It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Depressive and anxiety symptoms are prevalent among patients with various clinical conditions, resulting in diminished emotional well-being and impaired daily functioning. The neural mechanisms underlying these symptoms, particularly across different disorders, remain unclear, limiting the effectiveness of conventional treatments. Therefore, it is crucial to elucidate the neural underpinnings of depressive and anxiety symptoms and investigate novel, effective treatments across clinical conditions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that can help understand the neural underpinnings of symptoms and facilitate the development of interventions, addressing the two research gaps at both neural and clinical levels. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the therapeutic efficacy of tDCS in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among individuals with diverse clinical diagnoses. This review evaluated evidence from fifty-six randomized, sham-controlled trials that administered repeated tDCS sessions with a parallel design, applying a three-level meta-analytic model. tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 2-mA intensity demonstrates moderate efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms, identifying the left DLPFC as a transdiagnostic neural mechanism of depressive symptoms across clinical conditions. In comparison, the findings on anxiety symptoms demonstrate greater heterogeneity. tDCS over the left DLPFC is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and shows promising effects in alleviating anxiety symptoms among individuals with diverse diagnoses. These findings enhance our understanding of the neuropsychological basis of depressive and anxiety symptoms, laying the groundwork for the development of more effective tDCS interventions applicable across clinical conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Yang, Angela S. Y. 1 ; Lee, Tatia M. C. 1
1 The University of Hong Kong, State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757); The University of Hong Kong, Laboratory of Neuropsychology & Human Neuroscience, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 2757)
2 The University of Hong Kong, State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757); The University of Hong Kong, Laboratory of Neuropsychology & Human Neuroscience, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 2757); The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Psychology, Ting Kok, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.419993.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 6254)




