Content area

Abstract

Racial injustice in employment demands the attention of business organizations because it profoundly shapes our life prospects. While comparing the ideal of perfectly equal opportunity with its invariably imperfect alternatives can impede reform, the true challenge lies in addressing persistent inequities as we strive for equality. This article introduces “shared inequity” as a frame of reference for assessing workplace racial disparities and emphasizing a collective responsibility to remedy systemic issues. In critiquing an exaggerated notion of meritocracy, I emphasize that structural racism, rather than just individual acts, facilitates collective advantages, especially for White males. Hence, it is morally fitting to frame racial justice in employment, not only in terms of perfect equality, but also in terms of justly sharing an imbalance that cannot be corrected without counterbalance. The “shared inequity” lens offers a more realistic and just approach to pursuing racial justice in the workplace.

Details

Title
Shared Inequity: An Alternative Frame for Racial Justice in Employment
Author
Dawkins, Cedric E. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 York University, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.21100.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9430) 
Pages
825-838
Publication year
2024
Publication date
Sep 2024
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
01674544
e-ISSN
15730697
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3100356414
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.