It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Methane emissions from the oil and gas sector are a large contributor to climate change. Robust emission quantification and source attribution are needed for mitigating methane emissions, requiring a transparent, comprehensive, and accurate geospatial database of oil and gas infrastructure. Realizing such a database is hindered by data gaps nationally and globally. To fill these gaps, we present a deep learning approach on freely available, high-resolution satellite imagery for automatically mapping well pads and storage tanks. We validate the results in the Permian and Denver-Julesburg basins, two high-producing basins in the United States. Our approach achieves high performance on expert-curated datasets of well pads (Precision = 0.955, Recall = 0.904) and storage tanks (Precision = 0.962, Recall = 0.968). When deployed across the entire basins, the approach captures a majority of well pads in existing datasets (79.5%) and detects a substantial number (>70,000) of well pads not present in those datasets. Furthermore, we detect storage tanks (>169,000) on well pads, which were not mapped in existing datasets. We identify remaining challenges with the approach, which, when solved, should enable a globally scalable and public framework for mapping well pads, storage tanks, and other oil and gas infrastructure.
This work uses deep learning on satellite imagery to map well pads and storage tanks in two major U.S. basins. The resulting data fills large gaps in existing databases, a crucial step for improving methane emission estimates and source attribution.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Stanford University, Stanford Research Computing, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956); Stanford University, Department of Earth System Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
2 Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
3 Environmental Defense Fund, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.427145.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9311 8665)
4 Stanford University, Department of Earth System Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956); Stanford University, Woods Institute for the Environment and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)