It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) affects roughly 1 in 7500 individuals. While at the population level there is a general pattern of affected muscles, there is substantial heterogeneity in muscle expression across- and within-patients. There can also be substantial variation in the pattern of fat and water signal intensity within a single muscle. While quantifying individual muscles across their full length using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the optimal approach to follow disease progression and evaluate therapeutic response, the ability to automate this process has been limited. The goal of this work was to develop and optimize an artificial intelligence-based image segmentation approach to comprehensively measure muscle volume, fat fraction, fat fraction distribution, and elevated short-tau inversion recovery signal in the musculature of patients with FSHD. Intra-rater, inter-rater, and scan-rescan analyses demonstrated that the developed methods are robust and precise. Representative cases and derived metrics of volume, cross-sectional area, and 3D pixel-maps demonstrate unique intramuscular patterns of disease. Future work focuses on leveraging these AI methods to include upper body output and aggregating individual muscle data across studies to determine best-fit models for characterizing progression and monitoring therapeutic modulation of MRI biomarkers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Springbok Analytics, Charlottesville, USA
2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.270240.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 1622)
3 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.412750.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9166)
4 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA (GRID:grid.412016.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2177 6375)
5 Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.240741.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9026 4165); University of Washington, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 6657)
6 University of Washington, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 6657)
7 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, USA (GRID:grid.267308.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9206 2401); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311); Rice University, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.21940.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8278)
8 Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.240023.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0427 667X); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311)
9 Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.240741.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9026 4165)
10 Springbok Analytics, Charlottesville, USA (GRID:grid.240741.4); University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA (GRID:grid.27755.32) (ISNI:0000 0000 9136 933X)