Droit innu d'appartenance a la terre et droit de propriete: Deux modes de penser l'univers et l'existence

Abstract

Le choix et le traitement de la problematique se de finissent comme suit:

I. Conception innue du territoire. Analyse du discours innu sur le territoire afin de voir comment le peuple innu du Quebec concoit pour lui-meme sa relation a la terre et le titre qu'il dit detenir sur le territoire; examen du mode d'organisation sociale et juridique des Innus, y compris le nouveau projet de societe mis en avant par un peuple pret a s'inventer une nouvelle forme de modernite.

II. Droit de propriete et pluralisme juridique. Exploration du pluralisme juridique au moyen de l'etude de l'origine et de l'evolution de la propriete, concept au coeur de la tradition juridique occidentale, de l'epoque feodale a nos jours; reflexions sur le rapport entre le droit innu d'appartenance a la terri et le droit de propriete, entre autres, au moyen de l'analyse des dichotomies societe moderne-societe traditionnelle/droit ecrit-droit oral; reflexions sur la question du piege des mots et sur la necessite d'entamer un dialogue interculturel menant a une reforme du droit canadien et quebecois dans le domaine foncier.

III. Methodologie. Recours principalement a l'anthropologie juridique et a l'histoire du droit. Examen du discours innu sur le territoire et des travaux d'anthropologues quebecois s'y rapportant; utilisation de travaux d'anthropologues francais et d'historiens du droit afin d'etudier le rapport droit innu-droit civil dans un contexte qui tienne compte des categories et des logiques propres a deux traditions juridiques s'inscrivant dans des univers historiques et culturels distincts. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Alternate abstract:

You are viewing a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer

Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer

The choice and treatment of the problem end as follows:

I. Innu conception of the territory. Analysis of the Innu discourse on the territory in order to see how the Innu people of Quebec conceive for themselves their relationship to the land and the title they say they hold on the territory; examination of the mode of social and legal organization of the Innu, including the new social project put forward by a people ready to invent a new form of modernity.

II. Property rights and legal pluralism. Exploration of legal pluralism through the study of the origin and evolution of property, a concept at the heart of Western legal tradition, from feudal times to the present day; reflections on the relationship between the Innu right to belong to the land and the right to property, among other things, through the analysis of the dichotomies modern society-traditional society/written law-oral law; reflections on the question of the trap of words and on the need to initiate an intercultural dialogue leading to a reform of Canadian and Quebec law in the field of land.

III. Methodology. Recourse mainly to legal anthropology and the history of law. Examination of the Innu discourse on the territory and the work of Quebec anthropologists relating thereto; use of the work of French anthropologists and legal historians to study the relationship between Innu law and civil law in a context that takes into account the categories and logics specific to two legal traditions that are part of distinct historical and cultural universes . (Abstract shortened by UMI.)