel solvent diffusion method in aqueous system and physicochemical characterization. Int. J. Pharm.; 2002; 239, pp. 121-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00081-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12052697]
38. Sahu, P.K.; Mishra, D.K.; Jain, N.; Rajoriya, V.; Jain, A.K. Mannosylated solid lipid nanoparticles for lung-targeted delivery of Paclitaxel. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.; 2015; 41, pp. 640-649. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2014.891130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564799]
39. Jain, N.K.; Srivastava, R.; Naidu, V. Niclosamide loaded cationic Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for treatment of Cancer. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO); Sendai, Japan, 22–25 August 2016; pp. 245-248.
40. Rao, M.P.; Manjunath, K.; Bhagawati, S.T.; Thippeswamy, B.S. Bixin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced hepatoprotection—Preparation, characterisation and in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm.; 2014; 473, pp. 485-492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.07.027] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066077]
41. Singh, H.; Jindal, S.; Singh, M.; Sharma, G.; Kaur, I.P. Nano-formulation of rifampicin with enhanced bioavailability: Development, characterization and in-vivo safety. Int. J. Pharm.; 2015; 485, pp. 138-151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.02.050] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25769294]
42. Agrawal, S.; Ashokraj, Y.; Bharatam, P.V.; Pillai, O.; Panchagnula, R. Solid-state characterization of rifampicin samples and its biopharmaceutic relevance. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2004; 22, pp. 127-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.02.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15158898]
43. Shishoo, C.J.; Shah, S.A.; Rathod, I.S.; Savale, S.S.; Kotecha, J.S.; Shah, P.B. Stability of rifampicin in dissolution medium in presence of isoniazid. Int. J. Pharm.; 1999; 190, pp. 109-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00286-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10528103]
44. Sung, J.C.; Padilla, D.J.; Garcia-Contreras, L.; Verberkmoes, J.L.; Durbin, D.; Peloquin, C.A.; Elbert, K.J.; Hickey, A.J.; Edwards, D.A. Formulation and pharmacokinetics of self-assembled rifampicin nanoparticle systems for pulmonary delivery. Pharm. Res.; 2009; 26, pp. 1847-1855. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9894-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19407933]
45. Bachhav, S.S.; Dighe, V.D.; Kotak, D.; Devarajan, P.V. Rifampicin Lipid-Polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LIPOMER) for enhanced Peyer’s patch uptake. Int. J. Pharm.; 2017; 532, pp. 612-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.040]
46. Yuan, H.; Miao, J.; Du, Y.Z.; You, J.; Hu, F.Q.; Zeng, S. Cellular uptake of solid lipid nanoparticles and cytotoxicity of encapsulated paclitaxel in A549 cancer cells. Int. J. Pharm.; 2008; 348, pp. 137-145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.07.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17714896]
47. Yin, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, Q.; Zheng, N.; Cheng, J. Biodegradable micelles capable of mannose-mediated targeted drug delivery to cancer cells. Macromol. Rapid Commun.; 2015; 36, pp. 483-489. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/marc.201400650] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619623]
48. Pandita, D.; Ahuja, A.; Lather, V.; Dutta, T.; Velpandian, T.; Khar, R.K. Development, characterization and in vitro assessement of stearylamine-based lipid nanoparticles of paclitaxel. Die Pharm.-Int. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2011; 66, pp. 171-177.
49. Zhang, Z.; Feng, S.S. The drug encapsulation efficiency, in vitro drug release, cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded poly(lactide)-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate nanoparticles. Biomaterials; 2006; 27, pp. 4025-4033. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.006]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Wenhua Road No. 103, Shenyang 110016, China;
2 Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Wenhua Road No. 103, Shenyang 110016, China;
3 Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Wenhua Road No. 103, Shenyang 110016, China;