Content area
Scholars have debated the existence of a Caesarean text of the Gospels for over a century. Codex Koridethi (Θ 038), a ninth century four-Gospel Greek manuscript, has been central to the Caesarean text theory since Lake and Blake (1923) and Streeter (1924) postulated this fourth text-type. This dissertation analyzes the scribal tendencies and textual affinities of Codex Koridethi with the intention of determining whether it supports the existence of a distinct Caesarean form of text. After an introduction, I discuss the history of the manuscript and its physical characteristics. I then survey the question of text-types broadly before giving a detailed summary of the Caesarean text debate. A discussion of methodology follows. I transcribed Codex Koridethi in all four Gospels. I then collated these transcriptions with Alexandrian, Western, Byzantine, and Caesarean witnesses against the Majority Text. Transcriptions from these other witnesses come from a mixture of published sources and my own work. For each Gospel, I show the percentage agreement among all collated witnesses, with and without insignificant variants. I then show the highest agreement partners for Codex Koridethi in each chapter of the Gospel, to check for block mixture. Using the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, I show the genealogical directionality of all witnesses compared to Codex Koridethi. Finally, I identify every reading that is shared by Codex Koridethi and only Caesarean witnesses. For those readings, I determine whether they are likely to be genealogically significant, based on Codex Koridethi’s scribal tendencies. It is shown that for all four Gospels, there is not enough evidence to support the existence of a Caesarean text. Codex Koridethi is closest to Family 13 in Matthew, but there is not a clear distinction between the Byzantine and Caesarean witnesses. Codex Koridethi and 565 are closely related in Mark, but the other Caesarean witnesses are closer to the Byzantine text. The manuscript is Byzantine in Luke and John. These results bring the existence of a Caesarean text into serious question.