It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Auxetic materials have a negative Poisson’s ratio and are of significant interest in applications that include impact mitigation, membrane separations and biomedical engineering. While there are numerous examples of structured materials that exhibit auxetic behavior, the examples of engineered auxetic structures is largely limited to periodic lattice structures that are limited to directional or anisotropic auxetic response. Structures that exhibit a three-dimensionally isotropic auxetic response have been, unfortunately, slow to evolve. Here we introduce an inverse design algorithm based on global node optimization to design three-dimensional auxetic metamaterial structures from disordered networks. After specifying the target Poisson’s ratio for a structure, an inverse design algorithm is used to adjust the positions of all nodes in a disordered network structure until the desired mechanical response is achieved. The proposed algorithm allows independent control of shear and bulk moduli, while preserving the density and connectivity of the networks. When the angle bending stiffness in the network is kept low, it is possible to realize optimized structures with a Poisson’s ratios as low as −0.6. During the optimization, the bulk modulus of these networks decreases by almost two orders of magnitude, but the shear modulus remains largely unaltered. The materials designed in this manner are fabricated by dual-material 3D-printing, and are found to exhibit the mechanical responses that were originally encoded in the computational design engine. The approach proposed here provides a materials-by-design platform that could be extended for engineering of optical, acoustic, and electrical properties, beyond the design of auxetic metamaterials.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822); California State University, Fullerton, Department of Physics, Fullerton, USA (GRID:grid.253559.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8158)
2 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Science and Engineering Division, Gaithersburg, USA (GRID:grid.94225.38) (ISNI:000000012158463X)
3 The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
4 The University of Chicago, Department of Physics, The James Franck and Enrico Fermi Institutes,, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)