It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) is a popular cathode material for Li-ion batteries, yet degradation and side reactions at the cathode-electrolyte interface pose significant challenges to their long-term cycling stability. Coating LiNixMnyCo1−x−yO2 (NMC) with refractory materials has been widely used to improve the stability of the cathode-electrolyte interface, but mixed results have been reported for Al2O3 coatings of the Ni-rich NMC811 materials. To elucidate the role and effect of the Al2O3 coating, we have coated commercial-grade NMC811 electrodes with Al2O3 by the atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique. Through a systematic investigation of the long-term cycling stability at different upper cutoff voltages, the stability against ambient storage, the rate capability, and the charger transfer kinetics, our results show no significant differences between the Al2O3-coated and the bare (uncoated) electrodes. This highlights the contentious role of Al2O3 coating on Ni-rich NMC cathodes and calls into question the benefits of coating on commercial-grade electrodes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Binghamton University, Materials Science and Engineering, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508)
2 University of California San Diego, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
3 Binghamton University, Analytical and Diagnostics Lab, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508)
4 University of California San Diego, Department of NanoEngineering, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
5 Binghamton University, Materials Science and Engineering, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508); Binghamton University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508)
6 Binghamton University, Materials Science and Engineering, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508); Binghamton University, Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508)
7 Binghamton University, Materials Science and Engineering, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508); Binghamton University, Department of Chemistry, Binghamton, USA (GRID:grid.264260.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 4508)