It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Assessing failure pressure is critical in determining pipeline integrity. Current research primarily concerns the buckling performance of pressurized pipelines subjected to a bending load or axial compression force, with some also looking at the failure pressure of corroded pipelines. However, there is currently a lack of limit state models for pressurized pipelines with bending moments and axial forces. In this study, based on the unified yield criterion, we propose a limit state equation for steel pipes under various loads. The most common operating loads on buried pipelines are bending moment, internal pressure, and axial force. The proposed limit state equation for intact pipelines is based on a three-dimensional pipeline stress model with complex load coupling. Using failure data, we investigate the applicability of various yield criteria in assessing the failure pressure of pipelines with complex loads. We show that the evaluation model can be effectively used as a theoretical solution for assessing the failure pressure in such circumstances and for selecting appropriate yield criteria based on load condition differences.
Assessing failure pressure is critical in determining pipeline integrity. In this study, based on the unified yield criterion, authors propose a limit state equation for steel pipes under various loads which can be converted into a series of failure pressure evaluation models for pipeline with different yield criteria.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Fang, Hong-yuan 1 ; Wang, Nian-nian 1 ; Du, Xue-ming 1 ; Zhao, Hai-sheng 2 ; Zhai, Ke-Jie 1 1 Zhengzhou University, School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou, China (GRID:grid.207374.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2189 3846); National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Major Infrastructure Testing and Rehabilitation Technology, Zhengzhou, China (GRID:grid.207374.5); Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Conservancy and Transportation Infrastructure Safety, Zhengzhou, China (GRID:grid.207374.5)
2 Dalian University of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian, China (GRID:grid.30055.33) (ISNI:0000 0000 9247 7930); Dalian University of Technology, School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian, China (GRID:grid.30055.33) (ISNI:0000 0000 9247 7930)




