Abstract

Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and femicide (intimate partner femicide, IPF), as a worldwide phenomenon, cannot be explained in a simple way. From an ecological point of view, there are individual factors contemplated. In the current studies, we consider personality as an individual factor to clarify what differentiates a non-lethal IPVAW situation from a femicide. Study 1 was designed to investigate the accuracy with which trained interviewers judged the personality of a group of IPVAW perpetrators during an interview. The target sample of study 1 was composed of 293 males who after being interviewed completed a measure of personality assessing the “Big Three” model of personality. The interviewers performed fairly accurate judgements about the personality of the target participants. Study 2 shows the differences in personality, using Eysenck’s personality model, between the IPF and IPVAW perpetrators and their victims. The total sample study 2 was formed of 551 participants distributed among IPF perpetrators, IPVAW perpetrators, and the victims of both groups. Differences in proportions were observed between both groups of perpetrators as well as between each group and their respective victims. With these findings, we propose personality as a femicide risk factor that should be taken into consideration by police officers and other practitioners when receiving an IPVAW report.

Details

Title
Personality Comparison between Lethal and Non-lethal Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators and Their Victims
Author
Pineda, David 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Galán, Manuel 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Martínez-Martínez, Ana 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Andrés-Prades, Pablo J. 3 ; García-Barceló, Nestor 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Carbonell, Enrique J. 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; González-Álvarez, José L. 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Avda. de La Universidad, Forensic Psychology Unit, S/N. Edf. AltamiraElche, Spain (GRID:grid.26811.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0586 4893) 
 Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Avda. de La Universidad, Forensic Psychology Unit, S/N. Edf. AltamiraElche, Spain (GRID:grid.26811.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0586 4893); Catholic University of Murcia, Psychology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Murcia, Spain (GRID:grid.10586.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 8496) 
 Institute for Forensic and Security Sciences (ICFS) of the Autonomous University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria Cantoblanco, C/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.5515.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1957 8126) 
 University Research Institute of Criminology and Criminal Science, School of Law, University of Valencia, Central Departmental Building/Office 1P03, Valencia, Spain (GRID:grid.5338.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 938X) 
 Secretaría de Estado de Seguridad, Dirección General de Coordinación y Estudios, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.5338.d) 
Pages
567-577
Publication year
2024
Publication date
May 2024
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
13894986
e-ISSN
15736695
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3058353746
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.