It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Safety culture is a critical determinant of organisational performance, particularly in high-risk industries especially in oil and gas. Understanding stakeholder preferences is essential for developing effective strategies that enhance safety culture. This study utilised the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritise stakeholder preferences, identifying key elements of safety culture in Malaysia's oil and gas sector. This study employed a structured methodology to evaluate safety culture within the oil and gas industry, focusing on 18 sub-elements across three key domains: psychological, behavioural, and situational factors. A diverse sample of industry experts was recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling to ensure a comprehensive representation of stakeholder views. The AHP framework was applied to analyse the data, utilizing structured questionnaires and multicriteria decision-making techniques to prioritize the identified safety culture elements. The AHP analysis identified distinct priorities among different professional groups within the oil and gas sector. Safety and Health Practitioners emphasized practical elements such as safety rules and management commitment, while academicians prioritized knowledge and training. Management personnel highlighted the importance of safety ownership and communication, whereas policymakers focused on broader, policy-oriented aspects. The findings suggest that safety culture improvement initiatives should be tailored to address the specific needs and priorities of each professional group. A nuanced understanding of stakeholder preferences is crucial for developing comprehensive strategies that integrate observable behaviours, situational conditions, and psychological factors, ultimately fostering a robust safety culture in the oil and gas industry.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412259.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 1343); Department of Corporate Governance and HSE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412259.9)
2 Universiti Putra Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Serdang, Malaysia (GRID:grid.11142.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 800X)
3 Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412259.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 1343); Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, Shah Alam, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412259.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 1343)
4 Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Faculty of Business Management, Raub, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412259.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 1343)