Abstract
[3] This study applies a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach to comprehensively analyze all available comparison studies among common PWV assessment methods. Certain publication types such as review articles, editorials, comments, guidelines, and case reports, duplicates, studies with insufficient data for network meta-analysis, and studies comparing the same method with different devices were excluded. Data extracted from original reports covered various aspects, including publication details, study location, population characteristics, assessment methods, devices used, PWV index, and baseline PWV means. In relation to tonometry, considered the gold standard, piezoelectric and oscillometric methods exhibit the narrowest LoAs on PWV, with a notably high correlation observed in tonometry vs. piezoelectricity comparison.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 CarVasCare Research Group, Facultad de Enfermería de Cuenca, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca 16071, Spain; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile
2 Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca 16071, Spain
3 CarVasCare Research Group, Facultad de Enfermería de Cuenca, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca 16071, Spain
4 Internal Medicine Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid 28040, Spain
5 Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca 16071, Spain; Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción 2024, Paraguay
6 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile; Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca 16071, Spain