It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Tibetan Plateau contains the largest numbers of glaciers outside the polar regions, yet the initiation times of glacial advances remain unclear. The potential relics of original moraines might be preserved in the sedimentary basins. Here, we present sedimentological and geochronological data from five boreholes located upstream of the Tsangpo Gorge, Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. Our findings reveal that fluvial sediment accumulation began over 2.5 million of years ago due to enhanced rock uplift downstream, and extensive glacial advances occurred after ~0.75 million of years. Notably, the earliest extensive glacial advance (~0.75 million of years) is considerably younger than the formation of the Tsangpo Gorge (>2.5 million of years). Following the initiation of this glacial advance, the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis experienced rapid exhumation of approximately 1.3–1.6 kilometers. Such geomorphological processes and exhumation history suggest that rock uplift, rather than glacial damming, played a pivotal role in maintaining the stability of the knickpoints on the southeastern margins of the Tibetan Plateau.
The onset of Himalayan glaciation took place ~0.75 million years ago enhancing the average erosion and mountain exhumation of the Eastern Himalayan syntaxis, based on borehole sedimentological and geochronological data.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 China Earthquake Administration, State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.450296.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9558 2971)
2 Lanzhou University, Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Green Development for the Yellow River Drainage Basin, Lanzhou, China (GRID:grid.32566.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 8571 0482)
3 University College London, Department of Earth Sciences, Kings Cross London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)