Content area
Abstract
Future forestry management requires a balance between the needs of the environment, the economy, and the interests of both First Nations and non-native groups. One way to approach this situation is to look at the differences between the Aboriginal and dominant Euro-Canadian constructions of forestry and natural resources, and to determine the perceived needs represented by each group. Through the use of participant observation and interviews in First Nations communities, this thesis examines the holistic traditional Aboriginal fields of nature and the environment. In contrast, the dominant Euro-Canadian field of forestry is examined in terms of an economically-based instrumental rationality. The comparison of these constructs reveals several areas of conflict and misunderstanding. Possible alternatives for an Aboriginal forestry within the province of New Brunswick are suggested.
