Abstract
Artificial recharge of groundwater has been recognized as a promising option for sustaining groundwater supplies and ensure water security for the ever rising population. With the aid of geospatial and multi-criteria decision analysis methodologies, the current study's scope aids in evaluating groundwater potential zones and locating suitable zones and sites for groundwater recharge for the revival of the Kanari River. A pragmatic methodology was suggested in this study for implementing water harvesting structures for river revival and estimation of water demand, pumping, and recharge. The geometric mean and the normalized weight for individual features were specified using the AHP in a GIS environment. All the different features/datasets were overlaid, and possible groundwater zones were revealed using AHP. Integrated maps were used to identify the groundwater recharge zone and locations for establishing artificial recharge structures within the Kanari River system. Ultimately, the domestic water demand, agriculture water use, pumping, and livestock water demand were estimated for water budgeting, and based on this data, the water availability was calculated. Based on the study results, the water demand of the Kanari River watershed was estimated to be 732 MCM. Taking into consideration the supply and demand scenarios, the pumping overdraft of the Kanari River watershed was found to be 423 MCM, and the proposed additional recharge through the planned conservation structures was estimated to be 859 MCM. So, even if pumping overdraft is considered, this additional groundwater recharge can fulfill the local demand, help maintain the river flow, and ensure water availability and security in the region.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Mehla, Mukesh Kumar 5
1 Mahatma Gandhi University of Horticulture and Forestry, Department of Natural Resource Management, Durg, India (GRID:grid.411552.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1766 4022)
2 Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Jabalpur, India (GRID:grid.444466.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0741 0174)
3 Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Department of Agronomy, Raipur, India (GRID:grid.444687.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0580 1788)
4 College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), School of Natural Resource Management, Umiam, India (GRID:grid.459438.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1800 9601)
5 Texas Tech University, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Lubbock, USA (GRID:grid.264784.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2186 7496)




