Content area
Abstract
Bohmian ontology includes particles and a wavefield. I explore how these objects give rise to the world we experience, which properties these fundamental objects have, and what kind of property is spin. Also, I present an example of how our choices about property attribution affect our evaluation of the nonlocality in the system.
According to the traditional presentation of Bohm's interpretation, a Bohmian world is "classical" in the sense that pointer states, mental states, etc., are composed of or supervene on particle properties alone. However, I show that this approach does not make sense and argue that a Bohmian account of these states must include both particle properties and wavefield properties. I then clarify the role this plays in a systematic account of Bohmian probability. Also, my discussion shows that Vink's interpretation does not give us the world we experience.
I then focus on particle and wavefield properties. I start by evaluating the recent arguments given by Brown et. al. that Bohmian particles do not bear properties such as gravitational mass, charge, etc. I reject their arguments but agree that (with the exception of inertial mass) we should not attribute these properties to Bohmian particles. I continue by examining the confusions underlying Cushing's (1995) proposal that a tunneling time measurement might be able to falsify Bohm's interpretation but neither verify or falsify the Copenhagen interpretation. The recognition that tunneling time is both a wavefield property and a particle property clarifies many of the issues. Next, I explain how Bohm's interpretation models spin measurements, the ways in which spin is contextual, and how Bohmian spin relates to the Kochen-Specker theorem. I also provide several reasons why we should not attribute spin vectors to Bohmian particles.
Finally, I use the framework of the Bell Inequalities to discuss a system in which the properties we decide to attribute, and the time at which we evaluate the system, affect the way in which the system evolves nonlocally.