It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Older adults (OAs) are typically slower and/or less accurate in forming perceptual choices relative to younger adults. Despite perceptual deficits, OAs gain from integrating information across senses, yielding multisensory benefits. However, the cognitive processes underlying these seemingly discrepant ageing effects remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, 212 participants (18–90 years old) performed an online object categorisation paradigm, whereby age-related differences in Reaction Times (RTs) and choice accuracy between audiovisual (AV), visual (V), and auditory (A) conditions could be assessed. Whereas OAs were slower and less accurate across sensory conditions, they exhibited greater RT decreases between AV and V conditions, showing a larger multisensory benefit towards decisional speed. Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modelling (HDDM) was fitted to participants’ behaviour to probe age-related impacts on the latent multisensory decision formation processes. For OAs, HDDM demonstrated slower evidence accumulation rates across sensory conditions coupled with increased response caution for AV trials of higher difficulty. Notably, for trials of lower difficulty we found multisensory benefits in evidence accumulation that increased with age, but not for trials of higher difficulty, in which increased response caution was instead evident. Together, our findings reconcile age-related impacts on multisensory decision-making, indicating greater multisensory evidence accumulation benefits with age underlying enhanced decisional speed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Leeds, School of Biomedical Sciences, West Yorkshire, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); Trinity College Dublin, Institute of Neuroscience, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.8217.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9705)
2 University of Leeds, School of Biomedical Sciences, West Yorkshire, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); Birmingham City University, School of Social Sciences, West Midlands, UK (GRID:grid.19822.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 2449)
3 Nottingham Trent University, School of Social Sciences, Nottinghamshire, UK (GRID:grid.12361.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 0727 0669)
4 University of Leeds, School of Psychology, West Yorkshire, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
5 University of Glasgow, School of Neuroscience and Psychology, Lanarkshire, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X)
6 University of Leeds, School of Biomedical Sciences, West Yorkshire, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)