Powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe corylacearum: An emerging problem on hazelnut in Italy

Abstract

Erysiphe corylacearum has recently been reported in northern Italy (Piedmont) and other European countries as the causal agent of a new emerging powdery mildew on hazelnut. This disease is much more dangerous than the common hazelnut powdery mildew caused by Phyllactinia guttata as it significantly reduces yield and quality of hazelnuts. This study aimed to perform morphological and molecular characterization of the fungal isolates from powdery mildew-infected plants in the Piedmont Italian region. Additionally, genetic diversity studies and pathogenicity tests were conducted. Thirty-six fungal isolates originating from symptomatic hazelnut plants exhibiting specific powdery mildew symptoms on the superior leaf side were identified morphologically as E. corylacearum. Single- and multilocus sequence typing of five loci (ITS, rpb2, CaM, GAPDH and GS) assigned all isolates as E. corylacearum. Multilocus and GAPDH phylogenetic studies resulted in the most efficient characterization of E. corylacearum. Studied fungal isolates were able to cause new emerging powdery mildew disease by fulfilling Koch’s postulates. The emergence of powdery mildew disease in Italy revealed the E. corylacearum subgrouping, population expansion, and high nucleotide similarity with other recently identified E. corylacearum hazelnut isolates. To contain this harmful disease and inhibit the fungus spread into new geographical zones, it will be necessary to implement more rigorous monitoring in neighboring hazelnut plantations near infected hazelnuts, use sustainable fungicides and search for new biocontrol agents.

Introduction

The powdery mildew fungi are obligate, biotrophic plant pathogens belonging to the Erysiphales order of the Ascomycota phylum [1]. Recently, they have been increasing in Europe due to the spread of novel powdery mildews into new geographic areas accompanied by new species assignment and taxonomic splitting [2, 3].

Erysiphe corylacearum is one of the alien pathogens affecting hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.; common European hazelnut) in the Middle East and East-Central and Southern Europe. This pathogen has a negative impact on fruit production and safety (U. Braun & S. Takam.), and is the causal agent of the new emerging hazelnut powdery mildew disease [4].

E. corylacearum has been reported for the first time on hazelnut in Turkey [4]. Before that, it was documented only on other Corylus species in Asia, such as Asian hazel (Corylus heterophylla Fisch. ex Trautv.), Japanese hazel (Corylus sieboldiana Blume) or in America on beaked hazel (Corylus cornuta Marshall) [5–7]. After Turkey, it further spread on hazelnut from the Middle East i.e. Iran [8] to East Europe (Ukraine [9], Romania [10]), Central Europe (Austria [11], Hungary [12], Germany [13], Slovenia [14], Switzerland [15]), and Southern Europe (Italy [16] and Spain [17]). Regarding Italy, it was reported for the first time in the Piedmont region in 2020 [16, 18].

This fungal pathogen is much more dangerous than Phyllactinia guttata (Wallr.: Fr), the causal agent of the so-called ’common’ hazelnut powdery mildew [19], due to its impact on both the yield and the hazelnut plants life. Symptoms of P. guttata are visible mainly on the lower surface of the leaf during late summer and have minimal impact on hazelnuts, requiring little or no treatment. On the contrary, E. corylacearum is particularly harmful to hazelnut cultivation, causing significant damage, that results in a strong reduction in both yield and quality of hazelnuts, especially when associated with water stress [4]. The plants affected by the new powdery mildew show symptoms of a white patina on the upper surface of the leaves; in the case of an intensive attack, the symptoms also occur on young shoots, bracts, and fruits. Powdery mildew lesions turn gradually from yellow to brown colour. In susceptible cultivars, leaves dry out and fruits fall prematurely, resulting in high yield losses [4].

Currently, there are limited curative chemical interventions against E. corylacearum (e.g. treatment with triazole fungicide Revysion). Farmers may rely on the use of preventive control methods such as the use of sulphur-based fungicides (efficient also against P. corylicola and gall mites) and sustainable agronomic practices (removal and destruction of the infected leaves and other symptomatic plant material, balanced fertilization, and irrigation).

Currently, there are no available data on the impact of this emerging disease on hazelnuts in Italy. Considering the heavy impact of E. corylacearum on hazelnut crop in countries where it is already well established, there is a strong risk that this pathogen may profoundly compromise hazelnut production in Piedmont, one of the major Italian hazelnut producers, and that it will spread to other cultivation areas in Italy. The objective of the present study was to characterize the causal agent of the new hazelnut powdery mildew disease found in the Piedmont region. Both morphological observation and single- and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses were performed together with pathogenicity tests to fulfill Koch’s postulates. Furthermore, the pathogen geographical distribution in Piedmont was studied.

Materials and methods

Field survey

A field survey was performed in the Piedmont region (North-Western Italy). During the late spring-summer period (June-August) of 2022, eight hazelnut orchards planted with the ‘Tonda Gentile delle Langhe’ (Trilobata) cultivar have been observed for E. corylacearum symptoms in eight different locations of Torino, Cuneo and Asti provinces (Fig 1). Leaves showed the characteristic symptoms of new powdery mildew associated with E. corylacearum and they appeared as round, white, powdery spots visible mainly on the upper surface of the leaves and gradually increased in size. The leaves also showed symptoms of common powdery mildew, visible mostly on the lower part of the leaf. Symptomatic leaves were collected and transported in paper bags to the laboratory for morphological observations and molecular analyses.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

The site of samples collection indicated by a star are those where E. corylacearum is detected during 2022 field-survey, while locations marked by a dot correspond to the fungus-free zones.

Morphological characterization

A total of 160 isolates were collected from eight locations and examined for their morphological characteristics. Each isolate was collected from a single powdery mildew spot from the upper or lower leaf surface of a single hazelnut plant.

To make anatomical observations, hyphae, conidiophores, conidia, and chasmothecia from a single powdery mildew spot were stripped off from the leaf surface with a clean needle and mounted in water. The remaining portion of the sample (isolate) was conserved and used for molecular study if necessary. Slides were observed under a Leica DM750 biological microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Leica EC4 camera (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Anatomical features were measured using ScopeImage 9.0 with 40× objective. Microscopic observations of all isolates were carried out, determining the shape and size of conidia, asci, ascospores, chasmothecia and appendages. The obtained results were compared with the species descriptions reported by Braun and Cook [7] and Bradshaw et al. [20]. Based on morphological observations, 36 random fungal isolates were selected and used in subsequent molecular analyses.

DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing

Mycelia containing both conidia and chasmothecia of a single powdery mildew spot were scraped from the leaf surface and used for DNA extraction with 5% Chelex (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA), as described previously by Hirata and Takamatsu [21]. DNA extracts were used directly for PCR amplification of the following DNA regions: internal transcribed spacer (ITS), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2), calmodulin (CaM), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and glutamine synthetase (GS). The ITS region was amplified using either primers ITS1 and ITS4 [22] or ITS1 and PM6 [23]. The other four genes were amplified as described by Bradshaw et al. [24], using the following primers: PmRpb2_4 and PMRpb2_6R (rpb2), PMCAM1 and PMCAM4R (CaM), PMGAPDH1 and PMGAPDH3R (GAPDH), and GSPM2 and GSPM3R (GS). PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced in both directions at the BMR Genomics Centre (Padua, Italy). The obtained sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the following accession numbers: OQ917083- OQ917118 for ITS, OR126170- OR126205 for rpb2, OQ995105- OQ995140 for CaM, OR105713- OR105735 for GAPDH, and OR126217- OR126241 for GS (Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Sequence analyses

The ITS sequences of all 36 isolates obtained were aligned with the reference Erysiphe sequences available in the GenBank database, using the BLAST software package (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Subsequently, Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses were performed on both single and concatenated sequences of five loci (ITS, rpb2, CaM, GAPDH and GS). Concatenated phylogenetic analyses were also performed on the basis of Bayesian inference (BI) using Geneious Prime v. 2020.1.2 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand). Heating parameter in BI phylogenetic analyses was adjusted to 0.2 by sampling the trees at every 1000 generations. BI analyses were terminated when the mean standard deviation of the split frequencies was less than 0.01. The ITS phylogenetic analyses were carried out including 26 reference sequences of E. corylacearum and 11 reference sequences of close Erysiphe phylogenetic species infecting Corylus spp., such as E. pseudocorylacearum, E. cornutae, E. coryli-americanae, E. corylicola, and E. syringae [20]. Other single and multilocus-sequence phylogenetic analyses included only the 36 isolates from this study, as gene sequences of reference E. corylacearum isolates were not available. In all phylogenetic analyses, E. necator (FH00941202) sequences were used as the outgroup. Concatenated dataset of five loci included a total of 2,397 bp. The best-fit nucleotide model of each dataset for a ML analysis was determined using Findmodel (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/findmodel/findmodel.html): JC: Jukes-Cantor for ITS, TrN: Tamura-Nei plus Gamma for CaM and GAPDH and concatenated tree, and HKY: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano for rpb2 and GS. The ML analyses were carried out with MEGA 11 software [25]. The most appropriate nucleotide model of each partition was identified by means of MrModeltest v.2.3 [26] and used for BI analyses.

DNA polymorphism parameters (haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, number of polymorphic sites, mutations and nucleotide differences) were determined by means of DNA Sequence Polymorphism v. 6 software [27].

Tajima’s D, Fu’s and Li’s D, and Fu’s and Li’s F tests determined departures from the null hypothesis of neutral evolution. Significant values of these tests can indicate the presence of population changes such as change in size, population expansion, population contraction, and population subdivision [28, 29].

Pathogenicity assays

Two-years old healthy hazelnut plants of ‘Tonda Gentile delle Langhe’ cv. were used for the pathogenicity assays. Plants were maintained in 20 L plastic pots containing a sterilized mixture of 80% peat and 20% perlite in a greenhouse.

Three plants were inoculated with powdery mildew on three randomly selected branches, using 10 μL of a conidial suspension (1 × 10⁵ spores mL⁻¹) obtained by washing conidial spores from the field-collected heavily infected leaves with powdery mildew symptoms on the upper leaf side.

Plants were then maintained under growth chamber conditions: 25 °C (day), 19°C (night), 12-h photoperiod and once daily watering. Three non-inoculated plants were kept away from inoculated ones under the same conditions in a greenhouse and served as control plants.

Re-isolations were performed from leaves artificially inoculated with powdery mildew fungus and from control plants. Macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the hyphae, conidiophores and conidia stripped off from leaves of the inoculated plants were observed. Specific symptoms of powdery mildew and disease severity were evaluated at three time-points starting 10 days post-inoculation (dpi) (10, 15 and 20 dpi).

Disease severity (DS) as the percentage of visually infected leaf area was evaluated by averaging three inoculated plants. Statistical analyses for the pathogenicity assay were performed using PAST v. 4.03 software [30]. Differences in DS between different time-points were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, and in case of significant results (P < 0.05), the Turkey HSD was used for mean separation.

Results

Field survey

Out of eight hazelnut orchards inspected, typical E. corylacearum symptoms were observed in two orchards located in the Benevello and Serravalle Langhe areas of the Cuneo province. Symptoms associated with E. corylacearum were not found in the remaining sites in the provinces Torino and Asti (Fig 1). In these two provinces, only symptoms specific to common powdery mildew caused by P. guttata were observed.

Symptoms caused by E. corylacearum have been observed from late spring through the summer. These symptoms consisted of small circular, powdery white spots on the adaxial leaf surface, measuring a few millimeters in size, with pale to chlorotic leaf areas. Lesions of yellow to brown color corresponding to the upper white spots were observed on the lower leaf surface. Powdery spots progressively increased to 1–1.5 cm in size (Fig 2A), and also occurred on young branches and fruit bracts at later inspections (Fig 2B). Infected leaves tended to a purple-bronze color (Fig 2C). Finally, heavily infected leaves wilted prematurely, and affected fruits dried and occasionally fell.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

(A) 0.5–1 cm circular, powdery white spots and pale to yellow leaf areas on upper leaf surface; (B) White to grayish mycelium growth on fruit bracts; (C) Progressive growth of the powdery spots and turning the leaf color to purple-bronze in late infection stage.

Morphological characterization

Morphological observations of 160 samples from eight locations confirmed the presence of E. corylacearum only in samples from powdery mildew spots from the upper leaf side in two orchards; Benevello and Serravalle Langhe. All other samples collected from the remaining six locations where common powdery mildew was observed did not show the presence of E. corylacearum. In these samples, the presence of P. guttata was only observed (data not shown). These morphological results confirmed the results of the field survey and indicated that E. corylacearum is predominantly found on the ‘upper’ powdery spots of the hazelnut leaves, and P. guttata is found on the ‘lower’ ones.

Microscopic observation of 36 selected E. corylacearum samples mainly revealed a mycelium on the upper side of leaves, with the following characteristics: 2–5 μm wide, white, branched, hyaline, septate, and thin-walled. The size of conidiophores was around 69 ± 4 × 7.1 ± 1.2 μm. Size and shape of conidia were similar among all isolates, showing an ellipsoid to ovoid shape, hyaline, with size of 32.3 ± 0.8 × 20.4 ± 0.7 μm, and they were produced individually on the conidiophores (Fig 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

(A) Conidia; (B) Chasmothecium realising the asci with ascospores; (C) Ascospores; (D) Chasmothecium and its appendages. Scale bar = 20 μm (A-C), 50 μm (D).

Chasmothecia were scattered to gregarious on the lower side of leaves, with a diameter of 88 ± 10 μm; 6 to 14 hyaline appendages for each chasmothecium. Appendages were long about the chasmothecial diameter, equatorial, with a thick base and thinner upper part, and with regularly dichotomously branched apices and curved tips. Each chasmothecium contained 3–5 asci of obovoid to ellipsoid shape with a size of 44 ± 1 × 33.2 ± 0.8 μm, containing 5–7 hyaline ascospores of ellipsoid to ovoid shape with a size of 20.0 ± 0.7 × 12.4 ± 0.3 μm (Fig 3). Following the key for the identification to the species of Erysiphe on Corylus hosts [20], all studied isolates were identified as E. corylacearum.

Based on morphological observations, 36 E. corylacearum isolates were selected and used in subsequent molecular analyses. Among them, 22 isolates originated from Serravalle Langhe location and 14 isolates from Benevello location (Table 1).

Molecular identification and phylogenetic analyses

The alignment of 36 ITS sequences from this study with the reference Erysiphe spp. sequences available in the GenBank database showed the highest identity (99.6–100%) with E. corylacearum, while a lower identity (98.9–99.2%) was observed with E. pseudocorylacearum, the closest phylogenetic relative of E. corylacearum [20].

Phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences of the studied isolates and of 11 reference isolates of six Erysiphe species grouped all 36 isolates with E. corylacearum (Fig 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

The values at the nodes indicate bootstrap support values based on 1000 replicates. For each isolate, the isolate name, the Accession Number, the host affiliation, and the geographic origin are shown. The isolates of E. corylacearum from this study are shown in bold and their collection site is shown in parentheses; (BE) = Benevello, (SL) = Serravalle Langhe. The isolate FH00941202 of Erysiphe necator was used as outgroup.

All studied isolates clustered in the same cluster with E. corylacearum from Italy, Spain, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, Romania, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Georgia, and Iran. Within this major group, only E. corylacearum Chinese isolates HMNWAFU-CF2012020 and Dai13042 from Asian hazel, and Hungarian KK_3_219 isolate from hazelnut formed a separate subcluster.

Phylogenetic analyses carried out for the single-locus sequences (rpb2, CaM and GAPDH) permitted a further distinction of the studied isolates in distinct E. corylacearum subclusters, while the GS analysis grouped all studied isolates together as the ITS region (S1 Fig).

Finally, concatenated ML phylogenetic analyses based on all five loci (ITS, rpb2, CaM, GAPDH and GS) were performed and the obtained results allowed a more robust differentiation of the studied isolates discerning 4 different subclusters when compared to single loci (Fig 5). The first subcluster included predominantly isolates from the Serravalle Langhe orchard with two isolates from the Benevello orchard, while the other three subclusters contained isolates exclusively from one orchard, either Serravalle Langhe or Benevello. Concatenated BI phylogenetic analyzes confirmed the results of grouping and subgrouping of the studied isolates obtained by ML analyses (S2 Fig).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

The site of their collection is shown in parentheses; (BE) = Benevello, (SL) = Serravalle Langhe. The concatenated phylogenetic tree was obtained by Maximum Likelihood analysis using the Tamura-Nei plus Gamma model. The isolate FH00941202 of Erysiphe necator was used as outgroup.

Overall, the ITS region revealed 4 haplotypes within Italian and reference isolates with a low degree of haplotype diversity (Hd) (0.125), as well as a low degree of nucleotide diversity per site (π) (0.00120) (S1 Table). Tajima’s D, Fu’s and Li’s D, and Fu’s and Li’s F tests were significantly negative which may indicate the population expansion or selective processes. Two independent studies, including this one and one performed by Mezzalama et al. [18] found higher DNA polymorphism among reference isolates originating from eleven countries compared to the Italian isolates originating from Piedmont. The haplotypes identified in this study were mainly associated with singleton variable sites. On the other hand, no InDel haplotypes were found in the examined region by the DNASP software, and they were not associated with insertion/deletion mutations.

Pathogenicity assays

The first symptoms became visible on inoculated hazelnut branches at 10 dpi, consisting of tiny white powdery spots on the upper leaf surface. White spots gradually extended along with the onset of chlorotic leaf areas. On the lower leaf side, yellow to brown areas corresponding to the upper powdery spots were discerned. Inoculated hazelnut plants showed typical powdery mildew symptoms at 15–20 dpi, while control plants were asymptomatic (Fig 6).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Pathogenicity test with Erysiphe corylacearum: (a) an inoculated and (b) a non-inoculated hazelnut plant. Powdery mildew symptoms observed 20 days post-inoculation.

During the development of the powdery mildew disease, E. colyracearum specific symptoms were observed during all three observation periods (10,15 and 20 dpi), and DS increased gradually during the time course of the disease. Symptoms between all three-time course periods were statistically significant and the highest incidence of the disease was observed at 20 dpi when DS reached about 40%. (S3 Fig).

Discussion

A recent taxonomic study on powdery mildew disease agents caused by Erysiphe species on Corylus hosts in the world includes six species; E. cornutae, E. corylacearum, E. coryli-americanae, E. corylicola, E. pseudocorylacearum, and E. syringae [20]. Beside them, P. guttata is a globally widespread powdery mildew agent on hazelnut, of no particular economic concern for hazelnut growers [4, 7, 19, 31].

In this study, 36 new strains, originating from one geographic zone (Cuneo province in the Piedmont region) isolated from hazelnut plants showing powdery mildew disease symptoms on the upper leaf side, were identified as E. corylacearum. We demonstrated that these strains were the causal agent of the new powdery mildew disease. On the other hand, surveyed hazelnut orchards in Turin and Asti provinces with typical symptoms of common powdery mildew did not show the presence of E. corylacearum, and only the presence of P. guttata was found in them.

The results of our study are of particular importance because E. corylacearum is increasingly damaging hazelnut cultivation not only in the Piedmont region, but also throughout the European Union, where it is considered as an emerging pathogen [32]. Originally found only in Asia and America on other hazelnut species (Asian, Japanese and beaked hazelnut), it was able to spread in less than a decade to hazelnut trees from Turkey and Iran to Eastern, Central and Southern Europe, including Italy [7]. Moreover, it will probably expand further into new geographic regions.

All the isolates examined in this study were identified morphologically as E. corylacearum following the identification key for the Erysiphe species on Corylus hosts [20]. However, this key follows the strict host specialization and, due to a possible host range expansion of Erysiphe spp., confirmatory molecular analyses were required for the correct identification of the isolates.

Molecular characterization confirmed the morphological identification in this study. Given that ITS-based identification is not always sufficient for the precise identification of powdery mildew species [33] and considering that the majority of previous studies on E. corylacearum were based exclusively on the ITS molecular characterization [8, 10–13, 15, 18], we undertook identification using also other loci [24]. The GS phylogenetic analyses grouped all 36 isolates with E. corylacearum, in a way similar to the ITS marker. However, when the rpb2, CaM and GAPDH loci were used in phylogenetic analyses, it was possible to better differentiate studied isolates separating them into two distinct E. corylacearum subclusters. This confirmed the usefulness of the markers rpb2, CaM and GAPDH reported by results of Bradshaw and coworkers [24] allowing an improved broad and fine scale phylogenetic analyses of powdery mildew.

Finally, concatenated ML and BI phylogenetic analyses based on all five loci (ITS, rpb2, CaM, GAPDH and GS) permitted the most robust phylogenetic scaling of E. corylacearum, as already reported in similar studies of fungal identification [24, 34–36]. This analysis enabled not only a differentiation into two separate clusters, but also made possible to separate the major cluster into four different subclusters. The most similar results with the combined phylogenetic analysis were achieved with the GAPDH marker, which indicates its potential and usefulness in future phylogenetic analyses of E. corylacearum. High-resolution genetic typing approach of MLST in this study reflected the results of previous MLST works of hazelnut powdery mildews [24], but for more comprehensive concatenated phylogenetic studies, it will be necessary the multi-locus sequencing of E. corylacearum from other countries.

The recent emergence of E. corylacearum in Italy and throughout many European countries may be associated with the accidental import of infected common hazelnut propagating material from Asia, which is susceptible to this powdery mildew. Another possibility is that it was present in latent form on Japanese hazel that was imported in Europe at the beginning of the twentieth century [37] or on some other exotic hazelnuts. Since host jumps and/or host range expansions may happen in powdery mildews [38], it might be that E. corylacearum started to spread from exotic on other well-established Corylus spp. in Europe such as common and Turkish hazelnut (Corylus colurna). One additional hypothesis is that E. corylacearum gradually spread from its initial infection zone (Turkey and Iran) towards to Europe via wind. Obligate biotrophs such as powdery mildews are known for their long-distance dispersal habit. They may be transported as structures able to cause an infection up to ≥ 1000 km from initial sites, threating the plant health and yield [39] if they are supported by the production of huge numbers of wind-dispersed spores from one plant to another, essential for the survival of these obligately biotrophic fungi [40, 41]. Moreover, powdery mildews asci show ‘explosive discharge’, known to move in nature with speed exceeding 30 m/s (or 100 km/h) [42].

Regarding the neutrality tests in this study and taking in consideration that all E. corylacearum (studied and reference) isolates showed negative values for Fu and Li’s D and Fu and Li’s F statistics, the expansion of population size or population selection may be suggested similar to reports for other emergent fungi [43–45]. However, negative but not significant values of neutrality tests among the known Italian E. corylacearum isolates may indicate that the fungus recently arrived, but that further expansion throughout the country has not yet initiated.

It will be interesting to have more E. corylacearum gene sequences available from other countries and the whole fungal genome in the GenBank database. This would allow to search for adaptive founder events which frequently occur in powdery mildew genomes, such as single nucleotide variations, transposition events, and genome rearrangements. These events might be also one of the possible drivers of adaptation of powdery mildews, including E. corylacearum, to new plant hosts and environmental conditions [46, 47].

Conclusion

Conclusively, this study has shown that the emerging hazelnut powdery mildew in Northern Italy is caused by E. corylacearum. Wind-spread, infected planting material, susceptibility of ‘Tonda Gentile delle Langhe’, the major cultivar of hazelnut grown in Piedmont, to E. corylacearum are potential key aspects that should be considered in efficient management of new emerging plant diseases. Moreover, more surveys in neighboring hazelnut plantations near infected plantations, the use of sustainable fungicides and the search for new biocontrol agents will be necessary for an efficient containment of this disease. These initiatives, together with the concomitant search of resistant cultivars and the use of fungicides with different modes of action, may contribute to a successful management of this new emerging and dangerous powdery mildew disease.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

Phylogenetic analyses of 36 Erysiphe corylacearum isolates based on single sequences from rpb2 (a), CaM (b), GAPDH (c), and GS (d). Each phylogenetic tree was obtained by Maximum Likelihood analysis. Reference strains included in the phylogenetic analyses of 5 loci are indicated in bold. Bootstrap values of less than 50% are not presented. The tree was rooted to Erysiphe necator (FH00941202).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301941.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Consensus phylogram based on ITS, rpb2, CaM, GAPDH and GS sequences of the studied Erysiphe corylacearum isolates.

The concatenated phylogenetic tree was obtained by Bayesian analysis using the GTR substitution model. The isolate FH00941202 of Erysiphe necator was used as outgroup.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301941.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Powdery mildew disease severity on artificially infected hazelnut plants at 10, 15 and 20 days post-inoculation (dpi).

The means and standard deviations of 9 replicates were shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301941.s003

(TIF)

S1 Table. Molecular parameters of the isolates of Erysiphe corylacearum obtained from partial ITS sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301941.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Authors thank C. Boccaccio (University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy) for helping in DNA extraction from plant samples.

Citation: Matić S, Caruso AG, D’Errico C, Botto CS, Noris E, Trkulja V, et al. (2024) Powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe corylacearum: An emerging problem on hazelnut in Italy. PLoS ONE 19(5): e0301941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301941

About the Authors:

Slavica Matić

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Turin, Italy

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-8744

Andrea G. Caruso

Roles: Data curation, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Chiara D’Errico

Roles: Software, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Turin, Italy

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0546-9900

Camilla Sacco Botto

Roles: Data curation, Methodology

Affiliation: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Turin, Italy

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-1135

Emanuela Noris

Roles: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Turin, Italy

Vojislav Trkulja

Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Agricultural Institute of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Stefano Panno

Roles: Data curation, Methodology

Affiliation: Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Salvatore Davino

Roles: Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Marco Moizio

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: SAGEA Centro di Saggio s.r.l., Castagnito d’Alba (CN), Italy

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

References

1. Hacquard S. Chapter Four—The Genomics of Powdery Mildew Fungi: Past Achievements, Present Status and Future Prospects. In Martin F. M.(Ed.), Adv Bot Res. 2014; 70:109–142). Academic Press.

2. Desprez-Loustau ML, Massot M, Feau N, Fort T., de Vicente A, Torés JA, et al. Further Support of Conspecificity of Oak and Mango Powdery Mildew and First Report of Erysiphe quercicola and Erysiphe alphitoides on Mango in Mainland Europe. Plant Dis. 2017; 101(7), 1086–1093. pmid:30682963

3. Kiss L. Powdery mildew as invasive plant pathogens: new epidemics caused by two North American species in Europe. Mycol Res. 2005; 109(3), 259–260. pmid:15912940

4. Sezer A, Dolar FS, Lucas SJ, Köse Ç, Gümüş E. First report of the recently introduced, destructive powdery mildew Erysiphe corylacearum on hazelnut in Turkey. Phytoparasitica 2017; 45(4), 577–581.

5. Pscheidt, J.W., Ocamb, C.M. 2023. Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Management Handbook. https://pnwhandbooks.org/plantdisease (accessed 10 July 2023)

6. Takamatsu S, Ito H, Shiroya Y, Kiss L, Heluta V. First comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the genus Erysiphe (Erysiphales, Erysiphaceae) II: the Uncinula lineage. Mycologia 2015; 107(5), 903–914. pmid:26240302

7. Braun U, Cook RTA. Taxonomic Manual of the Erysiphales (powdery Mildews). CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre 2012.

8. Arzanlou M, Torbati M, Golmohammadi H. Powdery mildew on hazelnut (Corylus avellana) caused by Erysiphe corylacearum in Iran For Pathol. 2018; 48(5), e12450. pmid:33373284

9. Heluta VP, Makarenko NV, Al-Maali GA. First records of Erysiphe corylacearum (Erysiphales, Ascomycota) on Corylus avellana in Ukraine. Ukr Bot J. 2019; 76, 252–259.

10. Chinan VC, Mânzu CC. Occurrence of Erysiphe corylacearum causing powdery mildew of Corylus avellana in Romania For Pathol. 2021; 51(3), e12681.

11. Voglmayr H, Zankl T, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Kirisits T. First report of Erysiphe corylacearum on Corylus avellana and C. colurna in Austria. New Dis Rep. 2020; 42(1), 14.

12. Kalmár K, Desiderio F, Varjas V. First report of Erysiphe corylacearum Causing Powdery Mildew on Hazelnut in Hungary. Plant Dis. 2022; pmid:35536860

13. Beenken L, Kruse J, Schmidt A, Braun U. Epidemic spread of Erysiphe corylacearum in Europe—first records from Germany. Schlechtendalia. 2022; 39, 112–118.

14. Zajc J, Rot M, Snoj D, Žerjav M, Schroers HJ, Piškur B. et al. First report of Erysiphe corylacearum on Corylus avellana and C. colurna in Slovenia. New Dis Rep. 2023; 47(1), e12160.

15. Beenken L, Brodtbeck T, De Marchi R. First record of Erysiphe corylacearum on Corylus avellana in Switzerland and in central Europe. New Dis Rep. 2020; 41(1), 11–11.

16. Agrion RP. Nuovo oidio su nocciolo (Erysiphe corylacearum). In Regione Piemonte. Torino. https://www.regione.piemonte.it/web/sites/default/files/media/documenti/2020-10/mal_bianco_nocciolo_da_erysiphe_corylacearum.pdf (accessed 10 July 2023).

17. Mazzaglia A, Drais MI, Turco S, Silvestri C, Cristofori V, Aymami A, et al. First report of Erysiphe corylacearum causing powdery mildew on Corylus avellana in Spain. New Dis Rep. 2021; 44(1), e12035.

18. Mezzalama M, Guarnaccia V, Martano G, Spadaro D. Presence of Powdery Mildew Caused by Erysiphe corylacearum on Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) in Italy. Plant Dis. 2020; 105(5), 1565. pmid:33373284

19. Hartney S, Glawe DA, Dugan F, Ammirati J. First Report of Powdery Mildew on Corylus avellana caused by Phyllactinia guttata in Washington State. Plant Health Prog. 2005; 6(1), 22.

20. Bradshaw M, Braun U, Meeboon J, Tobin P. Phylogeny and taxonomy of powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe species on Corylus hosts. Mycologia. 2021; 113(2), 459–475. pmid:33534662

21. Hirata T, Takamatsu S. Nucleotide sequence diversity of rDNA internal transcribed spacers extracted from conidia and cleistothecia of several powdery mildew fungi. Mycoscience 1996; 37(3), 283–288.

22. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal rna genes for phylogenetics. In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. (Eds.), PCR Protocols. 1990; (pp. 315–322). Academic Press.

23. Takamatsu S, Kano Y. PCR primers useful for nucleotide sequencing of rDNA of the powdery mildew fungi. Mycoscience 2001; 42(1), 135–139.

24. Bradshaw MJ, Guan GX, Nokes L, Braun U, Liu SY, Pfister DH. Secondary DNA Barcodes (CAM, GAPDH, GS, and RpB2) to Characterize Species Complexes and Strengthen the Powdery Mildew Phylogeny [Original Research]. Front Ecol Evol. 2022; 10.

25. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38(7), 3022–3027. pmid:33892491

26. Nylander JAA. Modeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. 2004. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden.

27. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34(12), 3299–3302. pmid:29029172

28. Fu YX, Li WH. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993; 133(3), 693–709. pmid:8454210

29. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123(3), 585–595. pmid:2513255

30. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001; 4(1): 9pp.

31. Schmidt A, Braun U. Asexual morphs of powdery mildew species (Erysiphaceae)–new and supplementary morphological descriptions and illustrations. Schlechtendalia. 2020; 37, 30–79.

32. EPPO. Erysiphe corylacearum, an emerging pathogen of hazelnut in the EPPO region. EPPO Reporting Service, 42. https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-6981 (accessed 10 July 2023).

33. Ellingham O, David J, Culham A. Enhancing identification accuracy for powdery mildews using previously underexploited DNA loci. Mycologia. 2019; 111(5), 798–812. pmid:31449476

34. Marmolejo J, Siahaan SAS, Takamatsu S, Braun U. Three new records of powdery mildews found in Mexico with one genus and one new species proposed. Mycoscience. 2018; 59(1), 1–7.

35. Villafana RT, Rampersad SN. Three-Locus Sequence Identification and Differential Tebuconazole Sensitivity Suggest Novel Fusarium equiseti Haplotype from Trinidad. Pathogens. 2020; 9(3). pmid:32121520

36. Zeng ZQ, Zhuang WY. New Species of Neocosmospora (Ascomycota) from China as Evidenced by Morphological and Molecular Data. Life (Basel). 2023; 13(7). pmid:37511890

37. Bean W.J. 1981. Trees and Shrubs Hardy in the British Isles (8 ed., Vol. 2). John Murray, London.

38. Beenken L. First records of the powdery mildews Erysiphe platani and E. alphitoides on Ailanthus altissima reveal host jumps independent of host phylogeny. Mycol Prog. 2017; 16(2), 135–143.

39. Brown JK, Hovmøller MS. Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science. 2002; 297(5581), 537–541. pmid:12142520

40. Viljanen-Rollinson SLH, Parr EL, Marroni MV. Monitoring longdistance spore dispersal by wind a review. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2007; 60(0), 291–296.

41. Wingen LU, Shaw MW, Brown JKM. Long-distance dispersal and its influence on adaptation to host resistance in a heterogeneous landscape. Plant Pathol. 2013; 62(1), 9–20.

42. Money NP. Chapter 3—Spore Production, Discharge, and Dispersal. In Watkinson S. C., Boddy L., & Money N. P. (Eds.), The Fungi (Third Edition). 2016; (pp. 67–97). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382034-1.00003-7

43. Matić S, Tabone G, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML. Alternaria Leaf Spot Caused by Alternaria Species: An Emerging Problem on Ornamental Plants in Italy. Plant Dis. 2020; 104(8), 2275–2287. pmid:32584157

44. Quispe-Apaza C, Mansilla-Samaniego R, Espejo-Joya R, Bernacchia G, Yabar-Larios M, López-Bonilla C. Spatial and Temporal Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Hemileia vastatrix from Peruvian Coffee Plantations. Plant Pathol J. 2021; 37(3), 280–290. pmid:34111917

45. Wang L, Liu LM, Hou YX, Li L., Huang SW. Pathotypic and genetic diversity in the population of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA causing rice sheath blight in China. Plant Pathol. 2015; 64(3), 718–728.

46. Fouché S, Oggenfuss U, Chanclud E, Croll D. A devil’s bargain with transposable elements in plant pathogens. Trends Genet. 2022; 38(3), 222–230. pmid:34489138

47. Kusch S, Qian J, Loos A, Kümmel F, Spanu PD, Panstruga R. Long-term and rapid evolution in powdery mildew fungi. Mol Ecol. 2023. pmid:36862075