MORALIZAM I METAMORALIZAM

Abstract

Dva su cilja ovog priloga: (1) epistemološki, da pokaže razliku izmeðu saznajnih kapaciteta pojmova u naslovu i (2) ideološkokritički, da prepozna grupne interese iza hegemonih moralizama. Moralizacija propisuje dobro, emocionalizuje, homogenizuje, manipuliše moralnim uputstvima i zabranama i smanjuje autonomno rasuðivanje pojedinaca. Metamoralizam razdvaja procene stanja i ponašanja od moralnih sudova. Politički moralizam je deo ideološke svesti i oblik sužene saznajne perspektive. Prikazani su razni oblici istorijskih i savremenih političkih moralizama, njihov delatni emotivni potencijal, struktura i retorika neoliberalnog moralizma i samorefleksivni metamoralizam levice. Istaknuta je saznajna nadmoć metamoralizma koji nije procena nepravde sa stanovišta ličnog morala nego legitimnosti moći na koju se nepravda oslanja.

Alternate abstract:

There are two goals of this paper: (1) epistemologically, to show the difference between the cognitive capacities of the concepts in the title, and (2) ideologically-critical, to recognize the group interests behind hegemonic moralisms. The moralization prescribes the good, emotionalizes, homogenizes, manipulates moral instructions or prohibitions, and reduces the autonomous judgment of individuals. The metamoralism distinguishes evaluations of states and behavior from moral judgments. The political moralism is a part of ideological consciousness and a form of a narrow cognitive perspective.The various forms of historical and contemporary political moralisms, their active emotional potential, the structure and rhetoric of neoliberal moralism and the self-reflexive metamoralism of the left are presented. The cognitive supremacy of metamoralism is highlighted, which is not an assessment of injustice from the point of view of personal morality, but a superior assessment of the legitimacy of the power on which the injustice relies.