Abstract
The judiciary is a foundation of democracy, upholding the rule of law and protecting rights. Efficient court administration is vital for public trust, justice, and timely proceedings. Currently, courts face challenges such as inconsistencies, adjournments, and absence of transparency, undermining the justice system. Traditional manual processes and paper-based documentation cause significant backlogs, slow resolutions, and limited public access. As case volumes and complexities rise, modernizing court administration through digital transformation is progressively critical. Currently, many countries are integrating technologies in the courts for its administration and other activities. In recent years, courts and judges have been subjected to pressure to improve performance, uplifting judicial effectiveness to a top priority. Subsequently, several countries have integrated simplification and digitization strategies in judicial initiatives to enhance court efficiency. Switzerland’s Justitia 4.0 and Brazil’s PJE are notable initiatives that focused to strengthen court administration through digitalization. These aspects motivated this study to examine the detailed integration of industry 4.0 technologies such as the Internet of things, cloud computing, blockchain, big data analytics, robotics, drones, Metaverse, digital twins, and artificial intelligence for court administration with digitalized infrastructure. According to the study, integrating these technologies in less complex cases helps minimize expenditures and save time, making to resolve cases conveniently, efficiently, and superiorly. The study also identified the challenges and issues associated with industry 4.0 technologies such as evidence gathering, evidence preservation, robot judges for pre-judgment analysis, and judgment delivery, which future studies need to be explored.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Priyadarshi, Neeraj 6 ; Twala, Bhekisipho 7 1 Uttaranchal University, Law College Dehradun, Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.449906.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 4659 5193)
2 Doon University, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.449113.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1774 1235)
3 Uttaranchal University, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.449906.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 4659 5193)
4 SR University, Department of ECE, Warangal, India (GRID:grid.419655.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0008 3668)
5 Phagwara, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, India (GRID:grid.449005.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1756 737X)
6 JIS College of Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kolkata, India (GRID:grid.440742.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 6713)
7 Tshwane University of Technology, Digital Transformation Portfolio, Pretoria, South Africa (GRID:grid.412810.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0109 1328)




