It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Italy implemented two-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) regionally from 2003 to 2013 and nationally from 2017 onwards. Our objective was to analyze regional disparities in varicella outcomes resulting from disparities in vaccine coverage rates (VCRs) projected over a 50-year time-horizon (2020–2070). A previously published dynamic transmission model was updated to quantify the potential public health impact of the UVV program in Italy at the national and regional levels. Four 2-dose vaccine strategies utilizing monovalent (V) and quadrivalent (MMRV) vaccines were evaluated for each region: (A) MMRV-MSD/MMRV-MSD, (B) MMRV-GSK/MMRV-GSK, (C) V-MSD/MMRV-MSD, and (D) V-GSK/MMRV-GSK. Costs were reported in 2022 Euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted 3% annually. Under strategy A, the three regions with the lowest first-dose VCR reported increased varicella cases (+ 34.3%), hospitalizations (+ 20.0%), QALYs lost (+ 5.9%), payer costs (+ 22.2%), and societal costs (+ 14.6%) over the 50-year time-horizon compared to the three regions with highest first-dose VCR. Regions with low first-dose VCR were more sensitive to changes in VCR than high first-dose VCR regions. Results with respect to second-dose VCR were qualitatively similar, although smaller in magnitude. Results were similar across all vaccine strategies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Merck Canada Inc, Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences (BARDS) Health Economic and Decision Sciences (HEDS), Kirkland, Canada (GRID:grid.488353.1)
2 Merck & Co., Inc., Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Rahway, USA (GRID:grid.417993.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2260 0793)
3 CHEORS, North Wales, USA (GRID:grid.417993.1)
4 MSD Italy, Market Access, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.419499.8)
5 MSD Italy, Medical Affairs, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.419499.8)
6 LHU Reggio Calabria, Calabria, Italy (GRID:grid.419499.8)
7 University of Florence, and Meyer Children’s University Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Florence, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2304)
8 University of Padua, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences, Hygiene and Public Health Unit, and Public Health, Padua, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470)