1. Introduction
Per- and poly-fluoroalkylated substances (PFAS) are a family of more than 4000 chemicals [1], from which more than 600 are currently being commercially used [2]. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) define PFAS as “fluorinated substances that contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I atom attached to it)” [3]. PFAS are characterized by having very strong bonds between carbon and fluorine atoms [4,5,6], which gives them thermal and chemical stability [7] and causes them to be persistent in the environment [6]. Since PFAS chemicals have both hydrophobic and lipophobic tails and a polar hydrophilic head [5,8,9], they repel water and oil and have thus been widely used in commercial and industrial products since the 1940s [7,10]. Their carbon length and functional groups vary [1], and they can be classified as long and short chains [11]. Long chain PFAS are defined as perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) with eight carbons and greater and perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs) with six carbons and greater [11]. Short-chain PFAS are defined as PFCA with seven or fewer carbons and PFSA with five or fewer carbons. This difference in the number of carbons is because PFSA compounds tend to bioaccumulate more than PFCAs with the same number of carbon atoms [11]. Specific structures of individual PFAS chemicals are accessible through the US EPA CompTox Chemicals repository.
Long-chain PFAS include legacy chemicals such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluooroctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS) [11,12]. Short-chain PFAS include perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), and perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) [13]. In addition, hexafluoropropylene oxide (HFPO) dimer acid and its ammonium salts, better known as GenX and 3H-4,8-dioxanonanoate (ADONA), are also short-chain PFAS that were introduced to replace PFOA, while chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate (F53B) was introduced to replace PFOS [14]. In the 2000s, a voluntary PFOS phase-out was initiated, followed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) PFOA Stewardship Program to eliminate PFAS emissions and products [15,16]. With the phase-out of long-chain PFAS, the use of short-chain PFAS was extended to replace PFAS chemicals; however, these PFAS are less regulated, and despite having shorter half-lives of elimination in organisms, they are as persistent in the environment as long-chain PFAS and are also extensively distributed [13,17].
Due to their physicochemical properties, PFAS are used in a myriad of consumer products, including fabric coatings, non-stick cookware, fire-fighting foams, food packaging, and personal care products [18,19,20]. Human and animal exposure to PFAS is through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposures [18,21], and PFAS are present in the blood of the majority of humans living in industrialized countries [22,23,24]. In general, PFAS bind to albumin [17,25] and accumulate in the blood, liver, kidneys, testicles, brain [9,26,27], and ovaries [28] but do not tend to accumulate in adipose tissue [8,21,27]. However, one study found that PFAS were present in the adipose tissue of pigs, attributing this difference to the protonated or deprotonated form of PFAS [29]. These compounds are typically not metabolized in vivo, hence their long half-lives [18,28,30,31]. Elimination half-lives vary between species and chemical types [17,30]. PFAS can be eliminated through urine, feces, and bile [18,28,30] and can also be excreted through breast milk [18] and menstrual fluid [32,33]. In general, the half-life of elimination decreases in PFAS with a shorter carbon chain, and half-lives of elimination in humans and other animals are summarized in Table 1 [28,29,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Furthermore, there are biological sex differences in the half-life of PFAS elimination. For example, in female rats, the half-life of PFOA is around 2–4 h, while in male rats, it is 4–9 days [28,41]. This difference is explained by differences in secretory mechanisms in the kidney between female and male rats [28]. Nevertheless, this is not the case for all species; for example, in non-human primates, PFOA has an apparent longer half-life of elimination in females (32 d) compared to males (21 d) [55]. In mice, the half-life of PFOA in females is 15 days, and in males, 21 days [52], potentially translating to their serving as an appropriate model to study potential human toxic effects [21]. Another important detail is the difference in the half-life of elimination between some species [61]; for example, the half-life of elimination of PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS in rodents is much shorter compared to humans [28,34,35,41,42,45,47,48,52]; however, in pigs, PFAS have longer time lengths for elimination compared to other species [29]. While elimination half-lives for long-chain PFAS are reported, studies to determine the half-life of elimination of the newer PFAS and their replacements remain necessary.
PFAS can be easily absorbed after oral ingestion [12,62] and are detected in drinking water [21,63,64], animal food products [1,65,66], and bodily fluids [67,68]. As noted above, PFAS have been detected in the serum of most of the U.S. population [67,68,69,70,71] and are reportedly higher in children [72]. The average human exposure to PFOA and PFOS in 2015–2016 was 1.56 and 4.72 ng/mL [73,74], while high PFOA and PFOS exposure levels ranged from 47–128 and 30–219 ng/kg/day, respectively [75]. However, serum concentrations of short-chain PFAS have trended towards being increased [32]. In 2022, the USEPA established interim drinking water health advisories for PFOA (0.004 ppt), PFOS (0.02 ppt), GenX chemicals (10 ppt), and PFBS (2000 ppt) [76]. In addition, the USEPA has proposed a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for six PFAS, with enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) set at 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS individually and 10 ppt for PFNA, PFHxS, and HFPO-DA (GenX chemicals) [77]. Under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, PFOS were listed in 2009 in Annex B, which restricts the production and use of the chemicals listed [78]. Furthermore, PFOA and PFHxS were recently listed as Annex A chemicals [78], and long-chain PFCAs are being reviewed to determine their annex listing [78]. In the European Union, the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) established the tolerable daily intake (TDI) for PFOS and PFOA as 150 ng/kg and 1500 ng/kg body weight per day, respectively [5]. The TDI for production animals, however, remains unclear. PFAS are reported to adversely affect health in humans and animal models, including liver and kidney disease, cancer, lipid and insulin alterations, changes in the immune system, alterations in the thyroid function, endocrine disruption, and reproductive and developmental toxicity [5,18,61]. This review will focus on PFAS’ effects on female reproduction with a description of available human and animal studies.
2. Female Reproduction
The female reproductive system is comprised of the oviducts, uterus, cervix, vagina, ovaries, and external genitalia [79,80]. The ovary is a dense structure in the pelvic cavity near the lateral walls [80], composed of somatic and germ cells [81]. The two primary functions of the ovary are (1) production and release of oocytes through the processes of oogenesis and folliculogenesis and (2) production and secretion of hormones (17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4)), which are essential for the proper functioning of the female reproductive system [79,82,83] and female general health [84].
The process of folliculogenesis describes how immature oocyte-containing follicles develop and mature to be ovulated or die by atresia [79]. Primordial follicles are the most immature follicle stage present in the ovary [79] and are comprised of the oocyte surrounded by a single layer of flattened or squamous granulosa cells that are surrounded by a basal lamina [79,81,85]. Local ovarian factors activate the primordial follicles to develop into primary follicles, upon which an increase in oocyte size is observed [80,85]. The flattened granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte become cuboidal granulosa cells [79,80,81,85]. The zona pellucida, a non-cellular layer, also appears at this stage of follicular development, surrounding the oocyte, and it is preserved until ovulation [81,85]. Granulosa cells are essential for the nutrition and support of the oocyte, synthetizing factors that are trafficked to the oocyte by diffusion through the zona pellucida [86]. The secondary follicles develop from primary follicles and are referred to as pre-antral follicles, containing multiple layers of granulosa and theca cells [81]. The newly recruited theca cell layer contains blood vessels and nerves and supports the follicle [81]. Secondary follicles also have a network of gap junctions consisting of connexins, proteins necessary for follicular development, and connect to adjacent cells, allowing nutrients, small metabolites, and second messengers to pass from cell to cell [85]. Only some follicles proceed to the next developmental stage when they are known as tertiary or antral follicles, which are dependent upon follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [81,85].
Follicular fluid (FF) is formed from filtered blood circulating in the thecal capillaries [87] and from granulosa cells. This fluid accumulates and separates the inner and outer layers of the follicle to form an antral cavity [80,81,85]. Most of these follicles will undergo atresia; the remaining will grow to the preovulatory stage [85]. Preovulatory follicles produce E2, which rises in concentration, resulting in positive feedback on the hypothalamus and pituitary to precipitate the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, critical for ovulation of the oocyte [81,85]. The LH surge decreases E2 production and increases P4 secretion [81]. The remaining granulosa and theca cells luteinize to form the corpus luteum (CL), producing P4 to prepare the uterus in case pregnancy occurs [81,85]. If pregnancy does not occur, the CL will degenerate, becoming a corpus albicans, marking the end of the ovarian cycle [80].
The entire ovarian reserve of oocytes is produced during fetal development [88,89]. A human female has 14 million oocytes at 20 weeks of gestation, but this number will decline during the female’s life [81,89,90]. At the time of birth, the ovary contains ~1–2 million oocytes; at puberty, this number drops to ~300,000, and at menopause, the ovary has <100 oocytes [81,89,91,92,93,94,95]. Of these, only 400–500 oocytes are ovulated during a woman’s lifetime [81,93].
As noted, steroid hormones are produced in and act on the ovary, similar to other tissues [81]. In the ovary, E2 and P4 are synthesized from circulating cholesterol [81,96] through the two-cell two-step theory of steroidogenesis. Cholesterol is converted via a series of enzymatic reactions to form testosterone in the theca cell and aromatized to E2 via the action of cytochrome P450 isoform 19A1 in the granulosa cell [97]. Thus, the ovary is a dynamic organ vital for the production of the female gamete and critical to proper endocrine balance in females.
3. Ovarian Toxicity
In the United States (US), 6.1 million women (10%) aged 15–44 years have difficulty conceiving [98]. As mentioned previously, women are born with a finite number of oocytes and anything that disrupts reproductive health can lead to temporary or permanent infertility [99]. The average age at the onset of menopause in the US is 51 years, and it results from the cessation of ovarian cyclicity due to the depletion of the ovarian follicular pool [100]. Menopause onset before 40 years is referred to as premature ovarian failure (POF) and can be induced by an increase in levels of gonadotropins or hypoestrogenism leading to a depletion of the ovarian follicular pool [101] and alterations in the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis [102].
Environmental, occupational, medicinal, or xenoestrogenic chemicals can also cause adverse effects on the female reproductive system [83,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. Chemicals that affect ovarian function are known as ovotoxicants and can target different stages of follicular development [88,106,112], leading to harmful effects on follicle development, decreased oocyte quality and ovulation, disruption of the estrous cycle, and altered hormonal production [106,108,113,114,115]. Depletion of primordial follicles by ovotoxicants can cause POF and permanent infertility due to the loss of the follicle pool that is irreplaceable [88,99,100,112,116,117]. Damage to growing or antral follicles can disrupt the menstrual cycle by altering ovarian steroid production and impairing ovulation, but the damage is temporary because these follicles can be replaced from the primordial follicle pool [88,99,108,116]. Many factors can influence ovarian toxicity, including the concentration and duration of chemical exposure, as well as the age at which the exposure occurs [112]. Thus, ovotoxicity is a broad term comprising a range of phenotypic outcomes of toxicant exposure.
4. Effect of PFAS on Human Female Reproduction as Determined by Epidemiological Studies
Several studies have associated exposure to PFAS with adverse effects on female reproduction. However, most have evaluated the effects of long-chain or legacy PFAS, and inconsistencies, as noted throughout this review, exist amongst these associative findings. Epidemiological studies have linked PFAS exposure with alterations in reproductive hormone levels, menarche and menopause onset, menstrual cycle length, endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and impaired fertility.
4.1. Endocrine Disruption
PFAS are reported as endocrine disruptors [9], and exposure to PFAS is postulated to alter the regulation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–ovarian axis [118]. In girls between 6–9 years old, high PFOS serum concentrations are associated with lower total testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels [119]. In addition, levels of PFNA are also inversely associated with IGF-1 levels [119]. In Taiwanese girls aged between 12–17 years, there were no links determined between PFAS serum concentration and serum E2, FSH, and LH, with the exception of perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA), which was correlated with decreased FSH levels, and both PFOS and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) were inversely associated with serum testosterone levels [120,121]. In contrast, testosterone concentrations were higher in 15-year-old girls who were prenatally exposed to PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS [122]. Interestingly, another study in 20-year-old women did not link prenatal exposure to PFOS and PFOA with levels of E2, testosterone, FSH, or LH [123]. However, inverse associations were reported for E2 and P4 levels and PFOS concentrations in women, but a lack of any link was reported for the other PFAS, including PFOA [33,124]. In women aged between 20–45 years, serum testosterone concentrations were positively associated with exposure to PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA [125]. In midlife women during the menopausal transition, PFOA and PFOS exposure showed a positive connection with FSH levels, while PFNA and PFOA had an inverse relationship with E2 in circulation [126]. The potential for PFAS exposure to affect reproductive hormone levels is concerning and could contribute to negative effects on female reproduction and general health.
4.2. Puberty and Menopause Onset
Exposure to PFAS has also been associated with differences in cycle length, puberty initiation, and menopause onset, alterations which may affect the proper functioning of the reproductive system and might lead to infertility.
4.3. Puberty and Menopause
Exposure to PFAS has been correlated with altered timing of puberty and menopause onset, which are both important for female reproductive and general health. Not many epidemiological studies have evaluated the timing of puberty onset and correlations with PFAS exposure, with inconsistent results in those reported. Three studies have illustrated links between high levels of PFOA and PFOS with delayed puberty in girls [123,127,128]. Early puberty onset has been correlated with exposure to PFOS, PFHxS, PFHps, PFNA, and PFDA [129]. Similarly, there are links reported between higher PFAS serum levels and early menopause onset, albeit with discrepancies also existing [33,130]. Interestingly, PFAS serum concentrations in premenopausal women are lower than in postmenopausal women, who may bioaccumulate PFAS once they no longer menstruate [130,131,132,133]. Reverse causation has been proposed as a possible explanation for differences in time to pregnancy, early menopause, and PFAS levels in women [33,130,134]. Since PFAS may be excreted through endometrial lining shedding during menstruation, women who no longer menstruate may have higher levels of PFAS; the same would apply to women that have longer interpregnancy intervals, who may have experienced a greater number of menstrual cycles to eliminate more PFAS [33,130,134].
4.4. Menstrual Cyclicity
PFAS exposures have been shown to cause irregular menstrual cycles [118]. Increased odds of irregular menstrual cycles have been associated with exposure to PFOA [128]. Higher PFOS concentrations have also been associated with irregular menstrual cyclicity, but there were no associations with other PFAS, including PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA [125]. Similarly, another study did not note a correlation between exposure to PFOS and PFOA and menstrual cycle length [123]. Different PFAS may change menstrual cycle length in both directions; for example, exposure to PFOA decreases menstrual cycle length, but conversely, exposure to perfluorodecanoate (PFDeA) increases the duration [135]. In women from Greenland, Poland, and Ukraine, higher levels of PFOA were linked with longer menstrual cycles [136], while higher PFOS levels were less firmly related to irregular menstrual cycles [136]. Positive associations between PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS and self-reported longer menstrual cycles were reported in Chinese women [137]. After adjusting for confounders, self-reported irregular menstrual cycles were generally not associated with PFAS serum concentrations in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort [138]. However, shorter cycles were associated with lower serum concentrations of perfluoroheptane sulfonate (PFHpS) and PFOS in parous women [138]. In addition, in women using oral contraceptives, longer menstrual cycles were associated with higher PFNA and PFUnA concentrations [138]. Alterations in the length of the menstrual cycle and cyclicity are important since they can lead to problems with normal endocrine homeostasis and fertility.
4.5. Fecundity Indices
In women aged 35–44 years, there was no association between fecundability ratios and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), which is used clinically as a marker of ovarian reserve [139,140] and PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS serum levels; however, women with higher serum PFAS concentrations had longer mean cycle lengths and were less likely to achieve pregnancy by the cessation of the study [141]. In agreement with these findings, a relationship between PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS prenatal exposure was not reported with AMH levels in adolescents (14–16 years) and young adult (20 years) female offspring [123,142]. In addition, higher concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and perfluorooctane sulfonamide (PFOSA) were associated with a longer time to pregnancy [118,143,144]. Serum PFOS and PFOA were linked to reduced fecundity [145], while PFOA and PFNA were associated with a lower probability of pregnancy [135]. In contrast, a lack of association between PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFNA, PFDA, PFOSA, N-methyl-perfluorooctanoic sulfonamidoacetate (MeFOSAA), and N-ethyl-perfluorooctane-sulfonamidoacetate (EtFOSAA)) concentrations and time to pregnancy has also been noted [146] and limited support for an association between time to pregnancy and plasma concentrations of PFOSA was noted in primiparous women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study [147]. In women from Greenland, Poland, and Ukraine, consistent findings between PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS levels and infertility were absent [148]. Nonetheless, high levels of PFNA were associated with a longer time to pregnancy and odds ratio for infertility in women from Greenland, but these associations did not repeat after conducting a sensitivity analysis of primiparous women [148]. In general, there is support for PFAS exposure being associated with longer time to pregnancy and fecundity, though a discrepancy certainly exists in the literature.
4.6. PFAS in Follicular Fluid
Follicular fluid is a physiological and biologically relevant component found in the antral cavity of the follicle, which contains proteins, steroid hormones, polysaccharides, metabolites, reactive oxygen species, and antioxidants [149]. Follicular vascularity permits the partitioning of xenobiotics to this biofluid with close proximity to the oocyte [150]. Since the blood–follicle barrier can be crossed by albumin [151,152], it has been suggested that PFAS can be present in growing follicles [8], and indeed, PFAS have been detected in follicular fluid collected from women (Figure 1D) [125,153,154,155,156]. PFAS have a reported high blood–follicle transfer efficiency [156], and the ratio of PFAS concentration in both the serum and the FF has been positively correlated [156]. PFOA, PFOS, PFESA, PFNA, PFUndA, PFDA, PFHxS, and PFHpS were detected in FF from Chinese women [157], PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFUnDA, and PFDA were detected in women from Estonia and Sweden [158], and both PFOS and PFUnDA in FF were associated with dietary consumption [159]. In a small cohort of US women, PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS were also detectable in FF [160]. Levels of PFOS in FF have been determined to be higher in women with irregular menses [125]. PFOA in FF was found to be significantly associated with elevated odds of PCOS with adjustment for confounding influences [161]. High FF levels of PFOA have been linked with a diminished ovarian reserve, suggesting that PFOA may affect the ovarian reserve function by altering the FF metabolic composition [162]. Moreover, another study determined that IVF patients who had PFAS in their FF had lower fertilization rates and a decreased number of embryos for transfer [163]. These studies suggest that the presence of PFAS in ovarian FF might lead to fertility issues.
4.7. Other Reproductive Pathology
As with other reproductive endpoints, variations in etiological responsibility of PFAS with endometriosis and PCOS are reported. Exposure to PFOA, PFNA, PFBS, and PFOS has been associated with endometriosis [164,165,166], although in Swedish women between 20–50 years, this was not observed [167]. Another relatively common female reproductive pathology, PCOS, is linked with PFAS exposure, including PFHxS, PFOA, and PFOS [125,167,168]. In Chinese women, PCOS-related infertility was positively associated with the PFDoA plasma level but, conversely, inversely correlated with plasma PFUnA [169], and as noted above, PFOA in FF was linked with higher odds of PCOS [161].
A clear link between ovarian cancer and PFAS exposure is not established, likely due to being understudied, with inconsistent results reported to date. Lack of association between PFOA serum concentrations and risk for ovarian cancer has been reported in one study [170], while another positively associated ovarian cancer with high PFOA serum levels [171]. In the human ovarian cancer cell lines, OVCAR-3 and Caov-3 exposed to PFOA, perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), and perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and treated with carboplatin, a chemotherapeutic agent, exposure to PFAS chemicals either singly or as mixtures, increased the survival of ovarian cancer cells receiving carboplatin treatment suggesting that PFAS chemicals conferred chemotherapeutic treatment resistance on the cancer cells [172].
5. Developmental Effects
PFAS chemicals have been suggested to cross the placental barrier [134] and are detectable in umbilical cord blood [173,174,175,176,177]. Contradictory reports of PFAS exposure and developmental outcomes are documented. Investigations of serum levels of PFOA and PFOS and pregnancy outcomes did not find an association between miscarriage, preterm birth, and birth weight [178]. Weak associations between preeclampsia and PFOS and PFOA, as well as offspring birth defects, have been reported [178]. Maternal serum PFAS concentrations were not associated with changes in offspring birth weight [179]. Moreover, the correlation between PFOS maternal and blood cord concentrations and offspring birth weight and sex was not supported [180] in one investigation, but a weak and variable association between offspring weight, length and head circumference at birth, and maternal serum PFAS concentration was reported in another [181]. In umbilical cord blood, elevated PFOA was weakly associated with low offspring birth weight, while increased PFOS levels were linked with preterm birth [173]. Reduced birth length was reported in female fetuses due to maternal PFOS, PFNA, PFDA, PFUnA, and PFDoA [174]. The negative association between cord blood PFOS and PFOA with birth weight, ponderal index, and head circumference has been noted, but no association was determined for gestational age and newborn length [182]. Likewise, another study concluded that developmental exposure to PFOA reduces fetal growth [183], and high concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in drinking water supplies have been correlated with lower mean birth weight, preterm birth, and reduced fertility [184]. In pregnant women from San Francisco, PFAS levels and birth weight or gestational age were not determined to be linked [185]. In a different cohort, PFHxS levels and decreased birth weight were linked; however, PFUnA was associated with increased birth weight [186]. Reduced birth weight was also reported as a consequence of maternal PFNA, PFDA, PFUnA, PFDeA, and PFDoA exposure [187,188]. Anogenital distance (AGD) is a measure of endocrine disruption during in utero development, and a link between increased female neonatal AGD and maternal PFAS concentrations has been reported [189]. However, similar to other reproductive endpoints, shortened AGD in female infants at three months of age is associated with maternal serum concentrations of PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA [190], while two more studies did detect a correlation between maternal serum PFAS and AGD in females [191,192].
6. Effect of PFAS on Female Reproduction as Determined by Studies in Animal Models
6.1. Reproductive Organ Weight
Several animal models have been used to try to bridge gaps in epidemiological studies regarding PFAS exposure and female reproduction and the mechanisms of action of reproductive and developmental toxicity, as summarized in Table 2. Most studies have been performed in rodent animal models; however, others have used differing animal models, including swine, cattle, and fish. In addition to humans, studies in animal models mostly focus on the legacy PFAS, and some of the results show discrepancies. Changes in reproductive organ weight have been reported in rodents, but the results are inconsistent. In lean mice exposed to 2.5 mg/kg per body weight of PFOA for 15 d, a reduction in ovarian weight was observed but not in obese mice [193]. There were no changes in uterine weight due to PFOA exposure [193]. In contrast, in prepubertal mice exposed to 0.01 mg/kg PFOA from PND 18–20, increased absolute and relative uterine weight was observed [194]. Exposure to 50 mg/kg/day PFHxS for 42 days decreased ovarian weight in mice [195]. In contrast, neonatal (PND 1–5) and juvenile (PND 26–30) female rats exposed to 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg PFOA, respectively, had increased ovarian weight [196]. In pregnant Kunming mice, PFOA exposure did not alter ovarian weight [197]. Similarly, mice exposed to 1, 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg of PFOA did not have alterations in ovarian or uteri weight [198], nor did adult female mice treated with 0.1 mg/kg/day of PFOS for 4 months [199]. Additionally, prepubertal female rats treated with 0.5, 1.5, and 3 mg/kg/day of PFDoA for 28 d did not have changes to ovarian or uterine weight [200]. Conversely, PFOS exposure in female zebrafish inhibited ovarian growth [201]. Other studies found different results in pathological lesions in the female reproductive tract of animals exposed to PFAS. Tubular hyperplasia in the ovaries was increased in female rats after being fed for 2 years with 1.5 mg/kg/day of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO); however, a subsequent analysis did not determine any association with ovarian hyperplasia [202]. Prepubertal CD-1 mice exposed to PFOA had histopathological changes in the uterus, cervix, and vagina [194], but female Sprague Dawley rats fed with 1.3–1.8 mg/kg/day PFOS for 4 or 14 weeks did not experience histological changes in the reproductive tract [203]. Similarly, prepubertal female rats treated with PFDoA did not experience observable histomorphological ovarian or uterine changes [200], nor was any alteration to reproductive organs noted in six-week-old female rats exposed to PFBA [204].
6.2. Endocrine Disruption
Hormone level changes, differences in the estrous cycle, and the number of follicles have also been evaluated in different animal models to try to understand PFAS toxicity, and some inconsistencies have been observed in these studies. C57BL/6 female mice exposed to 5 mg/kg PFOA at three weeks of age for five days per week for four weeks did have altered serum E2; however, P4 serum levels were increased during the estrus and proestrus stages of the estrous cycle [205]. Exposure to 2.5 mg/kg/day PFOA for 15 d did not impact E2 or P4 serum levels; however, when samples lower than the level of detection were omitted from the E2 assay, E2 serum levels were higher in obese mice due to PFOA exposure [193]. In another study, PFOA exposure decreased serum P4 in pregnant mice [197]. In mice exposed to 1, 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg of PFOA, there was no impact on E2, but P4 and pregnenolone levels were decreased at 5 mg/kg exposure, and 1 mg/kg increased testosterone levels [198]. An in vitro study in mouse ovaries exposed to 100 µg/mL PFOA reported a decrease in E2 and estrone levels [198]. Secretion of P4 was not altered by 0.012–24 mM PFOA exposure in cultured porcine theca cells [206]. However, in granulosa cells, P4 and E2 secretion were decreased at 0.12 mM and 0.012 mM PFOA, respectively, indicating a concentration-dependent effect [206]. Adult female mice treated with 0.1 mg/kg/day of PFOS for four months had decreased serum levels of E2 and P4 at the proestrus and diestrus stages of the estrous cycle [199]. In addition, decreased LH, FSH, and gonadotropin—releasing hormone levels were also observed [199]. In prepubertal rats, PFDoA decreased serum E2 level at an exposure level of 3 mg/kg/day [200]. In contrast, PFOA exposure increased E2 and P4 levels in swine granulosa cells [207]. Thus, there are variations in the endocrine effects; however, disruption to hormonal homeostasis by PFAS chemicals is supported.
6.3. Estrous Cyclicity
In prepubertal rats, PFDoA did not induce irregularities in estrous cyclicity or timing of vaginal opening [200]. However, early vaginal opening was observed with 10 mg/kg of PFOA and 1 and 10 mg/kg of PFOS after neonatal and juvenile exposure [196]. Furthermore, the same study showed that PFOS and PFOA exposure induced irregular estrous cyclicity [196] and 1 or 10 mg/kg of PFOS for 14 d increased time spent in diestrus [208]. In contrast, PFOS did not alter the estrous cycle in rats [209] nor in mice dosed with 2.5 mg/kg of PFOA for 15 d [193] or rats exposed to PFHxS, PFUnA, and PFHxA [210,211,212]. However, mice chronically exposed to PFHxS had increased estrous cycle length with longer duration spent in diestrus [195]. Similarly, longer estrous cycles and decreased ovulation rates after exposure to PFHxS were noted in mice [213]. While no alterations in estrous cyclicity were observed in female rats dosed with 2.5 mg/kg/day of PFDoA for 14 d, exposure for 42 d caused continuous diestrus [214]. Prolonged diestrus is indictive of ovarian failure; thus, it could be reflective of entry into premature cyclicity cessation.
6.4. Follicular Effects
Differences in ovarian follicle number due to PFAS exposure have been reported in several studies.
In mice, PFOS exposure decreased the number of mature follicles and CL and increased the number of atretic follicles [199]. In vivo exposure to 5 mg/kg PFOA decreased the number of primordial follicles, while the number of preantral and antral follicles was increased [198]. Neonatal PFOA and PFOS exposure in rats decreased the number of secondary follicles, growing follicles, atretic follicles, and CL [196]. PFHxS exposure also decreased secondary and antral follicles and CL in mouse ovaries [190]. In pregnant mice, PFOA decreased the number of CL [197]. In vitro exposure to 50 µM of PFOA in mice increased the number of secondary follicles [215], while 100 µg/mL PFOA decreased antral follicle growth [198]. In fathead minnow, PFOS exposure decreased the number of CL and increased atretic follicles [216]. However, in contrast, rats exposed to PFDoA did not change their follicle or CL number [200,214]. Thus, follicle loss is supported as an outcome of PFAS exposures, though inconsistent findings are noted.
6.5. Developmental Effects
Exposure to PFAS has been shown to alter developmental outcomes. PFOA exposure increased the number of resorbed embryos at 10 mg/kg/day on gestational day (GD) 13 and increased serum E2 on GD 7 in mice [197]. Furthermore, pregnant CD-1 mice exposed to PFOA had decreased fetal and placental weight, an increased number of resorptions and dead fetuses, and a decreased live fetus number in a dose-dependent manner [217]. Similarly, PFOS exposure in mice decreased maternal body weight gain and fetal and placental weight dose-dependently [218]. Mice exposed to PFOA had early pregnancy loss, compromised postnatal survival, and delayed growth and development [219]. Exposure to PFOS in rats from GD 0 until PND 20 did not cause alterations in the number of litters, gestation length, number of implantation sites, and resorptions [220]. Moreover, in utero exposure to PFOS in mice and rats compromised postnatal survival and delayed growth and development [221]. In addition, exposure to PFOS in swordtail fish caused female reproductive and developmental toxicity [222]. Bovine oocytes exposed to PFNA in vitro during maturation and then fertilized had impaired developmental competence during maturation and alterations in lipid accumulation in the blastocysts [223]. Pregnant female rats dosed with 2.5 mg/kg/day PFDoA either died or were moribund at the end of the pregnancy with signs of hemorrhage in the implantation sites and congestion of the endometrium, and only one female delivered pups that had low body weight [214]. In contrast to these studies in which developmental impacts of PFAS were reported, several others did not observe impacts. Sprague Dawley rats exposed to PFHxS did not have reproductive or developmental effects in either the dams or the offspring [210]. In CD-1 mice, PFHxS did not impact postnatal survival, development, and vaginal opening in F1 mice; however, the live litter size was decreased [224]. In rodents, exposure to GenX caused placental abnormalities, reduced pup birth weight, and increased neonatal mortality [225,226]. In pregnant female rats, exposure to PFUnA did not change the sex ratio of live pups; however, the body weight of pups was decreased on PND 0 and 4 [212].
Some multi-generational studies with PFAS have been reported. In a two-generation study, females exposed to APFO 70 d before mating did not affect estrous cyclicity, fertility, pregnancy, the natural length of gestation, or the number of litters [227]. In the F1 generation, there were no effects on female reproduction, but a delay in vaginal opening was noted [227]. Exposure to PFHxA did not affect mating, fertility, gestation length, number of implantation sites, litter size, sex ratio, or pup survival in F0 and F1 generations [50,211]. There were no fertility or reproductive effects, including infertility, estrous cyclicity, pregnancy, mating, and natural delivery after exposure to PFBS in a two-generation study in rats [228]. In zebrafish F1 and F2 generations, PFOS exposure caused deformities and other developmental outcomes [229,230]. Additionally, F1 embryos exposed in utero to PFOS had malformations and increased mortality [201]. Furthermore, zebrafish exposure to F53B delayed hatchings, increased birth defects, and reduced survival rates [231]. However, developmental toxicity was not observed in zebrafish embryos exposed to GenX and ADONA [232].
Taken together, studies in animal models indicate that PFAS exposures cause female reproductive toxicity by inducing changes in reproductive organs, endocrine disruption, alterations in the estrous cycle, differences in the number of follicles and CL, and developmental toxicity. However, these findings have some inconsistencies, and the time and route of exposure, type of PFAS chosen, type of animal model chosen, and developmental status of the animal are likely contributors to the variation in endpoint impacts noted.
7. Possible Mechanisms of Action by which PFAS Exposure Causes Female Reproductive Toxicity
A lack of understanding of the mechanisms of action in which PFAS causes reproductive toxicity exists. However, several studies have evaluated molecular endpoints to generate an understanding of modes of action related to female reproductive toxicity, as summarized below and in Figure 1C. PFAS can interact with estrogen receptors [200,233,234,235,236] and are endocrine disruptors since they can alter hormone levels. Reproductive toxicity is suggested to be increased as the chemical carbon chain length increases and a sulfonate group is added [237]. Additionally, exposure to PFOA and PFHxS disrupts gap junction intercellular communication in cumulus cell–oocyte complexes [213,238], which could lead to alterations in the growth and development of the oocyte [239]. Exposure to PFOS and PFHxS increased the intracellular level of reactive oxygen species in mouse oocytes [237]. Additionally, in pregnant and non-pregnant mouse ovaries, oxidative stress and apoptosis were observed after exposure to PFOA [197,238]. Further, in swine granulosa cells, PFOA exposure induced cell viability but inhibited free radical production, altering normal ovarian homeostasis [240]. Additionally, PFOS and PFHxS induced mitochondrial depolarization, chromosome misalignment, abnormal assembly of F-actin and spindle, and compromised developmental competence of oocytes [237]. Moreover, in mice, PFOA exposure altered abundance genes and proteins with roles in the cell cycle, Hippo pathway, steroidogenesis, DNA damage sensing and repair, and reproduction [193,198,215]. PFOS also altered the mRNA abundance of genes involved in estrogen receptor function, early thyroid development, and steroidogenic enzyme synthesis in zebrafish embryos [241]. Related further to steroidogenesis, PFDoA affected ovarian levels of genes involved in steroidogenesis and cholesterol transport [200]. In juvenile Atlantic cod fish ovarian tissue, exposure to PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA changed levels of genes involved in cellular signaling, adhesion, cytoskeleton, remodeling, lipid metabolism, ovarian development, steroidogenesis, cancer, and apoptotic and proapoptotic reproduction signaling pathways [242]. Alterations in the levels of the genes and proteins involved in the biological and molecular functions mentioned could lead to alterations in ovarian homeostasis, leading to reproductive toxicity.
Another possible mechanism that can lead to female reproductive toxicity is through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARs) signaling pathways (reviewed in Ding et al., 2020 [8]). The PPAR isoforms α, β/δ, and γ are transcription factors that are ligand-specific and have different functions. PPARs are present in the ovary and involved in different processes (reviewed in Komar, 2005 [243]), including cell cycle, steroidogenesis, apoptosis, angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, and tissue remodeling [243,244,245]. PPARα is located primarily in theca cells and stroma, PPARβ/δ has a widespread ovarian location, and PPARγ is present in the oocyte, theca, and granulosa cells of different species [243]. PFAS can interact with PPAR isoforms [246] in different tissues, including the ovary, possibly leading to alterations in ovarian function and other female reproductive effects [8], though this is not well explored.
Cholesterol is a precursor of bile acids, steroid hormones, and cholesterol esters, and the cholesterol metabolite, cholesta-3,5-diene, regulates cholesterol biosynthesis and absorption and acts on transcription factors and receptors [247]. In both men and women, positive associations between PFAS exposure and increased serum cholesterol have been reported [248,249,250,251,252,253,254]. Both cholesterol and cholesta-3,5-diene are increased by PFOA exposure in female mice [255], and a PFAS-induced increase in cholesterol has been noted in other animal investigations [252,253,256]. In male and female C57BL/6J mice exposed to PFAS via drinking water, increased circulating cholesterol was observed [256] and was also recapitulated in female C57BL/6 mice exposed to PFOA [257]. The abundance of ovarian cholesterol-responsive proteins (RALY, CFTR, LRP1, NAXE, APOA4, APOA2, SOAT1, EHD1, HMGCS2, and CES1C) was altered in PFOA-exposed mice [255], suggesting that the ovary is responsive to systemic cholesterol fluctuations. Since cholesterol is a precursor of steroid hormones and cholesterol excess has been implicated in aberrant ovarian function [258], PFAS exposure could impact fertility through altering steroidogenesis, concomitant with endocrine disrupting effects of PFAS reported in human and animal studies.
8. Conclusions
There is support in the current literature for PFAS chemicals being considered female reproductive toxicants with effects on the endocrine system, folliculogenesis, puberty and menopause timing, fertility, pregnancy success, and development. Effects including altered cholesterol levels, menstrual/estrous cycle disturbance, offspring developmental perturbations, and infertility are noted both in human epidemiological and animal studies, as summarized in Figure 1. There are inconsistencies across studies, likely attributable to developmental status, geographical location, and exposure paradigm (chemical, dose, duration, and route).
Conceptualization, A.F.K. and M.E.G.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.G.-A. and C.A.-B.; writing—review and editing, M.E.G.-A., C.A.-B. and A.F.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Summary of PFAS reproductive impacts. Results from (A) human and (B) animal studies related to PFAS-induced reproductive toxicity. (C) Molecular pathways altered in the ovary by PFAS exposure and (D) PFAS chemicals detected in follicular fluid from women. Created using Biorender.
PFAS half-life of elimination in different species.
Species | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFAS | Humans | Rat | Mouse | Non-Human Primates | Pigs | Cattle | Chicken | |||||||
F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | |
PFOS | 3.4–5.4 y [ | 100 d [ | 30.4–37.8 d [ | 36.4–42.8 d [ | 110–200 d [ | 131–200 d [ | 1.7 y [ | 38.7–106 d [ | 120 d [ | 125 d [ | ||||
62–71 d [ | 38–41 d [ | * 3.5 d [ | ||||||||||||
PFOA | 2.7–3.8 y [ | 2–4 h [ | 4–9 d [ | 16 d [ | 22 d [ | 32.6 d [ | 20–21d [ | 236 d [ | 1.3 d [ | ~19.2 h [ | 5.2 d [ | |||
* 5.4 d [ | ||||||||||||||
PFNA | 2.5–4.3 y [ | 1.4–2.44 d [ | 29.5–47 d [ | 25.8–68.4 d [ | 34.3–68.9 d [ | 8.7 d [ | ||||||||
PFDA | 4.5–12 y [ | 58.6 d [ | 39.9 d [ | 19 d [ | ||||||||||
PFHxS | 5.3–8.5 y [ | 1.12 h–1.7 d [ | 215.9–29 d [ | 24.9–26.8 d [ | 27.9–30.5 d [ | 87 d [ | 141 d [ | 1.9 y [ | * 7 d [ | |||||
PFBA | ~3 d [ | 1.03–1.76 h [ | 6.38–9.22 h [ | 2.79–3.08 h [ | 5.22–16.25 h [ | 40.3 h [ | 41.0 h [ | |||||||
PFHxA | 32 d [ | 0.42–3 h [ | 1–3 h [ | 1 h [ | 2.4 h [ | 5.3 h [ | 4.1 d [ | |||||||
PFBS | 28 d [ | 0.64–4 h [ | 2.1–4.5 h [ | 4.5 h [ | 5.8 h [ | 8 h–3.5 d [ | 15 h–4 d [ | 43 d [ | ||||||
GenX | 8 h [ | 3 h [ | 18 h [ | 21 h [ | ||||||||||
F53B | 15.3 y [ |
Abbreviations: PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances; PFOS—perfluooroctane sulfonic acid; PFOA—perfluorooctanoic acid; PFNA—perfluorononanoic acid; PFDA—perfluorodecanoic acid; PFHxS—perfluorohexane sulfonic acid; PFBA—perfluorobutanoic acid; PFHxA—perfluorohexanoic acid; PFBS—perfluorobutanesulfonic acid; GenX—hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and ammonium salts; F53B—chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate; y = year; d = days; h = hours; * in eggs. Superscripts indicate citation in which data published.
Summary of effect of PFAS on female reproduction as determined by studies in animal models [
PFAS Substance | Species and Strain | Dose | Exposure Route | Duration of Exposure | Findings | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFOA | KK.Cg-a/a mice | 2.5 mg/kg | Oral | 15 d | Reduction in ovarian weight | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 0.01 mg/kg | Gavage | PND 18–20 | Increased absolute and relative uterine weight | [ |
PFOA | Sprague-Dawley rats | 0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg | Injected | PND 1–5 or PND 26–30 | Increased ovarian weight | [ |
PFOA | Kunming mice | 2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg/d | Gavage | GD 1–7 or GD 1–13 | No alterations in ovarian weight | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 1, 5, 10, 20 mg/kg | Oral | 10 d | No alterations in ovarian or uterine weight | [ |
CD-1 mouse ovaries | 100 µg/mL | In vitro | 96 h | Decreased E2 and estrone levels | ||
PFOA | C57BL/6 | 5 mg/kg | Gavage | 5 d per w for 4 w | No alterations in E2 serum levels | [ |
PFOA | Porcine theca cells | 0.0012 mM | In vitro | 24 h | No alterations on P4 levels | [ |
Porcine granulosa cells | 0.12, 0.012 mM | In vitro | 24 h | Decreased E2 and P4 levels | ||
PFOA | Swine granulosa cells | 2, 20, 200 ng/mL | In vitro | 48 h | Increased E2 levels | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 50 µM | In vitro | 96 h | Increased number of secondary follicles | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 2, 10, 25 mg/kg/d | Gavage | GD 11–16 | Decreased fetal and placental weight | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg/d | Gavage | GD 1–17 | Early pregnancy loss | [ |
PFOA | CD-1 mice | 1, 5 mg/kg/d | Gavage | ED 1.5–11.5 or 17.5 | Placental abnormalities | [ |
APFO | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1.5, 15 mg/kg/d | Oral | 2 y | Tubular hyperplasia in the ovaries | [ |
APFO | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg | Oral | >70 d | No effects to estrous cyclicity, fertility, pregnancy, natural length of gestation on F0 | [ |
PFOS | Sprague-Dawley rats | 0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg | Injected | PND 1–5 or PND 26–30 | Increased E2 and LH levels | [ |
PFOS | ICR mice | 0.1 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 4 m | No alterations in ovarian weight | [ |
PFOS | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1.3–1.8 mg/kg/d | Oral | 4 or 14 w | No alterations to uterus, cervix or vagina | [ |
PFOS | Zebrafish | 50, 250 µgL−1 | Via tank water | 70 d | Inhibited ovarian growth | [ |
PFOS | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1, 10 mg/kg | Intraperitoneal injection | 14 d | Irregular estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFOS | Crl:CD® (SD)IGS BR VAF® rats | 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 3.2 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 6 w | No alterations in estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFOS | Fathead minnow | 0.3, 1 mg/L | Via tank water | 21 d | Decreased number of CL | [ |
PFOS | CD-1 mice | 0.5, 2, 8 ng/kg/d | Gavage | GD 11–16 | Decreased maternal body weight gain, fetal and placental weight | [ |
PFOS | Sprague-Dawley rats | 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg/d | Gavage | GD 0–20 | No alterations in the number of litters, gestation length, number of implantation sites, and resorptions | [ |
PFOS | CD-1 mice | 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/kg/d | In utero | GD 1–18 | Compromised postnatal survival | [ |
Sprague-Dawley rats | 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 mg/kg/d | GD 2–21 | ||||
PFOS | Swordtail fish | 0.1, 0.5, 2.5 mg/L | Via tank water | 6 w | Female reproductive and developmental toxicity | [ |
PFOS | Zebrafish | 5, 50, 250 µg/L | Via tank water | 5 m | Alterations to embryonic growth, reproduction and offspring development | [ |
PFOS | Zebrafish | 0.6, 100, 300 µg/L | Via tank water | 0–180 dpf | Increased mortality and developmental outcomes | [ |
PFHxS | ICR mice | 5, 50 mg/kg/d | Intragastric administration | 42 d | Decreased ovarian weight | [ |
PFHxS | Crl:CD® (SD)IGS BR VAF/Plus ® rats | 0.3, 1.3, 10 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 14 d prior to cohabitation through GD 21, GD 25, or PND 22 | No alterations to estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFHxS | CD-1 mice | 25.1, 62.5 mg/kg | Intraperitoneal injection | Single dose | Irregular estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFHxS | Crl:CD1(ICR) mice | 0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg/d | Gavage, in utero, via lactation | 42 d | Decreased litter size | [ |
PFDoA | Sprague- Dawley rats | 0.5, 1.5, 3 mg/kg/d | Oral | 28 d | No changes in ovarian and uterine weight | [ |
PFDoA | Crl:CD (SD) rats | 2.5 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 42 d | Irregular estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFBA | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1.2, 6, 30, 150 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 28 d or 90 d | No changes in ovarian and uterine weight | [ |
PFBS | Sprague-Dawley rats | 30, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg/d | Gavage | >70 d | No fertility or reproductive effects to dams and female offspring | [ |
PFHxA | Crl:CD (SD) rats | 20, 100, 500 mg/kg | Gavage | 90 d | No alterations in estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFHxA | Crl:CD (SD) rats | 50, 150, 300 mg/kg | Gavage | 39–52 d | No reproductive or developmental toxicity | [ |
PFUnA | Crl:CD (SD) rats | 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg/d | Gavage | 41–46 d | No alterations to estrous cyclicity | [ |
PFNA | Bovine oocytes | 0.1, 10 mg/mL | In vitro | 22 h | Impaired oocyte developmental competence | [ |
GenX | CD-1 mice | 1, 5 mg/kg/d | Gavage | ED 1.5–11.5 or 17.5 | Placental abnormalities | [ |
GenX | Sprague-Dawley rats | 1, 3, 10, 30, 62.5, 125, 250 mg/kg/d | Gavage | GD 17–21 or GD8-PND 2 | Decreased pup weight | [ |
GenX | Zebrafish | 0.04, 0.1, 0.4, 1.1, 3.1, 9.3, 27.2, 80.0 µM | Filter inserts containing zebrafish embryos in 96-well culture trays with DMSO or DI water | 0–5 dpf | No developmental toxicity | [ |
ADONA | ||||||
F53B | Zebrafish | 1.5, 3, 6, | Via tank water | 6–132 hpf | Delayed hatchings | [ |
Abbreviations: PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances; PFOS—perfluooroctane sulfonic acid; PFOA—perfluorooctanoic acid; PFNA—perfluorononanoic acid; PFHxS—perfluorohexane sulfonic acid; PFBA—perfluorobutanoic acid; PFHxA—perfluorohexanoic acid; PFBS—perfluorobutanesulfonic acid; PFUnA—perfluoroundecanoic acid; PFDoA—perfluorododecanoic acid; GenX—hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and ammonium salts; F53B—chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate; APFO—ammonium perfluorooctanoate; ADONA—3H-4,8-dioxanonanoate; y = year; m = months; w = weeks; d = days; h = hours; GD = gestational day; PND = postnatal day; ED = embryonic day; dpf = days post-fertilization; hpf = hours post-fertilization.
References
1. Death, C.; Bell, C.; Champness, D.; Milne, C.; Reichman, S.; Hagen, T. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in livestock and game species: A review. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 774, 144795. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144795] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609849]
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Action Plan; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
3. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Reconciling Terminology of the Universe of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Recommendations and Practical Guidance; OECD Series on Risk Management, No. 61; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021.
4. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Fact Sheet—Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA); EPA 505-F-17-001 Office of Land and Emergency Management: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
5. Authority, E.F.S. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and their salts Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain. EFSA J.; 2008; 6, 653. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.653]
6. Lau, C. Perfluoroalkyl acids: Recent research highlights. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2012; 33, pp. 405-409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.03.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429996]
7. Bell, E.M.; De Guise, S.; McCutcheon, J.R.; Lei, Y.; Levin, M.; Li, B.; Rusling, J.F.; Lawrence, D.A.; Cavallari, J.M.; O’Connell, C. et al. Exposure, health effects, sensing, and remediation of the emerging PFAS contaminants—Scientific challenges and potential research directions. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 780, 146399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146399] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33770593]
8. Ding, N.; Harlow, S.D.; Randolph, J.F., Jr.; Loch-Caruso, R.; Park, S.K. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their effects on the ovary. Hum. Reprod. Update; 2020; 26, pp. 724-752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32476019]
9. Jensen, A.A.; Leffers, H. Emerging endocrine disrupters: Perfluoroalkylated substances. Int. J. Androl.; 2008; 31, pp. 161-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00870.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18315716]
10. Lindstrom, A.B.; Strynar, M.J.; Libelo, E.L. Polyfluorinated Compounds: Past, Present, and Future. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2011; 45, pp. 7954-7961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es2011622] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21866930]
11. Buck, R.C.; Franklin, J.; Berger, U.; Conder, J.M.; Cousins, I.T.; de Voogt, P.; Jensen, A.A.; Kannan, K.; Mabury, S.A.; van Leeuwen, S.P. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: Terminology, classification, and origins. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag.; 2011; 7, pp. 513-541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.258]
12. Jesper, K.; Astrup, J.A.; Marlies, W. Short-Chain Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS); Agency TDEP: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2015.
13. Brendel, S.; Fetter, É.; Staude, C.; Vierke, L.; Biegel-Engler, A. Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids: Environmental concerns and a regulatory strategy under REACH. Environ. Sci. Eur.; 2018; 30, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0134-4]
14. Chambers, W.S.; Hopkins, J.G.; Richards, S.M. A Review of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substance Impairment of Reproduction. Front. Toxicol.; 2021; 3, 732436. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2021.732436]
15. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA and 3M Announce Phase out of PFOS. [Press Release]. 2000; Available online: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/33aa946e6cb11f35852568e1005246b4.html (accessed on 8 June 2023).
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Management of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas (accessed on 8 June 2023).
17. Han, X.; Nabb, D.L.; Russell, M.H.; Kennedy, G.L.; Rickard, R.W. Renal Elimination of Perfluorocarboxylates (PFCAs). Chem. Res. Toxicol.; 2012; 25, pp. 35-46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx200363w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985250]
18. Agency for Toxic Sunstances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Perfluoralkyls; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
19. Gaines, L.G.T. Historical and current usage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A literature review. Am. J. Ind. Med.; 2023; 66, pp. 353-378. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23362] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614869]
20. Dasu, K.; Xia, X.; Siriwardena, D.; Klupinski, T.P.; Seay, B. Concentration profiles of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in major sources to the environment. J. Environ. Manag.; 2022; 301, 113879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113879] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34619593]
21. Post, G.B.; Cohn, P.D.; Cooper, K.R. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), an emerging drinking water contaminant: A critical review of recent literature. Environ. Res.; 2012; 116, pp. 93-117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22560884]
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals Volume one: NHANES 1999–2010; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals Volume Two: NHANES 2011–2016; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
24. Kannan, K.; Corsolini, S.; Falandysz, J.; Fillmann, G.; Kumar, K.S.; Loganathan, B.G.; Mohd, M.A.; Olivero, J.; Wouwe, N.V.; Yang, J.H. et al. Perfluorooctanesulfonate and Related Fluorochemicals in Human Blood from Several Countries. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2004; 38, pp. 4489-4495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0493446] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15461154]
25. Han, X.; Snow, T.A.; Kemper, R.A.; Jepson, G.W. Binding of Perfluorooctanoic Acid to Rat and Human Plasma Proteins. Chem. Res. Toxicol.; 2003; 16, pp. 775-781. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx034005w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12807361]
26. Calvert, L.; Green, M.P.; De Iuliis, G.N.; Dun, M.D.; Turner, B.D.; Clarke, B.O.; Eamens, A.L.; Roman, S.D.; Nixon, B. Assessment of the Emerging Threat Posed by Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances to Male Reproduction in Humans. Front. Endocrinol.; 2022; 12, 799043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.799043] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356147]
27. Pérez, F.; Nadal, M.; Navarro-Ortega, A.; Fàbrega, F.; Domingo, J.L.; Barceló, D.; Farré, M. Accumulation of perfluoroalkyl substances in human tissues. Environ. Int.; 2013; 59, pp. 354-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.004]
28. Vanden Heuvel, J.P.; Kuslikis, B.I.; Van Rafelghem, M.J.; Peterson, R.E. Tissue distribution, metabolism, and elimination of perfluorooctanoic acid in male and female rats. J. Biochem. Toxicol.; 1991; 6, pp. 83-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.2570060202] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1941903]
29. Numata, J.; Kowalczyk, J.; Adolphs, J.; Ehlers, S.; Schafft, H.; Fuerst, P.; Müller-Graf, C.; Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.; Greiner, M. Toxicokinetics of Seven Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonic and Carboxylic Acids in Pigs Fed a Contaminated Diet. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2014; 62, pp. 6861-6870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf405827u]
30. Kudo, N. Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics. Toxicological Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances; DeWitt, J.C. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 151-175.
31. Kemper, R.A.; Nabb, D.L. In vitro studies in microsomes from rat and human liver, kidney, and intestine suggest that perfluorooctanoic acid is not a substrate for microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Chem. Toxicol.; 2005; 28, pp. 281-287. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1081/DCT-200064468]
32. Ding, N.; Harlow, S.D.; Batterman, S.; Mukherjee, B.; Park, S.K. Longitudinal trends in perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances among multiethnic midlife women from 1999 to 2011: The Study of Women′s Health Across the Nation. Environ. Int.; 2020; 135, 105381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105381] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841808]
33. Knox, S.S.; Jackson, T.; Javins, B.; Frisbee, S.J.; Shankar, A.; Ducatman, A.M. Implications of early menopause in women exposed to perfluorocarbons. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2011; 96, pp. 1747-1753. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2401]
34. Olsen, G.W.; Burris, J.M.; Ehresman, D.J.; Froehlich, J.W.; Seacat, A.M.; Butenhoff, J.L.; Zobel, L.R. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2007; 115, pp. 1298-1305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17805419]
35. Li, Y.; Fletcher, T.; Mucs, D.; Scott, K.; Lindh, C.H.; Tallving, P.; Jakobsson, K. Half-lives of PFOS, PFHxS and PFOA after end of exposure to contaminated drinking water. Occup. Environ. Med.; 2018; 75, pp. 46-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104651] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133598]
36. Zhang, Y.; Beesoon, S.; Zhu, L.; Martin, J.W. Biomonitoring of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Human Urine and Estimates of Biological Half-Life. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2013; 47, pp. 10619-10627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es401905e] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23980546]
37. Chang, S.C.; Das, K.; Ehresman, D.J.; Ellefson, M.E.; Gorman, G.S.; Hart, J.A.; Noker, P.E.; Tan, Y.M.; Lieder, P.H.; Lau, C. et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of perfluorobutyrate in rats, mice, monkeys, and humans and relevance to human exposure via drinking water. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol.; 2008; 104, pp. 40-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn057] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18353799]
38. Russell, M.H.; Nilsson, H.; Buck, R.C. Elimination kinetics of perfluorohexanoic acid in humans and comparison with mouse, rat and monkey. Chemosphere; 2013; 93, pp. 2419-2425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.060] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24050716]
39. Olsen, G.W.; Chang, S.-C.; Noker, P.E.; Gorman, G.S.; Ehresman, D.J.; Lieder, P.H.; Butenhoff, J.L. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS) in rats, monkeys, and humans. Toxicology; 2009; 256, pp. 65-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.11.008]
40. He, Y.; Lv, D.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Liu, W.; Han, W. Human exposure to F-53B in China and the evaluation of its potential toxicity: An overview. Environ. Int.; 2022; 161, 107108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107108]
41. Lau, C.; Anitole, K.; Hodes, C.; Lai, D.; Pfahles-Hutchens, A.; Seed, J. Perfluoroalkyl Acids: A Review of Monitoring and Toxicological Findings. Toxicol. Sci.; 2007; 99, pp. 366-394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm128] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17519394]
42. Chang, S.C.; Noker, P.E.; Gorman, G.S.; Gibson, S.J.; Hart, J.A.; Ehresman, D.J.; Butenhoff, J.L. Comparative pharmacokinetics of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in rats, mice, and monkeys. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2012; 33, pp. 428-440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.07.002]
43. Tatum-Gibbs, K.; Wambaugh, J.F.; Das, K.P.; Zehr, R.D.; Strynar, M.J.; Lindstrom, A.B.; Delinsky, A.; Lau, C. Comparative pharmacokinetics of perfluorononanoic acid in rat and mouse. Toxicology; 2011; 281, pp. 48-55. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2011.01.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21237237]
44. Ohmori, K.; Kudo, N.; Katayama, K.; Kawashima, Y. Comparison of the toxicokinetics between perfluorocarboxylic acids with different carbon chain length. Toxicology; 2003; 184, pp. 135-140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00573-5]
45. De Silva, A.O.; Benskin, J.P.; Martin, L.J.; Arsenault, G.; McCrindle, R.; Riddell, N.; Martin, J.W.; Mabury, S.A. Disposition of perfluorinated acid isomers in sprague-dawley rats; Part 2: Subchronic dose. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2009; 28, pp. 555-567. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1897/08-254.1]
46. Benskin, J.P.; De Silva, A.O.; Martin, L.J.; Arsenault, G.; McCrindle, R.; Riddell, N.; Mabury, S.A.; Martin, J.W. Disposition of perfluorinated acid isomers in Sprague-Dawley rats; part 1: Single dose. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2009; 28, pp. 542-554. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1897/08-239.1]
47. Sundström, M.; Chang, S.C.; Noker, P.E.; Gorman, G.S.; Hart, J.A.; Ehresman, D.J.; Bergman, Å.; Butenhoff, J.L. Comparative pharmacokinetics of perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS) in rats, mice, and monkeys. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2012; 33, pp. 441-451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.07.004]
48. Kim, S.J.; Heo, S.H.; Lee, D.S.; Hwang, I.G.; Lee, Y.B.; Cho, H.Y. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of 3 perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc.; 2016; 97, pp. 243-255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.09.017]
49. Chengelis, C.P.; Kirkpatrick, J.B.; Myers, N.R.; Shinohara, M.; Stetson, P.L.; Sved, D.W. Comparison of the toxicokinetic behavior of perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and nonafluorobutane-1-sulfonic acid (PFBS) in cynomolgus monkeys and rats. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2009; 27, pp. 400-406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429410]
50. Kirkpatrick, J.B. A Combined 28-Day Repeated Dose Oral Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test of Perfluorohexanoic Acid and 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-Tridecafluoro-1-Octanol in Rats, with Recovery; WIL-Research Laboratories LLC: Ashland, OH, USA, 2005.
51. Gannon, S.A.; Fasano, W.J.; Mawn, M.P.; Nabb, D.L.; Buck, R.C.; Buxton, L.W.; Jepson, G.W.; Frame, S.R. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and kinetics of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propanoic acid ammonium salt following a single dose in rat, mouse, and cynomolgus monkey. Toxicology; 2016; 340, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2015.12.006]
52. Lou, I.; Wambaugh, J.F.; Lau, C.; Hanson, R.G.; Lindstrom, A.B.; Strynar, M.J.; Zehr, R.D.; Setzer, R.W.; Barton, H.A. Modeling single and repeated dose pharmacokinetics of PFOA in mice. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol.; 2009; 107, pp. 331-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005225]
53. Lau, C.; Rumpler, J.; Das, K.P.; Wood, C.R.; Schmid, J.E.; Strynar, M.J.; Wambaugh, J.F. Pharmacokinetic profile of Perfluorobutane Sulfonate and activation of hepatic nuclear receptor target genes in mice. Toxicology; 2020; 441, 152522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2020.152522] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32534104]
54. Seacat, A.M.; Thomford, P.J.; Hansen, K.J.; Olsen, G.W.; Case, M.T.; Butenhoff, J.L. Subchronic toxicity studies on perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol.; 2002; 68, pp. 249-264. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/68.1.249]
55. Butenhoff, J.L.; Kennedy, G.L., Jr.; Hinderliter, P.M.; Lieder, P.H.; Jung, R.; Hansen, K.J.; Gorman, G.S.; Noker, P.E.; Thomford, P.J. Pharmacokinetics of perfluorooctanoate in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol.; 2004; 82, pp. 394-406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh302]
56. Vestergren, R.; Orata, F.; Berger, U.; Cousins, I.T. Bioaccumulation of perfluoroalkyl acids in dairy cows in a naturally contaminated environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.; 2013; 20, pp. 7959-7969. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1722-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644948]
57. Lupton, S.J.; Dearfield, K.L.; Johnston, J.J.; Wagner, S.; Huwe, J.K. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Plasma Half-Life Determination and Long-Term Tissue Distribution in Beef Cattle (Bos taurus). J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2015; 63, pp. 10988-10994. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04565]
58. Lupton, S.J.; Huwe, J.K.; Smith, D.J.; Dearfield, K.L.; Johnston, J.J. Absorption and Excretion of 14C-Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Angus Cattle (Bos taurus). J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2012; 60, pp. 1128-1134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf2042505]
59. Yoo, H.; Guruge, K.S.; Yamanaka, N.; Sato, C.; Mikami, O.; Miyazaki, S.; Yamashita, N.; Giesy, J.P. Depuration kinetics and tissue disposition of PFOA and PFOS in white leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus) administered by subcutaneous implantation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2009; 72, pp. 26-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.09.007]
60. Wilson, T.B.; Stevenson, G.; Crough, R.; de Araujo, J.; Fernando, N.; Anwar, A.; Scott, T.; Quinteros, J.A.; Scott, P.C.; Archer, M.J.G. Evaluation of Residues in Hen Eggs After Exposure of Laying Hens to Water Containing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2021; 40, pp. 735-743. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4723]
61. Fenton, S.E.; Ducatman, A.; Boobis, A.; DeWitt, J.C.; Lau, C.; Ng, C.; Smith, J.S.; Roberts, S.M. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2021; 40, pp. 606-630. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4890]
62. Gustafsson, Å.; Wang, B.; Gerde, P.; Bergman, Å.; Yeung, L.W.Y. Bioavailability of inhaled or ingested PFOA adsorbed to house dust. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2022; 29, pp. 78698-78710. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20829-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699877]
63. Daly, E.R.; Chan, B.P.; Talbot, E.A.; Nassif, J.; Bean, C.; Cavallo, S.J.; Metcalf, E.; Simone, K.; Woolf, A.D. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure assessment in a community exposed to contaminated drinking water, New Hampshire, 2015. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health; 2018; 221, pp. 569-577. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.02.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514764]
64. Dauchy, X.; Boiteux, V.; Bach, C.; Rosin, C.; Munoz, J.F. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in firefighting foam concentrates and water samples collected near sites impacted by the use of these foams. Chemosphere; 2017; 183, pp. 53-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531559]
65. Gazzotti, T.; Sirri, F.; Ghelli, E.; Zironi, E.; Zampiga, M.; Pagliuca, G. Perfluoroalkyl contaminants in eggs from backyard chickens reared in Italy. Food Chem.; 2021; 362, 130178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130178] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102511]
66. Zafeiraki, E.; Vassiliadou, I.; Costopoulou, D.; Leondiadis, L.; Schafft, H.A.; Hoogenboom, R.L.; van Leeuwen, S.P. Perfluoroalkylated substances in edible livers of farm animals, including depuration behavior in young sheep fed with contaminated grass. Chemosphere; 2016; 156, pp. 280-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27179427]
67. Calafat, A.M.; Wong, L.Y.; Kuklenyik, Z.; Reidy, J.A.; Needham, L.L. Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the U.S. population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2007; 115, pp. 1596-1602. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10598] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18007991]
68. Calafat, A.M.; Kato, K.; Hubbard, K.; Jia, T.; Botelho, J.C.; Wong, L.Y. Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the U.S. general population: Paired serum-urine data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ. Int.; 2019; 131, 105048. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105048]
69. Worley, R.R.; Moore, S.M.; Tierney, B.C.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; Campbell, S.; Woudneh, M.B.; Fisher, J. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human serum and urine samples from a residentially exposed community. Environ. Int.; 2017; 106, pp. 135-143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645013]
70. Ye, X.; Kato, K.; Wong, L.-Y.; Jia, T.; Kalathil, A.; Latremouille, J.; Calafat, A.M. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in sera from children 3 to 11 years of age participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2014. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health; 2018; 221, pp. 9-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.011]
71. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. PFAS in the U.S. Population; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022.
72. Schrenk, D.; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.C.; Nebbia, C.S. Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. EFSA J.; 2020; 18, e06223.
73. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2018.
74. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
75. Trudel, D.; Horowitz, L.; Wormuth, M.; Scheringer, M.; Cousins, I.T.; Hungerbuhler, K. Estimating consumer exposure to PFOS and PFOA. Risk Anal.; 2008; 28, pp. 251-269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01017.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18419647]
76. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Questions and Answers: Drinking Water Health Advisories for PFOA, PFOS, GenX Chemicals and PFBS. 2023; Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/questions-and-answers-drinking-water-health-advisories-pfoa-pfos-genx-chemicals-and-pfbs (accessed on 13 June 2023).
77. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation. Web Site.Office of Water. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-04/drinking-water-utilities-and-professionals-technical-overview-of-pfas-npdwr.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2024).
78. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. PFASs Listed under the Stockholm Convention; Overview. United Nations Environment Programme. Factsheet. Web Site. Available online: https://www.pops.int/Implementation/IndustrialPOPs/PFAS/Overview/tabid/5221/Default.aspx (accessed on 13 June 2023).
79. Senger, P.L. Pathways to Pregnancy & Parturition; Current Conceptions Inc.: Redmond, OR, USA, 2012.
80. Martini, F. The Reproductive System. Fundamentals of Anatomy and Phisiology; 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
81. Bahr, J.; Milich, K. Ovarian Physiology. Ovarian Toxicology; 2nd ed. Hoyer, P.B. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 3-13.
82. Hoyer, P.B. 11.16—Female Reproductive Toxicology. Comprehensive Toxicology; 2nd ed. McQueen, C.A. Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp. 339-345.
83. Keating, A.F.; Hoyer, P.B. Mechanisms of Reproductive Toxicity. Drug Metabolism Handbook; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 697-736.
84. Hoyer, P.B.; Devine, P.J. Endocrinology and Toxicology: The Female Reproductive System. Handbook of Toxicology; Derelanko, M.J.; Hollinger, M.A. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 573-596.
85. Barnett, K.R.; Schilling, C.; Greenfeld, C.R.; Tomic, D.; Flaws, J.A. Ovarian follicle development and transgenic mouse models. Hum. Reprod. Update; 2006; 12, pp. 537-555. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml022] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16728463]
86. Gondos, B. Granulosa cell-germ cell relationship in the developing rabbit ovary. Development; 1970; 23, pp. 419-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.23.2.419]
87. Rodgers, R.J.; Irving-Rodgers, H.F. Formation of the Ovarian Follicular Antrum and Follicular Fluid1. Biol. Reprod.; 2010; 82, pp. 1021-1029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.082941] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20164441]
88. Hirshfield, A.N. Overview of ovarian follicular development: Considerations for the toxicologist. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.; 1997; 29, pp. 10-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1997)29:1<10::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-H]
89. Faddy, M.J.; Telfer, E.; Gosden, R.G. The kinetics of pre-antral follicle development in ovaries of CBA/Ca mice during the first 14 weeks of life. Cell Prolif.; 1987; 20, pp. 551-560. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1987.tb01364.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502925]
90. Szmelskyj, I.; Aquilina, L.; Szmelskyj, A.O. Chapter 2—Anatomy and physiology of the reproductive system: Prerequirements for conception. Acupuncture for IVF and Assisted Reproduction; Szmelskyj, I.; Aquilina, L.; Szmelskyj, A.O. Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2015; pp. 23-58.
91. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G.; Gougeon, A.; Richardson, S.J.; Nelson, J.F. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: Implications for forecasting menopause. Hum. Reprod.; 1992; 7, pp. 1342-1346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137570] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1291557]
92. Gosden, R.; Krapez, J.; Briggs, D. Growth and development of the mammalian oocyte. BioEssays; 1997; 19, pp. 875-882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.950191007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9363681]
93. Gosden, R.G. Follicular status at the menopause. Hum. Reprod.; 1987; 2, pp. 617-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136601]
94. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G.; Edwards, R.G. Ovarian follicle dynamics in mice: A comparative study of three inbred strains and an F1 hybrid. J. Endocrinol.; 1983; 96, pp. 23-33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0960023]
95. Faddy, M.J.; Jones, E.C.; Edwards, R.G. An analytical model for ovarian follicle dynamics. J. Exp. Zool.; 1976; 197, pp. 173-185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401970203] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/965906]
96. Gwynne, J.T.; Strauss, J.F., 3rd. The role of lipoproteins in steroidogenesis and cholesterol metabolism in steroidogenic glands. Endocr. Rev.; 1982; 3, pp. 299-329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/edrv-3-3-299] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6288367]
97. Falck, B. Site of production of oestrogen in rat ovary as studied in micro-transplants. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl.; 1959; 47, pp. 1-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1960.tb01823.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13821382]
98. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office on Women’s Health. Infertility. 2021; Available online: https://www.womenshealth.gov/a-z-topics/infertility (accessed on 13 June 2023).
99. Hoyer, P.B.; Keating, A.F. Xenobiotic effects in the ovary: Temporary versus permanent infertility. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.; 2014; 10, pp. 511-523. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2014.880690] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450963]
100. Hoyer, P.B.; Mark-Kappeler, C.J. Ovotoxicity in Small Preantral Follicules. Ovarian Toxicology; 2nd ed. Hoyer, P.B. Taylor and Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 89-115.
101. Rebar, R.W. Premature ovarian failure. Obstet. Gynecol.; 2009; 113, pp. 1355-1363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a66843] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19461434]
102. Wang, X.-F.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Q.-H.; Min, J.-X.; Ma, N.; Luo, L.-C. Biological mechanisms of premature ovarian failure caused by psychological stress based on support vector regression. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med.; 2015; 8, pp. 21393-21399.
103. Mattison, D.; Schulman, J. How xenobiotic chemicals can destroy oocytes. Contemp. Obstet. Gynecol.; 1980; 15, 157.
104. Mattison, D.R. Clinical manifestations of ovarian toxicity. Reprod. Toxicol.; 1985; 109, pp. 697-724.
105. Mattison, D.R.; Shiromizu, K.; Nightingale, M.S. Oocyte destruction by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Am. J. Ind. Med.; 1983; 4, pp. 191-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.1983.4.1-2.191]
106. Hoyer, P.B.; Sipes, I.G. Assessment of follicle destruction in chemical-induced ovarian toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.; 1996; 36, pp. 307-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.001515]
107. Mark-Kappeler, C.J.; Sen, N.; Lukefahr, A.; McKee, L.; Sipes, I.G.; Konhilas, J.; Hoyer, P.B. Inhibition of ovarian KIT phosphorylation by the ovotoxicant 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide in rats. Biol. Reprod.; 2011; 85, pp. 755-762. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.092742] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21677306]
108. Bhattacharya, P.; Keating, A.F. Ovarian metabolism of xenobiotics. Exp. Biol. Med.; 2011; 236, pp. 765-771. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1258/ebm.2011.011051] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616964]
109. Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.; Bourguignon, J.P.; Giudice, L.C.; Hauser, R.; Prins, G.S.; Soto, A.M.; Zoeller, R.T.; Gore, A.C. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: An Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr. Rev.; 2009; 30, pp. 293-342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19502515]
110. DiFranza, J.R.; Aligne, C.A.; Weitzman, M. Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children’s health. Pediatrics; 2004; 113, pp. 1007-1015. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.S3.1007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15060193]
111. Foster, W.G.; Neal, M.S.; YoungLai, E.V. Endocrine disrupters and ovarian function. Int. Congr. Ser.; 2004; 1266, pp. 126-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2004.01.066]
112. Ganesan, S.; Madden, J.A.; Keating, A.F. Ovarian metabolism of xenobiotics. Ovarian Toxicology; 2nd ed. Hoyer, P.B. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 15-37.
113. Bhattacharya, P.; Keating, A.F. Impact of environmental exposures on ovarian function and role of xenobiotic metabolism during ovotoxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2012; 261, pp. 227-235. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2012.04.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531813]
114. Hoyer, P.B. Damage to ovarian development and function. Cell Tissue Res.; 2005; 322, pp. 99-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-005-1083-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15856308]
115. Hoyer, P.B. Reproductive toxicology: Current and future directions. Biochem. Pharmacol.; 2001; 62, pp. 1557-1564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00814-0]
116. Hooser, S.B.; Douds, D.P.; DeMerell, D.G.; Hoyer, P.B.; Sipes, I.G. Long-term ovarian and gonadotropin changes in mice exposed to 4-vinylcyclohexene. Reprod. Toxicol.; 1994; 8, pp. 315-323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0890-6238(94)90047-7]
117. Generoso, W.M.; Stout, S.K.; Huff, S.W. Effects of alkylating chemicals on reproductive capacity of adult female mice. Mutat. Res./Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen.; 1971; 13, pp. 171-184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(71)90010-8]
118. Fei, C.; McLaughlin, J.K.; Lipworth, L.; Olsen, J. Maternal levels of perfluorinated chemicals and subfecundity. Hum. Reprod.; 2009; 24, pp. 1200-1205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den490] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19176540]
119. Lopez-Espinosa, M.-J.; Mondal, D.; Armstrong, B.G.; Eskenazi, B.; Fletcher, T. Perfluoroalkyl Substances, Sex Hormones, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 at 6–9 Years of Age: A Cross-Sectional Analysis within the C8 Health Project. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2016; 124, pp. 1269-1275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509869] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26794451]
120. Zhou, Y.; Hu, L.-W.; Qian, Z.; Chang, J.-J.; King, C.; Paul, G.; Lin, S.; Chen, P.-C.; Lee, Y.L.; Dong, G.-H. Association of perfluoroalkyl substances exposure with reproductive hormone levels in adolescents: By sex status. Environ. Int.; 2016; 94, pp. 189-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258660]
121. Tsai, M.-S.; Lin, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, M.-H.; Hsu, S.H.J.; Chien, K.-L.; Sung, F.-C.; Chen, P.-C.; Su, T.-C. Association between perfluoroalkyl substances and reproductive hormones in adolescents and young adults. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health; 2015; 218, pp. 437-443. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.008]
122. Maisonet, M.; Calafat, A.M.; Marcus, M.; Jaakkola, J.J.K.; Lashen, H. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Serum Testosterone Concentrations at 15 Years of Age in Female ALSPAC Study Participants. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2015; 123, pp. 1325-1330. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408847] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034840]
123. Kristensen, S.L.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H.; Ernst, E.; Olsen, S.F.; Bonde, J.P.; Vested, A.; Halldorsson, T.I.; Becher, G.; Haug, L.S.; Toft, G. Long-term effects of prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances on female reproduction. Hum. Reprod.; 2013; 28, pp. 3337-3348. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det382] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24129614]
124. Barrett, E.S.; Chen, C.; Thurston, S.W.; Haug, L.S.; Sabaredzovic, A.; Fjeldheim, F.N.; Frydenberg, H.; Lipson, S.F.; Ellison, P.T.; Thune, I. Perfluoroalkyl substances and ovarian hormone concentrations in naturally cycling women. Fertil. Steril.; 2015; 103, pp. 1261-1270.e1263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.001]
125. Heffernan, A.L.; Cunningham, T.K.; Drage, D.S.; Aylward, L.L.; Thompson, K.; Vijayasarathy, S.; Mueller, J.F.; Atkin, S.L.; Sathyapalan, T. Perfluorinated alkyl acids in the serum and follicular fluid of UK women with and without polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing fertility treatment and associations with hormonal and metabolic parameters. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health; 2018; 221, pp. 1068-1075. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037723]
126. Harlow, S.D.; Hood, M.M.; Ding, N.; Mukherjee, B.; Calafat, A.M.; Randolph, J.F.; Gold, E.B.; Park, S.K. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Hormone Levels During the Menopausal Transition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2021; 106, pp. e4427-e4437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab476]
127. Lopez-Espinosa, M.J.; Fletcher, T.; Armstrong, B.; Genser, B.; Dhatariya, K.; Mondal, D.; Ducatman, A.; Leonardi, G. Association of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) with age of puberty among children living near a chemical plant. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2011; 45, pp. 8160-8166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es1038694]
128. Di Nisio, A.; Rocca, M.S.; Sabovic, I.; De Rocco Ponce, M.; Corsini, C.; Guidolin, D.; Zanon, C.; Acquasaliente, L.; Carosso, A.R.; De Toni, L. et al. Perfluorooctanoic acid alters progesterone activity in human endometrial cells and induces reproductive alterations in young women. Chemosphere; 2020; 242, 125208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125208] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31896193]
129. Ernst, A.; Brix, N.; Lauridsen, L.L.B.; Olsen, J.; Parner, E.T.; Liew, Z.; Olsen, L.H.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances during Fetal Life and Pubertal Development in Boys and Girls from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2019; 127, 017004. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP3567] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30628845]
130. Taylor, K.W.; Hoffman, K.; Thayer, K.A.; Daniels, J.L. Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and menopause among women 20–65 years of age (NHANES). Environ. Health Perspect.; 2014; 122, pp. 145-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306707]
131. Dhingra, R.; Winquist, A.; Darrow, L.A.; Klein, M.; Steenland, K. A Study of Reverse Causation: Examining the Associations of Perfluorooctanoic Acid Serum Levels with Two Outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2017; 125, pp. 416-421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP273] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529882]
132. Harada, K.; Koizumi, A.; Saito, N.; Inoue, K.; Yoshinaga, T.; Date, C.; Fujii, S.; Hachiya, N.; Hirosawa, I.; Koda, S. et al. Historical and geographical aspects of the increasing perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination in human serum in Japan. Chemosphere; 2007; 66, pp. 293-301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16793116]
133. Harada, K.; Inoue, K.; Morikawa, A.; Yoshinaga, T.; Saito, N.; Koizumi, A. Renal clearance of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in humans and their species-specific excretion. Environ. Res.; 2005; 99, pp. 253-261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.12.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16194675]
134. Rickard, B.P.; Rizvi, I.; Fenton, S.E. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease. Toxicology; 2022; 465, 153031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.153031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34774661]
135. Lum, K.J.; Sundaram, R.; Barr, D.B.; Louis, T.A.; Buck Louis, G.M. Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals, Menstrual Cycle Length, and Fecundity: Findings from a Prospective Pregnancy Study. Epidemiology; 2017; 28, pp. 90-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000552]
136. Lyngsø, J.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H.; Høyer, B.B.; Støvring, H.; Bonde, J.P.; Jönsson, B.A.; Lindh, C.H.; Pedersen, H.S.; Ludwicki, J.K.; Zviezdai, V. et al. Menstrual cycle characteristics in fertile women from Greenland, Poland and Ukraine exposed to perfluorinated chemicals: A cross-sectional study. Hum. Reprod.; 2014; 29, pp. 359-367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det390]
137. Zhou, W.; Zhang, L.; Tong, C.; Fang, F.; Zhao, S.; Tian, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, J. Plasma Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Concentration and Menstrual Cycle Characteristics in Preconception Women. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2017; 125, 067012. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP1203]
138. Singer, A.B.; Whitworth, K.W.; Haug, L.S.; Sabaredzovic, A.; Impinen, A.; Papadopoulou, E.; Longnecker, M.P. Menstrual cycle characteristics as determinants of plasma concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa study). Environ. Res.; 2018; 166, pp. 78-85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879567]
139. Van Rooij, I.A.J.; Broekmans, F.J.M.; Scheffer, G.J.; Looman, C.W.N.; Habbema, J.D.F.; de Jong, F.H.; Fauser, B.J.C.M.; Themmen, A.P.N.; te Velde, E.R. Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study. Fertil. Steril.; 2005; 83, pp. 979-987. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.029] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15820810]
140. Dólleman, M.; Faddy, M.J.; van Disseldorp, J.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Messow, C.M.; Leader, B.; Peeters, P.H.M.; McConnachie, A.; Nelson, S.M.; Broekmans, F.J.M. The Relationship Between Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Women Receiving Fertility Assessments and Age at Menopause in Subfertile Women: Evidence From Large Population Studies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2013; 98, pp. 1946-1953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-4228]
141. Crawford, N.M.; Fenton, S.E.; Strynar, M.; Hines, E.P.; Pritchard, D.A.; Steiner, A.Z. Effects of perfluorinated chemicals on thyroid function, markers of ovarian reserve, and natural fertility. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2017; 69, pp. 53-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.01.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111093]
142. Donley, G.M.; Taylor, E.; Jeddy, Z.; Namulanda, G.; Hartman, T.J. Association between in utero perfluoroalkyl substance exposure and anti-Müllerian hormone levels in adolescent females in a British cohort. Environ. Res.; 2019; 177, 108585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108585]
143. Vélez, M.P.; Arbuckle, T.E.; Fraser, W.D. Maternal exposure to perfluorinated chemicals and reduced fecundity: The MIREC study. Hum. Reprod.; 2015; 30, pp. 701-709. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu350] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567616]
144. Louis, G.M.B.; Sundaram, R.; Schisterman, E.F.; Sweeney, A.M.; Lynch, C.D.; Gore-Langton, R.E.; Maisog, J.; Kim, S.; Chen, Z.; Barr, D.B. Persistent Environmental Pollutants and Couple Fecundity: The LIFE Study. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2013; 121, pp. 231-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205301] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23151773]
145. Whitworth, K.W.; Haug, L.S.; Baird, D.D.; Becher, G.; Hoppin, J.A.; Skjaerven, R.; Thomsen, C.; Eggesbo, M.; Travlos, G.; Wilson, R. et al. Perfluorinated compounds and subfecundity in pregnant women. Epidemiology; 2012; 23, pp. 257-263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823b5031]
146. Vestergaard, S.; Nielsen, F.; Andersson, A.M.; Hjøllund, N.H.; Grandjean, P.; Andersen, H.R.; Jensen, T.K. Association between perfluorinated compounds and time to pregnancy in a prospective cohort of Danish couples attempting to conceive. Hum. Reprod.; 2012; 27, pp. 873-880. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der450]
147. Whitworth, K.W.; Haug, L.S.; Sabaredzovic, A.; Eggesbo, M.; Longnecker, M.P. Brief Report: Plasma Concentrations of Perfluorooctane Sulfonamide and Time-to-pregnancy Among Primiparous Women. Epidemiology; 2016; 27, pp. 712-715. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000524]
148. Jørgensen, K.T.; Specht, I.O.; Lenters, V.; Bach, C.C.; Rylander, L.; Jönsson, B.A.G.; Lindh, C.H.; Giwercman, A.; Heederik, D.; Toft, G. et al. Perfluoroalkyl substances and time to pregnancy in couples from Greenland, Poland and Ukraine. Environ. Health; 2014; 13, 116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-116] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25533644]
149. Mariani, G.; Bellver, J. Chapter 9—Proteomics and Metabolomics Studies and Clinical Outcomes. Reproductomics; Horcajadas, J.A.; Gosálvez, J. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 147-170.
150. Foster, W.G. Do environmental contaminants adversely affect human reproductive physiology?. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.; 2003; 25, pp. 33-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)31080-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12548323]
151. Hess, K.A.; Chen, L.; Larsen, W.J. The ovarian blood follicle barrier is both charge- and size-selective in mice. Biol. Reprod.; 1998; 58, pp. 705-711. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.3.705] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9510957]
152. Schweigert, F.J.; Gericke, B.; Wolfram, W.; Kaisers, U.; Dudenhausen, J.W. Peptide and protein profiles in serum and follicular fluid of women undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod.; 2006; 21, pp. 2960-2968. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del257] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893915]
153. Petro, E.M.L.; D’Hollander, W.; Covaci, A.; Bervoets, L.; Fransen, E.; De Neubourg, D.; De Pauw, I.; Leroy, J.; Jorssen, E.P.A.; Bols, P.E.J. Perfluoroalkyl acid contamination of follicular fluid and its consequence for in vitro oocyte developmental competence. Sci. Total Environ.; 2014; 496, pp. 282-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25089690]
154. Kim, Y.R.; White, N.; Bräunig, J.; Vijayasarathy, S.; Mueller, J.F.; Knox, C.L.; Harden, F.A.; Pacella, R.; Toms, L.L. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in follicular fluid from women experiencing infertility in Australia. Environ. Res.; 2020; 190, 109963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109963] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745751]
155. McCoy, J.A.; Bangma, J.T.; Reiner, J.L.; Bowden, J.A.; Schnorr, J.; Slowey, M.; O’Leary, T.; Guillette, L.J.; Parrott, B.B. Associations between perfluorinated alkyl acids in blood and ovarian follicular fluid and ovarian function in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Sci. Total Environ.; 2017; 605–606, pp. 9-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.137]
156. Kang, Q.; Gao, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Fu, M.; Zhang, S.; Wan, Y.; Shen, H.; Hu, J. Nontargeted identification of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human follicular fluid and their blood-follicle transfer. Environ. Int.; 2020; 139, 105686. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105686]
157. Hong, A.; Zhuang, L.; Cui, W.; Lu, Q.; Yang, P.; Su, S.; Wang, B.; Zhang, G.; Chen, D. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in women seeking in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment (IVF-ET) in China: Blood-follicular transfer and associations with IVF-ET outcomes. Sci. Total Environ.; 2022; 838, 156323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156323]
158. Bellavia, A.; Zou, R.; Björvang, R.D.; Roos, K.; Sjunnesson, Y.; Hallberg, I.; Holte, J.; Pikki, A.; Lenters, V.; Portengen, L. et al. Association between chemical mixtures and female fertility in women undergoing assisted reproduction in Sweden and Estonia. Environ. Res.; 2023; 216, 114447. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114447]
159. Hallberg, I.; Björvang, R.D.; Hadziosmanovic, N.; Koekkoekk, J.; Pikki, A.; van Duursen, M.; Lenters, V.; Sjunnesson, Y.; Holte, J.; Berglund, L. et al. Associations between lifestyle factors and levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), phthalates and parabens in follicular fluid in women undergoing fertility treatment. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.; 2023; 33, pp. 699-709. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00579-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37481638]
160. Clark, K.L.; Shukla, M.; George, J.W.; Gustin, S.; Rowley, M.J.; Davis, J.S. An environmentally relevant mixture of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) impacts proliferation, steroid hormone synthesis, and gene transcription in primary human granulosa cells. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol.; 2024; 11, kfae049. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae049]
161. Li, S.; Li, G.; Lin, Y.; Sun, F.; Zheng, L.; Yu, Y.; Xu, H. Association between Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Follicular Fluid and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Infertile Women. Toxics; 2024; 12, 104. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics12020104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38393199]
162. Shen, H.; Gao, M.; Li, Q.; Sun, H.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, J.; Yu, X.; Jia, T.; Xin, Y. et al. Effect of PFOA exposure on diminished ovarian reserve and its metabolism. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.; 2023; 21, 16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01056-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726108]
163. Governini, L.; Orvieto, R.; Guerranti, C.; Gambera, L.; De Leo, V.; Piomboni, P. The impact of environmental exposure to perfluorinated compounds on oocyte fertilization capacity. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.; 2011; 28, pp. 415-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9548-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21344220]
164. Louis, G.M.; Peterson, C.M.; Chen, Z.; Hediger, M.L.; Croughan, M.S.; Sundaram, R.; Stanford, J.B.; Fujimoto, V.Y.; Varner, M.W.; Giudice, L.C. et al. Perfluorochemicals and endometriosis: The ENDO study. Epidemiology; 2012; 23, pp. 799-805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826cc0cf] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22992575]
165. Campbell, S.; Raza, M.; Pollack, A.Z. Perfluoroalkyl substances and endometriosis in US women in NHANES 2003–2006. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2016; 65, pp. 230-235. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.08.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27544573]
166. Wang, B.; Zhang, R.; Jin, F.; Lou, H.; Mao, Y.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, J. Perfluoroalkyl substances and endometriosis-related infertility in Chinese women. Environ. Int.; 2017; 102, pp. 207-212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.003]
167. Hammarstrand, S.; Jakobsson, K.; Andersson, E.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Olovsson, M.; Andersson, E.M. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water and risk for polycystic ovarian syndrome, uterine leiomyoma, and endometriosis: A Swedish cohort study. Environ. Int.; 2021; 157, 106819. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106819]
168. Vagi, S.J.; Azziz-Baumgartner, E.; Sjödin, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Dumesic, D.; Gonzalez, L.; Kato, K.; Silva, M.J.; Ye, X.; Azziz, R. Exploring the potential association between brominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, phthalates, and bisphenol A in polycystic ovary syndrome: A case-control study. BMC Endocr. Disord.; 2014; 14, 86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-14-86]
169. Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Wu, S.; Liang, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cui, L.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y. Perfluoroalkyl substances exposure and risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome related infertility in Chinese women. Environ. Pollut.; 2019; 247, pp. 824-831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.039] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30731307]
170. Barry, V.; Winquist, A.; Steenland, K. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Exposures and Incident Cancers among Adults Living Near a Chemical Plant. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2013; 121, pp. 1313-1318. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306615] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24007715]
171. Vieira, V.M.; Hoffman, K.; Shin, H.-M.; Weinberg, J.M.; Webster, T.F.; Fletcher, T. Perfluorooctanoic Acid Exposure and Cancer Outcomes in a Contaminated Community: A Geographic Analysis. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2013; 121, pp. 318-323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205829] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23308854]
172. Rickard, B.P.; Tan, X.; Fenton, S.E.; Rizvi, I. Select Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Induce Resistance to Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 5176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095176] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563566]
173. Arbuckle, T.E.; Kubwabo, C.; Walker, M.; Davis, K.; Lalonde, K.; Kosarac, I.; Wen, S.W.; Arnold, D.L. Umbilical cord blood levels of perfluoroalkyl acids and polybrominated flame retardants. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health; 2013; 216, pp. 184-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.03.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22494936]
174. Chen, L.; Tong, C.; Huo, X.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Y. Prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and birth outcomes: A longitudinal cohort with repeated measurements. Chemosphere; 2021; 267, 128899. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128899]
175. Spratlen, M.J.; Perera, F.P.; Lederman, S.A.; Robinson, M.; Kannan, K.; Trasande, L.; Herbstman, J. Cord blood perfluoroalkyl substances in mothers exposed to the World Trade Center disaster during pregnancy. Environ. Pollut.; 2019; 246, pp. 482-490. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.018]
176. Cai, D.; Li, Q.-Q.; Chu, C.; Wang, S.-Z.; Tang, Y.-T.; Appleton, A.A.; Qiu, R.-L.; Yang, B.-Y.; Hu, L.-W.; Dong, G.-H. et al. High trans-placental transfer of perfluoroalkyl substances alternatives in the matched maternal-cord blood serum: Evidence from a birth cohort study. Sci. Total Environ.; 2020; 705, 135885. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135885] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841927]
177. Apelberg, B.J.; Goldman, L.R.; Calafat, A.M.; Herbstman, J.B.; Kuklenyik, Z.; Heidler, J.; Needham, L.L.; Halden, R.U.; Witter, F.R. Determinants of Fetal Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Baltimore, Maryland. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2007; 41, pp. 3891-3897. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0700911]
178. Stein, C.R.; Savitz, D.A.; Dougan, M. Serum Levels of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Pregnancy Outcome. Am. J. Epidemiol.; 2009; 170, pp. 837-846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp212]
179. Monroy, R.; Morrison, K.; Teo, K.; Atkinson, S.; Kubwabo, C.; Stewart, B.; Foster, W.G. Serum levels of perfluoroalkyl compounds in human maternal and umbilical cord blood samples. Environ. Res.; 2008; 108, pp. 56-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.06.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18649879]
180. Inoue, K.; Okada, F.; Ito, R.; Kato, S.; Sasaki, S.; Nakajima, S.; Uno, A.; Saijo, Y.; Sata, F.; Yoshimura, Y. et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and related perfluorinated compounds in human maternal and cord blood samples: Assessment of PFOS exposure in a susceptible population during pregnancy. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2004; 112, pp. 1204-1207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6864] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15289168]
181. Bach, C.C.; Bech, B.H.; Nohr, E.A.; Olsen, J.; Matthiesen, N.B.; Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E.C.; Bossi, R.; Henriksen, T.B. Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Maternal Serum and Indices of Fetal Growth: The Aarhus Birth Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2016; 124, pp. 848-854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510046] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495857]
182. Apelberg, B.J.; Witter, F.R.; Herbstman, J.B.; Calafat, A.M.; Halden, R.U.; Needham, L.L.; Goldman, L.R. Cord serum concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in relation to weight and size at birth. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2007; 115, pp. 1670-1676. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10334] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18008002]
183. Johnson, P.I.; Sutton, P.; Atchley, D.S.; Koustas, E.; Lam, J.; Sen, S.; Robinson, K.A.; Axelrad, D.A.; Woodruff, T.J. The Navigation Guide—Evidence-based medicine meets environmental health: Systematic review of human evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growth. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2014; 122, pp. 1028-1039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307893] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24968388]
184. Waterfield, G.; Rogers, M.; Grandjean, P.; Auffhammer, M.; Sunding, D. Reducing exposure to high levels of perfluorinated compounds in drinking water improves reproductive outcomes: Evidence from an intervention in Minnesota. Environ. Health; 2020; 19, 42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00591-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321520]
185. Eick, S.M.; Hom Thepaksorn, E.K.; Izano, M.A.; Cushing, L.J.; Wang, Y.; Smith, S.C.; Gao, S.; Park, J.S.; Padula, A.M.; DeMicco, E. et al. Associations between prenatal maternal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and birth outcomes among pregnant women in San Francisco. Environ. Health; 2020; 19, 100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00654-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938446]
186. Callan, A.C.; Rotander, A.; Thompson, K.; Heyworth, J.; Mueller, J.F.; Odland, J.Ø.; Hinwood, A.L. Maternal exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids measured in whole blood and birth outcomes in offspring. Sci. Total Environ.; 2016; 569–570, pp. 1107-1113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.177] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387804]
187. Gyllenhammar, I.; Diderholm, B.; Gustafsson, J.; Berger, U.; Ridefelt, P.; Benskin, J.P.; Lignell, S.; Lampa, E.; Glynn, A. Perfluoroalkyl acid levels in first-time mothers in relation to offspring weight gain and growth. Environ. Int.; 2018; 111, pp. 191-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.002]
188. Wang, Y.; Adgent, M.; Su, P.-H.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, P.-C.; Hsiung, C.A.; Wang, S.-L. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluorocarboxylic Acids (PFCAs) and Fetal and Postnatal Growth in the Taiwan Maternal and Infant Cohort Study. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2016; 124, pp. 1794-1800. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509998]
189. Li, J.; Yang, L.; He, G.; Wang, B.; Miao, M.; Ji, H.; Wen, S.; Cao, W.; Yuan, W.; Liang, H. Association between prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and anogenital distance in female neonates. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2022; 245, 114130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182800]
190. Lind, D.V.; Priskorn, L.; Lassen, T.H.; Nielsen, F.; Kyhl, H.B.; Kristensen, D.M.; Christesen, H.T.; Jørgensen, J.S.; Grandjean, P.; Jensen, T.K. Prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and anogenital distance at 3 months of age in a Danish mother-child cohort. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2017; 68, pp. 200-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.08.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27592399]
191. Arbuckle, T.E.; MacPherson, S.; Foster, W.G.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Fisher, M.; Monnier, P.; Lanphear, B.; Muckle, G.; Fraser, W.D. Prenatal perfluoroalkyl substances and newborn anogenital distance in a Canadian cohort. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2020; 94, pp. 31-39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.03.011]
192. Christensen, J.V.R.; Bangash, K.K.; Weihe, P.; Grandjean, P.; Nielsen, F.; Jensen, T.K.; Petersen, M.S. Maternal exposure to perfluoroalkyl chemicals and anogenital distance in the offspring: A Faroese cohort study. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2021; 104, pp. 52-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.06.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34182087]
193. González-Alvarez, M.E.; Severin, A.; Sayadi, M.; Keating, A.F. PFOA-Induced Ovotoxicity Differs Between Lean and Obese Mice With Impacts on Ovarian Reproductive and DNA Damage Sensing and Repair Proteins. Toxicol. Sci.; 2022; 190, pp. 173-188. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfac104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36214631]
194. Dixon, D.; Reed, C.E.; Moore, A.B.; Gibbs-Flournoy, E.A.; Hines, E.P.; Wallace, E.A.; Stanko, J.P.; Lu, Y.; Jefferson, W.N.; Newbold, R.R. et al. Histopathologic changes in the uterus, cervix and vagina of immature CD-1 mice exposed to low doses of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in a uterotrophic assay. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2012; 33, pp. 506-512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.10.011]
195. Yin, X.; Di, T.; Cao, X.; Liu, Z.; Xie, J.; Zhang, S. Chronic exposure to perfluorohexane sulfonate leads to a reproduction deficit by suppressing hypothalamic kisspeptin expression in mice. J. Ovarian Res.; 2021; 14, 141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00903-z]
196. Du, G.; Hu, J.; Huang, Z.; Yu, M.; Lu, C.; Wang, X.; Wu, D. Neonatal and juvenile exposure to perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS): Advance puberty onset and kisspeptin system disturbance in female rats. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2019; 167, pp. 412-421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.025] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30368134]
197. Chen, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Xie, X.; Xie, Y.; Luo, D.; Zhang, D.; Yu, X. et al. Maternal exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid inhibits luteal function via oxidative stress and apoptosis in pregnant mice. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2017; 69, pp. 159-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.02.010]
198. Yang, M.; Lee, Y.; Gao, L.; Chiu, K.; Meling, D.D.; Flaws, J.A.; Warner, G.R. Perfluorooctanoic Acid Disrupts Ovarian Steroidogenesis and Folliculogenesis in Adult Mice. Toxicol. Sci.; 2022; 186, pp. 260-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfac005]
199. Feng, X.; Wang, X.; Cao, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhou, R.; Chen, L. Chronic Exposure of Female Mice to an Environmental Level of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Suppresses Estrogen Synthesis Through Reduced Histone H3K14 Acetylation of the StAR Promoter Leading to Deficits in Follicular Development and Ovulation. Toxicol. Sci.; 2015; 148, pp. 368-379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv197] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358002]
200. Shi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ding, L.; Feng, Y.; Xu, M.; Dai, J. The effect of perfluorododecanonic acid on endocrine status, sex hormones and expression of steroidogenic genes in pubertal female rats. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2009; 27, pp. 352-359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.02.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429406]
201. Du, Y.; Shi, X.; Liu, C.; Yu, K.; Zhou, B. Chronic effects of water-borne PFOS exposure on growth, survival and hepatotoxicity in zebrafish: A partial life-cycle test. Chemosphere; 2009; 74, pp. 723-729. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.075] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18996565]
202. Butenhoff, J.L.; Kennedy, G.L.; Chang, S.-C.; Olsen, G.W. Chronic dietary toxicity and carcinogenicity study with ammonium perfluorooctanoate in Sprague–Dawley rats. Toxicology; 2012; 298, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.04.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531602]
203. Seacat, A.M.; Thomford, P.J.; Hansen, K.J.; Clemen, L.A.; Eldridge, S.R.; Elcombe, C.R.; Butenhoff, J.L. Sub-chronic dietary toxicity of potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate in rats. Toxicology; 2003; 183, pp. 117-131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00511-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12504346]
204. Butenhoff, J.L.; Bjork, J.A.; Chang, S.-C.; Ehresman, D.J.; Parker, G.A.; Das, K.; Lau, C.; Lieder, P.H.; van Otterdijk, F.M.; Wallace, K.B. Toxicological evaluation of ammonium perfluorobutyrate in rats: Twenty-eight-day and ninety-day oral gavage studies. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2012; 33, pp. 513-530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.08.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21878386]
205. Zhao, Y.; Tan, Y.S.; Haslam, S.Z.; Yang, C. Perfluorooctanoic acid effects on steroid hormone and growth factor levels mediate stimulation of peripubertal mammary gland development in C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol. Sci.; 2010; 115, pp. 214-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20118188]
206. Chaparro-Ortega, A.; Betancourt, M.; Rosas, P.; Vázquez-Cuevas, F.G.; Chavira, R.; Bonilla, E.; Casas, E.; Ducolomb, Y. Endocrine disruptor effect of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) on porcine ovarian cell steroidogenesis. Toxicol. In Vitro; 2018; 46, pp. 86-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.09.030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982594]
207. Basini, G.; Bussolati, S.; Torcianti, V.; Grasselli, F. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) affects steroidogenesis and antioxidant defence in granulosa cells from swine ovary. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.; 2023; 101, 104169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2023.104169]
208. Austin, M.E.; Kasturi, B.S.; Barber, M.; Kannan, K.; MohanKumar, P.S.; MohanKumar, S.M.J. Neuroendocrine effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate in rats. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2003; 111, pp. 1485-1489. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6128]
209. Luebker, D.J.; Case, M.T.; York, R.G.; Moore, J.A.; Hansen, K.J.; Butenhoff, J.L. Two-generation reproduction and cross-foster studies of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in rats. Toxicology; 2005; 215, pp. 126-148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.07.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16146667]
210. Butenhoff, J.L.; Chang, S.-C.; Ehresman, D.J.; York, R.G. Evaluation of potential reproductive and developmental toxicity of potassium perfluorohexanesulfonate in Sprague Dawley rats. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2009; 27, pp. 331-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429404]
211. Loveless, S.E.; Slezak, B.; Serex, T.; Lewis, J.; Mukerji, P.; O’Connor, J.C.; Donner, E.M.; Frame, S.R.; Korzeniowski, S.H.; Buck, R.C. Toxicological evaluation of sodium perfluorohexanoate. Toxicology; 2009; 264, pp. 32-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.07.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19632293]
212. Takahashi, M.; Ishida, S.; Hirata-Koizumi, M.; Ono, A.; Hirose, A. Repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity of perfluoroundecanoic acid in rats. J. Toxicol. Sci.; 2014; 39, pp. 97-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2131/jts.39.97] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24418714]
213. Adyeni, B.S.; Carlos, U.; Tatiana, H.M.; Luisa, G.; Jessica, T.; Eduardo, C.; Miguel, B.; Fahiel, C.; Alma, L.; Edmundo, B. et al. Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) disturbs the estrous cycle, ovulation rate, oocyte cell communication and calcium homeostasis in mice. Reprod. Biol.; 2023; 23, 100768. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2023.100768]
214. Kato, H.; Fujii, S.; Takahashi, M.; Matsumoto, M.; Hirata-Koizumi, M.; Ono, A.; Hirose, A. Repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity of perfluorododecanoic acid in rats. Environ. Toxicol.; 2015; 30, pp. 1244-1263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tox.21996]
215. Clark, K.L.; Davis, J.S. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) promotes follicular growth and alters expression of genes that regulate the cell cycle and the Hippo pathway in cultured neonatal mouse ovaries. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.; 2022; 454, 116253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2022.116253]
216. Ankley, G.T.; Kuehl, D.W.; Kahl, M.D.; Jensen, K.M.; Linnum, A.; Leino, R.L.; Villeneuve, D.A. Reproductive and developmental toxicity and bioconcentration of perfluorooctanesulfonate in a partial life-cycle test with the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2005; 24, pp. 2316-2324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1897/04-634R.1]
217. Suh, C.H.; Cho, N.K.; Lee, C.K.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Son, B.C.; Lee, J.T. Perfluorooctanoic acid-induced inhibition of placental prolactin-family hormone and fetal growth retardation in mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.; 2011; 337, pp. 7-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.01.009]
218. Lee, C.K.; Kang, S.G.; Lee, J.T.; Lee, S.-W.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.H.; Son, B.C.; Kim, K.H.; Suh, C.H.; Kim, S.Y. et al. Effects of perfluorooctane sulfuric acid on placental PRL-family hormone production and fetal growth retardation in mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.; 2015; 401, pp. 165-172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2014.10.026]
219. Lau, C.; Thibodeaux, J.R.; Hanson, R.G.; Narotsky, M.G.; Rogers, J.M.; Lindstrom, A.B.; Strynar, M.J. Effects of perfluorooctanoic acid exposure during pregnancy in the mouse. Toxicol. Sci.; 2006; 90, pp. 510-518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj105] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16415327]
220. Butenhoff, J.L.; Ehresman, D.J.; Chang, S.-C.; Parker, G.A.; Stump, D.G. Gestational and lactational exposure to potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate (K+PFOS) in rats: Developmental neurotoxicity. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2009; 27, pp. 319-330. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.12.010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19162172]
221. Lau, C.; Thibodeaux, J.R.; Hanson, R.G.; Rogers, J.M.; Grey, B.E.; Stanton, M.E.; Butenhoff, J.L.; Stevenson, L.A. Exposure to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate during Pregnancy in Rat and Mouse. II: Postnatal Evaluation. Toxicol. Sci.; 2003; 74, pp. 382-392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfg122] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12773772]
222. Han, J.; Fang, Z. Estrogenic effects, reproductive impairment and developmental toxicity in ovoviparous swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri) exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). Aquat. Toxicol.; 2010; 99, pp. 281-290. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.05.010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20570370]
223. Hallberg, I.; Kjellgren, J.; Persson, S.; Örn, S.; Sjunnesson, Y. Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) alters lipid accumulation in bovine blastocysts after oocyte exposure during in vitro maturation. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2019; 84, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.11.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30502403]
224. Chang, S.; Butenhoff, J.L.; Parker, G.A.; Coder, P.S.; Zitzow, J.D.; Krisko, R.M.; Bjork, J.A.; Wallace, K.B.; Seed, J.G. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of potassium perfluorohexanesulfonate in CD-1 mice. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2018; 78, pp. 150-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.04.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29694846]
225. Blake, B.E.; Cope, H.A.; Hall, S.M.; Keys, R.D.; Mahler, B.W.; McCord, J.; Scott, B.; Stapleton, H.M.; Strynar, M.J.; Elmore, S.A. et al. Evaluation of Maternal, Embryo, and Placental Effects in CD-1 Mice following Gestational Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) or Hexafluoropropylene Oxide Dimer Acid (HFPO-DA or GenX). Environ. Health Perspect.; 2020; 128, 27006. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP6233] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074459]
226. Conley, J.M.; Lambright, C.S.; Evans, N.; McCord, J.; Strynar, M.J.; Hill, D.; Medlock-Kakaley, E.; Wilson, V.S.; Gray, L.E. Hexafluoropropylene oxide-dimer acid (HFPO-DA or GenX) alters maternal and fetal glucose and lipid metabolism and produces neonatal mortality, low birthweight, and hepatomegaly in the Sprague-Dawley rat. Environ. Int.; 2021; 146, 106204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106204] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126064]
227. Butenhoff, J.L.; Kennedy, G.L.; Frame, S.R.; O’Connor, J.C.; York, R.G. The reproductive toxicology of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) in the rat. Toxicology; 2004; 196, pp. 95-116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2003.11.005]
228. Lieder, P.H.; York, R.G.; Hakes, D.C.; Chang, S.-C.; Butenhoff, J.L. A two-generation oral gavage reproduction study with potassium perfluorobutanesulfonate (K+PFBS) in Sprague Dawley rats. Toxicology; 2009; 259, pp. 33-45. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.01.027]
229. Wang, M.; Chen, J.; Lin, K.; Chen, Y.; Hu, W.; Tanguay, R.L.; Huang, C.; Dong, Q. Chronic zebrafish PFOS exposure alters sex ratio and maternal related effects in F1 offspring. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2011; 30, pp. 2073-2080. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.594] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21671259]
230. Keiter, S.; Baumann, L.; Färber, H.; Holbech, H.; Skutlarek, D.; Engwall, M.; Braunbeck, T. Long-term effects of a binary mixture of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and bisphenol A (BPA) in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol.; 2012; 118–119, pp. 116-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.04.003] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542737]
231. Shi, G.; Cui, Q.; Pan, Y.; Sheng, N.; Sun, S.; Guo, Y.; Dai, J. 6:2 Chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate, a PFOS alternative, induces embryotoxicity and disrupts cardiac development in zebrafish embryos. Aquat. Toxicol.; 2017; 185, pp. 67-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.02.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187362]
232. Gaballah, S.; Swank, A.; Sobus, J.R.; Howey, X.M.; Schmid, J.; Catron, T.; McCord, J.; Hines, E.; Strynar, M.; Tal, T. Evaluation of Developmental Toxicity, Developmental Neurotoxicity, and Tissue Dose in Zebrafish Exposed to GenX and Other PFAS. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2020; 128, 047005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP5843] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271623]
233. Benninghoff, A.D.; Bisson, W.H.; Koch, D.C.; Ehresman, D.J.; Kolluri, S.K.; Williams, D.E. Estrogen-like activity of perfluoroalkyl acids in vivo and interaction with human and rainbow trout estrogen receptors in vitro. Toxicol. Sci.; 2011; 120, pp. 42-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq379] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21163906]
234. Li, J.; Cao, H.; Feng, H.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, A.; Fu, J. Evaluation of the Estrogenic/Antiestrogenic Activities of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Their Interactions with the Human Estrogen Receptor by Combining In Vitro Assays and In Silico Modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 54, pp. 14514-14524. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03468] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111528]
235. Qiu, Z.; Qu, K.; Luan, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Hai, Y.; Zhao, C. Binding specificities of estrogen receptor with perfluorinated compounds: A cross species comparison. Environ. Int.; 2020; 134, 105284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105284]
236. Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Guo, L.-H. Assessment of Estrogenic Activity of Perfluoroalkyl Acids Based on Ligand-induced Conformation State of Human Estrogen Receptor. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2013; 47, pp. 634-641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es304030x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23214429]
237. Feng, J.; Soto-Moreno, E.J.; Prakash, A.; Balboula, A.Z.; Qiao, H. Adverse PFAS effects on mouse oocyte in vitro maturation are associated with carbon-chain length and inclusion of a sulfonate group. Cell Prolif.; 2023; 56, e13353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13353]
238. Lopez-Arellano, P.; Lopez-Arellano, K.; Luna, J.; Flores, D.; Jimenez-Salazar, J.; Gavia, G.; Teteltitla, M.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Dominguez, A.; Casas, E. et al. Perfluorooctanoic acid disrupts gap junction intercellular communication and induces reactive oxygen species formation and apoptosis in mouse ovaries. Environ. Toxicol.; 2019; 34, pp. 92-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tox.22661]
239. Clark, K.L.; Ganesan, S.; Keating, A.F. Impact of toxicant exposures on ovarian gap junctions. Reprod. Toxicol.; 2018; 81, pp. 140-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.07.087] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30056208]
240. Basini, G.; Bussolati, S.; Torcianti, V.; Grasselli, F. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Induces Redox Status Disruption in Swine Granulosa Cells. Vet. Sci.; 2022; 9, 254. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9060254] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737306]
241. Du, G.; Hu, J.; Huang, H.; Qin, Y.; Han, X.; Wu, D.; Song, L.; Xia, Y.; Wang, X. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) affects hormone receptor activity, steroidogenesis, and expression of endocrine-related genes in vitro and in vivo. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.; 2013; 32, pp. 353-360. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.2034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23074026]
242. Khan, E.A.; Zhang, X.; Hanna, E.M.; Yadetie, F.; Jonassen, I.; Goksøyr, A.; Arukwe, A. Application of quantitative transcriptomics in evaluating the ex vivo effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) ovarian physiology. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021; 755, 142904. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142904]
243. Komar, C.M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and ovarian function—implications for regulating steroidogenesis, differentiation, and tissue remodeling. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.; 2005; 3, 41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-41]
244. Komar, C.M.; Braissant, O.; Wahli, W.; Curry, T.E., Jr. Expression and localization of PPARs in the rat ovary during follicular development and the periovulatory period. Endocrinology; 2001; 142, pp. 4831-4838. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.11.8429] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606451]
245. Komar, C.M.; Curry, T.E., Jr. Localization and Expression of Messenger RNAs for the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Ovarian Tissue from Naturally Cycling and Pseudopregnant Rats1. Biol. Reprod.; 2002; 66, pp. 1531-1539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.5.1531] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11967220]
246. Huang, Q.; Chen, Q. Mediating Roles of PPARs in the Effects of Environmental Chemicals on Sex Steroids. PPAR Res.; 2017; 2017, 3203161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3203161] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819354]
247. Reichert, C.O.; de Freitas, F.A.; Levy, D.; Bydlowski, S.P. Oxysterols and mesenchymal stem cell biology. Vitamins and Hormones; Litwack, G. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 409-436.
248. Haug, M.; Dunder, L.; Lind, P.M.; Lind, L.; Salihovic, S. Associations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with lipid and lipoprotein profiles. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.; 2023; 33, pp. 757-765. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00545-x]
249. Eriksen, K.T.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; McLaughlin, J.K.; Lipworth, L.; Tjønneland, A.; Overvad, K.; Sørensen, M. Association between Plasma PFOA and PFOS Levels and Total Cholesterol in a Middle-Aged Danish Population. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e56969. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056969]
250. Nelson, J.W.; Hatch, E.E.; Webster, T.F. Exposure to polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and cholesterol, body weight, and insulin resistance in the general U.S. population. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2010; 118, pp. 197-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901165] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20123614]
251. Steenland, K.; Tinker, S.; Frisbee, S.; Ducatman, A.; Vaccarino, V. Association of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate with serum lipids among adults living near a chemical plant. Am. J. Epidemiol.; 2009; 170, pp. 1268-1278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp279] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19846564]
252. Canova, C.; Di Nisio, A.; Barbieri, G.; Russo, F.; Fletcher, T.; Batzella, E.; Dalla Zuanna, T.; Pitter, G. PFAS Concentrations and Cardiometabolic Traits in Highly Exposed Children and Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2021; 18, 12881. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412881] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948492]
253. Rosen, E.M.; Kotlarz, N.; Knappe, D.R.U.; Lea, C.S.; Collier, D.N.; Richardson, D.B.; Hoppin, J.A. Drinking Water–Associated PFAS and Fluoroethers and Lipid Outcomes in the GenX Exposure Study. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2022; 130, 097002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP11033] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069575]
254. Starling, A.P.; Engel, S.M.; Whitworth, K.W.; Richardson, D.B.; Stuebe, A.M.; Daniels, J.L.; Haug, L.S.; Eggesbø, M.; Becher, G.; Sabaredzovic, A. et al. Perfluoroalkyl substances and lipid concentrations in plasma during pregnancy among women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Environ. Int.; 2014; 62, pp. 104-112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.004]
255. González-Alvarez, M.E.; Keating, A.F. Hepatic and ovarian effects of perfluorooctanoic acid exposure differ in lean and obese adult female mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2023; 474, 116614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2023.116614] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422089]
256. Roth, K.; Yang, Z.; Agarwal, M.; Liu, W.; Peng, Z.; Long, Z.; Birbeck, J.; Westrick, J.; Liu, W.; Petriello, M.C. Exposure to a mixture of legacy, alternative, and replacement per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) results in sex-dependent modulation of cholesterol metabolism and liver injury. Environ. Int.; 2021; 157, 106843. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106843]
257. Rebholz, S.L.; Jones, T.; Herrick, R.L.; Xie, C.; Calafat, A.M.; Pinney, S.M.; Woollett, L.A. Hypercholesterolemia with consumption of PFOA-laced Western diets is dependent on strain and sex of mice. Toxicol. Rep.; 2016; 3, pp. 46-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.11.004]
258. Yesilaltay, A.; Dokshin, G.A.; Busso, D.; Wang, L.; Galiani, D.; Chavarria, T.; Vasile, E.; Quilaqueo, L.; Orellana, J.A.; Walzer, D. et al. Excess cholesterol induces mouse egg activation and may cause female infertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. E4972-E4980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418954111]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Per- and poly-fluoroalkylated substances (PFAS) are a large group of chemicals that persist both in the environment and in the body. Legacy PFAS, e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, are implicated as endocrine disruptors and reproductive and developmental toxicants in epidemiological and animal model studies. This review describes female reproductive outcomes of reported studies and includes where associative relationships between PFAS exposures and female reproductive outcomes have been observed as well as where those are absent. In animal models, studies in which PFAS are documented to cause toxicity and where effects are lacking are described. Discrepancies exist in both human and animal studies and are likely attributable to human geographical contamination, developmental status, duration of exposure, and PFAS chemical identity. Similarly, in animal investigations, the model used, exposure paradigm, and developmental status of the female are important and vary widely in documented studies. Taken together, support for PFAS as reproductive and developmental toxicants exists, although the disparity in study conditions and human exposures contribute to the variation in effects noted.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer