Introduction
Malaria transmission to mosquitoes depends on the presence of mature gametocytes in human peripheral blood that are ingested by a mosquito during blood feeding. Ingested parasites undergo several developmental transformations in a process called sporogony. After ingestion, gametocytes transform into male and female gametes that fuse to form a zygote. The zygote differentiates into a motile ookinete that penetrates the midgut epithelium to form an oocyst. Multiple rounds of mitotic replication result in the formation of sporozoites inside an oocyst. Upon oocyst rupture, sporozoites are released into the haemocoel and invade the salivary glands (Mueller et al., 2010). These sporozoites penetrate the distal portion of the two lateral and medial lobes of the glands and accumulate extracellularly inside secretory cavities before entering the salivary ducts (Wells and Andrew, 2019). Despite the large number of sporozoites in the cavities, only a small proportion pass through the proximal part of the lobes where the salivary ducts become narrow (Frischknecht et al., 2004; Bradley et al., 2018), and only tens or low hundreds of sporozoites are assumed to be inoculated per mosquito bite (Graumans et al., 2020). Developmental bottlenecks during sporogony, as well as the size of the sporozoite inoculum, remain incompletely understood (Graumans et al., 2020).
The density of gametocytes in human peripheral blood is an important determinant of human to mosquito transmission. Though infections with parasite densities below the microscopic threshold for detection can infect mosquitoes (Schneider et al., 2007; Bousema et al., 2006), the likelihood and infection intensity increase with the number of ingested gametocytes (Bradley et al., 2018). Because of the abundance of low-density gametocyte carriers among infected populations, these are considered important drivers of malaria transmission (Andolina et al., 2021; Slater et al., 2019; Ouédraogo et al., 2016). Importantly, this conclusion is based on the assumption that all infected mosquitoes are equally infectious regardless of oocyst densities.
In apparent support of this assumption, single oocyst infections can result in thousands of salivary gland sporozoites (Rosenberg and Rungsiwongse, 1991; Pringle, 1965). A positive correlation between oocyst densities and salivary gland sporozoites was previously observed in
While these studies provide some insights into sporozoite expelling and transmission dynamics, they do not reflect natural feeding conditions. Also, microscopy techniques used to quantify sporozoites may have underestimated the number of sporozoites (Medica and Sinnis, 2005). Subsequent studies with rodent
If low oocyst/low sporozoite densities in mosquitoes are unlikely to initiate infections in humans, this may have profound consequences for our understanding of transmission (WHO, 2017). If mosquitoes with low-infection burdens have limited transmission potential, then the rationale for targeting low-density infections in humans that give rise to low-infection burdens in mosquitoes (Bradley et al., 2018) may be diminished.
Here, we examined the progression of sporozoite development and the number of sporozoites expelled into artificial skin by individual
Results
Low number of
Multicopy mitochondrial COX-1 and 18S rRNA gene targets were analyzed in octuplicate on serial dilutions of sporozoites to assess qPCR performance and select the target that achieved highest sensitivity and most consistent sporozoite detection. COX-1 outperformed 18S in detecting sporozoites (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for COX-1 qPCR were determined at 20 sporozoites per sample (8/8 sample positivity with a coefficient of variation <2) (Figure 1A). Next, we confirmed the qPCR performance in combination with the matrix that was used for expelling experiments by spotting serial dilutions of sporozoites in whole-blood on Integra dermal substitute artificial skin (Agostinis et al., 2021) prior to nucleic acid extraction. The matrix had no apparent impact on sporozoite detectability and quantification (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), unlike previously used filter paper matrices (Brugman et al., 2018; Holzschuh and Koepfli, 2022).
Figure 1.
The detectability of sporozoites by molecular methods and oocysts by immunolabeling.
(A) qPCR performance for
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
qPCR performance on extracted
A serial dilution of SPZ was prepared as described in ‘Materials and methods’ and run in octuplicate to assesses the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for qPCR targeting 18S. (A) Dots represent sample cycle threshold (left y-axis) and bars the coefficient of variation (right y-axis). For each serial dilution, Ct sample positivity is shown as the percentage of the total number of replicates analyzed. The LOD was set at 100% sample positivity, which was 50 SPZ per sample. The LOQ was set at 100% sample positivity, with a coefficient of variation (COV) <2. For 18S, this was 1000 SPZ per sample (COV 0.71%). (B) Next to test if Integra bovine collagen artificial skin would be suitable as a mosquito feeding membrane to collect expelled SPZ we first tested DNA extraction and quantification from this material. Serial dilutions of SPZ were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and human blood. To compare DNA extraction efficiency, three conditions were tested in duplicate and compared by COX-1 qPCR; SPZ diluted in PBS, SPZ diluted in whole-blood, and SPZ diluted in whole-blood spotted on artificial skin. The amount of SPZ in the sample (x-axis, log 10) plotted against the qPCR Ct value (y-axis) for tested conditions. (C) The amount of SPZ in sample and mean Ct of the three assessed conditions. SPZ serial dilutions in PBS and human blood showed comparable Ct values. SPZ in blood spotted on artificial skin showed slightly lower Ct values, indicating that SPZ can be efficiently extracted from skin without loss of signal. Detection was possible down to approximately five SPZ.
A comparative analysis of oocyst densities using mercurochrome staining and immunostaining
Subsequently, mosquito feeding assays were performed by offering diluted in vitro cultured gametocytes to mosquitoes to obtain a broad range of oocyst densities. The association between log10 oocyst intensity and infection prevalence in mosquitoes was assessed using a logistic regression model (using data from 457 mosquitoes, Figure 1B). Mosquito infection prevalence was strongly associated with oocyst intensity, corroborating earlier work (Churcher et al., 2012), with a strong positive sigmoidal association and a 14.68 (95% CI, 8.18–26.35, p<0.0001) times higher odds of infection prevalence associated with a tenfold higher oocyst density. In this analysis, oocysts were enumerated microscopically following standard mercurochrome staining. We previously used 3SP2-Alexa 488 anti-circumsporozoite (CSP) immunostaining to visualize ruptured and intact oocysts (Stone et al., 2013). The concordance between oocyst prevalence by standard oocyst mercurochrome staining (day 8 post infection [PI]) and anti-CSP immunostaining on day 18 PI (Figure 1C) was investigated. For this, oocyst density distributions by both methods were compared within batches of mosquitoes that were fed on cultured gametocytes during the same standard membrane feeding assay (Figure 1D). We observed no statistically significant difference in oocyst densities determined by day 8 mercurochrome staining (median five oocysts, interquartile range [IQR], 2–20, N = 252) and day 18 immunolabeling (median six oocysts, IQR, 2–14, N = 167; Student’s
Highly infected mosquitoes become salivary gland sporozoite positive earlier
Following assay validation, the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) was compared between mosquitoes with low and high oocyst densities. Batches of high- and low-infected mosquitoes were generated using standard membrane feeding assay with standard concentrations of cultured gametocytes or culture material that was five- or tenfold diluted (Figure 1B). On day 8 PI, 20 mosquitoes were dissected and batches that had ≥70% oocyst infection prevalence and means of ≤5 or >20 oocysts were selected for subsequent dissections (Figure 1B). On days 9–11, salivary glands and the remaining mosquito body (that included the mosquito midgut) were collected separately and analyzed for sporozoite density by COX-1 qPCR. Mosquitoes were then binned into four categories of sporozoite infection intensity, defined as the sum of mosquito body and salivary gland sporozoite density (Figure 2A). This total sporozoite density was examined in relation with the likelihood of being salivary gland sporozoite positive and thus having completed sporogonic development.
Figure 2.
Extrinsic incubation period in high- versus low-infected mosquitoes.
(A) Total sporozoites (SPZ) per mosquito in body plus salivary glands (x-axis) were binned by infection load <1k; 1k–10k; 10k–50k; >50k and plotted against the proportion of mosquitoes (%) that were SPZ positive (y-axis) as estimated from an additive logistic regression model with factors day and SPZ categories. In total, 120, 120, and 40 mosquitoes were dissected on days 9 (blue), 10 (dark green), and 11 (light green), respectively. Error bars show the 95% confidence intervals. (B) Violin plots of SPZ density in single oocysts dissected on days 9 (purple) and 10 (green). The box indicates the interquartile range (IQR) (Q1 and Q3 quartiles) and the median. Lines extending Q1 and Q3 quartiles indicate the range of the data within 1.5× IQR.
On day 9 PI, 54.3% of highly infected mosquitoes (>50,000 sporozoites) were salivary glands sporozoite positive (Figure 2A) and had 3.17 (95% CI 95%, 0.7–14.4, p=0.4278) times the odds of being salivary gland positive compared to low-infected mosquitoes with <1000 sporozoites (27.3% salivary gland sporozoite positive). By day 10 PI, 82.2% of mosquitoes with 10,000–50,000 (10k–50k) sporozoites were salivary glands positive and had 11.56 (95% CI, 1.83, 73.25, p=0.0449) times the odds of being salivary glands positive compared to low-infected mosquitoes with <1000 sporozoites (28.6% salivary glands sporozoite positive). On day 11 PI, all 15 highly infected mosquitoes (>50,000 sporozoites) were salivary glands sporozoite positive and meaningful odds ratios and 95% CIs could not be determined. When considering the entire period over which EIP experiments were conducted, mosquitoes with >50,000 sporozoites had a 13.44 times higher odds of being salivary glands positive compared to low-infected mosquitoes (<1000 sporozoites; 95% CI, 4.02–44.88, p<0.0001). Mosquitoes harboring 10,000–50,000 sporozoites had a 5.98 times higher odds of being salivary glands positive compared to low-infected mosquitoes (95% CI, 1.88–19.07, p=0.0119). These data demonstrate that EIP is shorter in high-infected compared to low-infected mosquitoes in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment.
Sporozoite densities increase with oocyst age
To quantify the number of sporozoites per oocyst, individual oocysts were isolated from midguts on days 9 and 10 PI (Soontarawirat et al., 2017) and stained with 1% mercurochrome. The median sporozoite density was 10,485 (IQR, 9171.3–12,322.5; 12 examined mosquitoes) per oocyst for day 9 and 15,390 (IQR, 10,600–20,887, 19 examined mosquitoes) for day 10 (Figure 2B, p=0.04995, by Welch’s two-sample
Oocyst density, salivary gland density, and the size of the sporozoite inoculum are positively associated in mosquitoes infected with cultured gametocytes
We performed artificial skin feeding experiments with individual mosquitoes on day 15 PI to assess sporozoite expelling. To avoid interference of residual blood with oocyst immunolabeling, we assessed mosquito oocyst density (ruptured and intact oocysts) and sporozoite density in the salivary glands on day 18, allowing 3 d for bloodmeal digestion. This approach allowed us to determine the density of intact and ruptured oocysts and associate this to sporozoite density in the same mosquito. It was noted that a minority of oocysts failed to rupture during this time span; 5% (93/1854) of all oocysts were visually intact and 88.3% (166/188) of examined mosquitoes had at least one unruptured oocyst on day 18. While we observed good concordance between oocyst densities by mercurochrome staining on day 8 and immunostaining on day 18 PI (Figure 1D), oocysts sporadically did not take up the 3SP2-Alexa 488 anti-CSP antibody labeling. In 54% (12/22) of mosquitoes without evidence of ruptured oocysts, we observed salivary gland sporozoites. Nevertheless, there was a strong positive association observed between ruptured oocysts and salivary gland sporozoite load (ρ = 0.80, p<0.0001; N = 185) (Figure 3B). When intact oocysts were also included, this association was nearly identical (ρ = 0.80, p<0.0001; N = 185). We estimated a median of 4951 (IQR, 3016–8318) salivary gland sporozoites per ruptured oocyst in
Figure 3.
Sporozoite expelling in relation to infection burden in
(A) Binning of mosquitoes by total sporozoite load and expelling prevalence (N = 186). (B) The number of ruptured oocysts stained by 3SP2-Alexa 488 anti-CSP and fluorescent microscopy (x-axis) in relation to total salivary gland sporozoite density (y-axis), assessed by COX-1 qPCR; ρ = 0.80 (CI, 0.74–0.85, p<0.0001). The red dot indicates a mosquito which had 9 ruptured oocysts but only 126 residual salivary glands sporozoites while it expelled 1567 sporozoites. Considering the high number of ruptured oocysts in the midgut, it is possible that some lobes of salivary glands were missed during dissection and sporozoite load was underestimated by qPCR. (C) Total sporozoite density (residual salivary gland sporozoites + sporozoites expelled, x-axis) in relation to the number of expelled sporozoites (y-axis) by COX-1 qPCR ρ = 0.35 (CI, 0.17–0.50, p=0.0002). The dotted line on the x-axis shows the threshold of qPCR detection of 20 sporozoites. The line represents the fitted linear regression line, the intercept is forced to zero for biological plausibility, and the gray shaded area is the 95% CI.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
Sporozoite expelling in relation to infection burden.
Total sporozoite density (residual salivary gland sporozoites + sporozoites expelled, x-axis) in relation to the number of expelled sporozoites (y-axis) by COX-1 qPCR (ρ = 0.016, 95% CI, –0.12 to 0.16, p=0.8321). This figure includes 26 observations from mosquitoes that did not expel any sporozoites; these observations were excluded from the main text. The line represents the fitted linear regression line, the intercept is forced to zero for biological plausibility, and the shaded area is the 95% CI.
Among all mosquitoes used in skin feeding experiments, 53% (116/216) expelled sporozoites at any density, and 45% (97/216) expelled sporozoites above our threshold for reliable detection and quantification of 20 sporozoites/skin. In line with previous work with rodent malaria species
We observed no statistically significant association between salivary gland infection intensity and the prevalence of expelling sporozoites (Figure 3A; 95% CI, 0.74–0.85; p=0.1880). Among mosquitoes that expelled sporozoites, the medians of expelled and residual salivary gland sporozoites were 136 (IQR, 34–501) and 23,947 (IQR, 9127–78,380), respectively, while the highest number of sporozoites detected in skin was 4166. We observed a weak but statistically significant positive association between total sporozoite load and the number of expelled sporozoites (ρ = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.17–0.50; p=0.0002; N = 112; Figure 3C). When examining this association for different ranges of total sporozoite load (<10,000; <50,000; <100,000 sporozoites), correlation estimates remained highly similar although this correlation lost statistical significance when only including low total sporozoite loads <10,000 sporozoites (ρ = 0.29; 95% CI, –0.07 to 0.58, p=0.1094) (Figure 3—source data 1). When we included 26 observations from mosquitoes that did not expel any sporozoites, we observed no statistically significant association between total sporozoite load and the number of expelled sporozoites (ρ = 0.016, 95% CI, –0.12 to 0.16; p=0.8321).
We observed no evidence for a sharp increase in sporozoite expelling at sporozoite densities ≥10,000, as was previously described in rodent malaria models Aleshnick et al., 2020; 28% (53/186) of our mosquitoes harbored sporozoites below this density. Among these low-infected mosquitoes, 64% (34/53) expelled sporozoites and the median number of expelled sporozoites was 67 (IQR, 13–128).
Infected mosquitoes in Burkina Faso show comparable correlations between oocyst density, salivary gland density, and sporozoite inoculum
Seven gametocyte donors (age 5–15 y; median 48 gametocytes/µl [range 40–167]) were recruited in Balonghin, Burkina Faso. Their blood was offered to locally reared
Figure 4.
Sporozoite expelling in relation to infection load in
(A) Direct feeding (blue) vs magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS; green). Bars show the infection prevalence for each of the seven gametocyte carriers. Scatter plots with median lines show the midgut oocyst density as a result of direct feeding (blue) and MACS (green). (B) Binning of total sporozoite load and expelling prevalence (N = 25). (C) Scatter plot of absolute numbers of ruptured oocyst (sheet) density assessed by fluorescent microscopy vs total salivary gland sporozoite density assessed by COX-I qPCR; ρ = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95). The line represents the fitted linear regression line and the gray shaded area is the 95% CI. (D) Scatter plot of absolute numbers of total sporozoite density (residual salivary gland sporozoites + sporozoites expelled) and sporozoites expelled into the artificial skin assessed by COX-I qPCR; ρ = 0.70 (CI, 0.52–0.82). The line represents the fitted linear regression line, the intercept is forced to zero for biological plausibility, and the gray shaded area is the 95% CI.
Figure 5.
Clonal complexity of
Clonal data for three donors: 01646 IR (top row), 01661 NJ (middle row), and 011690 CC (bottom row). Left panel shows scatter plots for the association between sporozoite salivary gland load and expelled sporozoites in skin, with a Spearman’s rank correlation across samples from each donor. Right panel shows clonal data for each donor sample in a heatmap plot. The colored numbers on y-axes correspond to the color of the sample in the scatter plot. Purple indicates the presence of a clone in the salivary gland only, turquoise indicates the presence of a clone in the skin only, and green indicates the presence of a clone in both salivary gland and skin.
During the artificial skin feeding, 30% (16/53) of probing mosquitoes did not ingest blood, of which 68% (11/16) expelled sporozoites (range 1–11,970). There appeared to be a trend toward higher prevalence of expelling with increasing sporozoite density (Figure 4B). There was a strong association between ruptured oocyst density and total salivary gland sporozoite density (ρ = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.80–0.95; p<0.0001) (Figure 4C); when intact oocysts were also included, the association was very similar (ρ = 0.86, p<0.0001; N = 30). When examining these associations for different ranges of oocyst intensity (<5, <10, <20 oocysts), correlation estimates remained highly similar and statistical significance was retained (Figure 4—source data 1). There was also a strong positive association between total sporozoite load and the number of sporozoites expelled (ρ = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.52–0.82; p<0.0001) (Figure 4D). When examining this association between total sporozoite load and expelling for different ranges of total sporozoite load (<10,000, <50,000, <100,000 sporozoites), correlation estimates remained similar and statistically significant (Figure 4—source data 1).
Discussion
We examined
The proportion of infectious mosquitoes is a central component of malariometric indices both in terms of quantifying the force of infection and the human infectious reservoir. The entomological inoculation rate (EIR) is defined as the number of infectious bites per person per time unit and is the product of human biting rate and the proportion of sporozoite-positive mosquitoes (Tusting et al., 2014; Shaukat et al., 2010). While EIR is a common measure of human malaria exposure, mosquito infection prevalence is used in this calculation and thus assumes all sporozoite-positive mosquitoes are equally infectious (Smith et al., 2012). Similarly, assessments of the human infectious reservoir for malaria typically take the number of oocyst-positive mosquitoes as a measure of transmission (Ouédraogo et al., 2016; Gonçalves et al., 2017) and thereby not only assume that all oocysts will lead to salivary gland sporozoites but also that all oocyst-positive mosquitoes have equal transmission potential. Recent work with a rodent malaria model challenged this central assumption (Aleshnick et al., 2020); we provide the first direct evidence for
In this study, we assessed sporozoite expelling by mosquitoes carrying low- and high-infection burdens. Our findings confirm that the vast majority (~95%) of oocysts rupture to release sporozoites. This estimate is higher than a previous study with cultured gametocytes (~72%) (Stone et al., 2013) that did not provide a second bloodmeal that may accelerate oocyst maturation (Shaw et al., 2020); a second bloodmeal also better mimics natural feeding habits where multiple bloodmeals are taken within the period required for sporogony. Moreover, we observed a strong positive association between sporozoite salivary gland load and ruptured oocyst density in mosquitoes infected with both cultured and naturally circulating gametocytes, with similar median numbers of 4951 (IQR, 3016–8318) and 6350 (IQR, 4225–8475) salivary gland sporozoites per ruptured oocyst in
Importantly, we observed a positive association between salivary gland sporozoite density and the number of expelled sporozoites. For unknown reasons, this association was markedly stronger in experiments where
Our study leaves a number of questions and has several limitations. While the use of two mosquito and gametocyte sources was a relevant strength of our study, an uncertainty relates to the choice of artificial skin that has a realistic 1.33 mm thickness but is arguably less natural than microvascularized skin with all the natural cues for mosquito probing. Whilst genuine skin might have improved natural feeding behavior, probing and blood feeding were highly efficient in our model and we see no reasons to assume bias in the comparison between high- and low-infected mosquitoes. Our assessments of EIP and sporozoite expelling did not demonstrate the viability of sporozoites. Whilst the infectivity of sporozoites at different time points PI has been examined previously (Yang et al., 2017), these experiments have never been conducted with individual mosquitoes. In vitro experiments that aim to determine the infectivity of single mosquito bites would ideally retain the skin barrier that may be a relevant determinant for invasion capacity and use primary hepatocytes. These experiments were beyond the scope of the current work and would also not provide conclusive evidence on the likelihood of achieving secondary infections. Given striking differences in sporozoite burden between different
In conclusion, we observed that the majority of oocysts rupture and contribute to salivary gland infection load. We further observe that this sporozoite load is highly variable and an important determinant of the number of sporozoites that is expelled into the skin upon probing.
Materials and methods
Mosquito feeding on gametocyte carriers who were naturally infected with
Then, 700 µl of whole blood was used for immediate feeding, which was performed as described elsewhere, using 3- to 5-day-old
Mosquito husbandry and oocyst detection by mercurochrome staining
In both insectaries, at Radboudumc (the Netherlands) and CNRFP (Burkina Faso), following membrane feeding, unfed mosquitoes were immediately removed from cups with an aspirator. On days 4–6 PI, mosquitoes were given a second bloodmeal to synchronize oocyst development. Mosquitoes were kept at 27–29°C in the insectaries on 5–10% glucose and dissected for 7–8 d to assess infection prevalence. Twenty mosquito midguts were stained with 1% mercurochrome and oocysts were examined and confirmed by two independent microscopists at ×400 under an optic microscope (CX 40 Olympus). If oocyst prevalence was above 40%, the infected mosquitoes were transferred to the bio-secure insectary in Nijmegen, whilst in Ouagadougou cups with infected mosquitoes were placed into secured metal cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) and kept in a temperature- and relative humidity-controlled environment (27–29°C and 70–80% HR) with double-screened doors to prevent sporozoite-positive mosquitoes from escaping.
Extrinsic incubation period
The EIP, defined as the duration of sporogony, was estimated in
Sporozoite-expelling experiments
On 15 and 16 d post feeding, at Radboudumc and CNRFP respectively, infected mosquitoes were used to quantify the number of expelled sporozoites. To prevent contamination, all instruments and equipment were cleaned from nucleic acids by 30 min exposure to sodium hypochlorite (10% in H2O), rinsed with water, and paper-dried on the day before the experiment. New gloves were used each time the experiments were performed. Integra dermal substitute (Dermal Regeneration Template, single layer 20 × 25 cm, ref 68101), hereafter referred to as artificial skin, was cut into 3.5 cm squares (Figure 6). Squares were transferred to Petri dishes filled with sterile nuclease-free water (VWR, E476) and left overnight at room temperature (RT). Mosquitoes were individually collected in small Perspex cages (5 × 5 × 7 cm, covered with netting material on the top and bottom sides). Mosquitoes were starved 14–16 hr prior to feeding. On the day of the expelling experiment, artificial skin was transferred with gloves to an inverted positioned glass membrane mini-feeder (convex bottom, 15 mm diameter, ref 70172000) connected to a heated circulating water bath (CORIO C-B5, Julabo) set to 39°C. A rubber band was wrapped around the feeder to secure the artificial skin. Paper tissue was gently pressed on the skin four times to absorb water. Then, 100 µl of naïve donor blood (EDTA, BD Vacutainers, ref 367525) was pipetted on the circular artificial skin area and spread evenly across the surface with the horizontal side of the tip. The feeder was then turned around and placed on top of the cage, without touching the netting, with a maximum of 8 min for mosquito probing. Following mosquito probing, a scalpel (Dalhausen präzisa plus, no. 11) was used to cut the artificial skin above the rubber band around the entire feeder. The artificial skin was transferred with tweezers to a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube containing 180 µl oocyst lysis buffer, and stored at –20°C. After feeding, mosquitoes were transferred to metal cages. Mosquitoes were kept at 27–29°C in the insectaries on 5% glucose.
Figure 6.
Artificial skin feeding procedure.
(A) Petri dish filled with sterile nuclease-free water, containing the artificial skin. (B) Skin folded around a mini-feeder and supplemented with 100 µl of human blood. (C) Feeding setup with adjustable table and a small Perspex cage containing a single mosquito underneath. (D) A blood-feeding mosquito on artificial skin.
Immunolabeling of intact and ruptured oocysts
Mosquitoes were allowed to digest blood for 3 d to prevent interference with immunolabeling; mosquito salivary glands and midguts were dissected on day 18 PI for
Sample extraction, sporozoite quantification by qPCR, and amplicon deep sequencing
Serial dilutions of
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed in R, version 3.1.12 (Team RC, 2019). Associations between log10 oocyst intensity and infection prevalence were modeled using a logistic regression model (using N = 457, Figure 1B). The difference in mean log10 oocyst densities between staining types was compared using a
Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between oocyst sheets and salivary gland sporozoite load (one outlier not included) (ρ = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.74–0.85; p<0.0001; N = 111, Figure 3B); the association between total sporozoite density and the number of sporozoites that was expelled into the artificial skin (ρ = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.17–0.50; p=0.0002; N = 112, Figure 3C) (one outlier not included); the associations between ruptured oocyst density and total sporozoite load, and between total sporozoite load and skin expelling (ρ = 0.9, 95% CI, 0.80–0.95; p<0.0001; N = 25, Figure 4C) and (ρ = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.52–0.82; p<0.0003; N = 25, Figure 4D).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023, Andolina, Graumans et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
It is currently unknown whether all
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer