It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
During conversation, people often endeavor to convey information in an understandable way (finding common ground) while also sharing novel or surprising information (exploring new ground). Here, we test how friends and strangers balance these two strategies to connect with each other. Using fMRI hyperscanning, we measure a preference for common ground as convergence over time and exploring new ground as divergence over time by tracking dyads’ neural and linguistic trajectories over the course of semi-structured intimacy-building conversations. In our study, 60 dyads (30 friend dyads) engaged in a real-time conversation with discrete prompts and demarcated turns. Our analyses reveal that friends diverge neurally and linguistically: their neural patterns become more dissimilar over time and they explore more diverse topics. In contrast, strangers converge: neural patterns and language become more similar over time. The more a conversation between strangers resembles the exploratory conversations of friends, the more they enjoy it. Our results highlight exploring new ground as a strategy for a successful conversation.
People employ different conversational strategies to establish social connection. Here, the authors use fMRI hyperscanning to track neural and linguistic trajectories during naturalistic conversation to show that friends diverge, exploring new ground, while strangers converge, seeking common ground.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Princeton University, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)
2 Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006); University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
3 Caldwell University, Department of Psychology, Caldwell, USA (GRID:grid.448604.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0383 182X)
4 Pomona College, Department of Psychological Science, Claremont, USA (GRID:grid.262007.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 0463); Pomona College, Department of Neuroscience, Claremont, USA (GRID:grid.262007.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 0463)
5 University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Marketing Department, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Operations, Information, and Decisions Department, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
6 Princeton University, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006); Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)