It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Electrochemical hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production (EHPP) via a two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e- ORR) provides a promising alternative to replace the energy-intensive anthraquinone process. M-N-C electrocatalysts, which consist of atomically dispersed transition metals and nitrogen-doped carbon, have demonstrated considerable EHPP efficiency. However, their full potential, particularly regarding the correlation between structural configurations and performances in neutral media, remains underexplored. Herein, a series of ultralow metal-loading M-N-C electrocatalysts are synthesized and investigated for the EHPP process in the neutral electrolyte. CoNCB material with the asymmetric Co-C/N/O configuration exhibits the highest EHPP activity and selectivity among various as-prepared M-N-C electrocatalyst, with an outstanding mass activity (6.1 × 105 A gCo−1 at 0.5 V vs. RHE), and a high practical H2O2 production rate (4.72 mol gcatalyst−1 h−1 cm−2). Compared with the popularly recognized square-planar symmetric Co-N4 configuration, the superiority of asymmetric Co-C/N/O configurations is elucidated by X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy analysis and computational studies.
The relationship between the structural configurations of M-N-C electrocatalysts and their performances in neutral environments has been insufficiently investigated. Here the authors demonstrate that an ultralow metal-loaded Co-N-C electrocatalyst, featuring the asymmetric Co-C/N/O configuration, exhibit exceptional efficiency in electrochemically producing hydrogen peroxide under neutral conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details












1 University College London, Christopher Ingold Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)
2 Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Department of Inorganic Spectroscopy, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany (GRID:grid.419576.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 861X)
3 Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Electron Physical Science Imaging Centre, Diamond Light Source, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.18785.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 0696)
4 Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Electron Physical Science Imaging Centre, Diamond Light Source, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.18785.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 0696); University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
5 University College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)
6 Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.18785.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 0696)
7 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Catalysis Hub, Research Complex at Harwell, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.76978.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2296 6998)