It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Long-term farmland abandonment has increased fuel build-up in many Euro-Mediterranean mountainous regions. The high fuel hazard in these landscapes, combined with ongoing climate change, is increasing the frequency of extreme wildfires, thus altering contemporary fire regimes. Mitigating the loss of the landscape’s capacity to regulate large and intense fires is crucial to prevent future harmful effects of fires. As such, effective strategies to manage these fire-prone landscapes are needed. Yet, further understanding of their performance under global change scenarios is required. This study assessed the effects of fire-smart management strategies on future landscape dynamics, fire regulation capacity (FRC), and fire regime in a Mediterranean fire-prone mountainous landscape in Portugal (30,650 ha) undergoing long-term land abandonment and climate change scenarios. For that, we applied the LANDIS-II model under climate change scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) and long-term farmland abandonment (2020–2050) according to three fire-smart management strategies focused on fire prevention compared with a business-as-usual (BAU) strategy based on fire suppression.
Results
Future fire activity and land dynamics resulted in changes that fostered landscape heterogeneity and fragmentation and favoured fire-adapted forests and agroforestry systems while decreasing the dominance of shrublands and croplands. FRC decreased over time, particularly under RCP 8.5 and the BAU strategy. In turn, fire-smart strategies better prevented large and intense fires than the BAU strategy, but their effectiveness decreased under RCP 8.5. The loss of FRC resulted in increased burned area and fire frequency, which predicts a shift from contemporary fire regimes but more markedly under RCP 8.5 and in the BAU strategy.
Conclusions
Fire-smart strategies outperformed BAU in averting current fire regime intensification. Merging forest- and silvopasture-based management is the most promising approach in taming the effects of climate and farmland abandonment on future fire activity. Our study underlines that planning and management policies in fire-prone Mediterranean mountain landscapes must integrate fire-smart strategies to decrease landscape fuel hazard and buffer the impact of global change on future fire regimes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 InBIO Laboratório Associado, CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Vairão, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Vairão, Portugal (GRID:grid.5808.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1503 7226); Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Departamento de Biologia, Porto, Portugal (GRID:grid.5808.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1503 7226); Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, CITAB-Centro de Investigação e de Tecnologias Agro-Ambientais e Biológicas, Vila Real, Portugal (GRID:grid.12341.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2182 1287); Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, CIMO-Centro de Investigação de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal (GRID:grid.34822.3f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9851 275X); Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, SusTEC-Laboratório Associado Para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal (GRID:grid.34822.3f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9851 275X)
2 Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, CIMO-Centro de Investigação de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal (GRID:grid.34822.3f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9851 275X); Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, SusTEC-Laboratório Associado Para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal (GRID:grid.34822.3f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9851 275X)
3 Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, CITAB-Centro de Investigação e de Tecnologias Agro-Ambientais e Biológicas, Vila Real, Portugal (GRID:grid.12341.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2182 1287)
4 InBIO Laboratório Associado, CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Vairão, Portugal (GRID:grid.12341.35); BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Vairão, Portugal (GRID:grid.5808.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1503 7226); Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Departamento de Biologia, Porto, Portugal (GRID:grid.5808.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1503 7226)