It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) is an essential cellular process activated by the accumulation of unfolded proteins within the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER), a condition referred to as ER stress. Three ER anchored receptors, IRE1, PERK and ATF6 act as ER stress sensors monitoring the health of the ER. Upon detection of ER stress, IRE1, PERK and ATF6 initiate downstream signaling pathways collectively referred to as the UPR. The overarching aim of the UPR is to restore ER homeostasis by reducing ER stress, however if that is not possible, the UPR transitions from a pro-survival to a pro-death response. While our understanding of the key signaling pathways central to the UPR is well defined, the same is not true of the subtle signaling events that help fine tune the UPR, supporting its ability to adapt to varying amplitudes or durations of ER stress. In this study, we demonstrate cross talk between the IRE1 and PERK branches of the UPR, wherein IRE1 via XBP1s signaling helps to sustain PERK expression during prolonged ER stress. Our findings suggest cross talk between UPR branches aids adaptiveness thereby helping to support the plasticity of UPR signaling responses.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Manitoba, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609)
2 University of Galway, Apoptosis Research Centre, Galway, Ireland (GRID:grid.6142.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0488 0789); University of Galway, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Galway, Ireland (GRID:grid.6142.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0488 0789)
3 Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University of Manitoba, Department of Paediatrics, Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609)
4 University of Manitoba, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609); CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.419404.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0701 0170); Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.460198.2)