Diagnostic psychiatric and somatic comorbidity in patients with depression in the Western Balkan countries

Abstract

Introduction

This paper aims to examine the frequency and significance of diagnostic comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and somatic diseases in a sample of patients with depression as well as present current psychopharmacological treatment of the patients in the sample.

Methods

The subjects in this study sample were 489 patients from the four Western Balkan countries with current primary diagnosis of major depression according to ICD 10. Comorbid psychiatric disorders and non-psychiatric illnesses were noted according to ICD 10 criteria during the diagnostic interview and analysed later. Additionally, the pharmacological treatment (existing and newly introduced) for each patient was noted and analysed later.

Results

At least one comorbid psychiatric disorder was present in 72.5% of patients. The most frequent were anxiety disorders (53.6%), specifically generalized anxiety disorder (20.2%); non-organic sleep disorders (50.7%), specifically insomnia (48.4%); and sexual dysfunctions (21.4%), specifically lack of sexual desire (20.2%). Comorbidity with any non-psychiatric illness was present in 80.3% of patients. The most frequent were circulatory system diseases (55.9%), specifically hypertension (45.9%); endocrine, nutritional and metabolic disorders (51.3%), specifically hyperlipidaemia (24.0%); and other non-psychiatric disorders (60.7%), specifically low back pain (22.7%). All patients received pharmacological treatment with different medications. Most patients received monotherapy or combination therapy of antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics and antiepileptics. The most frequently used antidepressants were escitalopram, sertraline, and duloxetine. The most frequently used anxiolytics were alprazolam and diazepam, the most used antiepileptic was pregabalin, and the most used antipsychotics were olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole.

Conclusion

The results of the study confirm the results of previous research studies about the high prevalence of psychiatric and non-psychiatric comorbidities in patients with depression that were conducted in the past. It would be important if future studies could prove the importance of those comorbidities on clinical severity, choice of treatment, and its outcome in patients with depression.

Introduction

Comorbidity is one of the concepts in psychiatry that arose as a consequence of the modern diagnostic system [1]. This means that previous diagnostic systems contained a significantly smaller number of diagnostic categories and were significantly more broadly conceived. Current diagnostic systems have a significantly larger number of diagnostic categories, and there is a significantly greater possibility of analysing comorbid disorders. This concept allowed psychiatrists to look at their patients from multiple aspects, which ensured that important information in the patient’s clinical severity were not neglected. The existence of clear diagnostic criteria and no hierarchical rule for establishing a diagnosis have given researchers the opportunity to analyse many aspects of complex psychiatric disorders. Clinicians often use this concept in formulating recommendations for therapy and seeking a pragmatic approach to possible complications of some psychiatric disorders [2]. During the last decades, the concept of comorbidity has taken hold in psychiatry to a significant extent [3].

Although the original concept of comorbidity refers to any medical illness that is present in one patient, it has become usual in psychiatry to examine only psychiatric syndromes under this term [3]. So, for example, it is common to examine only the presence of other psychiatric disorders under the term comorbidity of depression [4]. Studies examining the frequency of psychiatric comorbidity in subjects with depression indicate that 74% of subjects with depression met the diagnostic criteria for at least one other psychiatric disorder, and that as many as a third of subjects with depression met the criteria for three or more disorders [4]. At the same time, the most frequent comorbidities for the depressive disorder were anxiety disorders (58%) and disorders due to abuse of alcohol and other substances (42%). Among anxiety disorders, the most common were social phobia (27%), specific phobia (24%), post-traumatic stress disorder (19%), and generalized anxiety disorder (17%). Among substance use disorders, alcohol abuse or addiction was the most common (29%) [5]. Other psychiatric disorders were significantly less common: dysthymia 9%, somatoform disorders 23%, impulse disorders 19%, and eating disorders 4% [4]. However, for a considerable period of time there has been a lack of quality studies on depression comorbidity with larger sample sizes relying on routine clinical practice. Thus, it remains unclear whether there have been any changes over time in the frequency and significance of comorbidity of depression.

On the other hand, research studies have shown that depression does not occur only in comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, but that it can occur simultaneously with many somatic diseases. The results of research studies indicate that depression in some somatic diseases occurs significantly more often than in the general population. Thus, for example, it was indicated that depression occurs in 40–65% of patients with myocardial infarction, in 25% of patients with cancer, in 25% of patients with cerebrovascular diseases, and with significantly more frequent occurrence in patients with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis relative to the general population [3, 6]. Nevertheless, all of these studies were conducted on samples of patients with primary somatic illnesses and resulted in a lack of research study results regarding the frequency of comorbid somatic illness in a sample of patients with depression.

Therefore, this paper aims to examine the frequency and significance of diagnostic comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and various somatic diseases in a sample of patients with depression, and to present current psychopharmacological treatment of the patients in the sample. The research hypothesis is that there is a high frequency of diagnostic comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and somatic diseases in patients with depression. This hypothesis was formed on the basis of clinical experience and on the basis of the cited research studies that examined comorbidity of depression.

Method

This study is part of a larger research project known as the ‘COSMOS study,’ which aims to identify the incidence of comorbidities and therapeutic procedures in selected neurological and psychiatric diagnoses. The study seeks to evaluate the differences in therapy between patients with comorbidities and those without them, like the study from Dragašek (2019) [7]. The COSMOS study focused on several diagnostic groups as the primary diagnoses under investigation: Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, and neuropathic pain. Each monitored area had its own parameters of investigation.

A primary diagnosis refers to the disorder that is most distressing to the patient and is the primary reason for the patient to seek help from a specialist in psychiatry or neurology. The COSMOS study was a prospective, naturalistic, longitudinal, non-intervention, observational multi-centre study conducted in over 174 clinician practices at 46 different clinical treatment facilities in four countries in the Western Balkans region: Serbia (18 centres), Croatia (5 centres), Bosnia and Herzegovina (4 centres), and North Macedonia (19 centres). There were 96 investigators from Serbia, 10 investigators from Croatia, 22 investigators from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 46 investigators from North Macedonia. Only investigators with appropriate specialization, completed required education for conducting the study, and at whose site the agreement for study participation was signed were included in the study as study investigators.

The COSMOS study included adult participants (> 18 years old) diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, and/or neuropathic pain, who voluntarily participated in the study, were able to follow the study protocol, and had signed a written consent form. This article presents the findings regarding patients whose primary diagnosis was depression. The recruitment period for this study was from 1^st December 2019 to 1^st December 2021.

The study was reviewed and approved by independent ethics committees and/or regulatory authorities in participating countries in line with the local legislation requirements for epidemiological studies. In Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ethical Committee of the Clinical Center University of Sarajevo number 03-02-50626, of 7 October 2019; Agency for medicinal products and medical devices, number: 08–07.5-1-9963-1/19 of 18 October 2019. In Serbia: Ethical Committee of the University Clinical Centre of Serbia in Belgrade, number 274/13, of 29 November 2019; Ethical Committee of Instutute od Mental Health, number 2057/1, of 17 December 2019. In Croatia: Ethical Committee of the University Clinical Centre Zagreb, Class: 8.1-19/260-2, Number: 02/21 AG, of 25 November 2019; Ethics Committee of the Zagreb-West Health Centre, of 20 December 2019; Ethics Committee of the Primorsko-Goranska County Health Centre, No.: 01-7/7-6-20 of 23 January 2020. In North Macedonia: Commission for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Medical Devices and National Ethics Committee, number 11-6812/3, of 2 September 2019.

Patient’s written consent was the first procedure carried out during the study baseline visit. The information was explained verbally by the investigator in a manner understandable to the patient. Only patients who gave their voluntary consent to participate in the study (Informed Consent Form, ICF), were further included in the study. Furthermore, data was collected only from patients who gave their consent for the collection, analysis and reporting of their personal data in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR).

Subjects

The subjects in this study sample were 489 patients with different clinical types of depression according to ICD 10. That means that depression was the main reason for a patient to seek treatment from a psychiatrist, neurologist or neuropsychiatrist. Patients with primary diagnoses of any other psychiatric disorders were excluded from the study sample as they did not align with the study objectives. There were 39.5% (n = 193) patients from Serbia, 22.7% (n = 111) from Bosnia and Herzegovina, 22.7% (n = 111) from North Macedonia, and 15.1% (n = 74) from Croatia. Table 1 presents basic demographic and clinical data of the sample.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Among 489 patients, 65.4% (n = 320) were diagnosed with a depressive episode, 29.7% (n = 145) were diagnosed with recurrent depressive disorder (relapse), 2.7% (n = 13) with dysthymia–a chronic depression of mood, 3.1% (n = 15) with organic depression disorder, 1.6% (n = 8) with recurrent brief depressive episodes, and 1.0% with atypical depression.

In the subgroup of patients with depressive episodes, the prevalence of the different types of episodes were as follows: 13.4% (n = 43) of patients had mild depression, 47.8% (n = 153) patients had moderate depression, 32.5% (n = 104) of patients had severe depression without psychotic symptoms, and 6.3% (n = 20) of patients had severe depression with psychotic symptoms. In the subgroup of patients with recurrent depressive disorder, the prevalence was as follows: 8.3% (n = 12) of patients had mild depression, 40.0% (n = 58) of patients had moderate depression, 36.6% (n = 53) of patients had severe depression without psychotic symptoms, and 15.2% (n = 22) of patients had severe depression with psychotic symptoms. On average, the patients included in the sample (n = 455) had an average of 2.2 ± 1.5 of depressive episodes within the last 2 years.

Procedure

The study sample consisted of patients who sought psychiatric treatment at various psychiatric facilities across four countries. These patients were referred by primary care physicians and other psychiatrists, or sought treatment on their own accord for mental health issues. The patients included in the study samples underwent a semi-structured interview with a specialist of psychiatry to assess the presence of psychiatric disorders and somatic illnesses related to their mental and somatic health problems. Patients diagnosed with depression were included in the study sample after their diagnosis was established according to ICD 10 criteria and after obtaining their informed consent in accordance with the aims of the study. The comorbid psychiatric disorders and non-psychiatric illnesses according to ICD 10 criteria were recorded during the diagnostic interview and analysed afterwards. Additionally, the pharmacological treatment for each patient, both existing and newly introduced, was recorded and analysed later. All patients were seen by their physician who also participated as an investigator in the study.

Statistical analyses

Summary statistics include the number of patients/observations, frequencies and corresponding percentages for categorical variables. For continuous variables, descriptive statistics (number of patients/observations, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum, first and third quartile) have been tabulated. All analyses in this statistical report were performed only for patients with available data. Due to the aims of the study, the effects of therapy and thorough statistical analysis and data correlations were not analysed. Microsoft Office Excel 2016© was used for the computational part of the analysis, and Microsoft Office Word 2016© was used to compile the report and prepare the paper.

Results

Psychiatric comorbidity of depression

Among patients with recorded data, at least one comorbid psychiatric disorder was present in 72.5% of patients. On average, patients (n = 484) had 1.2 ± 1.1 comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnoses. 27.5% (n = 133) of patients diagnosed with depression had no comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnoses, 38.0% (n = 184) had one comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnoses, 20.9% (n = 101) had two comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnoses, 11.0% (n = 53) had three, 2.3% (n = 11) had four, and 0.4% (n = 2) had five or more comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnoses.

Table 2 displays the frequency of psychiatric comorbidities within the sample, with each patient possibly having several comorbid diagnoses. Most frequent were anxiety disorders, specifically generalized anxiety disorder; non-organic sleep disorder, specifically insomnia; and sexual dysfunction, specifically lack of sexual desire.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Non-psychiatric comorbidity of depression

Comorbidity with any non-psychiatric illness was present in 392 (80.3%) out of 489 patients. Each patient could possibly have several comorbidities. The average number of comorbid non-psychiatric disorder diagnoses per patient was 1.4 ± 1.0 (n = 489). Out of the total sample of 489 patients, 96 (19.7%) did not have any comorbid non-psychiatric illness diagnosis. However, 173 (35.5%) patients had one comorbid non-psychiatric disorder, 132 (27.0%) had two, 80 (16.4%) had three, 6 (1.2%) had four, and 1 (0.2%) patient had five or more comorbid non-psychiatric illnesses diagnoses.

Table 3 displays the frequency of non-psychiatric comorbidities in the sample, with each patient possibly having several comorbid diagnoses. Most frequent were diseases of the circulatory system, specifically hypertension; endocrine, nutritional and metabolic disorders, specifically hyperlipidaemia; and other non-psychiatric disorders, specifically low back pain.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Pharmacological treatment

Every patient (100%) in the sample received pharmacological treatment with different medicines. Table 4 displays the distribution of patients who were treated with a specific group of medicines. The majority of patients in the sample were treated with antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and/or antiepileptics, either as monotherapy or in combination with each other, or in combination with other listed groups of medicines.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 5 displays the average total daily dose and distribution of patients treated with a specific medicine (INN). The most frequently used antidepressants were escitalopram, sertraline, duloxetine and venlafaxine. The most frequently used anxiolytics were alprazolam and diazepam, the most frequently used antiepileptic was pregabalin, and the most frequently used antipsychotics were olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Discussion

The co-occurrence of two or more psychiatric disorders at the same time in the same person and the co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and somatic illnesses is a complex phenomenon that can have an impact on various aspects of these disorders and illnesses. For example, individuals with depression and comorbid conditions may experience a more severe and prolonged course of illness compared to those with depression alone. With this research, we attempted to bridge a significant time gap in previous studies on this topic. This time gap may be viewed as a barrier to understanding mental health problems in everyday clinical practice. The problem with psychiatric comorbidity is that some diseases are often overlooked and neglected, which can have significant and negative impacts on patients, their treatments, and their quality of life.

Before discussing them, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution. In this study, we collected information about the patients’ medical illnesses through interviews, but a complete medical examination was not conducted. This limitation prevents us from concluding that all the relevant data was collected and included in the results. Additionally, assessing personal information about the mental and medical status of patients with depression can be challenging as their current mood may affect the accuracy of their reports on functioning and other pertinent data. Also, in this research, a categorical approach was applied, but in future research it would be important to apply a dimensional approach with the inclusion of instruments for the assessment of psychopathological phenomena.

Psychiatric comorbidity of depression

The findings of our study revealed that over half of the patients with primary depression had comorbidities with other psychiatric conditions or somatic illnesses. The most prevalent comorbid condition was in the spectrum of anxiety disorders, which is consistent with previously published studies [4, 8, 9]. For example, according to Fava et al., 2000, comorbid anxiety disorder diagnoses were present in 51% of consecutive depressed outpatients between the ages of 18 and 65 years [8]. In an epidemiological study done by Kessler et al., 2005, 62% of individuals with major depressive disorder also met the criteria for generalized anxiety disorder, 52% for social phobia, 50% for posttraumatic stress disorder, 48% for panic disorder, and 42% for obsessive-compulsive disorder [9]. All of these results are expected considering that symptoms of depression and anxiety frequently co-occur, regardless of whether depression or an anxiety disorder is considered as the primary disorder.

Our study revealed that non-organic sleep disorder and sexual dysfunction were next in line as the most common comorbid conditions in patients with depression. Our findings related to the prevalence of insomnia are consistent with the results of other clinical studies. According to Winokur A et al., 2001, insomnia may occur in 60–80% of patients with major depression [10]. Given that non-organic sleep disturbances, in particular insomnia, are among the criteria for diagnosing depression, these findings did not come as a surprise to us. Furthermore, this raises the question of whether this is a true comorbidity of psychiatric conditions or simply an overlapping diagnostic criterion for various psychiatric disorders categorized as distinct categories in diagnostic manuals.

On the other hand, the findings of our study indicate a lower prevalence of sexual dysfunction compared to other clinical studies. According to Thakurdesai & Sawant, 2018, sexual dysfunctions were seen in 63% of patients with mild to moderate stage of depression [11]. This discrepancy could be due to a different methodology and different study sample. But the issue of frequent comorbidity of sexual dysfunction and depression could be viewed as a consequence of overlapping diagnostic criterions. Moreover, patients who experience sexual dysfunction most frequently report a lack of desire, which has an impact on their relationships and quality of life. This further complicates the healing process because it increases the patients’ sense of loneliness. This could potentially be a symptom of depression, a consequence of the use of antidepressants, or it could be an independent disorder diagnosed as a comorbid condition.

Non-psychiatric comorbidity of depression

Furthermore, our study revealed a high prevalence of comorbid somatic illnesses in patients diagnosed with depression. The most common diagnosed comorbid conditions were diseases of the circulatory system, mostly hypertension. In addition, endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic disorders, as well as other conditions such as low back pain and headache, were also found to be among the most frequent non-psychiatric conditions in patients with depression. Our data shows that diseases of the cardiovascular system had the highest number of reported comorbid conditions, consistent with the data obtained in previous studies. However, the order of comorbidities is somewhat different (Robertson & Katona, 1997; Kupfer & Frank, 2003) [3, 6]. Additionally, it is worth noting that another study (Scalco et al., 2005) found evidence supporting increased prevalence of hypertension in depressed patients, increased prevalence of depression in hypertensive patients, as well as an association between depressive symptoms and hypotension, and alteration of the circadian variation of blood pressure in depressed patients [12]. In general, all of these results and previous reports suggest that depression is associated with the presence of cardiovascular problems and diseases [13].

On the other hand, our findings show that, rather than cancer as a comorbid condition, endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic issues ranked second after circulatory diseases in the list of most prevalent comorbidities. Given the average age of the subjects, who were over 50 years old, and the high prevalence of these diseases in the general population of this age group, it is not surprising that our study identified these as the most common non-psychiatric comorbid conditions in patients with depression.

One of the most frequently present non-psychiatric comorbidities in our study were pain syndromes such as low back pain, pain in limb, myalgia, headache, and stomach pain. In general, pain syndromes frequently co-occur in depression. According to the findings of other clinical studies, the reported prevalence of pain in depressed patients varies from 50% to 60% of individuals with depression [14, 15]. Additionally, some clinical studies have shown that physical symptoms, including pain, are the primary motive for patients to seek medical attention [15]. As pain has a significant impact on both treatment outcomes and the functioning of patients with depression, guidelines recommend that every patient with depression should be assessed for the presence, nature, location, and severity of pain complaints [16].

Pharmacological treatment

In this epidemiological study, nearly all patients with depression received treatment with antidepressants, which are specified as the first line of treatment in the guidelines (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2022, American Psychiatric Association (APA) 2010) [17, 18]. According to the guidelines of the APA, patients with mild to moderate major depressive disorder are recommended to be treated initially with an antidepressant, and those with severe major depressive disorder should also receive an antidepressant unless electroconvulsive therapy is planned [17]. The most commonly prescribed medicines in our study were escitalopram and sertraline. Patients were frequently treated concomitantly, with psychiatric pharmacological treatment options being more commonly prescribed than non-psychiatric therapies. The most frequently concomitantly prescribed medicines were anxiolytics, antipsychotics or antiepileptics. The most commonly used antidepressants, escitalopram and sertraline, were administered at recommended doses, whereas duloxetine was slightly below the recommended dose [19–21]. A balanced activity on serotonin and noradrenaline is exhibited by duloxetine at the recommended starting and maintenance dose of 60 mg in the treatment of depression [22].

Statistical analysis and further investigation of treatment patterns among subgroups of included patients with depression based on specific comorbidities were not performed in this study. According to literature data, there is a need to personalize antidepressant treatment in order to enhance treatment outcomes by maximizing the chances of improvement and minimizing the risk of adverse events. The choice of the initial treatment modality should consider several factors such as the symptom profile, presence of co-occurring disorders or psychosocial stressors, the patient’s prior treatment experience, and patient preference [17].

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are considered the first-line treatment for uncomplicated depression or comorbidity with a spectrum of anxiety disorders. The most used SSRI is escitalopram [23]. As per Cipriani A, 2018, escitalopram is considered a favourable SSRI in terms of its efficacy and acceptability balance [24].

In most cases of comorbidity with cardiovascular diseases, SSRIs are considered the first-line antidepressant agents because of their more acceptable safety profile and wider margins of nontoxic levels compared with other antidepressant classes [25]. According to the 2021 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), patients who have coronary heart disease (CHD) and moderate to severe major depression should be evaluated for antidepressant treatment with SSRIs, as this type of treatment can lower the rates of CHD readmission and all-cause mortality [26]. However, there are pharmacological differences among different SSRIs [25]. Sertraline has been suggested to be one of the first-choice antidepressant agents for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) [25, 27]. According to Stahl, 2017, sertraline has the best documented cardiovascular safety of any antidepressant [28].

In terms of improving pain symptoms, antidepressant treatment has been associated with reductions in pain symptoms among individuals with psychogenic or somatoform pain disorders. For neuropathic pain in general, evidence-based guidelines recommend the use of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) [17]. Given the greater tolerability of SNRI antidepressants, these agents may sometimes be chosen before a TCA for a patient with co-occurring depression and neuropathic pain. Besides, duloxetine is the only antidepressant with official indication for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Duloxetine as a dual antidepressant reduces pain symptoms by potentiating descending pain inhibitory pathways in the central nervous system. In the USA it is also approved for other indications (fibromyalgia, chronic musculoskeletal pain) [17, 29].

Conclusion

The study findings corroborate results of earlier research studies conducted some time ago on the high prevalence of psychiatric and non-psychiatric comorbidities in patients with depression. It would be important if future studies could prove the importance of those comorbidities on clinical severity, choice of treatment, and its outcome in patients with depression. Recognizing the comorbidities of depression is crucial as some of these conditions often go unnoticed and are overlooked, which can have serious and unnecessary negative consequences for patients. Therefore, it is imperative to view depression through the lens of comorbidity in order to improve the quality of medical treatment and alleviate the suffering of patients, regardless of their primary diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

COSMOS epidemiological study group: from Croatia: Alma Mihaljević Peleš, Marina Šagud, Petra Folnegović Grošić, Đurđica Sivić, Vesna Kalšan Saik, Ivan Otić, Elizabeta Dadić Hero, Tomislav Ahel; from Srbia: Milan Latas, Maja Ivković, Olivera Vuković, Čedo Miljević, Bojana Pejušković, Milica Ječmenica Lukić, Marija Sarajlija, Diana Raketić, Saša Čelojević, Vera Cvijanović, Vesna Nikolić, Lela Trikoš, Irena Jevremović, Maja Paunović, Vojin Kuzmanović, Slobodan Petrović, Jugoslav Veličković, Vladan Ivanović, Slavica Ivić, Dragana Mirić, Sanja Stefanović, Kamelija Zarkov, Jasna Nedeljković, Nataša Marković, Biljana Atanacković, Ljubomir Ljubić, Zoran Đurković, Boris Jovanović, Jasmina Lazarević, Ljiljana Stanimirović, Ljiljana Todorović, Zoran Jovanović, Biljana Pavlović, Lidija Šarac, Radmila Štulić, Dejan Rakić, Gordana Tončev, Mirjana Petrović, Tanja Bošković Matić, Zorica Knežević, Jelena Miletić, Mirjana Jovanović, Vladimir Janjić, Sandra Labović Miletić, Biljana Radivojević, Nadežda Savić, Gordana Lazović, Milica Bekrić Pajić, Vladimir Čukuranović, Jelena Simić –Nikolić, Ljiljana Čukuranović, Ružica Milošević, Milica Kovačević, Milan Dragojlović, Marija Đurđić, Gordana Mitrović, Raško Pantović, Nevena Radojičić, Mira Gavrić Kezić, Ana Pražić, Aleksandar Stojanov, Ljiljana Milenković, Nikola Vukašinović, Vladan Radivojević, Jelena Matejić, Vladimir Đorđević, Dejan Ćurić, Svetlana Krstić, Dragana Radosavljević, Ivan Milojević, Marina Miloradović Erić, Slavica Savić Dimitrijević, Slavica Manojlović Jovanović, Milica Arsić, Katarina Todorović, Zoran Tomić, Jelena Mišić, Sanela Popovi, Željko Živanović, Vladimir Knežević, Branislav Šakić, Aleksandra Dickov, Sofija Banić Horvat, Goran Platiša, Dubravka Milutinović, Katarina Pavlović Ivić, Sanja Selaković, Stanimir Čekerinac, Bogdanka Đapić, Livija Despenić, Žužana Tot, Borbala Kolesar, Snežana Šušljik, Dragana Stefanović, Vladan Marković, Vladan Simonović; from North Macedonia: Viktorija Vujović, Branislav Stefanovski, Kadri Hadžihamza, Kamka Pakketchieva, Aleksander Risteski, Vaska Damjanovska Mitova, Teodora Stefanovska, Dimitar Bonevski, Anthony Novotny, Stojan Bajraktarov, Vesna Weiss Pavlov, Fatmir Majiti, Snežana Radulović, Tatjana Boškova, Teuta Dalipi, Lidija Gjorevska-Zlatanovska, Lerka Pijanmanova Karovska, Roza Arsova Berkova, Elena Ličkova, Elena Simeonovska Joveva, Slavica Perunkovska, Donna Ignova, Biljana Ivanova, Pavlina Lozanovska, Elena Sotirovska, Gulapka Vasilevska, Julija Vasilevska, Ojdip Šajk, Ljubica Sprostra nova, Daniela Trajkovska, Irena Stefanovska, Anna Doneva, Rodna Kozoloska, Ljubinka Spirkoska, Nikola Olumčev, Jasmina Stepanovska, Imran Mehmedi, Adi Yakupi, Aleksander Kocevski, Gzim Ismaili, Kristina Serafimova, Slavica Najdovska; from Bosnia and Hercegovina: Amra Memić-Serdarević, Alma Džubur Kulenović, Gorana Sulejmanpašić, Eliza Idrizi, Srebrenka Bise, Inga Lokmić-Pekić, Šejla Šarkić Bedak, Sabina Radulović, Paša Bilalović, Izet Pajević, Mevludin Hasanović, Elvir Bećirović, Miralem Mešanović, Jasmin Hamidović, Nerminka Aljukić, Abdulrahman Kuldija, Nera Zivlak-Radulović, Mirjana Mišković, Diana Zorić, Božana Marijanac, Višnja Banjac Baljak.

Citation: Latas M, Stefanovski B, Mihaljević-Peleš A, Memić Serdarević A, Pajević I, Radulović NZ, et al. (2024) Diagnostic psychiatric and somatic comorbidity in patients with depression in the Western Balkan countries. PLoS ONE 19(1): e0295754. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295754

About the Authors:

Milan Latas

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Faculty of Medicine and University Clinical Centre of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-3865

Branko Stefanovski

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia

Alma Mihaljević-Peleš

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Amra Memić Serdarević

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina

Izet Pajević

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Hercegovina

Nera Zivlak Radulović

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-0325

Sabina Radulović

Contributed equally to this work with: Milan Latas, Branko Stefanovski, Alma Mihaljević-Peleš, Amra Memić Serdarević, Izet Pajević, Nera Zivlak Radulović, Sabina Radulović

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Psychiatric Hospital of Canton Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina

Bojana Đukić

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ BD, VK and ZJ also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliation: Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Vasilije Korugić

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ BD, VK and ZJ also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliation: Health Center “Dr Simo Milošević”, Belgrade, Serbia

Željko Jovandić

Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ BD, VK and ZJ also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliation: Special Hospital for Psychiatric Diseases "Kovin", Kovin, Serbia

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

References

1. Fava GA, Tossani E, Bech P, Berrocal C, Chouinard G, Csillag C, et al. Emerging clinical trends and perspectives on comorbid patterns of mental disorders in research. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014; 23 (Suppl 1): 92–101. pmid:24375537

2. Clarkin JF, Kendall PC. Comorbidity and treatment planning: summary and future directions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992; 60 (6): 904–8. pmid:1460151.

3. Kupfer DJ, Frank E. Comorbidity in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2003; (418): 57–60. pmid:12956816

4. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, McDermut W. Major depressive disorder and axis I diagnostic comorbidity. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 (3): 187–93. pmid:11926716

5. Zimmerman M, McGlinchey J, Chelminski I, Young D, et al. Diagnostic co-morbidity in 2300 psychiatric out-patients presenting for treatment evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview. Psychological Medicine 2008; 38 (2): 199–210. pmid:17949515

6. Robertson MM, Katona CLE. Depression and Physical Illness. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.

7. Dragašek J. The relationship of psychiatric and somatic comorbidities to treatment patterns in patients with bipolar disorder. Book of abstracts. Sinapsa Neuroscience Conference ‘19. Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, 20–21 September 2019.

8. Fava M, Rankin MA, Wright EC, Alpert JE, Nierenberg AA, Pava J, et al. Anxiety disorders in major depression. Compr Psychiatry 2000; 41 (2): 97–102. pmid:10741886

9. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005; 62 (6): 617–27. pmid:15939839

10. Winokur A, Gary KA, Rodner S, Rae-Red C, Fernando AT, Szuba MP. Depression, sleep physiology, and antidepressant drugs. Depress Anxiety 2001; 14 (1): 19–28. pmid:11568979

11. Thakurdesai A, Sawant N. A prospective study on sexual dysfunctions in depressed males and the response to treatment. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018; 60 (4): 472–477. pmid:30581213

12. Scalco AZ, Scalco MZ, Azul JB, Lotufo Neto F. Hypertension and depression. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005; 60 (3): 241–50. pmid:15962086

13. Air T, Tully PJ, Sweeney S, Beltrame J. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease and Depression. In: Eds. Baune BT, Tully BJ. Cardiovascular Diseases and Depression—Treatment and Prevention in Psychocardiology. Springer, 2016: 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32480-7_2.

14. Vaccarino AL, Sills TL, Evans KR, Kalali AH. Multiple pain complaints in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychosom Med. 2009; 71 (2): 159–62. pmid:19073755

15. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 10; 163(20): 2433–45. pmid:14609780

16. Doan L, Manders T, Wang J. Neuroplasticity underlying the comorbidity of pain and depression. Neural Plast. 2015: 504691. pmid:25810926

17. Gelenberg AJ, Freeman MP, Markowitz JC, Rosenbaum JF, Thase ME, Trivedi MH, et al. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder, Third Edition, American Psychiatric Association 2010.

18. Depression in adults: treatment and management [internet]. NICE guidelines [cited 2023 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222/resources/depression-in-adults-treatment-and-management-pdf-66143832307909.

19. Rao N. The clinical pharmacokinetics of escitalopram. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007; 46 (4): 281–90. pmid:17375980

20. Preskorn SH, Lane RM. Sertraline 50 mg daily: the optimal dose in the treatment of depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995; 10 (3): 129–41. pmid:8675965

21. Rodrigues-Amorim D, Olivares JM, Spuch C, Rivera-Baltanás T. A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Duloxetine. Front Psychiatry 2020; 23 (11): 554899. pmid:33192668

22. Dunner DL, Goldstein DJ, Mallinckrodt C, Lu Y, Detke MJ. Duloxetine in treatment of anxiety symptoms associated with depression. Depression and Anxiety 2003; 18 (2): 53–61. pmid:12964171

23. Coplan JD, Aaronson CJ, Panthangi V, Kim Y. Treating comorbid anxiety and depression: Psychosocial and pharmacological approaches. World J Psychiatry 2015; 22; 5 (4): 366–78. pmid:26740928

24. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018; 7; 391 (10128): 1357–1366. pmid:29477251

25. Yekehtaz H, Farokhnia M, Akhondzadeh S. Cardiovascular considerations in antidepressant therapy: an evidence-based review. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2013; 28; 8(4): 169–76. pmid:26005484; PMCID: PMC4434967.

26. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 7; 42 (34): 3227–3337. pmid:34458905

27. Glassman AH, O’Connor CM, Califf RM, Swedberg K, Schwartz P, Bigger JT Jr, et al. Sertraline treatment of major depression in patients with acute MI or unstable angina. JAMA. 2002; 14; 288 (6): 701–9. pmid:12169073

28. Stahl. SM. Prescriber‘s guide. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

29. Stahl SM. Stahl‘s Essential Psychopharmacology. Neuroscientific Basis and Practical Applications. Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2008: 543–5.