It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Smart charging of electric vehicles can alleviate grid congestion and reduce charging costs. However, various electric vehicle models currently lack the technical capabilities to effectively implement smart charging since they cannot handle charging pauses or delays. These models enter sleep mode when charging is interrupted, preventing resumption afterwards. To avoid this, they should be continuously charged with their minimum charging power, even when a charging pause would be desirable, for instance with high electricity prices. This research examines this problem to inform various stakeholders, including policymakers and manufacturers, and stimulates the adoption of proactive measures that address this problem. Here, we demonstrate through technical charging tests that around one-third of tested car models suffer from this issue. Through model simulations we indicate that eliminating paused and delayed charging problems would double the smart charging potential for all applications. Lastly, we propose concrete legal and practical solutions to eliminate these problems.
Electric vehicle smart charging can support the energy transition, but various vehicle models face technical problems with paused charging. Here, authors show that this issue occurs in 1/3 of the models in the market and that eliminating this issue would double the effectiveness of smart charging.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9637 0671)
2 ElaadNL, Arnhem, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1)
3 Utrecht University, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9637 0671)
4 Delft University of Technology, Department of Electrical Sustainable Energy, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740)
5 Enervalis, Hasselt, Belgium (GRID:grid.5292.c)
6 ElaadNL, Arnhem, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c)
7 Utrecht Sustainability Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c)
8 Stedin Groep, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c)
9 ElaadNL, Arnhem, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c); Stedin Groep, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c)
10 Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Information Technology Group (INF), Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)