Abstract
Cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is rare and most previous studies of CAS have been small case series, and randomized, phase II studies of CAS are limited. Since treatment options for CAS are controversial, and because only paclitaxel should be recommended based on high‐level evidence, it is important to evaluate the efficacy of another taxane‐derived agents, docetaxel, in real‐world practice. The efficacy and safety profiles of chemoradiotherapy using taxane‐based agents, docetaxel and paclitaxel, were retrospectively examined in the maintenance setting in 90 Japanese CAS patients, including 35 docetaxel‐treated cases and 55 paclitaxel‐treated cases. Overall survival and dose duration time of the patient group treated with docetaxel was equivalent to that with paclitaxel, even in the cohorts with metastasis. Adverse events due to docetaxel and paclitaxel were observed in 77.1% and 69.1% of cases, respectively. The incidence ratio of total severe adverse events tended to be higher in the docetaxel‐treated group (40.0%) than in the paclitaxel‐treated group (23.6%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred only in the paclitaxel‐treated group, whereas high‐grade interstitial pneumonia developed only in the docetaxel‐treated group. In addition, we also evaluate 19 patients selected other taxanes, 17 patients selected eribulin methylate, 11 patients pazopanib, and 2 patients selected nivolumab as second‐line chemotherapy. The efficacy of a monthly docetaxel regimen is equivalent to a three‐weekly paclitaxel regimen evaluated by Overall survival and DDT, even in the cohorts with metastasis, and it is a tolerable protocol for CAS as a maintenance therapy in the Japanese population.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Furudate, Sadanori 1 ; Maekawa, Takeo 2 ; Kato, Hiroshi 3 ; Ito, Takamichi 4 ; Matsushita, Shigeto 5
; Yoshino, Koji 6 ; Hashimoto, Akira 1 ; Muto, Yusuke 1 ; Ohuchi, Kentaro 1 ; Amagai, Ryo 1 ; Kambayashi, Yumi 1 ; Fujisawa, Yasuhiro 7 1 Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
2 Department of Dermatology, Jichi Medical School, Shimono, Japan
3 Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
4 Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
5 Department of Dermato‐Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan
6 Department of Dermato‐Oncology/Dermatology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
7 Department of Dermatology, University of Ehime, Matsuyama, Japan





