It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Hydrogen will play a key role in decarbonizing economies. Here, we quantify the costs and environmental impacts of possible large-scale hydrogen economies, using four prospective hydrogen demand scenarios for 2050 ranging from 111–614 megatonne H2 year−1. Our findings confirm that renewable (solar photovoltaic and wind) electrolytic hydrogen production generates at least 50–90% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than fossil-fuel-based counterparts without carbon capture and storage. However, electrolytic hydrogen production could still result in considerable environmental burdens, which requires reassessing the concept of green hydrogen. Our global analysis highlights a few salient points: (i) a mismatch between economical hydrogen production and hydrogen demand across continents seems likely; (ii) region-specific limitations are inevitable since possibly more than 60% of large hydrogen production potentials are concentrated in water-scarce regions; and (iii) upscaling electrolytic hydrogen production could be limited by renewable power generation and natural resource potentials.
Future hydrogen economies need massive amounts of low-carbon hydrogen. Here, we show that mismatches between economic production and supply locations, water scarcity, and the need for renewable power and materials might limit large-scale hydrogen production.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 ETH Zurich, Separation Processes Laboratory, Institute of Energy and Process Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); ETH Zurich, Chair of Energy Systems Analysis, Institute of Energy and Process Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Technology Assessment Group, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c)
2 Carnegie Institution for Science, Department of Global Ecology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.418276.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 7340)
3 Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Technology Assessment Group, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.418276.e)
4 ETH Zurich, Chair of Energy Systems Analysis, Institute of Energy and Process Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c)