It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
All-solid-state batteries using Si as the anode have shown promising performance without continual solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) growth. However, the first cycle irreversible capacity loss yields low initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) of Si, limiting the energy density. To address this, we adopt a prelithiation strategy to increase ICE and conductivity of all-solid-state Si cells. A significant increase in ICE is observed for Li1Si anode paired with a lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) cathode. Additionally, a comparison with lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NCM) reveals that performance improvements with Si prelithiation is only applicable for full cells dominated by high anode irreversibility. With this prelithiation strategy, 15% improvement in capacity retention is achieved after 1000 cycles compared to a pure Si. With Li1Si, a high areal capacity of up to 10 mAh cm–2 is attained using a dry-processed LCO cathode film, suggesting that the prelithiation method may be suitable for high-loading next-generation all-solid-state batteries.
All-solid-state batteries with silicon anodes have high capacities but low initial coulombic efficiencies (ICEs) because of first cycle irreversible capacity loss. Here, the authors report a prelithiation strategy to improve ICEs and reversibility.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 University of California San Diego, Materials Science and Engineering Program, La Jolla, CA, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
2 University of California, Materials Department and Materials Research Laboratory, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676)
3 and Research (A*STAR), Insitute of Materials, Research, and Engineering, Agency of Science, Technology, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.185448.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 0221)
4 LG Science Park, LG Energy Solution. Ltd., Gangseo-gu, Korea (GRID:grid.185448.4)
5 University of California San Diego, Department of NanoEngineering, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
6 University of California San Diego, Department of NanoEngineering, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242); Sogang University, Department of Chemistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.263736.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0286 5954)
7 University of California San Diego, Department of NanoEngineering, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242); University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)