It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cryoconites are the deposits on the surface of glaciers that create specific ecological niches for the development of microorganism communities. The sediment material can vary in origin, structure, and nutrient content, creating local variations in the growth conditions. An additional factor of variability is the location of the glaciers, as they are found in different climatic zones in the high mountain regions and closer to the poles. Here, using the analysis of amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, we studied the taxonomic composition of the prokaryotic communities from glaciers from remote regions, including the Arctic (Mushketova on the Severnaya Zemlya, IGAN in Polar Ural), Antarctic (Pimpirev on the Livingstone Island) and Central Caucasus (Skhelda and Garabashi) and connected it with the variation of the physicochemical characteristics of the substrate: pH, carbon, nitrogen, macro- and microelements. The cryoconite microbiomes were comprised of specific for this environment phyla (mostly Pseudomonadota, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidota, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota), but each glacier had a unique taxonomic imprint. The core microbiome between regions was composed of only a few ASVs, among which the most likely globally distributed ones attributed to Polaromonas sp., Rhodoferax sp., Cryobacterium sp., and Hymenobacter frigidus. The WGSNA defined clusters of co-occurring ASVs between microbiomes, that significantly change their abundance corresponding with the variation of chemical parameters of cryoconites, but do not fully coincide with their regional separation. Thus, our work demonstrates that the chemical characteristics of the sediment material can explain the variation in the cryoconite prokaryotic community which is not always linked to geographic isolation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 St. Petersburg State University, Department of Applied Ecology, Saint-Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897); All-Russian Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Laboratory of Microbiological Monitoring and Bioremediation of Soils, Pushkin, Russia (GRID:grid.466463.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0445 582X)
2 St. Petersburg State University, Department of Applied Ecology, Saint-Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897); Russian Academy of Sciences, Tembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories, Nalchik, Russia (GRID:grid.4886.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 9124)
3 Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Department of Cryolithology and Glaciology, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.14476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 9668)
4 All-Russian Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Laboratory of Microbiological Monitoring and Bioremediation of Soils, Pushkin, Russia (GRID:grid.466463.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0445 582X); V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.466468.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0670 2482)