It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The macroscale connectome is the network of physical, white-matter tracts between brain areas. The connections are generally weighted and their values interpreted as measures of communication efficacy. In most applications, weights are either assigned based on imaging features–e.g. diffusion parameters–or inferred using statistical models. In reality, the ground-truth weights are unknown, motivating the exploration of alternative edge weighting schemes. Here, we explore a multi-modal, regression-based model that endows reconstructed fiber tracts with directed and signed weights. We find that the model fits observed data well, outperforming a suite of null models. The estimated weights are subject-specific and highly reliable, even when fit using relatively few training samples, and the networks maintain a number of desirable features. In summary, we offer a simple framework for weighting connectome data, demonstrating both its ease of implementation while benchmarking its utility for typical connectome analyses, including graph theoretic modeling and brain-behavior associations.
Here, the authors use fMRI data to update connectomes with new, asymmetric, and signed weights, leading to an intuitive brain structure that is aligned to functional brain systems, more efficient, subject-specific, state-dependent and varies with age
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Indiana University, Cognitive Science Program, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.257410.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0413 3089); Indiana University, School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X)
2 Indiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X)
3 Universidade de Lisboa, LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Lisboa, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263)
4 Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy (GRID:grid.11469.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9780 0901)
5 Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Functional Neuroimaging Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy (GRID:grid.509937.1)
6 McGill University, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, Montréal, Canada (GRID:grid.14709.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8649)
7 Indiana University, Cognitive Science Program, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.257410.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0413 3089); Indiana University, School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X); Indiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X); Indiana University, Program in Neuroscience, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.257410.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0413 3089)