It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The purpose of this non-experimental study was to utilize a resource dependence theory (RDT) conceptual framework to examine differences between quality, affordability, and undergraduate enrollment based on private nonprofit four-year colleges and universities’ (PCUs) institutional characteristics from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) database. The results demonstrated that admission selectivity has the largest effect on variations in average undergraduate tuition, expenditures per student (EPS), six-year graduation rates, the percentage of Pell grantees, and the percentage of nonresident alien (NRAL) undergraduate students. From the perspective of RDT, these findings indicate that powerful PCUs utilize their market power to influence the supply of academically well-prepared students in the PCU enrollment market. The results also indicated there was an inverse relationship between quality and affordability—for students and institutions. An increase in quality costs students more in tuition, and it also costs institutions more in institutional aid. Further analysis showed that the inverse relationship between quality and affordability persists even when moderated by high- and low-income enrollment groups. Of note, PCUs with high rates of low-income enrollment and high EPS had lower student share of the cost (SSC) than PCUs with low or moderate low-income enrollment levels; however, there were few PCUs in the sample that met this condition. High-income enrollment is concentrated in large, more selective, secular, doctoral institutions, which also have higher SSC than other institutional categories. This suggests high-income students were willing to pay a premium for the benefits of quality, which conforms with previous literature.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer