Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model to Study Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is a nematode present worldwide. The worm shows homology to mammalian systems and expresses approximately 40% of human disease-related genes. Since Dr. Sydney Brenner first proposed C. elegans as an advantageous experimental worm-model system for genetic approaches, increasing numbers of studies using C. elegans as a tool to investigate topics in several fields of biochemistry, neuroscience, pharmacology, and toxicology have been performed. In this regard, C. elegans has been used to characterize the molecular mechanisms and affected pathways caused by metals that lead to neurotoxicity, as well as the pathophysiological interrelationship between metal exposure and ongoing neurodegenerative disorders. Several toxic metals, such as lead, cadmium, and mercury, are recognized as important environmental contaminants, and their exposure is associated with toxic effects on the human body. Essential elements that are required to maintain cellular homeostasis and normal physiological functions may also be toxic when accumulated at higher concentrations. For instance, manganese (Mn) is a trace essential element that participates in numerous biological processes, such as enzymatic activities, energy metabolism, and maintenance of cell functions. However, Mn overexposure is associated with behavioral changes in C. elegans, which are consistent with the dopaminergic system being the primary target of Mn neurotoxicity. Caenorhabditis elegans has been shown to be an important tool that allows for studies on neuron morphology using fluorescent transgenic worms. Moreover, behavioral tests may be conducted using worms, and neurotransmitter determination and related gene expression are likely to change after Mn exposure. Likewise, mutant worms may be used to study molecular mechanisms in Mn toxicity, as well as the expression of proteins responsible for the biosynthesis, transport, storage, and uptake of dopamine. Furthermore, this review highlights some advantages and limitations of using the experimental model of C. elegans and provides guidance for potential future applications of this model in studies directed toward assessing for Mn neurotoxicity and related mechanisms.

1. C. elegans as an Alternative Model to Study Neurotoxicity

Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) combines the simplicity of a small organism (reaching 1 mm when adult) with a notable biological conservancy with mammals, leveraging its use as a tool to solve crucial gaps in molecular biology [1,2,3,4], chemistry [5], biochemistry [6], toxicology [7,8,9], neuroscience [10], pathology [11], and genetics [12]. The easy genetic manipulation, including transgenics, mutants, and RNA interference (RNAi), which gave rise to multiple phenotypes highlights the biological dynamics in C. elegans.

The nematode is a soil-dwelling roundworm present worldwide. The wild-type (N2, Bristol) strain was established for research, from which many transgenic phenotypes were created. Worms can be grown in Petri dishes on nematode growth medium (NGM) nutritionally supplied with Escherichia coli (E. coli) OP50 at 20 °C. There is no need for CO₂ supply or light/dark cycles. In fact the excess of light is injurious for C. elegans [13]. Laboratories interested in C. elegans research can start the colony by ordering various strains (wild-type and transgenics) and E. coli OP50 from Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC). Compared to other models, C. elegans has a fast life cycle (3 days at 25 °C from egg to gravid adult), and its sexual forms comprise hermaphrodites and males, which represent 0.2% of the population. The self-fertilizing is controlled and can generate about 300 progenies per worm and 1000 progenies under crossed fertilizing. Males can be recognized by the shorter adult body size and tail shape differences, resembling an elegant fish fin [14].

The whole-body transparency of the nematode allows observation of intrabody structures and in vivo location of metal accumulation. Fluorescent protein tagging can be used to elucidate developmental process, neurotoxicity, fat storage, mitochondria integrity, and to characterize protein expression [15,16,17,18].

Caenorhabditis elegans sequencing has established 60–80% homology with the mammalian genome, with congruent basic biological functions similar to higher organisms, such as the digestive tract [19,20]. However, it has limitations for more complex studies, as some specific organs found in mammals are lacking, such as the eyes, lungs, and liver, as well as the circulatory and immunological systems [21,22].

Electron micrographs applied for the reconstruction of the shape of C. elegans have shown a constant number of cells (959 in adult hermaphrodites and 1031 in the adult male) and a stereotyped development [23]. The C. elegans nervous system includes 302 neurons in adult hermaphrodites and 385 in males due to the posterior mating circuit [24]. The evaluation of all connections from sensory input to end-organ output across the worm showed considerable connection differences between the sexes [25]. Functionally, the species has a similar nervous system to mammals, comprising well-defined neurotransmitters signaling, including dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), acetylcholine (ACh), and glutamate (Glu), which has turned it into a great model for neurotoxicity studies [26,27].

From a toxicological point of view, C. elegans is sensitive to many substances, including toxic metals, organic phosphates, and pesticides [28,29,30]. Accordingly, a screening was performed on ToxCast™ libraries of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), during which 968 chemicals were applied to C. elegans for new toxicological tests. The results obtained predicted developmental toxicity corroborating the results in rats, rabbits, and zebrafish [31].

Relevant parameters for toxicological screening can be evaluated in C. elegans, such as mortality, longevity, behavior, feeding, growth, and reproduction [32,33]. A relatively short incubation or treatment period is needed to examine the mortality or behavioral trials, ranging from a few minutes [26] to hours [5,7,8,34]. In this regard, neurodegeneration, reduction in growth, reproduction, feeding, locomotion, and worm lifespan have been evaluated under metal exposure, including with lead (Pb) [35], manganese (Mn) [36], titanium (Ti) [37], copper (Cu) [38], zinc (Zn) [39], gold (Au) [40], mercury (Hg) [41], iron (Fe) [42], and chrome (Cr) [43].

This review aims to highlight some essential advantages of using the experimental model C. elegans and to provide some application possibilities in studies of Mn neurotoxicity and related mechanisms. Moreover, we gathered the findings of the main studies related to Mn toxicity in C. elegans.

2. Manganese: Essential Element and Toxicity

Manganese is an essential metal for numerous enzymatic activities, energy metabolism, maintenance of cell functions, regulation of blood sugar, reproduction, and development [44]. The metal is the 12th most abundant element in the earth’s crust. It is distributed in the environment through natural processes, such as water and wind erosion, and anthropogenic activities, including ore mining and industrial manufacturing. Maintaining an adequate amount of Mn can be easily realized via dietary sources containing relatively high Mn levels, such as seeds and vegetables [45]. Thus, Mn deficiency is far less common than Mn overexposure. Although it is a nutritionally essential metal, Mn can be toxic if the levels are above approximately three times the physiological concentration (5.32–14.03 ng Mn/mg protein in the human brain) [46]. The concentration of Mn within the body can increase to toxic levels during the following scenarios: (1) during overexposure, which occur due to ingestion or inhalation of excess concentrations of Mn; (2) when there is an Fe deficiency, in which case transportation mechanisms shared by Fe and Mn facilitate the bioaccumulation of high concentrations of Mn; (3) when Mn excretion is impaired as a result of hepatic dysfunction [47,48].

The toxicity of Mn to humans was reported in workers in the mining and smelting industries and other occupational settings, such as welding, which generates high levels of Mn oxides. Manganese crosses the blood brain–barrier and eventually enters the human brain, where it disrupts neurotransmission and damages neurons important for motor functions, leading to a variety of clinical syndromes collectively known as manganism [49]. Manganism clinically resembles Parkinson’s disease (PD); however, the former involves the pathology in neurons of the globus pallidus as well as other brain areas, while PD is characterized by the progressive loss in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (please refer to these reviews for further discussion of manganism [50,51,52,53]).

As an important industrial material, Mn has many uses, including in lithium-ion manganese oxide batteries, Mn alloys (e.g., ferromanganese alloys are used in welding rods), pigments, fertilizer, glass, and steel, a fundamental building component of the modern world. An organic Mn compound, methylcyclopentadienyl Mn tricarbonyl (MMT), was introduced as a gasoline additive that is currently used worldwide to increase the octane rating. Combustion of gasoline containing MMT (currently 8.3 mg Mn/L) releases manganese oxide into the atmosphere, causing a potential Mn-related health concerns for the human population, especially in heavily populated areas; however, studies have shown that the air Mn levels were not significantly increased after the use of MMT [54]. Therefore, a definitive conclusion on the long-term effects of MMT use on human health has not yet been reached. Neuropsychological tests sensitive to subclinical performance deficits within specific cognitive domains, such as attention, memory, psychomotor functions are used in investigations aimed at determining if exposure to Mn at concentrations far below current exposure limits can leads to more acute or chronic syndromes. Population studies showed subtle behavioral effects in workers chronically exposed to airborne Mn in occupational settings [55].

Manganese at high levels can be toxic to a variety of organs, including the liver, cardiovascular system and, most importantly, the brain. On the other hand, although Mn plays a crucial role in the development of fetal, newborn, and children’s nervous systems, exposure to high concentrations during development has also been associated with signs and symptoms of developmental neurotoxicity [56,57]. Manganese crosses the barriers or takes the path of the olfactory tract to reach the target sites in the brain with the highest level in the putamen, caudate nucleus, and globus pallidus [44,58]. The transport of Mn across the cell membrane is not fully understood. It shares the transport machinery with other metals, such as Zn, Fe, Cu, and Ca [59,60]. Manganese deposits itself into nuclei and mitochondria [61]. Mitochondria is a critical target of Mn-induced neurotoxicity, characterized by mitochondria respiratory dysfunction and elevated levels of super oxidative and nitrogen species [62]. Other mechanisms involved in Mn-induced neurotoxicity include neurotransmission disruption, altered neurotransmitter metabolism, reduced Cu levels in the subventricular zone, proteotoxic stress, and inflammation [63,64].

Although Mn-induced neurotoxicity in occupational settings and its clinical form (manganism) are rare nowadays, the investigation of overexposure to Mn through a variety of other sources (for example, parenteral nutrition, infant formula, and vulnerable populations with high Mn absorption rates secondary to Fe deficiency) and the neurotoxic effects have been an ongoing effort as the range between the toxic threshold and the nutritional level is narrow for this metal [65,66]. Human and experimental studies have shown several mutations in the genes that render individuals susceptible to Mn toxicity, particularly for genes involved in the exportation and transportation of Mn [67,68]. Meanwhile, alternative models, such as C. elegans, have been increasingly used to investigate mechanisms and genetic modifiers of Mn-induced toxicity and neurodegeneration [69].

3. Mn Exposure and Determination in C. elegans

For investigations on the neurotoxic effects of Mn, the nematode can be exposed to Mn at different larval stages (L1–L4) or even as adult worms. However, some factors could reduce the bioavailability of metal and its toxicity, such as the thicker cuticle in adult worms compared to the initial stages [70]. Developmental stage can also influence the endpoint of interest and, therefore, this factor should be considered when designing investigations using this model system. Post-embryonic development is very copious, although it is tightly coordinated in a synchronized population. The nervous system is not fully developed until the end of L2, DNA repair mechanisms are not completely evolved before L4, and the reproductive system is not matured until the end of the fourth larval stage [71,72]. Sensitivity to exogenous agents also varies greatly within the larval stages [73].

For investigations of Mn toxicity on C. elegans, both acute and chronic exposure to the trace elements might be of interest. Acute toxicity is most commonly tested in liquid medium with different solvents, such as M9 [74], S medium [75], or 85 mM Sodium chloride (NaCl) + 0.1% Tween [76,77,78]. Attention should be paid to the lack of food, as experiments might not be meaningful in long exposure scenarios due to changed metabolism [79].

Long-term exposure is often conducted on agar plates via the nematode food source, E. coli, but can also be conducted in S medium [23]. One necessary attention should be concerning E. coli as the alive bacteria might be able to metabolize the compounds of interest, and its inactivation before exposure should be considered. Manganese can be added to the bacteria LB (Luria broth) medium before or after the inactivation of the E. coli (for example, via heat) [39,80]. Even when working with inactivated E. coli, one should investigate if no changes in Mn-species occur due to the experimental settings, especially when focusing on species-specific effects. The exposure time should be taken to determine how the experiment should be set out depending on the specific research interest. The applied Mn species is one parameter to be considered next to the method of exposure, incubation time, and larval stage. Commonly, Manganese chloride (MnCl₂), as described in Avila et al., or manganese sulfate (MnSO₄) are incubated [81,82]. Both of these species are Mn (II) compounds, which is Mn’s most stable oxidation state.

The different exposure methods can lead to great variances In absorption efficacy and bioavailability. The effective interpretation of novel results and comparisons of these with results from other studies requires that attention be paid to bioavailability and concentration–response or concentration–effect curves of Mn which need to be tested for each application method and developmental stage. Manganese toxicity varies strongly between metal species, administration form, and exposure time [83,84]. For the determination of concentration–effect, survival and lifespan assays are standard procedures in C. elegans laboratories. Verifying the lethal dose at which 50% of the animals die (LD50) for a specific Mn-containing compound is a crucial first step in the processes of determining a suitable exposure concentration for subsequent investigations of a desired novel endpoint [85]. Mutagenicity and genotoxicity are usually examined after sub-toxic Mn exposure, and lifespan assays are often conducted to investigate changes after slight chronic overexposure or depletion of the trace element [83].

As some substances exhibit poor absorption efficiency, the applied dose does not necessarily reflect the effective internal dose within the worms. To understand the actual toxicity, it is, therefore, necessary to measure the Mn content in C. elegans. The absorbed dose can be measured in a pool of worms, followed by normalization to either worm number or protein content. The latter might be more reliable, as inaccuracies in worm number might easily appear, but the protein content is precisely determined in each worm. The most common method for trace element measurement is the analytical approach via inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) [39,81]. Even though this method is very sensitive, it can only be used for total elemental content analysis, as samples have to be destroyed. Two other commonly used analytical approaches for Mn quantification are atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES), which can also be applied to C. elegans samples [86,87]. The group of Michalke has extensively studied the Mn species within the brain of rats and human serum/cerebrospinal fluid [88,89], but no such studies have been conducted on the nematode as of yet. Such investigations have been carried out in C. elegans for other trace elements, such as selenium [90], but Mn species in the worm still need to be understood further. Therefore, we cannot make any statements regarding different species-specific toxicities, transversions, and metabolic routes.

For localization of metal abundance, histochemical staining is utilized for C. elegans but lacks sensitivity (there are no specific stains for Mn) and quantitative data. Using event-mode X-ray fluorescence microscopy, McColl et al. were able to successfully visualize Mn on a subcellular level [91]. This scanning method, which rapidly accelerates acquisition rate and decreases radiation damage compared to traditional X-ray fluorescence microscopy, made visualization of elemental compartments and quantitation of Mn in nematodes possible [92,93,94,95]. Another method for intra-body localization of Mn is the visual and qualitative laser ablation inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) [96,97].

4. Exploring Manganese Toxicity in C. elegans

4.1. Neurotoxicity Assessments

Manganese toxicity has been plentifully investigated in C. elegans. This is mainly due to the conservancy of target genes to human diseases and the ease of genetic manipulation that allows for mechanism-based studies. Environmental exposure to Mn is linked to a neurodegenerative condition named manganism, whose pathophysiology resembles Parkinson’s disease. The main target of Mn is the dopaminergic (dAergic) system which can be accessed both in vivo and in vitro in C. elegans through observing neuron morphology, behavioral changes, neurotransmitter determination, and related-genes expression. The dAergic neurons represent 40,000–45,000 of the total neurons in rats, 160,000–320,000 in monkeys, and 400,000–600,000 in humans [98]. Alternatively, C. elegans offers a simple and easy evaluation by fluorescent transgenics, which provides evidence that there are only eight dAergic neurons in the hermaphrodites, which are divided into three classes based on their morphology, as follows: four CEP neurons innervate the tip of the nose (two ventral, the CEPV, and two dorsal, the CEPD), two ADE neurons innervate the head cuticle, and one pair of posterior PDE neurons are located in the posterior cuticle. Since males play the coupling function, six additional dAergic neurons are located in the tail [99]. Constructions combining the fluorescent label green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the sodium-dependent DA transporter DAT-1 expressed in dAergic neurons in C. elegans represent the first choice [33,100]. The main strains include BZ555 (egIs1 [dat-1p::GFP]), BY200 (vtIs1 (Pdat-1::GFP, pRF4(rol-6(su1006)), and BY250 [vtIs7; Pdat-1::GFP]. Another option is the strain OH7547 (otIs199 [cat-2::GFP + rgef-1(F25B3.3)::DsRed + rol-6(su1006)].), that expresses GFP in dAergic neurons and dsRed pan-neuronally [101]. However, it should be considered that there are intrinsic differences in each strain in response to exposure to the compounds [102].

Endpoint characterizations of Mn-induced neurotoxicity include neuronal development, puncta, neuronal absence or shrinkage, neuronal gaps, absence of cell bodies, and reduction in fluorescence intensity [18,102,103]. Such an analysis is feasible by using images acquired with confocal or fluorescence microscopy. As the neurons are distributed in C. elegans cylindrical body, Z-stack should be considered for representative images and, for that, worms can be anesthetized with 0.2% tricaine/0.02% tetramisole, 1 mM levamisole, or 10–25 mM sodium Azide (NaN3). Although it is not used as frequently as fluorescence, electron microscopy can also be used. The sum of slices and optical densitometry can be analyzed using the ImageJ software (NIH) (Figure 1).

All the main neuronal systems have been considered under Mn exposure (GABA, Ach, 5-HT, Glu), although Mn selectively affected C. elegans dAergic neurons [18]. The crucial mechanisms implicated in Mn neurotoxicity are discussed below.

4.2. The Benefits of C. elegans Genetic Conservation on Mn Toxicity

Investigations looking at the adverse effects of exposure to Mn are generally conducted in wild-type animals stratified by age and other phenotypic characteristics. Accordingly, Mn toxicity was associated with the reduction in C. elegans survival and deficits in lifespan that depend on the concentration of Mn and larval stage [8,104,105]. In addition, aged animals exposed to Mn are more susceptible to Mn toxicity when compared to young animals, which is mainly related to protein homeostasis impairments [106].

The molecular basis of Mn toxicity is readily assessed by looking at proteins responsible for DA biosynthesis, packaging, and reuptake which, are all present in C. elegans [99] (Figure 2). The DA biosynthesis requires tyrosine, which is firstly hydroxylated by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, cat-2) to produce L-Dopa. Dopa decarboxylase (bas-1) converts L-DOPA into DA [107]. Thus, DA interacts with different receptors encoded by the four genes dop-1, dop-2, dop-3, and dop-4 in C. elegans. Furthermore, dop-1 and dop-4 are analogous to mammals’ D1-like receptor genes and dop-2 and dop-3 to D2-like receptor genes [108]. Additionally, dop-5 and dop-6, have been proposed to be DA receptors based on sequence similarity to dop-3. After release, the DA efflux from the synaptic cleft moves through the conserved DA transporter (dat-1), followed by DA packing dependent on the vesicular monoamine transporter (cat-1) [108]. In C. elegans, Mn selectively impairs the dAergic neurons rather than other neurons, which is implicated in dat-1 since its mutation (knock-down) results in hypersensitivity to Mn [18].

The toxicity of Mn has also been related to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), a reduction in glutathione (GSH) levels, and mitochondrial changes [109,110,111]. The DA extracellular levels are also crucial for Mn-induced oxidative stress in C. elegans. An NADPH dual-oxidase, BLI-3, potentiates the synthesis of ROS from DA-derived toxic species, which can be transported via uptake through the DA transporter DAT-1. On the other hand, the bli-3 loss caused hyper-resistance to Mn toxicity [18]. Moreover, the Mn-induced oxidative stress can be protected by pre-treatment with anti-oxidants, such as ebselen [112].

Within cells, Mn accumulates predominantly in mitochondria, especially as Mn (II). It implies changes in oxidative respiration, resulting in high ROS production and culminating in mitochondrial dysfunction [113,114]. In C. elegans, Mn exposure significantly alters Fe and Ca homeostasis, combined with mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction and impairments in protein homeostasis, which may further confer the compound toxicity [82,106,110].

The genetic machinery implicated in metal homeostasis and transport is preserved in C. elegans. Three homologs for the divalent metal transporter (DMT1) have been characterized in C. elegans, namely smf-1, smf-2, and smf-3. Here, SMF-3 is the primary Mn uptake transporter in the worm, whereas SMF-1 has a minor role in this process, and SMF-2 regulates metal content (it is also responsible for Fe uptake) [115]. In mammals, DMT1 expression mostly occurs in the proximal duodenum, kidney, and brain tissues, where it plays the non-selective metal transport role [59]. In C. elegans, SMF-1 is mainly expressed in the intestine and associated gland cells, SMF-3 is expressed along the intestine and weakly in epidermal and neural cells, and SMF-2 is restricted to the epithelial cells of the pharynx and the pharyngeal-intestinal valve cells, and gonad sheath cells at the adult stage [115]. Mutations in smf-1 and smf-3 have been shown to confer increased Mn tolerance, while mutation in smf-2 led to increased Mn sensitivity. In addition, the inflammatory response to pathogens is also affected by the mutation in smf transporters which has been associated with the Mn role in the innate immune system [116]. The P-type Ca²⁺/Mn²⁺ ATPase (PMR1) is also implicated in the transport and homeostasis maintenance of Mn in the worm. Here, pmr-1 reduced expression by mutation, and RNAi rendered worms resistant to oxidative and pathogenic stress, respectively [116,117].

In C. elegans, the loss of heat shock proteins hsp-70 intensifies the protein oxidation and the dAergic neuronal degeneration through inhibition of the transcriptional upregulation of PINK1, a gene that has, in fact, been linked to Parkinson’s disease [82]. In addition to pink1, most related Parkinson’s disease genes, including park2/parkin, dj-1, and lrrk2, have at least one C. elegans homolog [118,119,120,121]. The role of dj-1 in oxidative stress regulation is an intersection point associated with both PD and Mn toxicity [122]. The influence of dj1 mutation over Mn uptake has been investigated in two different homologs present in C. elegans, namely djr1.1 and djr1.2, in the nuclear location and cytosol of head neurons, respectively. Manganese uptake was increased in the djr1.1 deletion mutant, while in double mutant djr1.1; djr1.2, Mn was not dispersed inside the worm [109].

The effects of pdr1 and djr1.1 on modulating Mn transport were evaluated in the transgenic expressing human α-synuclein protein (α-Syn). Here, α-Syn is a small protein whose accumulation of its misfolded form is also implicated in Parkinson’s disease neurodegeneration [123]. Caenorhabditis elegans transgenic expressing α-Syn and exposed to Mn presented a reduction in both Mn accumulation and Mn-induced oxidative stress when combined to a background of pdr1 and djr1.1 loss [109].

In addition, djr-1.2 has been reported for mitigating Mn-dependent lifespan reduction and DA signaling alterations conditioned on the DAF-2/DAF-16 signaling pathway [124]. Moreover, the absence of pdr-1 (parkin homolog) enhanced Mn accumulation and dAergic neurodegeneration in the worm, which was related to defects in exporting Mn through the putative Mn exporter ferroportin (fpn-1.1) [109,125].

The conservation of the transcription factor homolog of mammalian Nrf2 (SKN-1) in the worm confers protection on Mn-induced neurotoxicity when overexpressed or activated in the nucleus [18]. In C. elegans, SKN-1 is upstream regulated by DAF-2 (a receptor similar to the mammalian insulin-like growth factor 1, or IGF-1, receptor) pathway. It is well recognized in the worm that DAF-2 activates AGE-1 (a homolog of phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase, PI3K), which converts phosphatidyl inositol-2 phosphate (PIP2) to PIP3, which is responsible for the phosphatidyl inositol dependent kinase (PDK-1) activation. For instance, PDK-1 activates both AKT-1/2 and SGK-1 which retains SKN-1 and DAF-16 transcription factors in the cytoplasm (inactivated). Under Mn exposure, the AKT-1 expression is increased, and both SKN-1 and DAF-16 remain cytoplasmatic [105,126].

4.3. Mn Impairments on C. elegans Behavior and the Relationship to Its Toxic Mechanism

In mammals, neurotransmitters and hormones are the chemical messengers whose unbalance directly impact behavioral responses. One of the factors which motivated Sydney Brenner, who proposed C. elegans as an experimental, was that the animal had fewer neurons than a fruit fly. Later, Dr. Brenner was able to verify that gene mutations and neuron changes could be reliably measured through C. elegans behavioral observation. Since DA is the main target of Mn, we made some comments on its influences on C. elegans behavior.

Dopamine signaling modulates a range of behaviors in the worms, such as locomotion [127] and learning [128,129]. In addition, it allows animals to efficiently search for new sources of bacteria and stay at the food site. Additionally, DA-mediated slowing of locomotion is assessed by a Basal slowing response test, in which locomotion rates (on bacteria) are compared in well-fed worms transferred to bacteria-seeded plates vs. those placed on plates without bacteria [127]. Deficits in the dAergic system are made manifest by a reduced basal slowing response (which do not slow when finding the food) in worms exposed to Mn [105].

Caenorhabditis elegans can respond to environmental stimuli through sensory systems and modify its behaviors, making it a suitable model for studying behavioral plasticity. Ethanol preference is predictive of functional DA and 5-HT development, whereas worms with losses in DA and 5-HT biosynthesis (cat-2 and tph-1 mutants) do not show it [130]. The overload of Mn results in death in dAergic neurons due to modifications in locomotor activity in C. elegans, as observed in humans affected by manganism [127,131]. Tracker systems connected to a stereoscope can precisely indicate the distance traveled, speed, acceleration, and minor changes in locomotion [132,133]. However, body bends can be counted on plates without the bacterial lawn. Manganese reduces the body bends, mainly when the exposure occurs in the L1 larval stage [134].

The feeding behavior is examined in toxicological approaches and can be evidenced by the counting of pharynx rhythmic contractions in C. elegans. Pharyngeal pumping is sustained under the integrated output of the nervous system, including the glutamatergic, GABAergic, serotoninergic, and cholinergic’ systems [135,136]. In this regard, 5-HT is released in the presence of food and gives rise to glutamatergic activation, which contributes to high pharyngeal pumping rates [137]. Additionally, DA impacts pharyngeal pumping by acting on the dAergic receptor DOP-5 inducing 5-HT release [138]. This fact can justify the decreasing pharyngeal pumping rate under manganese exposure, as well as in cat-2 mutant worms with reduced DA production [8,18,139].

The reproductive profile can be assessed in C. elegans by counting the eggs inside the uterus (egg production), the eggs laid on the plate during a time period (egg laying), the hatching rate (brood size), and male mating behavior. Manganese delayed the reproduction in the worm by transient reducing the egg production and egg laying [7].

Thus, worm behaviors are strongly influenced by changing the genome expression and neurotransmitters’ homeostasis. In addition, behavioral observations add important information, mainly by pointing out the principal genetic targets, thus, simplifying the investigation of Mn toxic mechanisms. Figure 3 shows the effects and some signaling pathways that Mn may affect.

5. C. elegans Model to Study Neurodegenerative Disease

A multitude of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are characterized by disruption in metal homeostasis and subsequent accumulation of disease-related protein aggregations [140,141,142]. In exploring Mn toxicity in C. elegans, we see a relationship between Mn and many neurodegenerative diseases.

Parkinson’s disease is pathologically characterized by Lewy bodies, composed mainly of α-synuclein. Anatomically, we also see degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons projecting from the substantia nigra resulting in the three cardinal clinical features of PD, which are rigidity, resting tremors, and bradykinesia [51,143]. Manganese-induced Parkinsonism presents similarly to idiopathic Parkinson’s disease with motor deficits, such as bradykinesia, tremors, difficulty walking, and facial vacancy. Similarly, both conditions are characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons as well [50,51]. However, despite these similarities, there are distinct differences in the pathological presentations of each condition.

In Mn-induced Parkinsonism, we note degeneration of dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons mainly in the substantia nigra pars, but in idiopathic Parkinson’s we see the same degeneration in more of the basal ganglia, including the substantia nigra, globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, and striatum [51,140]. Furthermore, we also see the lack of Lewy bodies in Mn-induced Parkinsonism. However, Mn still induces aggregation and misfolding of alpha-synuclein and there exists emerging evidence to suggest that these accumulations are responsible for the neurotoxicity in Parkinson’s disease [140]. While the worm has no α-synuclein orthologue, C. elegans models for PD are based on transgenic worms overexpressing wild-type or mutant forms of the human α-synuclein [144]. Further studies aiming to better understand the pathophysiology of these similar, yet different, diseases may be helpful in developing therapeutic strategies for both disorders [51]. Recently, it was reported that metal dyshomeostasis is further induced in a parkin-deficient nematodes (PD model), where metallothionein 1 acts as a potential protective modulator in regulating homeostasis [84].

On the other hand, AD is characterized by several key pathologies, with one of them being AB peptides. It is demonstrated by Tong et al. (2014) that increased exposure to Mn is correlated with increased plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, mini-mental state examination score, and clinical dementia rating scale score. The study suggests that Mn induces Aβ peptide-related cognitive impairment by disrupting Aβ peptide degradation mechanisms [145]. However, we also note a meta-analysis of 17 studies that suggests Mn deficiency may be contributory to AD development [146]. While the relationship between Mn and AD is still not clear, there is evidence to suggest that disruption in Mn homeostasis may play a pathogenic role in the development of AD.

There are several reasons as to why C. elegans is an exceptional model for neurodegenerative diseases. This model has allowed for extensive studies into PD, including links between toxic compounds exposure, such as Mn, and increased risk of PD [21,144]. While in AD we do have an amyloid precursor protein (APP) orthologue, it lacks Aβ homology to humans. Thus, to measure Aβ toxicity in AD, transgenic expression of recombinant Aβ is used to circumvent C. elegans APP mechanisms [147]. These Aβ peptides can induce behavioral changes in C. elegans; for example, the strain CL2006 induces Aβ deposits in body wall muscles, resulting in rigidity and paralysis. Thus, paralysis in this scenario can be used as a quantifiable behavioral output of Aβ toxicity. Further evaluation of Aβ-mediated neurodegeneration can also be quantified through visualization of glutaminergic neurons in the tail of the worm [147]. Caenorhabditis elegans can be used as a model for a number of other pathologies, such as tauopathy in AD [147] or as a PDR-1 model in PD [144].

Neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD and PD, are multifactorial diseases with numerous complex pathologies. While there are multiple studies on the effects of Mn in AD and PD, how Mn contributes to subsequent protein aggregation and neurotoxicity has yet to be well understood [148]. The simplicity and homology of C. elegans to human have proven to be useful in the understanding of these neurodegenerative diseases, and further studies using C. elegans may be beneficial in clarifying this relationship. Translating some of the insights made in C. elegans maybe helpful in developing therapeutic approaches to AD, PD, and other neurodegenerative diseases in the future.

6. Concluding Remarks

Given the chronic environmental exposure and irreversible neurotoxicity of Mn, future studies should utilize contemporary methodologies to better characterize its mechanisms of neurotoxicity. Moreover, combined exposure to Mn and other divalent metals (and/or xenobiotics) can be addressed in future studies, since it is plausible that divalent metals can influence each other.

Finally, the corroboration of the mechanisms of Mn neurotoxicity between the nematode and mammals, the ease of manipulation, genetic conservancy, and the short-time of observation positively implicate C. elegans as a complementary and alternative biological model to address the complex signaling pathways associated with both the essentiality and neurotoxicity of this metal. Findings linking Mn toxicity with molecular targets provide critical information which will likely identify putative target sites for pharmacological interventions, not only for Mn intoxication but also in Parkinson’s disease treatment by taking into consideration the pathophysiological similarities between the two conditions.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Figure 1. Worms at the same larval stage (L1 to L4, or even adult worms) can be exposed for minutes or hours in liquid medium (96-wells or microtubes) or NGM dishes. Afterwards, parameters, such as behavioral evaluations, survival/lifespan, Mn determination, and neuronal viability, can be evaluated [33]. The Mn neurotoxicity is observed in fluorescent strains (BZ555 (egIs1 [dat-1p::GFP]), BY200 (vtIs1 (Pdat-1::GFP, pRF4(rol-6(su1006)), and BY250 [vtIs7; Pdat-1::GFP] [102]). Images are acquired in Z-stack, summed, and analyzed in ImageJ (NIH). The presence of puncta, neuronal absence or shrinkage, neuronal gaps, absence of cell bodies, and reduction in the fluorescence intensity are evidence of neurotoxicity [18,103].

Figure 2. dAergic conservancy in C. elegans.

Figure 3. Key targets of Mn on its neurotoxic effects in C. elegans.

References

1. Dingley, S.D.; Polyak, E.; Ostrovsky, J.; Srinivasan, S.; Lee, I.; Rosenfeld, A.B.; Tsukikawa, M.; Xiao, R.; Selak, M.A.; Coon, J.J. et al. Mitochondrial DNA Variant in COX1 Subunit Significantly Alters Energy Metabolism of Geographically Divergent Wild Isolates in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Mol. Biol.; 2014; 426, pp. 2199-2216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.02.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534730]

2. Gitschlag, B.L.; Kirby, C.S.; Samuels, D.C.; Gangula, R.D.; Mallal, S.A.; Patel, M.R. Homeostatic Responses Regulate Selfish Mitochondrial Genome Dynamics in C. elegans. Cell Metab.; 2016; 24, pp. 91-103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411011]

3. Haroon, S.; Li, A.; Weinert, J.L.; Fritsch, C.; Ericson, N.G.; Alexander-Floyd, J.; Braeckman, B.P.; Haynes, C.M.; Bielas, J.H.; Gidalevitz, T. et al. Multiple Molecular Mechanisms Rescue mtDNA Disease in C-elegans. Cell Rep.; 2018; 22, pp. 3115-3125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.099] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29562168]

4. Haslbeck, V.; Eckl, J.M.; Kaiser, C.J.O.; Papsdorf, K.; Hessling, M.; Richter, K. Chaperone-Interacting TPR Proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Mol. Biol.; 2013; 425, pp. 2922-2939. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.019]

5. Rohn, I.; Raschke, S.; Aschner, M.; Tuck, S.; Kuehnelt, D.; Kipp, A.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. Treatment of Caenorhabditis elegans with Small Selenium Species Enhances Antioxidant Defense Systems. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.; 2019; 63, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201801304]

6. Bouyanfif, A.; Liyanage, S.; Hequet, E.; Moustaid-Moussa, N.; Abidi, N. Review of FTIR microspectroscopy applications to investigate biochemical changes in C. elegans. Vib. Spectrosc.; 2018; 96, pp. 74-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2018.03.001]

7. Gubert, P.; Puntel, B.; Lehmen, T.; Bornhorst, J.; Avila, D.S.; Aschner, M.; Soares, F.A.A. Reversible reprotoxic effects of manganese through DAF-16 transcription factor activation and vitellogenin downregulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Life Sci.; 2016; 151, pp. 218-223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.016]

8. Gubert, P.; Puntel, B.; Lehmen, T.; Fessel, J.P.; Cheng, P.; Bornhorst, J.; Trindade, L.S.; Avila, D.S.; Aschner, M.; Soares, F.A.A. Metabolic effects of manganese in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans through DAergic pathway and transcription factors activation. Neurotoxicology; 2018; 67, pp. 65-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2018.04.008]

9. Wollenhaupt, S.G.N.; Soares, A.T.; Salgueiro, W.G.; Noremberg, S.; Reis, G.; Viana, C.; Gubert, P.; Soares, F.A.; Affeldt, R.F.; Ludtke, D.S. et al. Seleno- and Telluro-xylofuranosides attenuate Mn-induced toxicity in C.elegans via the DAF-16/FOXO pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol.; 2014; 64, pp. 192-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.030]

10. Denzel, M.S.; Lapierre, L.R.; Mack, H.I.D. Emerging topics in C-elegans aging research: Transcriptional regulation, stress response and epigenetics. Mech. Ageing Dev.; 2019; 177, pp. 4-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2018.08.001]

11. Ezcurra, M.; Benedetto, A.; Sornda, T.; Gilliat, A.F.; Au, C.; Zhang, Q.F.; van Schelt, S.; Petrache, A.L.; Wang, H.Y.; de la Guardia, Y. et al. C-elegans Eats Its Own Intestine to Make Yolk Leading to Multiple Senescent Pathologies. Curr. Biol.; 2018; 28, 2556.e5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.035] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30100339]

12. Gao, A.W.; de Bos, J.U.; Sterken, M.G.; Kammenga, J.E.; Smith, R.L.; Houtkooper, R.H. Forward and reverse genetics approaches to uncover metabolic aging pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. BBA-Mol. Basis Dis.; 2018; 1864, pp. 2697-2706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.09.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919364]

13. De Magalhaes, C.D.; Henriquez, B.; Seah, N.E.; Evans, R.M.; Lapierre, L.R.; Dillin, A. Visible light reduces C. elegans longevity. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 927. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02934-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500338]

14. Barrios, A. Exploratory decisions of the Caenorhabditis elegans male: A conflict of two drives. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.; 2014; 33, pp. 10-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.06.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970102]

15. Chalfie, M.; Tu, Y.; Euskirchen, G.; Ward, W.W.; Prasher, D.C. Green Fluorescent Protein as a Marker for Gene-Expression. Science; 1994; 263, pp. 802-805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8303295] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8303295]

16. Boulin, T.; Pocock, R.; Hobert, O. A novel Eph receptor-interacting IgSF protein provides C. elegans motoneurons with midline guidepost function. Curr. Biol.; 2006; 16, pp. 1871-1883. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.056]

17. Feinberg, E.H.; VanHoven, M.K.; Bendesky, A.; Wang, G.; Fetter, R.D.; Shen, K.; Bargmannl, C.I. GFP reconstitution across synaptic partners (GRASP) defines cell contacts and Synapses in living nervous systems. Neuron; 2008; 57, pp. 353-363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.030]

18. Benedetto, A.; Au, C.; Avila, D.S.; Milatovic, D.; Aschner, M. Extracellular Dopamine Potentiates Mn-Induced Oxidative Stress, Lifespan Reduction, and Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in a BLI-3-Dependent Manner in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet.; 2010; 6, e1001084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001084]

19. Schroeder, F.C. Modular assembly of primary metabolic building blocks: A chemical language in C. elegans. Chem. Biol.; 2015; 22, pp. 7-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.10.012]

20. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: A platform for investigating biology. Science; 1998; 282, pp. 2012-2018. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5396.2012]

21. Ruszkiewicz, J.A.; Pinkas, A.; Miah, M.R.; Weitz, R.L.; Lawes, M.J.A.; Akinyemi, A.J.; Ijomone, O.M.; Aschner, M. C. elegans as a model in developmental neurotoxicology. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2018; 354, pp. 126-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2018.03.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550512]

22. Hunt, P.R. The C. elegans model in toxicity testing. J. Appl. Toxicol.; 2017; 37, pp. 50-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3357] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443595]

23. Sulston, J.; Hodgkin, J. Methods. In: The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans; Wood WB. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1988.

24. White, J.G.; Southgate, E.; Thomson, J.N.; Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.; 1986; 314, pp. 1-340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22462104]

25. Cook, S.J.; Jarrell, T.A.; Brittin, C.A.; Wang, Y.; Bloniarz, A.E.; Yakovlev, M.A.; Nguyen, K.C.Q.; Tang, L.T.; Bayer, E.A.; Duerr, J.S. et al. Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes. Nature; 2019; 571, pp. 63-71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7]

26. Soares, F.A.; Fagundez, D.A.; Avila, D.S. Neurodegeneration Induced by Metals in Caenorhabditis elegans. Adv. Neurobiol.; 2017; 18, pp. 355-383. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60189-2_18]

27. Bargmann, C.I. Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Science; 1998; 282, pp. 2028-2033. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5396.2028]

28. Pinkas, A.; Cunha Martins, A., Jr.; Aschner, M. C. elegans-An Emerging Model to Study Metal-Induced RAGE-Related Pathologies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2018; 15, 1407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071407]

29. Queiros, L.; Martins, A.C.; Krum, B.N.; Ke, T.; Aschner, M.; Pereira, J.L.; Goncalves, F.J.M.; Milne, G.L.; Pereira, P. Assessing the neurotoxicity of the carbamate methomyl in Caenorhabditis elegans with a multi-level approach. Toxicology; 2021; 451, 152684. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.152684]

30. Martins, A.C.; Virgolini, M.B.; Tinkov, A.A.; Skalny, A.V.; Tirumala, R.P.; Farina, M.; Santamaria, A.; Lu, R.; Aschner, M. Iron overload and neurodegenerative diseases: What can we learn from Caenorhabditis elegans?. Toxicol. Res. Appl.; 2022; 6, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23978473221091852]

31. Boyd, W.A.; Smith, M.V.; Co, C.A.; Pirone, J.R.; Rice, J.R.; Shockley, K.R.; Freedman, J.H. Developmental Effects of the ToxCast Phase I and Phase II Chemicals in Caenorhabditis elegans and Corresponding Responses in Zebrafish, Rats, and Rabbits. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2016; 124, pp. 586-593. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409645]

32. Dengg, M.; van Meel, J.C. Caenorhabditis elegans as model system for rapid toxicity assessment of pharmaceutical compounds. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods; 2004; 50, pp. 209-214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2004.04.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15519907]

33. Helmcke, K.J.; Aschner, M. Hormetic effect of methylmercury on Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2010; 248, pp. 156-164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.07.023]

34. Zhang, R.Q.; Hong, Y.; Xiao, J.S. Separation and determination of pyrrolidinium ionic liquid cations by ion chromatography with direct conductivity detection. Chin. Chem. Lett.; 2013; 24, pp. 503-505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2013.03.033]

35. Albrecht, P.A.; Fernandez-Hubeid, L.E.; Deza-Ponzio, R.; Martins, A.C.; Aschner, M.; Virgolini, M.B. Developmental lead exposure affects dopaminergic neuron morphology and modifies basal slowing response in Caenorhabditis elegans: Effects of ethanol. Neurotoxicology; 2022; 91, pp. 349-359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2022.06.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35724878]

36. Tang, B.; Tong, P.; Xue, K.S.; Williams, P.L.; Wang, J.S.; Tang, L. High-throughput assessment of toxic effects of metal mixtures of cadmium(Cd), lead(Pb), and manganese(Mn) in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere; 2019; 234, pp. 232-241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.271] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31220657]

37. Wang, J.; Dai, H.; Nie, Y.; Wang, M.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhao, G.; Wu, L. et al. TiO2 nanoparticles enhance bioaccumulation and toxicity of heavy metals in Caenorhabditis elegans via modification of local concentrations during the sedimentation process. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2018; 162, pp. 160-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.051] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29990727]

38. Yu, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.; Yin, D.Q. Toxic and recovery effects of copper on Caenorhabditiselegans by various food-borne and water-borne pathways. Chemosphere; 2012; 87, pp. 1361-1367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.02.029]

39. Baesler, J.; Kopp, J.F.; Pohl, G.; Aschner, M.; Haase, H.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. Zn homeostasis in genetic models of Parkinson’s disease in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol.; 2019; 55, pp. 44-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.05.005]

40. Gonzalez-Moragas, L.; Berto, P.; Vilches, C.; Quidant, R.; Kolovou, A.; Santarella-Mellwig, R.; Schwab, Y.; Sturzenbaum, S.; Roig, A.; Laromaine, A. In vivo testing of gold nanoparticles using the Caenorhabditis elegans model organism. Acta Biomater.; 2017; 53, pp. 598-609. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.080] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161575]

41. Ke, T.; Prince, L.M.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Latent alterations in swimming behavior by developmental methylmercury exposure are modulated by the homolog of tyrosine hydroxylase in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurotoxicol. Teratol.; 2021; 85, 106963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106963]

42. Esposito, B.P.; Martins, A.C.; de Carvalho, R.R.V.; Aschner, M. High throughput fluorimetric assessment of iron traffic and chelation in iron-overloaded Caenorhabditis elegans. Biometals; 2020; 33, pp. 255-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-020-00250-4]

43. Xing, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, D. Using the larvae nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to evaluate neurobehavioral toxicity to metallic salts. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2009; 72, pp. 1819-1823. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.06.006]

44. Horning, K.J.; Caito, S.W.; Tipps, K.G.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Manganese Is Essential for Neuronal Health. Annu. Rev. Nutr.; 2015; 35, pp. 71-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034419]

45. Martins, A.C.; Krum, B.N.; Queirós, L.; Tinkov, A.A.; Skalny, A.V.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Manganese in the Diet: Bioaccessibility, Adequate Intake, and Neurotoxicological Effects. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2020; 68, pp. 12893-12903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00641]

46. Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Considerations on manganese (Mn) treatments for in vitro studies. Neurotoxicology; 2014; 41, pp. 141-142. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.01.010]

47. Martins, A.C.; Ke, T.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. New insights on mechanisms underlying methylmercury-induced and manganese-induced neurotoxicity. Curr. Opin. Toxicol.; 2021; 25, pp. 30-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2021.03.002]

48. Tinkov, A.A.; Paoliello, M.M.B.; Mazilina, A.N.; Skalny, A.V.; Martins, A.C.; Voskresenskaya, O.N.; Aaseth, J.; Santamaria, A.; Notova, S.V.; Tsatsakis, A. et al. Molecular Targets of Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Five-Year Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 4646. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094646] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925013]

49. Racette, B.A. Manganism in the 21st century: The Hanninen lecture. Neurotoxicology; 2014; 45, pp. 201-207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2013.09.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24148923]

50. Guilarte, T.R. Manganese and Parkinson’s disease: A critical review and new findings. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2010; 118, pp. 1071-1080. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901748] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403794]

51. Kwakye, G.F.; Paoliello, M.M.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Manganese-Induced Parkinsonism and Parkinson’s Disease: Shared and Distinguishable Features. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2015; 12, pp. 7519-7540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707519] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154659]

52. Roth, J.A. Are there common biochemical and molecular mechanisms controlling manganism and parkisonism. Neuromol. Med.; 2009; 11, pp. 281-296. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-009-8088-8]

53. Lucchini, R.G.; Martin, C.J.; Doney, B.C. From manganism to manganese-induced parkinsonism: A conceptual model based on the evolution of exposure. Neuromol. Med.; 2009; 11, pp. 311-321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-009-8108-8]

54. Bhuie, A.K.; Ogunseitan, O.A.; White, R.R.; Sain, M.; Roy, D.N. Modeling the environmental fate of manganese from methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl in urban landscapes. Sci. Total Environ.; 2005; 339, pp. 167-178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.06.012]

55. Lucchini, R.; Apostoli, P.; Perrone, C.; Placidi, D.; Albini, E.; Migliorati, P.; Mergler, D.; Sassine, M.P.; Palmi, S.; Alessio, L. Long-term exposure to “low levels” of manganese oxides and neurofunctional changes in ferroalloy workers. Neurotoxicology; 1999; 20, pp. 287-297. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10385891]

56. Jiang, Y.; Zheng, W. Cardiovascular toxicities upon manganese exposure. Cardiovasc. Toxicol.; 2005; 5, pp. 345-354. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1385/CT:5:4:345] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330345]

57. Frisbie, S.H.; Mitchell, E.J.; Roudeau, S.; Domart, F.; Carmona, A.; Ortega, R. Manganese levels in infant formula and young child nutritional beverages in the United States and France: Comparison to breast milk and regulations. PLoS ONE; 2019; 14, e0223636. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223636] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689314]

58. Bornhorst, J.; Wehe, C.A.; Huwel, S.; Karst, U.; Galla, H.J.; Schwerdtle, T. Impact of manganese on and transfer across blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in vitro. J. Biol. Chem.; 2012; 287, pp. 17140-17151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.344093]

59. Au, C.; Benedetto, A.; Aschner, M. Manganese transport in eukaryotes: The role of DMT1. Neurotoxicology; 2008; 29, pp. 569-576. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.04.022]

60. Aschner, M. The transport of manganese across the blood-brain barrier. Neurotoxicology; 2006; 27, pp. 311-314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2005.09.002]

61. Kalia, K.; Jiang, W.; Zheng, W. Manganese accumulates primarily in nuclei of cultured brain cells. Neurotoxicology; 2008; 29, pp. 466-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.02.012]

62. Erikson, K.M.; Dobson, A.W.; Dorman, D.C.; Aschner, M. Manganese exposure and induced oxidative stress in the rat brain. Sci. Total Environ.; 2004; 334–335, pp. 409-416. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.044] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15504526]

63. Sarkar, S.; Rokad, D.; Malovic, E.; Luo, J.; Harischandra, D.S.; Jin, H.; Anantharam, V.; Huang, X.; Lewis, M.; Kanthasamy, A. et al. Manganese activates NLRP3 inflammasome signaling and propagates exosomal release of ASC in microglial cells. Sci. Signal.; 2019; 12, eaat9900. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aat9900] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30622196]

64. O’Neal, S.L.; Zheng, W. Manganese Toxicity Upon Overexposure: A Decade in Review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep.; 2015; 2, pp. 315-328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0056-x]

65. Brna, P.; Gordon, K.; Dooley, J.M.; Price, V. Manganese toxicity in a child with iron deficiency and polycythemia. J. Child Neurol.; 2011; 26, pp. 891-894. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0883073810393962] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21596707]

66. Martins, A.C., Jr.; Ruella Oliveira, S.; Barbosa, F., Jr.; Tinkov, A.A.; A, V.S.; Santamaria, A.; Lee, E.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Evaluating the risk of manganese-induced neurotoxicity of parenteral nutrition: Review of the current literature. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.; 2021; 17, pp. 581-593. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2021.1894123] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620266]

67. Tuschl, K.; Clayton, P.T.; Gospe, S.M., Jr.; Gulab, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Singhi, P.; Aulakh, R.; Ribeiro, R.T.; Barsottini, O.G.; Zaki, M.S. et al. Syndrome of hepatic cirrhosis, dystonia, polycythemia, and hypermanganesemia caused by mutations in SLC30A10, a manganese transporter in man. Am. J. Hum. Genet.; 2012; 90, pp. 457-466. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22341972]

68. Wahlberg, K.E.; Guazzetti, S.; Pineda, D.; Larsson, S.C.; Fedrighi, C.; Cagna, G.; Zoni, S.; Placidi, D.; Wright, R.O.; Smith, D.R. et al. Polymorphisms in Manganese Transporters SLC30A10 and SLC39A8 Are Associated With Children’s Neurodevelopment by Influencing Manganese Homeostasis. Front. Genet.; 2018; 9, 664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00664]

69. Leyva-Illades, D.; Chen, P.; Zogzas, C.E.; Hutchens, S.; Mercado, J.M.; Swaim, C.D.; Morrisett, R.A.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M.; Mukhopadhyay, S. SLC30A10 is a cell surface-localized manganese efflux transporter, and parkinsonism-causing mutations block its intracellular trafficking and efflux activity. J. Neurosci.; 2014; 34, pp. 14079-14095. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2329-14.2014]

70. Cox, G.N.; Staprans, S.; Edgar, R.S. The cuticle of Caenorhabditis elegans: II. Stage-specific changes in ultrastructure and protein composition during postembryonic development. Dev. Biol.; 1981; 86, pp. 456-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(81)90204-9]

71. Byerly, L.; Cassada, R.C.; Russell, R.L. The life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: I. Wild-type growth and reproduction. Dev. Biol.; 1976; 51, pp. 23-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(76)90119-6]

72. Greenwald, I. Development of the Vulva. C. elegans II; 2nd. Riddle, D.L.; Blumenthal, T.; Meyer, B.J.; Priess, J.R. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1997.

73. Jones, C.A.; Hartman, P.S. Replication in UV-irradiated Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Photochem. Photobiol.; 1996; 63, pp. 187-192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03012.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8657732]

74. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics; 1974; 77, pp. 71-94. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/77.1.71] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4366476]

75. Lewis, J.A.; Fleming, J.T. Basic culture methods. Methods Cell Biol.; 1995; 48, pp. 3-29. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8531730]

76. Petrascheck, M.; Ye, X.; Buck, L.B. An antidepressant that extends lifespan in adult Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature; 2007; 450, pp. 553-556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05991]

77. Melov, S.; Ravenscroft, J.; Malik, S.; Gill, M.S.; Walker, D.W.; Clayton, P.E.; Wallace, D.C.; Malfroy, B.; Doctrow, S.R.; Lithgow, G.J. Extension of life-span with superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics. Science; 2000; 289, pp. 1567-1569. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5484.1567]

78. Henze, A.; Homann, T.; Rohn, I.; Aschner, M.; Link, C.D.; Kleuser, B.; Schweigert, F.J.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system to study post-translational modifications of human transthyretin. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 37346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37346]

79. Baugh, L.R. To grow or not to grow: Nutritional control of development during Caenorhabditis elegans L1 arrest. Genetics; 2013; 194, pp. 539-555. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.150847]

80. Evason, K.; Collins, J.J.; Huang, C.; Hughes, S.; Kornfeld, K. Valproic acid extends Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan. Aging Cell; 2008; 7, pp. 305-317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00375.x]

81. Lin, Y.T.; Hoang, H.; Hsieh, S.I.; Rangel, N.; Foster, A.L.; Sampayo, J.N.; Lithgow, G.J.; Srinivasan, C. Manganous ion supplementation accelerates wild type development, enhances stress resistance, and rescues the life span of a short-lived Caenorhabditis elegans mutant. Free Radic. Biol. Med.; 2006; 40, pp. 1185-1193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.11.007]

82. Avila, D.S.; Benedetto, A.; Au, C.; Bornhorst, J.; Aschner, M. Involvement of heat shock proteins on Mn-induced toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol.; 2016; 17, 54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40360-016-0097-2]

83. Nicolai, M.M.; Weishaupt, A.K.; Baesler, J.; Brinkmann, V.; Wellenberg, A.; Winkelbeiner, N.; Gremme, A.; Aschner, M.; Fritz, G.; Schwerdtle, T. et al. Effects of Manganese on Genomic Integrity in the Multicellular Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 10905. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010905]

84. Baesler, J.; Michaelis, V.; Stiboller, M.; Haase, H.; Aschner, M.; Schwerdtle, T.; Sturzenbaum, S.R.; Bornhorst, J. Nutritive Manganese and Zinc Overdosing in Aging C. elegans Result in a Metallothionein-Mediated Alteration in Metal Homeostasis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.; 2021; 65, e2001176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202001176]

85. Park, H.H.; Jung, Y.; Lee, S.V. Survival assays using Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cells; 2017; 40, pp. 90-99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2017.0017]

86. Schunk, P.F.; Kalil, I.C.; Pimentel-Schmitt, E.F.; Lenz, D.; de Andrade, T.U.; Ribeiro, J.S.; Endringer, D.C. ICP-OES and Micronucleus Test to Evaluate Heavy Metal Contamination in Commercially Available Brazilian Herbal Teas. Biol. Trace Elem. Res.; 2016; 172, pp. 258-265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0566-2]

87. Kazarjan, J.; Vaher, M.; Hunter, T.; Kulp, M.; Hunter, G.J.; Bonetta, R.; Farrugia, D.; Kaljurand, M. Determination of metal content in superoxide dismutase enzymes by capillary electrophoresisdagger. J. Sep. Sci.; 2015; 38, pp. 1042-1045. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201400925] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581166]

88. Neth, K.; Lucio, M.; Walker, A.; Zorn, J.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Michalke, B. Changes in Brain Metallome/Metabolome Pattern due to a Single i.v. Injection of Manganese in Rats. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0138270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138270]

89. Michalke, B. Review about the manganese speciation project related to neurodegeneration: An analytical chemistry approach to increase the knowledge about manganese related parkinsonian symptoms. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. Organ Soc. Miner. Trace Elem. (GMS); 2016; 37, pp. 50-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.03.002]

90. Rohn, I.; Marschall, T.A.; Kroepfl, N.; Jensen, K.B.; Aschner, M.; Tuck, S.; Kuehnelt, D.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. Selenium species-dependent toxicity, bioavailability and metabolic transformations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Met. Integr. Biomet. Sci.; 2018; 10, pp. 818-827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8MT00066B] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770420]

91. McColl, G.; James, S.A.; Mayo, S.; Howard, D.L.; Ryan, C.G.; Kirkham, R.; Moorhead, G.F.; Paterson, D.; de Jonge, M.D.; Bush, A.I. Caenorhabditis elegans maintains highly compartmentalized cellular distribution of metals and steep concentration gradients of manganese. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e32685. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032685] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393436]

92. Fahrni, C.J. Biological applications of X-ray fluorescence microscopy: Exploring the subcellular topography and speciation of transition metals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.; 2007; 11, pp. 121-127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.02.039]

93. James, S.A.; Myers, D.E.; de Jonge, M.D.; Vogt, S.; Ryan, C.G.; Sexton, B.A.; Hoobin, P.; Paterson, D.; Howard, D.L.; Mayo, S.C. et al. Quantitative comparison of preparation methodologies for X-ray fluorescence microscopy of brain tissue. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.; 2011; 401, pp. 853-864. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4978-3]

94. de Jonge, M.D.; Vogt, S. Hard X-ray fluorescence tomography--an emerging tool for structural visualization. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.; 2010; 20, pp. 606-614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2010.09.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20934872]

95. Ganio, K.; James, S.A.; Hare, D.J.; Roberts, B.R.; McColl, G. Accurate biometal quantification per individual Caenorhabditis elegans. Analyst; 2016; 141, pp. 1434-1439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5AN02544C] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811851]

96. Brinkhaus, S.G.; Bornhorst, J.; Chakraborty, S.; Wehe, C.A.; Niehaus, R.; Reifschneider, O.; Aschner, M.; Karst, U. Elemental bioimaging of manganese uptake in C. elegans. Metallomics; 2014; 6, pp. 617-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3mt00334e]

97. Aschner, M.; Palinski, C.; Sperling, M.; Karst, U.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. Imaging metals in Caenorhabditis elegans. Metallomics; 2017; 9, pp. 357-364. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6MT00265J] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28054081]

98. Bjorklund, A.; Dunnett, S.B. Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: An update. Trends Neurosci.; 2007; 30, pp. 194-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.006]

99. Sulston, J.; Dew, M.; Brenner, S. Dopaminergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol.; 1975; 163, pp. 215-226. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.901630207]

100. Cao, S.; Gelwix, C.C.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. Torsin-mediated protection from cellular stress in the dopaminergic neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci.; 2005; 25, pp. 3801-3812. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5157-04.2005]

101. Flames, N.; Hobert, O. Gene regulatory logic of dopamine neuron differentiation. Nature; 2009; 458, pp. 885-889. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07929]

102. Nass, R.; Hall, D.H.; Miller, D.M., 3rd; Blakely, R.D. Neurotoxin-induced degeneration of dopamine neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2002; 99, pp. 3264-3269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.042497999]

103. Martinez-Finley, E.J.; Avila, D.S.; Chakraborty, S.; Aschner, M. Insights from Caenorhabditis elegans on the role of metals in neurodegenerative diseases. Metallomics; 2011; 3, pp. 271-279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0mt00064g] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21210060]

104. Xiao, J.; Rui, Q.; Guo, Y.; Chang, X.; Wang, D. Prolonged manganese exposure induces severe deficits in lifespan, development and reproduction possibly by altering oxidative stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Environ. Sci.; 2009; 21, pp. 842-848. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62350-5]

105. Peres, T.V.; Arantes, L.P.; Miah, M.R.; Bornhorst, J.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bowman, A.B.; Leal, R.B.; Aschner, M. Role of Caenorhabditis elegans AKT-1/2 and SGK-1 in Manganese Toxicity. Neurotox Res.; 2018; 34, pp. 584-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12640-018-9915-1]

106. Angeli, S.; Barhydt, T.; Jacobs, R.; Killilea, D.W.; Lithgow, G.J.; Andersen, J.K. Manganese disturbs metal and protein homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Metallomics; 2014; 6, pp. 1816-1823. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4MT00168K]

107. Chase, D.L.; Koelle, M.R. Biogenic amine neurotransmitters in C. elegans. WormBook; 2007; pp. 1-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.132.1]

108. Vidal-Gadea, A.G.; Davis, S.; Becker, L.; Pierce-Shimomura, J.T. Coordination of behavioral hierarchies during environmental transitions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Worm; 2012; 1, pp. 5-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/worm.19148]

109. Bornhorst, J.; Chakraborty, S.; Meyer, S.; Lohren, H.; Brinkhaus, S.G.; Knight, A.L.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Karst, U.; Schwerdtle, T. et al. The effects of pdr1, djr1.1 and pink1 loss in manganese-induced toxicity and the role of alpha-synuclein in C. elegans. Metallomics; 2014; 6, pp. 476-490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3MT00325F]

110. Settivari, R.; Levora, J.; Nass, R. The divalent metal transporter homologues SMF-1/2 mediate dopamine neuron sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans models of manganism and parkinson disease. J. Biol. Chem.; 2009; 284, pp. 35758-35768. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.051409] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19801673]

111. Neumann, C.; Baesler, J.; Steffen, G.; Nicolai, M.M.; Zubel, T.; Aschner, M.; Burkle, A.; Mangerich, A.; Schwerdtle, T.; Bornhorst, J. The role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in manganese exposed Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol.; 2020; 57, pp. 21-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.09.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31546209]

112. Avila, D.S.; Benedetto, A.; Au, C.; Manarin, F.; Erikson, K.; Soares, F.A.; Rocha, J.B.; Aschner, M. Organotellurium and organoselenium compounds attenuate Mn-induced toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans by preventing oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med.; 2012; 52, pp. 1903-1910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.044]

113. Gunter, T.E.; Pfeiffer, D.R. Mechanisms by which mitochondria transport calcium. Am. J. Physiol.; 1990; 258, pp. C755-C786. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1990.258.5.C755]

114. Gavin, C.E.; Gunter, K.K.; Gunter, T.E. Mn2+ sequestration by mitochondria and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 1992; 115, pp. 1-5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(92)90360-5]

115. Au, C.; Benedetto, A.; Anderson, J.; Labrousse, A.; Erikson, K.; Ewbank, J.J.; Aschner, M. SMF-1, SMF-2 and SMF-3 DMT1 orthologues regulate and are regulated differentially by manganese levels in C. elegans. PLoS ONE; 2009; 4, e7792. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007792]

116. Bandyopadhyay, J.; Song, H.O.; Park, B.J.; Singaravelu, G.; Sun, J.L.; Ahnn, J.; Cho, J.H. Functional assessment of Nramp-like metal transporters and manganese in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2009; 390, pp. 136-141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.082] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785996]

117. Cho, J.H.; Ko, K.M.; Singaravelu, G.; Ahnn, J. Caenorhabditis elegans PMR1, a P-type calcium ATPase, is important for calcium/manganese homeostasis and oxidative stress response. FEBS Lett.; 2005; 579, pp. 778-782. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.032]

118. Sakaguchi-Nakashima, A.; Meir, J.Y.; Jin, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Hisamoto, N. LRK-1, a C. elegans PARK8-related kinase, regulates axonal-dendritic polarity of SV proteins. Curr. Biol.; 2007; 17, pp. 592-598. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.074] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346966]

119. Samann, J.; Hegermann, J.; von Gromoff, E.; Eimer, S.; Baumeister, R.; Schmidt, E. Caenorhabditits elegans LRK-1 and PINK-1 act antagonistically in stress response and neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem.; 2009; 284, pp. 16482-16491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M808255200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19251702]

120. Chege, P.M.; McColl, G. Caenorhabditis elegans: A model to investigate oxidative stress and metal dyshomeostasis in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci.; 2014; 6, 89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00089] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904406]

121. Lee, J.W.; Cannon, J.R. LRRK2 mutations and neurotoxicant susceptibility. Exp. Biol. Med.; 2015; 240, pp. 752-759. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370215579162] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888648]

122. Trempe, J.F.; Fon, E.A. Structure and Function of Parkin, PINK1, and DJ-1, the Three Musketeers of Neuroprotection. Front. Neurol.; 2013; 4, 38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00038]

123. Giasson, B.I.; Duda, J.E.; Murray, I.V.; Chen, Q.; Souza, J.M.; Hurtig, H.I.; Ischiropoulos, H.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M. Oxidative damage linked to neurodegeneration by selective alpha-synuclein nitration in synucleinopathy lesions. Science; 2000; 290, pp. 985-989. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5493.985] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11062131]

124. Chen, P.; DeWitt, M.R.; Bornhorst, J.; Soares, F.A.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Age- and manganese-dependent modulation of dopaminergic phenotypes in a C. elegans DJ-1 genetic model of Parkinson’s disease. Metallomics; 2015; 7, pp. 289-298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4MT00292J] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531510]

125. Chakraborty, S.; Chen, P.; Bornhorst, J.; Schwerdtle, T.; Schumacher, F.; Kleuser, B.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Loss of pdr-1/parkin influences Mn homeostasis through altered ferroportin expression in C. elegans. Metallomics; 2015; 7, pp. 847-856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5MT00052A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25769119]

126. Avila, D.S.; Somlyai, G.; Somlyai, I.; Aschner, M. Anti-aging effects of deuterium depletion on Mn-induced toxicity in a C. elegans model. Toxicol. Lett.; 2012; 211, pp. 319-324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.04.014]

127. Sawin, E.R.; Ranganathan, R.; Horvitz, H.R. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron; 2000; 26, pp. 619-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81199-X]

128. Bettinger, J.C.; McIntire, S.L. State-dependency in C. elegans. Genes Brain Behav.; 2004; 3, pp. 266-272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00080.x]

129. Kimura, K.D.; Fujita, K.; Katsura, I. Enhancement of odor avoidance regulated by dopamine signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci.; 2010; 30, pp. 16365-16375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6023-09.2010]

130. Lee, J.; Jee, C.; McIntire, S.L. Ethanol preference in C. elegans. Genes Brain Behav.; 2009; 8, pp. 578-585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00513.x]

131. Fitsanakis, V.A.; Zhang, N.; Anderson, J.G.; Erikson, K.M.; Avison, M.J.; Gore, J.C.; Aschner, M. Measuring brain manganese and iron accumulation in rats following 14 weeks of low-dose manganese treatment using atomic absorption spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. Toxicol. Sci.; 2008; 103, pp. 116-124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn019]

132. Gubert, P.; Aguiar, G.C.; Mourao, T.; Bridi, J.C.; Barros, A.G.; Soares, F.A.; Romano-Silva, M.A. Behavioral and metabolic effects of the atypical antipsychotic ziprasidone on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e74780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074780] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069346]

133. Yemini, E.; Kerr, R.A.; Schafer, W.R. Illumination for worm tracking and behavioral imaging. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2011; 2011, pp. 1480-1482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot067009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135668]

134. Schetinger, M.R.C.; Peres, T.V.; Arantes, L.P.; Carvalho, F.; Dressler, V.; Heidrich, G.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Combined exposure to methylmercury and manganese during L1 larval stage causes motor dysfunction, cholinergic and monoaminergic up-regulation and oxidative stress in L4 Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicology; 2019; 411, pp. 154-162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.10.006]

135. Horvitz, H.R.; Chalfie, M.; Trent, C.; Sulston, J.E.; Evans, P.D. Serotonin and octopamine in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science; 1982; 216, pp. 1012-1014. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6805073] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6805073]

136. Dallière, N.; Holden-Dye, L.; Dillon, J.; O’Connor, V.; Walker, R. Caenorhabditis elegans Feeding Behaviors; Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience: Oxford, UK, 2017.

137. Niacaris, T.; Avery, L. Serotonin regulates repolarization of the C. elegans pharyngeal muscle. J. Exp. Biol.; 2003; 206, pp. 223-231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00101]

138. Wormbase. Available online: http://www.wormbase.org (accessed on 20 September 2019).

139. Dalliere, N.; Bhatla, N.; Luedtke, Z.; Ma, D.K.; Woolman, J.; Walker, R.J.; Holden-Dye, L.; O’Connor, V. Multiple excitatory and inhibitory neural signals converge to fine-tune Caenorhabditis elegans feeding to food availability. FASEB J.; 2016; 30, pp. 836-848. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-279257]

140. Martins, A.C., Jr.; Morcillo, P.; Ijomone, O.M.; Venkataramani, V.; Harrison, F.E.; Lee, E.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. New Insights on the Role of Manganese in Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2019; 16, 3546. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193546]

141. Machiela, E.; Rudich, P.D.; Traa, A.; Anglas, U.; Soo, S.K.; Senchuk, M.M.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Targeting Mitochondrial Network Disorganization is Protective in C. elegans Models of Huntington’s Disease. Aging Dis.; 2021; 12, pp. 1753-1772. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14336/AD.2021.0404]

142. Johnson, S.A.; Fang, T.; De Marchi, F.; Neel, D.; Van Weehaeghe, D.; Berry, J.D.; Paganoni, S. Pharmacotherapy for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Review of Approved and Upcoming Agents. Drugs; 2022; 82, pp. 1367-1388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01769-1]

143. Venda, L.L.; Cragg, S.J.; Buchman, V.L.; Wade-Martins, R. alpha-Synuclein and dopamine at the crossroads of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci.; 2010; 33, pp. 559-568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.004]

144. Alexander, A.G.; Marfil, V.; Li, C. Use of Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to study Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Genet.; 2014; 5, 279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00279]

145. Tong, Y.; Yang, H.; Tian, X.; Wang, H.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, S.; Yu, J.; Zhang, T.; Fan, D.; Guo, X. et al. High manganese, a risk for Alzheimer’s disease: High manganese induces amyloid-beta related cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis.; 2014; 42, pp. 865-878. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-140534] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24961945]

146. Du, K.; Liu, M.; Pan, Y.; Zhong, X.; Wei, M. Association of Serum Manganese Levels with Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients; 2017; 9, 231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9030231] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273828]

147. Griffin, E.F.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. Genetic and Pharmacological Discovery for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Chem. Neurosci.; 2017; 8, pp. 2596-2606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00361] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29022701]

148. Martins, A.C., Jr.; Gubert, P.; Villas Boas, G.R.; Meirelles Paes, M.; Santamaria, A.; Lee, E.; Tinkov, A.A.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Manganese-induced neurodegenerative diseases and possible therapeutic approaches. Expert Rev. Neurother.; 2020; 20, pp. 1109-1121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2020.1807330] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799578]