1. Introduction
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the presence of the fusion gene BCR::ABL1, which encodes a constitutively active tyrosine kinase upstream of essential cell survival and proliferation pathways [1]. BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, have revolutionized the treatment of CML such that patients diagnosed and treated during chronic phase CML (CP-CML) are expected to have an excellent clinical response and normal life expectancy [2]. However, the prognosis for CML after progression to the more aggressive blast phase is dismal, with a median survival of between 7 and 11 months [3]. Despite the introduction of more potent BCR::ABL TKIs, the majority of patients with CML in the blast phase are resistant to treatment or relapse after an initial response. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only therapy that provides long-term remission, but transplant-related mortality and morbidity are high. The lack of a suitable donor also precludes many patients from being eligible for a transplant [3]. There is therefore a need to explore alternative therapeutic strategies for CML.
Herbal medicine has been used extensively in developing countries for the treatment of various diseases, and traditional herbs contain bioactive chemicals that can be modified and further developed into conventional therapeutics [4]. Naturally occurring compounds constitute a significant proportion of conventional chemotherapeutics including taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel), vinca alkaloids (e.g., vincristine) and topoisomerase inhibitors (e.g., etoposide) [5,6,7]. Leea. indica (Burm. f.) Merrill is a Southeast Asian medicinal plant used as treatment for a number of medical conditions [8,9] and is reported to have anti-bacterial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [10]. Studies have shown that L. indica also displays anti-cancer activity [11,12,13]. We had also observed a positive clinical response to a decoction of L. indica leaves in an advanced-phase CML patient who was resistant to dasatinib, a second-generation BCR::ABL1 TKI. The fractions from L. indica extract have been reported to inhibit proliferation [12,13,14] and induce apoptosis in a number of cancer cell lines [12,13]. We subsequently isolated a chemical constituent from L. indica leaves, which was identified as gallic acid by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses [8]. Gallic acid has been reported to exhibit anti-cancer activity in solid and liquid cancers, such as prostate cancer [15], breast cancer [16], non-small cell lung cancer [17] and leukemia [18], through a range of mechanisms such as histone deacetylase inhibition [15], p53/Bax overexpression [16], the modulation of oncogenic pathways [17,19,20] and the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration [18].
In this study, we investigated the effects of isolated gallic acid, denoted herein as GI, on CML cells and primary stem/progenitor cells. To determine if isolated gallic acid is equipotent to the commercial standard, we investigated the effects of commercial standard gallic acid, denoted herein as GA, on CML. Our results show that the efficacies of GI and GA in CML are similar. In addition, gallic acid acts through inhibiting mitochondrial respiration as well as a number of oncogenic signaling pathways. Our study suggests that these mechanisms are distinct processes and are required for gallic acid to be efficacious in CML.
2. Results
2.1. Gallic Acid Decreases Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in CML Cells
K562 and LAMA84 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of GI and GA for 72 h, and proliferation was determined. GI and GA inhibited proliferation, with IC50 values of 5.6 ± 1.9, 7.1 ± 1.6 μg/mL (K562) and 6.7 ± 1.5, 9.0 ± 1.8 μg/mL (LAMA84), respectively (average ± standard deviation; Figure 1A,B). Apoptotic morphological changes after treatment with GI and GA, as evidenced by cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing and a loss of membrane integrity, were observed, (Supplementary Figure S1). We showed that GI and GA induce dose-dependent apoptosis (as indicated by Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD- and Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD+ populations) in K562 and LAMA84 cells (Figure 1C,D and Supplementary Figure S2). An immunoblotting analysis of essential molecules involved in apoptotic pathways showed that GI and GA led to an increase in cleaved caspase 3 and cleaved PARP (Figure 1E,F and Supplementary Figure S3).
2.2. Gallic Acid Decreases Colony Formation and Survival in Primary CML CD34+ Cells
We next explored the effects of GI on primary CML stem/progenitor cells. Characteristics of CML stem/progenitor cells include proliferation and multi-lineage differentiation, which can be determined through a colony formation assay. GI at concentrations of 7.5 μg/mL to 20 μg/mL decreased colony formation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure S4). In cord blood CD34+ cells, a decrease in colony formation was only seen with GI at concentrations of 12.5 μg/mL and 20 μg/mL, suggesting that gallic acid is selective in inhibiting CML colony formation (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S4). GI also induced apoptosis in primary CML CD34+ cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2C).
2.3. Gallic Acid Is Synergistic with BCR::ABL1 TKIs in CML Cell Lines and Primary CML Cells
To examine if GI and GA exhibit synergy with BCR::ABL1 TKIs, we performed combination studies using the first-generation TKI, imatinib, the second-generation TKI, dasatinib, and the third-generation TKI, ponatinib. Compared to imatinib, dasatinib exhibits greater in vitro potency and is active against most imatinib-resistant BCR::ABL1 kinase mutations except the T315I mutation. Ponatinib is active against BCR::ABL1 kinase mutations including the T315I mutation. Imatinib and ponatinib were used in experiments for CML cell lines. Dasatinib was used in experiments for patient samples, which were imatinib-resistant (Supplementary Table S1). We treated the CML cell lines with GI and GA in combination with the BCR::ABL1 TKIs based on methods proposed by Chou and Talalay [21] and measured proliferation. GI was synergistic with imatinib in K562 and LAMA84 cells with a combination index (CI) < 1 at 50% inhibition (Figure 3A,B and Supplementary Table S2). Similarly, GA demonstrated synergy with imatinib in K562 and LAMA84 cells with a CI < 1 at 50% inhibition (Figure 3C,D and Supplementary Table S2). Similar to imatinib, we also showed that the combination of GI or GA with ponatinib exhibited synergistic effects in suppressing proliferation in K562 and LAMA84 cells (Supplementary Figure S5).
We next determined if gallic acid enhanced the efficacy of BCR::ABL1 TKI in primary CML stem/progenitor cells. As the cells were isolated from CML patients who were imatinib-resistant, we used the second-generation BCR::ABL1 TKI, dasatinib. Consistent with our observation with the CML cell lines, the combination of dasatinib and GI significantly decreased primary CML colony formation as compared to dasatinib alone (Figure 3E and Supplementary Figure S6).
2.4. Gallic Acid Modulates Oncogenic Pathways in CML
To investigate the mechanism of action of gallic acid in CML, we first explored the effect of GI and GA on the BCR::ABL1, SRC and mTOR pathways in LAMA84 cells. Phosphorylation of the adaptor protein CRKL, which is used to assess BCR::ABL1 kinase activity, was reduced in a dose-dependent manner with treatment with GI and GA. The phosphorylation levels of SRC (Y416) were decreased, as were those of the proteins involved in the mTOR pathway, such as S6 and 4-EBP1 (Figure 4A,B and Supplementary Figure S7). We further showed that the inhibitory effects of GI and GA upon oncogenic signaling pathways were observed in K562 cells (Figure 4C,D and Supplementary Figure S7). These results show that gallic acid exhibits anti-cancer effects via the modulation of oncogenic signaling pathways.
We next conducted phosphoprotein profiling using the Phospho Explorer Array PEX100 kit that covers 1318 proteins in 30 different oncogenic signaling pathways to explore changes in phosphorylation with GA treatment in LAMA84 cells. Proteins with a reduction of more than twofold in phosphorylation with treatment were identified (Supplementary Table S3). The majority of identified proteins affected by GA are those involved in transcription signaling (e.g., REL, CREB, STAT2, CREB and NFkB) and the cell cycle. Representative phosphoproteins were then selected and validated by immunoblotting in LAMA84 and K562 cells, such as p-MEK (S298), p-NFkB p65 (S529), p-FAK (Y397), p-DUSP1/MKP1 (S359), p-CREB (S133) and p-STAT4 (Y693) (Figure 5A and Supplementary Figure S8), demonstrating a concordance rate of 75%. The list of validated altered proteins analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) revealed more than 10 significant networks (Figure 5B). A total of 14 enriched canonical pathways were identified by applying the -log (p-value) > 8 (Figure 5C). The top pathways identified include ERK/MAPK (p-value = 2.51 × 10−13), FLT3 (p-value = 6.31 × 10−12) and JAK/STAT (p-value = 6.31 × 10−12) signaling pathways, all of which play significant roles in CML cell survival and apoptosis. The analysis of common diseases and functions demonstrates that this set of molecules is strongly associated with leukocyte function (p-value = 2 × 10−12), lymphocyte function (p-value = 2.2 × 10−12) and lymphopoiesis (p-value = 3.8 × 10−12) (Figure 5D).
2.5. Gallic Acid Inhibits Mitochondrial Respiration in CML
Gallic acid has been shown to inhibit mitochondrial respiration in acute myeloid leukemia [18]. Given the importance of mitochondrial respiration in myeloid leukemia [22], we explored the effect of GI and GA on mitochondrial respiration in CML cell lines. Both GI- and GA-treated K562 and LAMA84 cells exhibit a significant dose-dependent reduction in basal respiration (Figure 6A). Our results further show that with the addition of oligomycin, GI and GA induce a significant decrease in ATP-coupled mitochondrial respiration (indicating minimal respiration) as compared to the control in both cell lines (Figure 6B). The ETC accelerator response, which indicates maximal respiration, was also decreased upon treatment with GI and GA in response to the addition of carbonyl cyanide-4 (trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP) (Figure 6C). To confirm that mitochondrial respiration is the target of gallic acid, we investigated the effects of GI and GA in mitochondrial respiration-deficient ρ0 cells established in our laboratory [23]. We showed that the level of apoptosis is significantly decreased in the ρ0 LAMA84 cells as compared to the parental LAMA84 cells upon treatment with GI and GA (Figure 6D). Taken together, our results indicate that the action of gallic acid in CML is largely through inhibiting mitochondrial respiration.
3. Discussion
Plants contain active chemical constituents and are important sources of phytochemicals that have great promise for treating a variety of diseases, including cancer [24]. Plant-derived natural compounds have been used extensively in pharmacotherapy in cancer, with approximately 60% of clinical chemotherapeutic agents originating from plants [25,26]. Although L. indica has been used as a form of traditional medicine in treating cancer [27], the chemical constituents responsible for its anti-cancer properties are not well understood.
By isolating and analyzing the L. indica ethyl acetate fraction using HPLC-ESI-MS, we previously reported that L. indica is a source of a wide range of phenolic contents, which might explain the diverse pharmacological activities of L. indica [8,9]. Compared to other L. indica chemical constituents, gallic acid displayed anti-cancer activity [14], and thus, its effects and mechanism of action were further investigated in the context of CML. Our results extend the observations of a previous study [20] by showing that gallic acid induces apoptosis in 2 CML cell lines, K562 and LAMA84. Through the utilization of NMR and LC-MS analyses, we confirmed the structural identity of isolated gallic acid by comparing it against a commercial standard [8]. Biologically, we demonstrated no discernible difference between both compounds, which is consistent with the chemical analyses confirming their identical nature. We have shown that both isolated gallic acid and its commercial standard inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis with similar potencies and significantly augment the efficacy of BCR::ABL1 TKIs in CML cell lines.
Disease relapse upon BCR::ABL1 TKI treatment discontinuation or the development of treatment resistance in CML can occur due to the persistent leukemia stem/progenitor cell population [28]. We show that isolated gallic acid is effective in inducing apoptosis and inhibiting the colony formation of primary CML CD34+, suggesting that isolated gallic acid targets the CML stem/progenitor population. Previous studies on the anti-cancer effects of gallic acid have focused primarily on differentiated cancer cells [15,16,17,19,29]. A recent study suggested that gallic acid not only inhibits differentiated cancer cells but also targets cancer stem cells [30]. Our findings corroborate this observation and highlight the anti-leukemia stem cell property of gallic acid. Leukemia stem cells are responsible for disease initiation, maintenance and relapse [31]. A drug that can target stem/progenitor cells in CML, in addition to differentiated cancer cells, would represent a major advancement in the treatment strategy, offering the potential for more effective and durable clinical responses.
The significantly enhanced combinatory effect of isolated gallic acid and dasatinib further confirms that gallic acid is effective in inhibiting the proliferation of TKI-resistant primary CML stem/progenitor cells. Residual stem/progenitor cells are largely responsible for leukemia relapse. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that demonstrates that gallic acid inhibits the proliferation of drug-resistant stem/progenitor cells in leukemia. We also noted that isolated gallic acid at 17.5 µg/mL inhibits the colony formation of normal cord blood CD34+ in a similar manner as CML, suggesting a narrow therapeutic window. Further efforts to improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of gallic acid will be required.
The understanding of the molecular target and mechanism of action is essential for drug discovery and development. Our study has shown that gallic acid inhibits oncogenic pathways such as BCR::ABL1, SRC and mTOR. As pathways induced by SRC kinases and PI3K/mTOR are also regulated by BCR::ABL1 activity [32,33], we hypothesize that the inhibition of SRC and mTOR might be the consequence of BCR::ABL1 inhibition. In agreement with our hypothesis, IPA analysis based on our phosphoprotein profiling data shows that ERK/MAPK and JAK/STAT, which are also downstream of BCR::ABL1, are the top signaling pathways negatively affected in gallic acid-treated CML cells. Gallic acid has previously been reported to inhibit BCR::ABL1 tyrosine phosphorylation in a similar manner as imatinib [20]. In addition, gallic acid inhibits EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation in non-small cell lung and colon cancer cells [19,29]. While the mechanism of action of gallic acid in cancer cells is not universal but cancer cell type-specific [15,16,17,18], our findings suggest that the anti-leukemic activity of gallic acid is in part due to its ability in targeting multiple tyrosine kinase pathways.
Our data indicate that mitochondrial respiration is a target of gallic acid in CML cells. Both isolated gallic acid and its commercial standard disrupt mitochondrial respiration via decreasing the basal respiration, ATP coupler response and ETC accelerator response. Furthermore, we showed that mitochondrial respiration-deficient LAMA84 ρ0 cells are less sensitive to isolated gallic acid and its commercial standard, suggesting that gallic acid acts on CML via the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondrial respiration is a promising therapeutic target for leukemia, as leukemia cells, particularly leukemic stem cells, are more dependent on mitochondrial respiration than their normal hematopoietic counterparts for survival [34,35]. We previously showed that the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration is selective and effective in targeting BP-CML [23].
In conclusion, our findings show that isolated gallic acid and its commercial standard are active against both stem/progenitor and differentiated CML cells and synergize with BCR::ABL1 TKIs through the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and oncogenic signaling pathways. This previously unreported dual mechanism of action for gallic acid in CML provides an attractive therapeutic strategy, particularly for BCR::ABL1 TKI-resistant disease. Based on our findings, we will determine the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of gallic acid using CML patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Successful completion will set the stage for early-phase clinical trials.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Primary Cells
Primary peripheral blood or bone marrow samples were obtained from CML patients from Singapore General Hospital after obtaining written informed consent in accordance with institutional review board-approved protocols. Patient clinical information is in Supplemental Table S1. Cord blood samples were obtained from the Singapore Cord Blood Bank. Mononuclear cells were isolated with density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque-1077 from, followed by CD34+ cells purification using the CD34 MicroBead kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). We cultured CD34+ primary cells using a complete medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 200 pg/mL of the stem cell factor, 200 pg/mL of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, 200 pg/mL of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, 1 ng/mL of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 50 pg/mL of the leukemia inhibitory factor and 1 ng/mL of interleukin 6. The cells were cultured in the aforementioned medium for 24 h before being subjected to the respective assays.
4.2. Cell Lines
K562 and LAMA84 human CML cell lines (kind gift from Dr Junia Melo) were maintained in suspension in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), at 37 °C in 5% CO2. LAMA84 ρ0 cells, which were established in our laboratory [23] and used to identify if mitochondrial respiration is essential for the action of the drugs and compounds that were tested. LAMA84 ρ0 cells were maintained in suspension in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 50 µg/mL uridine and 100 µg/mL sodium pyruvate.
4.3. Drugs and Compounds
Imatinib methanesulfonate salt (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA), ponatinib (LC Laboratories, USA) and dasatinib (LC Laboratories) were dissolved in sterile distilled water and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), respectively. Gallic acid was isolated from L. indica leaves using the method previously reported [8]. Briefly, freshly harvested leaves of L. indica were cleaned and air-dried. They were blended using a Morries blender (Singapore) and extracted by maceration using 70% methanol for 3 days. The solvent was decanted and the process was repeated twice with fresh solvent each time, for a total of 9 days. The combined 70% methanolic extract was dried, reconstituted in water and further fractionated by liquid–liquid extraction using hexane, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate fraction was subjected to column chromatography, and gallic acid was isolated. The estimated concentration of gallic acid in the fresh leaves is 0.005–0.011% w/w. Commercial standard gallic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was dissolved in DMSO.
4.4. Measurement of Apoptosis
The cells were plated at a 1 × 105/mL density on 12-well-plates and treated with drugs and compounds for 72 h. Cell apoptosis was performed by Annexin V-FITC and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) (IM3614; Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) staining, as per the manufacturer’s protocol, and was analyzed on BD LSRFortessa. Early apoptosis was defined as Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD-, while late apoptosis was defined as Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD+. Total apoptosis was defined as the sum of both Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD- and Annexin V-FITC+/7-AAD+ populations.
4.5. Cell Proliferation Assay and Drug Combination Studies
Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105 on 96-well-plates and treated with drugs and compounds for 72 h. Cellular proliferation was analyzed by the CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation assay kit (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the combinatory effects of imatinib and isolated gallic acid or its commercial standard, combination studies were designed based on the methods described by Chou and Talalay [21]. The cells were treated with isolated gallic acid or its commercial standard and BCR::ABL1 TKI or in an equipotent constant-ratio combination. The concentrations of each compound and drug were indicated in Supplementary Table S2. The combination indices (CI) at 50% growth inhibition, calculated by the CompuSyn software 1.0 (Biosoft, Grimsby, UK), were used as a guide to quantitatively demonstrate combination effects (synergism, CI < 1; additive effect, CI = 1; antagonism, CI > 1).
4.6. Colony-Forming Assay
Primary CD34+ cells at 1–5 × 103 were plated in StemMACSTM HSC-CFU complete methylcellulose medium w/o Epo (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch, Germany). After two weeks of treatment, the number of colonies was scored. Images were captured with a microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan).
4.7. Western Blot (WB) Analysis
After 24 h of treatment, the cells were lysed in 20 mM pH 8.2 Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with cOmplete mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Equal amounts of the protein were resolved onto SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by WB using the primary antibodies (Cell Signalling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) p-SRC (Y416; #6943S), total SRC (#2108S), p-Crkl (Y207; #3181S), total Crkl (#3182S), p-S6 (S235/236; #2211S), total S6 (#2217S), p-4EBP1 (T37/46; #2855S), total 4EBP1 (#9644S), p-MEK (S298; sc271914), total MEK (sc6250), p-NFkB p65 (S536; #3033S), total NFkB p65 (#8242S), p-FAK (Y397; sc81493), total FAK (sc271126), p-DUSP1/MKP1 (S359; #2857S), total DUSP/MKP1 (#48625S), p-CREB (S133, #9198S), total CREB (#9198S), p-STAT4 (Y693; sc136194) and total STAT4 (sc398228). Proteins were detected using the Immobilon Western (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Images were captured via the Chemidoc XRS+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), and quantification was performed using the ImageJ 1.54 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) software.
4.8. Phospho-Antibody Array
Phosphoprotein profiling was performed using the Phospho Explorer Array PEX100 kit (Full Moon BioSystems Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on LAMA84 cells treated with drugs or compounds for 24 h. The samples were labelled with Alexa Fluor 555 streptavidin (S32355; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and scanned using a GenePix 4000 microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
4.9. Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) Measurement
After treatment for 24 h, 5 × 104 drug-treated cells/well were resuspended in the XF assay medium (Agilent Technologies) and were seeded in 96-well XF96 well plates coated with BD Cell-Tak (BD Biosciences, Fremont, CA, USA). One hour before performing the OCR assay, the cells were incubated at 37 °C in a CO2-free environment. OCR was measured with the Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA) on a Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analyses were performed both at basal conditions and after the injection of oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone and the antimycin A and rotenone combination.
4.10. Data Analysis
All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data are presented in the average ± standard deviation, unless stated otherwise. Student’s t-test was used to calculate the probability against the control data. Statistical analyses, including one-way and two-way ANOVA for single-drug and combination-drug treatments, were performed using Prism 8.0.1.
Conceptualization, C.C.; Methodology, H.-L.K., Y.-C.L., and C.C.; Data curation, W.X., C.S., Y.-H.L., Y.-C.L. and Z.-H.K.; Formal analysis, W.X., Y.-H.L., Z.-H.K., S.-Y.N., Y.-Y.S., D.S. and H.-L.K.; Funding acquisition, W.X., H.-L.K., Y.-Y.S. and C.C.; Writing—original draft, W.X., Y.-H.L. and Z.-H.K.; Writing—review and editing, Y.-C.L., S.-Y.N., Y.-Y.S., D.S., H.-L.K. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The use of primary samples for research conducted in the course of the study presented was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Singapore General Hospital (IRB approval #2023/2001).
Written informed consent has been obtained from patients.
Data are contained within the article.
We are grateful to the patients and physicians at the Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital.
C.C. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis Oncology, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical and Chiltern International. All other authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Gallic acid isolated from L. indica (GI) and gallic acid commercial standard (GA) inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in CML cell lines in a similar manner. (A,B) Drug response curve of K562 and LAMA84 cells to GI and GA. (C,D) GI and GA significantly induce apoptosis in CML cells. Treatment was 72 h. (E,F) Western immunoblotting of pro-apoptotic proteins shows an increase in both caspase 3 and PARP cleavage after 72 h of GI and GA treatment, respectively, in LAMA84 cells. β-actin serves as a loading control. Data are representative of at least three independent triplicates. * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates p < 0.01.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. GI decreases colony formation and induces apoptosis in CML stem/progenitor cells. (A,B) GI inhibits the colony formation of primary CML CD34+ cells in a dose-dependent manner and to a greater extent than normal cord blood CD34+ cells. Colonies were counted under a microscope and the results are presented as relative to the control. Four CML patient samples and three healthy cord blood samples were included in this study. (C) GI also induces apoptosis dose-dependently in primary CML cells after 72 h. All data were conducted in independent triplicates. * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates p < 0.01.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. GI and GA exhibit synergistic inhibitory effects with BCR::ABL1 TKIs in both CML cell lines and stem/progenitor cells. (A–D) Combination index (CI) was calculated using the method of Chou and Talalay and CI < 1 indicates synergism, CI = 1 is additive and CI > 1 suggests antagonism. GI and GA demonstrated synergy with imatinib in both LAMA84 and K562 cell lines with CI < 1 at both 50% and 90% growth inhibition. Data are representative of the mean and SD of at least three independent experiments. (E) GI significantly enhanced with the inhibitory effect of dasatinib on the colony formation of CML CD34+ (n = 3). In total, 20nM of dasatinib was used. All data were conducted in independent triplicates. * indicates p < 0.05.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. The inhibitory effects of GI and GA in BCR::ABL1-mediated pathways in CML cells. GI (A,C) and GA (B,D) decrease the phosphorylation of SRC, CrkL, S6 ribosomal protein and 4EBP-1 in LAMA84 and K562 CML cells after 24 h of treatment. β-actin serves as a loading control. Data are representative of at least three independent triplicates.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. GA is predicted to be involved in multiple signaling pathways in LAMA84 cells. Phosphoprotein profiling was conducted using LAMA84 lysates collected after GA treatment at 25 μg/mL for 24 h. Phosphoprotein profiling results were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software 22.0.1. (A) Western immunoblotting of MEK and FAK were conducted as secondary validation for phosphoprotein profiling results in LAMA84 cells. GAPDH serves as a loading control. (B) IPA predicted networks involving top hits from phosphoprotein profiling and molecules involved in BCR::ABL1, SRC and mTOR pathways to elucidate further connections between molecules. (C) Canonical pathway analysis predicted by IPA to be affected by GA treatment based on the number of molecules from the phosphoprotein profiling results involved in the respective pathways, and the significance is shown in –log(p-value). (D) Diseases and functions affected by GA treatment were predicted using IPA software with the same set of molecules, and significance is shown in –log(p-value).
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. GI and GA are ineffective in mitochondrial respiration-deficient CML ρ0 cells. (A–C) GI and GA significantly decrease the basal respiration, ATP coupler response and ETC accelerator response in K562 and LAMA84 cells. (D) The pro-apoptotic effects of GI and GA are significantly abolished in mitochondrial respiration-deficient LAMA84 ρ0 cells. All experiments were conducted in independent triplicates. * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates p < 0.01.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Ren, R. Mechanisms of BCR-ABL in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Cancer; 2005; 5, pp. 172-183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1567] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15719031]
2. Pan, Y.L.; Zeng, S.X.; Hao, R.R.; Liang, M.H.; Shen, Z.R.; Huang, W.H. The progress of small-molecules and degraders against BCR-ABL for the treatment of CML. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2022; 238, 114442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114442]
3. Hehlmann, R. How I treat CML blast crisis. Blood; 2012; 120, pp. 737-747. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-380147] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22653972]
4. Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Otero, P.; Pereira, A.G.; Chamorro, F.; Carpena, M.; Echave, J.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Status and Challenges of Plant-Anticancer Compounds in Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceuticals; 2021; 14, 157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14020157] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673021]
5. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod.; 2020; 83, pp. 770-803. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162523]
6. Mukhtar, E.; Adhami, V.M.; Mukhtar, H. Targeting microtubules by natural agents for cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther.; 2014; 13, pp. 275-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0791] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435445]
7. Gordaliza, M.; Castro, M.A.; del Corral, J.M.; Feliciano, A.S. Antitumor properties of podophyllotoxin and related compounds. Curr. Pharm. Des.; 2000; 6, pp. 1811-1839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612003398582] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11102564]
8. Singh, D.; Siew, Y.Y.; Chong, T.I.; Yew, H.C.; Ho, S.S.; Lim, C.S.E.; Tan, W.X.; Neo, S.Y.; Koh, H.L. Identification of Phytoconstituents in Leea indica (Burm. F.) Merr. Leaves by High Performance Liquid Chromatography Micro Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Molecules; 2019; 24, 714. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040714]
9. Singh, S.; Siew, Y.Y.; Yew, H.C.; Neo, S.Y.; Koh, H.L. Botany, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of Leea species. Medicinal Plants: Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Applications; Patra, K.J.K.; Rudramurthy, G.R. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 11-41.
10. Hossain, F.; Mostofa, M.G.; Alam, A.K. Traditional uses and pharmacological activities of the genus leea and its phytochemicals: A review. Heliyon; 2021; 7, e06222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06222] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659746]
11. Siew, Y.Y.; Yew, H.C.; Neo, S.Y.; Seow, S.V.; Lew, S.M.; Lim, S.W.; Lim, C.S.E.; Ng, Y.C.; Seetoh, W.G.; Ali, A. et al. Evaluation of anti-proliferative activity of medicinal plants used in Asian Traditional Medicine to treat cancer. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2019; 235, pp. 75-87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.12.040]
12. Yau Hsiung, W.; Abdul Kadir, H. Leea indica Ethyl Acetate Fraction Induces Growth-Inhibitory Effect in Various Cancer Cell Lines and Apoptosis in Ca Ski Human Cervical Epidermoid Carcinoma Cells. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. eCAM; 2011; 2011, 293060. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/293060] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423690]
13. Ghagane, S.C.; Puranik, S.I.; Kumbar, V.M.; Nerli, R.B.; Jalalpure, S.S.; Hiremath, M.B.; Neelagund, S.; Aladakatti, R. In vitro antioxidant and anticancer activity of Leea indica leaf extracts on human prostate cancer cell lines. Integr. Med. Res.; 2017; 6, pp. 79-87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2017.01.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462147]
14. Neo, S.Y.; Siew, Y.Y.; Yew, H.C.; He, Y.; Poh, K.L.; Tsai, Y.C.; Ng, S.L.; Tan, W.X.; Chong, T.I.; Lim, C.S.E. et al. Effects of Leea indica leaf extracts and its phytoconstituents on natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity in human ovarian cancer. BMC Complement. Med. Ther.; 2023; 23, 79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03904-1]
15. Jang, Y.G.; Ko, E.B.; Choi, K.C. Gallic acid, a phenolic acid, hinders the progression of prostate cancer by inhibition of histone deacetylase 1 and 2 expression. J. Nutr. Biochem.; 2020; 84, 108444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108444] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32615369]
16. Aborehab, N.M.; Elnagar, M.R.; Waly, N.E. Gallic acid potentiates the apoptotic effect of paclitaxel and carboplatin via overexpression of Bax and P53 on the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol.; 2021; 35, e22638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22638] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002289]
17. Zhang, T.; Ma, L.; Wu, P.; Li, W.; Li, T.; Gu, R.; Dan, X.; Li, Z.; Fan, X.; Xiao, Z. Gallic acid has anticancer activity and enhances the anticancer effects of cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer A549 cells via the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep.; 2019; 41, pp. 1779-1788.
18. Gu, R.; Zhang, M.; Meng, H.; Xu, D.; Xie, Y. Gallic acid targets acute myeloid leukemia via Akt/mTOR-dependent mitochondrial respiration inhibition. Biomed. Pharmacother.=Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2018; 105, pp. 491-497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.158] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29883944]
19. Lin, X.; Wang, G.; Liu, P.; Han, L.; Wang, T.; Chen, K.; Gao, Y. Gallic acid suppresses colon cancer proliferation by inhibiting SRC and EGFR phosphorylation. Exp. Ther. Med.; 2021; 21, 638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10070] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968169]
20. Chandramohan Reddy, T.; Bharat Reddy, D.; Aparna, A.; Arunasree, K.M.; Gupta, G.; Achari, C.; Reddy, G.V.; Lakshmipathi, V.; Subramanyam, A.; Reddanna, P. Anti-leukemic effects of gallic acid on human leukemia K562 cells: Downregulation of COX-2, inhibition of BCR/ABL kinase and NF-kappaB inactivation. Toxicol Vitr.; 2012; 26, pp. 396-405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.12.018]
21. Chou, T.C. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer Res.; 2010; 70, pp. 440-446. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1947]
22. Rex, M.R.; Williams, R.; Birsoy, K.; Ta Llman, M.S.; Stahl, M. Targeting mitochondrial metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma; 2022; 63, pp. 530-537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2021.1992759] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704521]
23. Xiang, W.; Cheong, J.K.; Ang, S.H.; Teo, B.; Xu, P.; Asari, K.; Sun, W.T.; Than, H.; Bunte, R.M.; Virshup, D.M. et al. Pyrvinium selectively targets blast phase-chronic myeloid leukemia through inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Oncotarget; 2015; 6, pp. 33769-33780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5615] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378050]
24. Dehelean, C.A.; Marcovici, I.; Soica, C.; Mioc, M.; Coricovac, D.; Iurciuc, S.; Cretu, O.M.; Pinzaru, I. Plant-Derived Anticancer Compounds as New Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Alternative Therapy. Molecules; 2021; 26, 1109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041109]
25. Shanmugam, M.K.; Lee, J.H.; Chai, E.Z.; Kanchi, M.M.; Kar, S.; Arfuso, F.; Dharmarajan, A.; Kumar, A.P.; Ramar, P.S.; Looi, C.Y. et al. Cancer prevention and therapy through the modulation of transcription factors by bioactive natural compounds. Semin. Cancer Biol.; 2016; 40–41, pp. 35-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.03.005]
26. Bishayee, A.; Sethi, G. Bioactive natural products in cancer prevention and therapy: Progress and promise. Semin. Cancer Biol.; 2016; 40–41, pp. 1-3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.08.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27565447]
27. Saralamp, P. Medicinal plants in Thailand. Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University: Bangkok, Thailand, 1996; 1.
28. Chomel, J.C.; Bonnet, M.L.; Sorel, N.; Sloma, I.; Bennaceur-Griscelli, A.; Rea, D.; Legros, L.; Marfaing-Koka, A.; Bourhis, J.H.; Ame, S. et al. Leukemic stem cell persistence in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in deep molecular response induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the impact of therapy discontinuation. Oncotarget; 2016; 7, pp. 35293-35301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9182]
29. Wang, D.; Bao, B. Gallic Acid Impedes Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progression via Suppression of EGFR-Dependent CARM1-PELP1 Complex. Drug Des. Devel. Ther.; 2020; 14, pp. 1583-1592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S228123] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425504]
30. Brahmbhatt, J.; Kumar, S.P.; Bhadresha, K.; Patel, M.; Rawal, R. Targeting leukemic stem cell subpopulation in AML using phytochemicals: An in-silico and in-vitro approach. Comput. Biol. Med.; 2023; 155, 106644. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106644]
31. Vetrie, D.; Helgason, G.V.; Copland, M. The leukaemia stem cell: Similarities, differences and clinical prospects in CML and AML. Nat. Rev. Cancer; 2020; 20, pp. 158-173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0230-9]
32. Li, S. SRC kinase signaling in leukaemia. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.; 2007; 39, pp. 1483-1488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.01.027]
33. Kim, J.H.; Chu, S.C.; Gramlich, J.L.; Pride, Y.B.; Babendreier, E.; Chauhan, D.; Salgia, R.; Podar, K.; Griffin, J.D.; Sattler, M. Activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway by BCR-ABL contributes to increased production of reactive oxygen species. Blood; 2005; 105, pp. 1717-1723. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-03-0849] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486067]
34. Lagadinou, E.D.; Sach, A.; Callahan, K.; Rossi, R.M.; Neering, S.J.; Minhajuddin, M.; Ashton, J.M.; Pei, S.; Grose, V.; O’Dwyer, K.M. et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell; 2013; 12, pp. 329-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23333149]
35. Jaras, M.; Ebert, B.L. Power cut: Inhibiting mitochondrial translation to target leukemia. Cancer Cell; 2011; 20, pp. 555-556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.10.028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22094249]
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Yi-Hui, Lam 1 ; Ze-Hui Kok 1 ; Yeh-Ching, Linn 1 ; Soek-Ying Neo 2 ; Yin-Yin, Siew 2
; Singh, Deepika 2 ; Hwee-Ling Koh 2
; Chuah, Charles 3 1 Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169608, Singapore
2 Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
3 Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169608, Singapore; Program in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore